H. EvansL1Cal Meeting: 8-Apr-04 1 Verifying L1Cal Readiness Our Colleagues will ask us the following questions when we ask to turn on the new L1Cal System.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Department of Environmental Conservation 1 DATAMAX PRINTER SETUP MODULE 1.

Advertisements

FTK H->  update Catalin, Tony. Recap - slides 2-9.

Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.

Zero Energy Response of ADF Raw ADC and ADF Output Et & New “36 LiveX sampling mode” for Find_DAC Philippe Laurens MSU Sept 2006 (rev 20-sept-2006)

Pedestal Tracking in action a.k.a. Active Stabilization of L1Cal Trigger Tower Zero Energy Response Philippe Laurens Michigan State University 09-Nov-2007.

H. EvansRun2b L1Cal Meeting: 22-Aug-021 Temple Review Post-Mortem Hal Evans Aug: Director’s Rev. of all CDF & DØ Run IIb Projects –Prep for DOE (Lehman)

L1CAL Online Software Philippe Laurens 31-May-2005.

Dir Rev of Run IIb June 3-5, Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger (WBS 1.2.1) Hal EvansColumbia University for the Run IIb L1Cal group.

L1CAL Online Control System Philippe Laurens 26-Aug-2005.

Feb 26, 2004 Mike Hildreth – DØ Collaboration Meeting Run IIb Trigger Simulation Report Mike Hildreth & Ela Barberis for the Run IIb Trigger Simulation.

Run IIb L1CAL TCC Philippe Laurens MSU 9-Feb-2006.

Pedestal Correction in action (but still during shutdown) Philippe Laurens Michigan State University 16-Oct-2007.

Pulser Tools for L1Cal2b Robert Kehoe L1Cal2b Mtg. May 3, 2005 Southern Methodist University Department of Physics  Goals  Status of 2A Software  Current.

H. EvansRun IIb L1Cal Meeting: 6-Mar-031 Changes to the GAB Current System Architecture Changes to GAB to Streamline this Architecture How this Affects.

H. EvansRun IIb Trigger Meeting: 26-Feb-04 1 Ensuring Success for L1Cal in Run IIb H. EvansColumbia U. Outline 1.Pre-Installation (extensive use of Test.

Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

H. EvansTAB/GAB PRR: 7-Oct-041 TAB & GAB Production Readiness Review Hal Evansfor the Nevis Group In a Nutshell u We have the components, the boards, the.

Saclay, 04 / 11 / 2002 E. Perez 1 Simulation of the performances of the upgraded L1Cal  Short reminder  Performances (jets) (see Jovan’s talk for electron.

New Run IIb L1Cal EM Algorithm Greg Pawloski Rice University Run IIb L1Cal Meeting May 31, 2005.

GLAST LAT Project Analysis Meeting March 22, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/8 LAT Instrument Test Analysis Eduardo do Couto e Silva March 23, 2004.

Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.

DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.

H. EvansRun IIb L1Cal Meeting: 1-May-031 Goals of the Summer Integration Test Summer Integration Schedule –16-Jul-03 – 8-Oct-03 Test Infrastructure –what.

DØ L1Cal Trigger 10-th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION FOR COLLIDING BEAM PHYSICS Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Siberian Branch of Russian.

GLAST LAT ProjectOnline Peer Review – July 21, Integration and Test L. Miller 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Integration Readiness Review.

How to connect your laptop to the classroom wireless AP.

February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.

Hardware.  Learn what hardware is  Learn different input and output devices  Learn what the CPU is.

Learning with Positive and Unlabeled Examples using Weighted Logistic Regression Wee Sun Lee National University of Singapore Bing Liu University of Illinois,

Michal Szelezniak – LBL-IPHC meeting – May 2007 Cluster finder in the HFT readout Single-hit detection efficiency for a cluster-finder algorithm.

CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.

1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.

 Computer Fundamentals Computer Software. Review  Five Components of Computers  Example of input device  Example of output device  Define system.

David Cussans/Scott Mandry, NIKHEF, October 2008 TLU v0.2.

Status of 2015 pledges 2016 requests RRB Report Concezio Bozzi INFN Ferrara LHCb NCB, November 3 rd 2014.

Software Engineering 1 Some Definitions Lesson 2.

