Internet Voting. What is Internet Voting? Internet voting is: an election process whereby people can cast their votes over the Internet, most likely through.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Voting Ian Brown (with some slides from Matt Bishop, UC Davis)
Advertisements

Electronic Voting Systems
Easy Voter Jitin Patel Perception of Electronic Voting Systems in Relation to Traditional Voting Methods Amongst Elderly Citizens.
Online Voting Presented By: George Oham George Olajide
Good or Bad?.  One of the closest contests in US history  Florida was the pivotal state  Neither Democrat Al Gore nor Republican George W. Bush had.
© 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. C H A P T E R 7 The Electoral Process.
Internet Voting Technology and policy issues. Selective History of Voting (US) early 1800’s: public oral voting at County Hall 1800’s: free-form, non-secret.
Administration of Absentee Ballot Programs Barry C. Burden (University of Wisconsin) Brian J. Gaines (University of Illinois)
Electrons Chapter 7 Section 2.
Vanja Malidžan Singidunum University, Belgrade. INFuture2011: “Information Sciences and e-Society”  Development of ICT  Implementation of ICT in voting.
Vote Hacking Kenny Denmark - October For an upcoming election, Washington D.C. was preparing a system to allow some voters to send in their ballots.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Internet Voting Technology and policy issues David Wagner UC Berkeley.
Internet Voting David Jefferson Compaq Systems Research Center 130 Lytton Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94301
ONLINE NATIONAL ELECTION VOTING SYSTEM
Electronic Voting (E-Voting) An introduction and review of technology Written By: Larry Brachfeld CS591, December 2010.
Voting Naked: A Feasible Election System or Just a Recurring Nightmare Presented by: Danita McRae Daniel Bramell.
Author: Michał Rajkowski Tutor: prof. dr hab. inż. Zbigniew Kotulski.
Article 1: Right to equality
TGDC Meeting, December 2011 Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology Update on UOCAVA Risk Assessment by.
Internet Voting: Weighing the Pros and Cons By: Forest Marie “The Case for Internet Voting” By: Joe Mohen and Julia Glidden “Gauging the Risks of Internet.
Objectives Analyze how the administration of elections in the United States helps make democracy work. Define the role of local precincts and polling places.
States control most of election law and procedure Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted (R) Nationwide: 500,000+ office holders of over 90,000 positions!
An Internet Voting System Manager Yonghua Li Kansas State University October 19, 2001 MSE Project - Phase I.
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Major Types of Government
ICT in Banking.
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission HAVA 101 TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
Elections Americans vote at extreme levels –Elections are held almost everyday besides Sundays and holidays –500,000 office holders are elected in the.
Electronic Voting Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science.
1 The Evolution of Internet Voting By Ka Ling Cheung.
Election Accessibility 2004 Christina Galindo-Walsh National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems (NAPAS)
Political Participation An Introduction. Voting Rates Voting-Age Population Austria89% Sweden87 Australia83 Germany81 France78 UK76 Japan74 Canada67 USA53.
Nathanael Paul CRyptography Applications Bistro February 3, 2004.
1 The Promise of Equality in Voting Still Not a Reality for Americans with Disabilities Granite State Independent Living “Tools for Living Life on Your.
Objectives Analyze how the administration of elections in the United States helps make democracy work. Define the role of local precincts and polling places.
The Electoral Process Chapter 7.
Political Parties Partying since 1787 *TAKE SMART NOTES: LISTEN – to what is said LOOK – at what is written THINK – about what is important WRITE – what.
Online voting: a legal perspective
Political Participation
CHAPTER 7 Elections How does the administration of elections in the United States make democracy work? What role do precincts and polling places play in.
Influence of Social Media & Technology By Gregory Samuels.
William H. Bowers – Ethics for the Information Age Chapter 6.5 – Online Voting.
Internet Voting Ashok CS 395T. What is “E-voting” Thomas Edison received US patent number 90,646 for an electrographic vote recorder in Specific.
E-voting Bringing the voting process to the technology age.
Registering to vote February Why do I need to register? Politics affects everything, from the food you eat to the streets you walk on, from the.
By Jessica Parkinson. Mobile phones have allowed our generation to connect with others all over the world. However, the potential threats are numerous,
The Administration of Elections Extent of Federal control Elections need to be free, honest, and accurate Most election law in the U.S. is State Law.
Bell-Ringer  What qualification make a good political candidate?
Secure Remote Electronic Voting CSE-681 Fall 2006 David Foster and Laura Stapleton Laura StapletonLaura Stapleton.
Election Reform The Open Voting Consortium. Elections are important Voting is how we ultimately control.our government Many elections are decided by just.
WHO CAN VOTE?. VOTING RIGHTS DENIED Voting in America has changed dramatically since the birth of our nation. Initially, many groups were denied that.
Let’s talk about voting Meagan Smith, M.S. │Office of Active Citizenship and Service.
Computer and Network Security Brendan Duncombe Bahein Maung.
E-Government, E-Voting, and the Future Jordan Weiler.
Section 2: Voter Qualifications. Objectives: * Identify the universal requirements for voting in the United States. * Explain the other requirements that.
Association of World Election Bodies Contents ICT–based Election Management Voter Registration and Identification Voting and Counting Examples.
Assignment 7: Chapter 7 Notes
Who can vote?.
EVoting 23 October 2006.
Political Cooperation
How do Elections Work? Section 2 (pages ).
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Electronic voting – safe or not?
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Rapporteur: Krzysztof PATER
Chapter 7 Section 2.
Presentation transcript:

