A Genetic Algorithm Solution for the Problem of Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Records Arzhang Alimoradi and Farzad Naeim John A. Martin & Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimal placement of MR dampers
Advertisements

The Community Geodetic Model (CGM): What is it and how does it relate to studies of lithospheric rheology? Jessica Murray, David Sandwell, and Rowena Lohman.
Application of Fluid-Structure Interaction Algorithms to Seismic Analysis of Liquid Storage Tanks Zuhal OZDEMIR, Mhamed SOULI Université des Sciences et.
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
TBI Committee Members Y. Bozorgnia C.B. Crouse J.P. Stewart
Slides for discussion SOPAC/UCSD/UA. From Press Release Inertial Force-Limiting Floor Anchorage Systems for Seismic Resistant Building Structures UA/UCSD.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models SCEC GMSV Workshop: Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications Nicolas Luco, Research Structural.
Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
Northridge 1D rock/soil Simulation (36 sites) Loma Prieta 1D east/west SAF Simulation (56 sites)
GMSM Mission and Vision Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.
Non-Linear Problems General approach. Non-linear Optimization Many objective functions, tend to be non-linear. Design problems for which the objective.
Earthquake location rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/geol600_nhe_location_groundmotion.ppt.
Will Performance-Based Engineering Break the Power Law? Tom Heaton John Hall Anna Olsen Masumi Yamada Georgia Cua.
GMSM Methodology and Terminology Christine Goulet, UCLA GMSM Core Members.
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Brian Chiou NGA Workshop July 19, 2004 NGA Dataset.
Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Hemangi Pandit Joel Conte Jon Stewart John Wallace.
What Will a Large Earthquake be Like? Tom Heaton Caltech.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Preliminary PEER-NGA Ground Motion Model Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs PEER-NGA Workshop 7 December 3, 2004.
Yousef Bozorgnia, Mahmoud Hachem, Kenneth Campbell PEER GMSM Workshop, UC Berkeley October 27, 2006 Attenuation of Inelastic Spectra and Its Applications.
03/24/2004NGA Workshop: Validation1 BROADBAND SIMULATION METHODOLOGY: A HYBRID DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACH  Use Deterministic Methodology at.
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.
First a digression The POC Ranking the Methods Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.
Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments Two Challenges for Optimal Path planning.
California Earthquakes. Sylmar Earthquake About: When: 6:00 A.M. February 9, 1971 Where: San Fernando Valley What: Ruptured segment of the San Fernando.
S a (T 1 ) Scaling Nilesh Shome ABS Consulting. Methodology Developed in 1997 (Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. (1998), “Earthquake,
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
PEER-SCEC WORKSHOP ON GROUND MOTION SIMULATION AND BUILDING RESPONSE SIMULATION with focus on long period ground motions and tall buildings PEER Nov 2,
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
L Braile, 1/26/2006 (revised, Sept., 2009) What is Moment Magnitude?
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
Youssef Hashash In collaboration with Duhee Park
Lecture 16 Earthquakes What are earthquakes? Elastic rebound theory Waves generated by earthquakes: P waves, S waves, Surface waves Locating earthquakes.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Cheng Chen Ph.D., Assistant Professor School of Engineering San Francisco State University Probabilistic Reliability Analysis of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab 1 December Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering K orea A dvanced I nstitute of S cience.
Static Pushover Analysis
Exploring Planet Earth Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Rupture Animation (Northridge, 1994) Brad Aagaard, USGS
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
NESC Academy 1 Unit 24 Seismic Shock. NESC Academy Nine people were killed by the May 1940 Imperial Valley earthquake. At Imperial, 80 percent of the.
Earthquake Seismology Lars Ottemöller University of Bergen, Norway.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. 1 Kang-Min Choi, Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST, Korea Jung-Hyun Hong, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ji-Seong Jo,
ANSS/NSMP STRONG- MOTION RECORD PROCESSING AND PROCEDURES Christopher D. Stephens and David M. Boore US Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA COSMOS/NSF International.
Faults and Earthquakes. Some faults become “locked” –Pressure pushes together the irregular walls of the fault; surfaces resist sliding Slip can’t occur.
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.
IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.
Zuhal OZDEMIR, Mhamed SOULI
Jennie Watson-Lamprey COSMOS Annual Meeting Technical Session November 9, PEER GMSM Program: Recommendations for Selection and Scaling of Ground.
INCORPORATION OF EARTHQUAKE SOURCE, PROPAGATION PATH AND SITE UNCERTAINTIES INTO ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Bob Darragh Nick Gregor Walt Silva.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. 1 모달 퍼지 이론을 이용한 지진하중을 받는 구조물의 능동제어 최강민, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 조상원, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 오주원, 한남대학교 토목공학과 이인원, 한국과학기술원.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Byoung-Wan : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Byoung-Wan : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Hyung-Jo.
Global topology optimization of truss structures Dmitrij Šešok Rimantas Belevičius Department of Engineering Mechanics. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.
Earthquakes and Seismic Waves
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
NGA Dataset Brian Chiou NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
How the ground shakes? Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D., by
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Brazilian “Strong-Motion” Data Stéphane Drouet, ON, Rio de Janeiro Marlon Pirchiner, IAG/USP, São Paulo Marcelo Assumpção, IAG/USP, São Paulo Luis Carlos.
Modal Control for Seismically Excited Structures using MR Damper
Preliminary PEER-NGA Ground Motion Model
Implementation of Modal Control for
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
Presentation transcript:

A Genetic Algorithm Solution for the Problem of Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Records Arzhang Alimoradi and Farzad Naeim John A. Martin & Associates First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 2 Agenda Why Genetic Algorithms? –Formulation of an optimal search and scaling method (minimal or no scaling) Example I: SAC-20 LA Example II: PEER-GMSM Concluding remarks

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 3 Why GA? Different philosophies with the analysis of complex systems: 1.Stochastic analysis, non-stationary indeterministic processes, applied with ‘reductionism’ 2.Analysis of complex systems (critical, chaotic)  Evidence for deterministic process (Olson and Allen, Nature, Vol. 438, pp , November 2005)  Physically critical systems (Corral, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 92, No. 10, March 2004)

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 4 1.Fault location, type, size and activity, strain rate 2.Rupture dynamics (slip rate, seismic moment, stress drop, directivity, mechanism,…) 3.Path (Q, topology, distances, refraction and reflection,…) 4.Local site effects (amplification, filtering, nonlinear soil deformations,…) 5.Basin effects 6.Soil-foundation-structure interaction 7.… ?!?!?! 6 DOF Time Series of Point Displacement Earthquake Ground Motion Process (Complex System)

Genetic Algorithms

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 6 Chromosomes Nucleus Optimization through adaptation! Genetic algorithms: what does biology have to do with ground motion selection?

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 7 GA Basics Natural System Artificial System

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 8 A population of five chromosomes: Gene 1: record 1 and the scaling Gene 2: scaling set 2 Gene 3-5: …

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 9 Total number of different combinations = The number of stable particles in the universe =

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 10

Example I: SAC-20 LA

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 12 SAC-20 LA, Post-Northridge 3 Dimensional inelastic model in CSi-Perform Prof. Krawinkler’s M2 Model (with panel zone distortions are modeled) Gravity beam-to-column connections are pinned

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 13 Comparison of Modal Properties Krawinkler’s M2Perform-3D T 1, sec T 2, sec T 3, sec Effective Modal Mass Effective Modal Mass Effective Modal Mass

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 14 Denali Pump Station # Denali Pump Station # Imperial Valley El Centro Array Station Imperial Valley El Centro Array Station Landers Yermo EWLanders Yermo NS Loma Prieta Anderson Dam 270Loma Prieta 360 Loma Prieta Hollister EW Northridge Newhall EWNorthridge Newhall NS Northridge Sylmar County Hospital Parking Lot 360 Northridge Sylmar County Hospital Parking Lot 90 Selected Bin

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 15

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 16

Example II: PEER GMSM Study

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 18 Estimate I Cumulative distribution function of maximum interstory drift ratio conditioned on a given earthquake event on a site with a given 30m soil shear-wave velocity. (To be used for distribution and mean evaluations)

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 19 Estimate I

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 20 Estimate II Median of maximum interstory drift ratio (To be used only for the evaluation of the arithmetic mean of response)

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 21 Estimate II

Oct. 27, 2006First PEER Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Analysis 22 Conclusions Need for a consistent theory with regards to selection and scaling, Scaling scheme shall not distort the spatial distribution of response when compared to ‘conforming records,’ A computational tool was presented for efficient search and scaling of ground motion records in a database.

It is a scale of proportions which makes the bad difficult and the good easy Albert Einstein