TrigSim Status ● What is TrigSim? ● What version do I use? ● Web site ● Basic running ● Features of p ● Drawbacks of p ● Future plans 10/24/03.

Ideas about Tests and Sequencing C.N.P.Gee Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 3rd March 2001.

ECE 466/658: Performance Evaluation and Simulation Introduction Instructor: Christos Panayiotou.

Bob Hirosky,UIC/DØ Jet Triggering at D-Zero Typical triggers used Efficiencies - what kind? Various ways to measure (Data/MC) Some measurements and closure.

HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.

Timescale The nominal dates for SM approvals for EPS are June 30 and July 7 for the Plenary meetings, with availability of a draft supporting note to the.

1 MICE Tracker Readout Update AFE IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress Summary Terry Hart, MICE Tracker Meeting, August.

1 L1CAL for DAQ Shifter By Selcuk Cihangir 3/20/2007 Representing L1CAL group (slides from many people)

Physics Results from CDF and Prospects for a FY 2011 Run Kevin Pitts / University of Illinois DOE S&T Review of Scientific User Facilities June 30 – July.

Ursula Bassler convenors meeting, August 28th, Tower 2 problem For about 30 BLS boards tower 0 is read out instead of tower 2  the information.

Inspection Review How to respond to Postings Training Document.

Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.

Level-1 Trigger Commissioning Status A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 10, 2010.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.

 offline code: changes/updates, open items, readiness  1 st data taking plans and readiness.

Study of missing Level-1 triggers using data10 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Trigger E/Gamma Signature Group Meeting 20/05/2010.

Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.

Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,

TAB-To-L3(Tape) ● At the L1Cal2b sidewalk test stand we have a setup to transmit the data coming from detector to tape using the new system. ● We installed.

Municipal Office of Ustí nad Labem

Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.

CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status

FVTX High Multiplicity Trigger for Run15

Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 23/3/2015

Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington

OSKAR station simulator

Progress on L1Cal at Nevis

p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result

Purpose of the ex-p: commission the LH coupler

Signal Conditioning.

Lecture 3: Main Memory.

ZDD status BESIII Collaboration Meeting, September 2012

西村美紀（東大）他 MEGIIコラボレーション日本物理学会第73回年次大会（2018年）東京理科大学（野田キャンパス）

Presentation transcript:

H. EvansL1Cal Meeting: 8-Apr-04 1 Verifying L1Cal Readiness Our Colleagues will ask us the following questions when we ask to turn on the new L1Cal System 1.Will the operation of L1Cal2b perturb data taking? 2.How do you know that data taken with the new trigger will not be worse than current data? Note: this does not address Installation issues

H. EvansL1Cal Meeting: 8-Apr-04 2 Issues & Plans 1.Operations & Stabilityrun test system a.crashes/deadtimemeas. in test syst. b.reliable downloadinguse in test syst. c.monitoring toolssoftware in place d.param determinationsoftware in place e.unpacker/reco stabledata from test syst 2.Trigger Qualitydata & MC a.rates & efficienciespred w/ MC – verify w/ data b.trigger definitions (L1,L2,L3)in place well beforehand sfilter coeff’s, thresholds, and/or terms, trigger list Note: all of these must be Documented

H. EvansL1Cal Meeting: 8-Apr-04 3 Testing Trigger Quality Constraint: limited # of split signals u currently 16-EM + 16-H  cannot test Sliding Windows Possible Chain to Rate/Eff Estimates 1.Define Triggers strig-list, and/or, thresh, filt. coeff’s 2.Using Splitter Data derive TT response s compare ADF Et(TT) output w/ Precision Readout  correct MC modeling of Et(TT) s probe pathological cases using TWG 3.MC models TAB Algorithms ssliding windows algorithm is deterministic suse standalone MC to look for algorithm pathologies 4.MC models And/Or terms & Trigger List  Rates & Eff’s sneed to test QCD MC vs. Data w/ Run IIa Trigger

H. EvansL1Cal Meeting: 8-Apr-04 4 This is a Lot of Work Make sure we have enough people (incl. outside L1Cal group) u test system running u L1Cal IIb data  data stream u download/calib/monitoring design & test u TT data analysis u MC analysis u trigger determination: L1, L2, L3 Start regular test system running as soon as possible u probably as soon as ADF v.2 is ready u use as many split signals as possible u write data to tape  Note: this is all in addition to u hardware production & testing u preparation for installation