Fire Effects Planning Framework PROPOSED Agenda Working session Richfield, UT 12/7-8/06 -Overview and orientation (powerpoint presentation) - Gather/process/analyze.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Advertisements

Los Padres National Forest
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
APPLICATION OF LANDSCAPE-SCALE HABITAT SUITABILTY MODELS TO BIRD CONSERVATION PLANNING Frank R. Thompson III, USDA Forest Service North Central Research.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Sabie Environmental Consulting TITLE: Remote sensed land cover classifcation REQUIRED BY: Biological Science DepartmentPRODUCT # 34.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
Overstory and understory vegetation management to meet fire resilience and wildlife habitat objectives Eric Knapp, Becky Estes, and Carl Skinner U.S. Forest.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental.
Regions in ArcINFO Regions can handle overlapping, noncontiguous and nested areas and makes real-world features easier to represent and analyze. Data management.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Wildland Fire Decision Support Tools Managing Long Duration Wildfires Workshop Salt Lake City, UT April 30 – May 1, 2008 Missoula, MT May 6-7, 2008 Wildland.
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
Landscape Planning for Fuel Reduction and Forest Restoration Alan Ager, PNW Research Station, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center,
Firefighter Refresher: Fuel Types and Suppression Tactics.
2 Cooperative Fire Hazard Mitigation Priority Project By Eric Geisler Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Forestry.
The Value of Prescribed Fire in Colorado’s Front Range Rob Addington The Nature Conservancy.
Duncan Lutes Systems for Environmental Management Bob Keane – USFS – Research Ecologist, P.I. Carl Key – USGS – Geographer John Caratti – SEM – Systems.
Examples. Using FEPF to identify priority treatment areas based on soil erosion potential and critical fish habitat In the Bitterroot Valley, MT.
Farsite Export Model ARCGIS 9 Volker Mell GIS Analyst Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes.
National Fire Danger Rating System. NFDRS Basics Indicator of worst case fire danger Five danger classes –Low, moderate, high, very high, extreme Describes.
EXPECTATIONS -FS Training course for FARSITE is 60hrs long. -It's own software separate from ArcGIS with it's own quirks and limitations. -Two week lab.
The Coeur d'Alene Tribe is learning the remote sensing methodology developed by LANDFIRE, and will be attempting to apply the methods to higher resolution.
Controls on Fire in the Pacific Northwest: Climate, Fuels, and Land Management Dave Peterson & Don McKenzie Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific.
Using FEPF for a Go/No Go decision. Scenario Dixie National Forest East Fork FMU.
Mark Finney, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT.
CLASS UPDATES Office hours: Fridays 9AM-12noon (or me for an appointment) Powerpoints – on class website Schedule changes: thesis statement, outline,
Using GIS in Forestry c 7 H
Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Schmidt et al GTR RMRS-87.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
Colorado Front Range Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project : Initial Pre and Post-Treatment Stand Structure Analysis for the Pike and San.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Fire Ecology and Fire Regimes in Boreal Ecosystems Oct 19, 2010.
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
GIS Applications in Interagency Fire Management Planning EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI Jeff Baranyi - ESRI EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI.
Clearwater Basin Collaborative Restoring America’s Forests Oct. 3-5, 2011, Truckee, CA Photo: William H. Mullins Kelly Creek CBC Landscape Assessment Preliminary.
SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELING OF COLORADO PLATEAU LANDSCAPES FROM CONCEPTUAL MODELS TO A COMPUTER SYSTEM Chew, Jimmie D., Kirk Moeller, and Chris Stalling.
Map Units for LANDFIRE: Integrating Vegetation Classification and Map Legends.
Assessing the Effectiveness of Landscape Fuel Treatments on Fire Growth and Behavior Rick D. Stratton Presented by Jacob J. LaCroix.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
Fire, birds, bears and trees Conservation and restoration of whitebark pine ecosystems.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Using GIS for Analysis: Queries Re-classification Map overlay Real world Land use Elevation Parcels Streets Retail A sample of approaches:
A Brief Look at Federal Wildland Fire Policy & WFDSS One Approach to Successful Implementation Dan O’Brien NWCC Fire Analyst March 31, 2008.
 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including.
Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon.
Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Fairbanks-North Star Borough CWPP Risk Assessment Update And Plan Evaluation.
Landscape Treatment Prioritization to Reduce Northern Spotted Owl Habitat Loss from Wildfire: A Test Case Using Fire Regime and Condition Class on the.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Fire, birds, bears and trees Conservation and restoration of whitebark pine ecosystems.
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
Restoring whitebark pine ecosystems in the face of climate change pine Bob Keane, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire Sciences Laboratory.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey October 22, 2015 EROS Fire Science Understanding a Changing Earth.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Wild Land Fire Ecology Kaylene Maize
NASA BAER Project: Improving Post-Fire Remediation Through Hydrological Modeling NASA Applied Science Program Applied Sciences Program - Wildfires.
Large Fire Simulator (FSIM)
WDFW Forest Management Mission
Identification of Restoration Sites for  a Fire-dependent Bird in an Urbanizing Environment Bradley A. Pickens North Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife.
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Wildfire Effects on Forest Cover in Ponderosa Pine Forest
Hawks Aloft, Inc. Fire Avian Monitoring for Jemez Collaborative Landscape Forest Restoration Project
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Beaver Ridge Restoration
Forest fuels evaluation and fuel treatment planning for DOI bureaus in 2008 Keith Reynolds, USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station Jim Menakis,
Presentation transcript:

Fire Effects Planning Framework PROPOSED Agenda Working session Richfield, UT 12/7-8/06 -Overview and orientation (powerpoint presentation) - Gather/process/analyze data (working meeting) - fire behavior - fire effects - crosswalk creation - Create Map Library (subsequent task by individual forest)

Extreme – 99% High – 90% Moderate – 80% Species Size/ Structure Crown fire potential 1 st Order Fire Effects Effect on whitebark pine Mapping Multiplier Information Source WB-only Seed/sap1, 2, or 3High Undesirable Effects WB established but not reproducing yet Tomback et al. 2001, FOFEM All except seed/sap 1,2, or 3 High Desirable Effects restore native fire regime Tomback et al. 2001, FOFEM All other species mixes All 2 or 3High Highly Desirable Effects provide potential WB habitat +100 Keane, Arno Pers. Comm. 1 Low or moderate Desirable Effects+1 Keane, Arno pers. Com. No BurnAllNone Not Habitat rock above 6500’ -100N/A Fire Effects Planning Framework (FEPF) Crosswalk fire behavior to fire effects on values/objectives 3 Photograph by Steve Sutherland; 2 years post-fire Extreme – 99% High – 90% Moderate – 80% BITTERROOT NATIONAL FOREST Fire Effects Planning Framework 2004 Fire Effects Map Library Fire Behavior Effects on Whitebark pine Effects on Lynx foraging habitat Extreme – 99% High – 90% Moderate – 80% Fire Effects Fire Behavior Vegetative attributes Desirability Landscape Dynamics Simulation Models Identify resources of interest Identify associated vegetative attributes Identify fire ecology 1 FlamMap 99 th % 90 th % 80 th % Based on FireFamilyPlus weather analysis for Energy Release Component Model fire behavior 2 Update vegetative attributes post-season 5 Create map library for - land, fuels, fire planning, - AMR/WFU activities 4 Source

Fire Effects Planning Framework With the proper input the Fire Effects Planning Framework (FEPF) will give you information on whether a given ignition - will or will not meet a set of objectives. NFDRS Plans - Useful for determining appropriate weather station, key thresholds, i.e. season ending/slowing events. NFDRS Plan input Land Management Plan Objectives – Where all Forest Service unplanned ignition objectives come from.. LMP Objectives input Local Experience – critical for model calibration Local Experience input Will we meet objectives with this ignition? Output IGNITION GIS Data – spatial modeling Input GIS Data

Step 1: Gather data and Identify key conditions Fire Weather * weather thresholds (FMP) * weather stations * fire behavior parameter for fire mgmt (ERC, BI, FL …) Resource issues * current and desired condition * map-able attributes species/habitat relationship (wildlife) * fire ecology * fire behavior parameter for effects (ERC, BI, FL …) GIS DATA SETS * Farsite set (topography, fuels, vegetation canopy fuels) * resource data layers

Weather data FireFamilyPlus Farsite/FLAMMAP (.txt) Seasonal %’s Threshold %’s 80, 90, 99 th %.wnd,.wtr,.fms Step 2: Model Fire Behavior Fuels data (LANDFIRE) Fuel Model Stand Height Crown Bulk Density Crown Base Height Canopy Cover PVTGROUPPVT GROUP NAME HT_GRP 1Upper Subalpine Forest G1,G2 2 Lower Subalpine Forest - Mesic D3, E2 3 Lower Subalpine Forest - Xeric F1, F2 4 Upper Montane Forest - Mesic C2, D2 5 Upper Montane Forest - Xeric C1 6 Lower Montane Forest - Mesic B2, B3 7 Lower Montane Forest - Xeric A2, B1 8Upper Subalpine Shrub - HerbaceousNF5 11 Lower Montane Shrub - Herbaceous NF1,NF2A, NF2, NF4 13 Agricultural XX1 14 Urban/Barren XX4 15 Water XX5 Vegetation/ Imagery Canopy Fuels Fuel Model Crosswalk

Weather data FireFamilyPlus Farsite/FLAMMAP (.txt) Seasonal %’s Threshold %’s 80, 90, 99 th %.wnd,.wtr,.fms Step 2: Model Fire Behavior Fuels data (LANDFIRE) Fuel Model Stand Height Crown Bulk Density Crown Base Height Canopy Cover PVTGROUPPVT GROUP NAME HT_GRP 1Upper Subalpine Forest G1,G2 2 Lower Subalpine Forest - Mesic D3, E2 3 Lower Subalpine Forest - Xeric F1, F2 4 Upper Montane Forest - Mesic C2, D2 5 Upper Montane Forest - Xeric C1 6 Lower Montane Forest - Mesic B2, B3 7 Lower Montane Forest - Xeric A2, B1 8Upper Subalpine Shrub - HerbaceousNF5 11 Lower Montane Shrub - Herbaceous NF1,NF2A, NF2, NF4 13 Agricultural XX1 14 Urban/Barren XX4 15 Water XX5 Vegetation/ Imagery Canopy Fuels Fuel Model Crosswalk INPUTSOUTPUTS