Internet Voting

What is Internet Voting? Internet voting is: an election process whereby people can cast their votes over the Internet, most likely through a web browser, from the comfort of their home, or possibly any other location where they can get Internet access

The 2 types of internet voting:  1. internet voting at traditional polling sites –Computers that have sufficient security, are then connected to the internet –This would speed the tabulation and reporting of votes –Election officials would remain at the voting sites  Some supporters of internet voting say this type of balloting undermines a main benefit of the internet voting which is the ability to vote from anywhere.

 2. Internet voting from any location: –Voters could cast ballots from anywhere, including their own homes. –Because no election officials would be present, this type of voting would require a new way to ensure each voters identity  This type of internet voting would probably be used in addition to voting at traditional polling sites as opposed to as a replacement.

Electronic voting –This type of voting in no way uses the internet. –You simply replace voting machines and paper ballots with computers. –Election officials would still be present at voting sites to prevent voter fraud. –The key benefit of this type of voting would be an end to the paper ballot problems.  For example, the kind that plagued Florida in the 2000 elections

How does Internet Voting Actually work?

The Positive Side of Internet voting How would internet voting help people?

It has worked before…  France 2003 –French citizens living in the United States used internet voting to elect their representatives to the Assembly of French Citizens. –Over 60% of voters chose to use internet voting over paper. –The occurrence was deemed a success and recommended for future use.

Other countries planning to take advantage of internet voting  Netherlands: in the parliamentary elections of 2007 people will be using the RIES internet voting system in order to cast their votes.  Switzerland: several cantons have been developing and attempting to use internet voting systems.

Progress…  EU Cyber-vote Project –In 2000 the European Commission launched the Cyber-Vote project –The aim of the project is to demonstrate “fully verifiable online elections guaranteeing absolute privacy of the votes and using fixed mobile internet terminals” –Trials have been performed in Sweden, France, and Germany

Positives of Internet Voting  Attract a younger generation of voters  Make absentee ballots much easier to submit  Would save money in the long run  Faster and more accurate counting of votes  Much more convenient for voters –Will increase voter numbers

More positives…  Makes voting easier for those who do not speak English  Will allow voters will disabilities to more easily cast their votes  Would help make voting easier for the elderly  It would be easier for those in remote locations to vote, for example places in Alaska or the mountains  Members of the military or anyone overseas could easily cast their votes

More positives…  Would allow those with unexpected circumstances to cast their votes, such as sudden business trips, or lack of transportation.

Here is a small sample of how internet voting can go wrong… internet voting clip internet voting clip

Problems with Internet Voting DiscriminationDiscrimination Minorities and the elderly SecuritySecurity viruses, trojans, identity theft, hackers

Problems continued… System Administrator AttacksSystem Administrator Attacks CoercionCoercion voting from home, or any other place PrivacyPrivacySolicitation Paper Trail

Problems continued… Vote sellingVote selling Vote registrationVote registration who will pay? TrustTrust

Most significant risk? Denial of Service

Examples of internet voting problems In 2000, Arizona became the first state to try online voting during primary elections. Several thousand voters tried to participate, but a series of Y2K- related glitches interfered on its first dayIn 2000, Arizona became the first state to try online voting during primary elections. Several thousand voters tried to participate, but a series of Y2K- related glitches interfered on its first day Switzerland was another country that tried to implement internet voting. Officials there found that the most popular method of voting was still postal ballots and more that 90 percent used that method over internet voting.Switzerland was another country that tried to implement internet voting. Officials there found that the most popular method of voting was still postal ballots and more that 90 percent used that method over internet voting.

What now? –For now, the long term implications of internet voting for democracy is unclear –Until security measures can be put in place to prevent fraud, it is unlikely that internet voting will be widely accepted. –Experiments in internet voting will continue for the next several years as officials at all levels of government familiarize themselves with the important issues involved in internet voting. –As experimentation continues, election officials may grow more confident in and more willing to adopt internet voting

How does this apply to you? “The future of our country, and the free world for that matter, rests on public confidence that the people have the power to elect their own government. Any process that has the potential to threaten the integrity of the system, or even the perceived integrity of the system, should be treated with the utmost caution and suspicion” (Rubin). “The future of our country, and the free world for that matter, rests on public confidence that the people have the power to elect their own government. Any process that has the potential to threaten the integrity of the system, or even the perceived integrity of the system, should be treated with the utmost caution and suspicion” (Rubin). The Bottom-line: more advanced technology = more secure internet voting