Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
King Kekaulike Complex Math Academy Mission: It is the mission of KKCMA to prepare all students for success in math as measured by performance on school,
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
A Guide to Implementation
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Welcome to Teacher Education at ECU. Teacher Education Undergraduate programs lead to initial license in NC in 21 different teaching areas Director of.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Conceptual Framework Salisbury University working draft 8/15/05.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
SENIOR SEMINAR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION What am I responsible for?
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
Moving Forward!. Responds to identified needs of the district and community, based upon data, and Provides Framework and Vehicle for School Improvement.
Parent Learning Morning November 6th 2007 October 2009.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
MYP Pre-authorisation Report April 12-13, 2010 Recommendations Summary Professional Development Day May 17 th 2010.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.
A conceptual framework establishes the shared vision for a unit’s efforts in preparing educators to work in P–12 schools. … Conceptual Framework.
SENIOR SEMINAR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION What am I responsible for?
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Standard 6 Unit Governance and Resources. 6a: Unit Leadership and Authority The unit and other faculty collaborate with P-12 practitioners in program.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
What It Is and How It Works
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
NJCU College of Education
February 21-22, 2018.
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework

Elements of a Conceptual Framework (CF) A shared vision, purpose, and goals for teacher preparation Professional knowledge bases (research) regarding current theory and best practices in teacher preparation Defined candidate proficiencies aligned with state and national standards A philosophy and system of data collection, assessment, and evaluation necessary for program renewal and enhanced student learning

Conceptual Framework (con’t) The conceptual framework establishes the shared vision for a unit’s efforts in preparing educators to work effectively in P–12 schools. It provides direction for: courses, programs, instruction, candidate performance, scholarship, service, and unit resources and accountability.

Conceptual Framework (con’t) The conceptual framework is articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with the unit and the institutional mission, and continuously evaluated.

Development of the Conceptual Framework A focus group composed of teacher education faculty from across campus reviewed WSU’s previous conceptual framework (TREC), current research, and the INTASC standards. TREC (based on the philosophy of reflective practice, engaging all learners, and collaboration) was revised and extended to include professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions, demonstrated student achievement, a more comprehensive unit assessment plan, and collaboration with a broader community.

WSU Teacher Preparation Program’s Conceptual Framework: Student Achievement: Teachers, Students, and Communities Working Together

The reference in the Model to Teachers includes: WSU faculty, collaborating teachers, and WSU candidates when they are in a teaching situation. The reference in the Model to Students includes: Our candidates, the k-12 students taught by our candidates, and faculty and community educators in professional development situations. Student Achievement: Teachers, Students, and Communities Working Together

The Conceptual Framework Model has Three Essential Components: A BASE, representing standards and professionalism A MIDSECTION, representing the components of the 1993 TREC Reflective Practice conceptual framework: reflecting, engaging, collaborating The PINNACLE, anticipated outcomes of student achievement and program renewal

The BASE: Standards and Research Acknowledges that all licensure programs are built upon professional standards and knowledge bases Delineates three areas of professionalism: candidate knowledge, skills, and dispositions Supports the MIDSECTION, reflective practice; and the PINNACLE, student achievement and program renewal

The MIDSECTION: Reflective Practice Teachers reflect upon the effectiveness of their instruction and based on that reflection strengthen and modify practice. Teachers engage students through the implementation of varied teaching strategies, appropriate interventions, and formative assessments. Teachers collaborate for growth by seeking the help of other professionals to enhance teaching skills, professional knowledge, and dispositions.

The PINNACLE: Anticipated Outcomes Enhanced professionalism and preparation for teaching Development of leadership skills Program renewal Increased student achievement