Species/ Species Mix Size/ Structure Fire Severity 0-14years post-fire years post-fire 40+years post-fire WB, DF, L, PP, LP, L-mixes, DF-mixes, PP- mixes Single storyLow Single storyMixed11-10 Single or multi-storyHigh10 Mixtures of DF, ES,AF, WB, LP, AL, L, GF Single storyLow Single storyMixed Single or multi-storyHigh 10 ES, GF,AL, C, QA, WH, MH, AF, CW Single storyMixed11-10 Single or multi-storyHigh10 All forested Seed/sapHigh10 Shrubs AllMixed or High No Burn1-10 Non-stocked, non- forest, forbs, grasses AllLow, Mixed, No Burn Unburnable, Agriculture, No Data n/aAll or 3 0 0,1, or 2 0,1,2,or 3 Fire Behavior Ecological Fire Behavior Fire effects on target over time Step 3: Merge to create Fire Effects Crosswalks Physical habitat characteristics Physical Fire Behavior Illustrative only

Species/ Species Mix Size/ Structure Fire Severity 0-14years post-fire years post-fire 40+years post-fire WB, DF, L, PP, LP, L-mixes, DF-mixes, PP- mixes Single storyLow Single storyMixed11-10 Single or multi-storyHigh10 Mixtures of DF, ES,AF, WB, LP, AL, L, GF Single storyLow Single storyMixed Single or multi-storyHigh 10 ES, GF,AL, C, QA, WH, MH, AF, CW Single storyMixed11-10 Single or multi-storyHigh10 All forested Seed/sapHigh10 Shrubs AllMixed or High No Burn1-10 Non-stocked, non- forest, forbs, grasses AllLow, Mixed, No Burn Unburnable, Agriculture, No Data n/aAll or 3 0 0,1, or 2 0,1,2,or 3 Fire Behavior Ecological Fire Behavior Fire effects on target over time Step 3: Merge to create Fire Effects Crosswalks Physical habitat characteristics Physical Fire Behavior Illustrative only Stored as set of rules or as.txt file

Species/ Species Mix Size/ Structure Fire Severity 0-14years post-fire years post-fire 40+years post-fire WB, DF, L, PP, LP, L-mixes, DF-mixes, PP- mixes Single storyLow Single storyMixed11-10 Single or multi-storyHigh10 Mixtures of DF, ES,AF, WB, LP, AL, L, GF Single storyLow Single storyMixed Single or multi-storyHigh 10 ES, GF,AL, C, QA, WH, MH, AF, CW Single storyMixed11-10 Single or multi-storyHigh10 All forested Seed/sapHigh10 Shrubs AllMixed or High No Burn1-10 Non-stocked, non- forest, forbs, grasses AllLow, Mixed, No Burn Unburnable, Agriculture, No Data n/aAll or 3 0 0,1, or 2 0,1,2,or 3 Fire Behavior Ecological Fire Behavior Fire effects on target over time Step 3: Merge to create Fire Effects Crosswalks Physical habitat characteristics Physical Fire Behavior Illustrative only Stored as set of rules or as.txt file FOFEM FVS-FFE SIMPPLLE WHRM URM Publications Expert Systems

FlamMap Crown Fire Potential Rate of Spread Fireline Intensity Step 4a: Create Fire Behavior Library 99 th % 90 th % 80 th %

Fire Behavior Library Step 4b: Create Fire Effects Library Restoration/Fuels Lynx 99 th % 90 th % 80 th % Aquatics Fire Fighter Safety Cavity Nester

Initial vegetation Lynx habitat Fire effects on vegetation Fire effects on Lynx habitat

Fire Effects Library 99 th % 90 th % 80 th % Uses: Set fuel treatment priorities

Uses: Model alternatives and future consequences This example shows use of SIMPPLLE FVS-FFE can also be used.

Incident Support Maps are draft, and illustrative only Uses: Go/NoGo (WFIP analyses) cost containment Quantify benefits or reductions in risk within MMA Consider potential benefits when determining suppression strategy by flank

Uses: Map Library for Fire Planning BITTERROOT NATIONAL FOREST 2004 Fire Effects Map Library Fire Behavior Fire Effects

Fire Effects Planning Framework Working session Richfield, UT 12/7-8/06 FEPF website search on Fire Effects Planning Framework User’s Guide Bitterroot Map Library Fire Behavior Examples Flammap (Bitterroot) Farsite (Dixie) FOFEM/ expert opinion (Yellowstone NP) Resource Examples Lynx (Bitterroot) Ponderosa pine (Dixie) Aspen (Dixie) Whitebark pine (Bitterroot, Yellowstone) Resources

What does it really take to make this work? Resource Objectives (conf. call, meeting) Weather (station, time period) Vegetation data (local vs. LANDFIRE) Calibration (vegetation, fire behavior, fire effects)