Survey of Current Teaching Evaluation Forms Teaching Effectiveness Committee.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.

Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.

UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

Review of SUNY Oneonta Course Evaluation Form Report and Recommendations from The Committee on Instruction: Part I March 16, 2009.

Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.

Presenters Katie Held Stephen Matsko Elizabeth Draggett.

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.

Building our Future: The First 100 Days A presentation and summary of survey responses and emerging themes.

Faculty Welfare Committee Web Survey: “Uncompensated Summer work by 9-month faculty at Auburn University” Fall 2004.

Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)

Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:

Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.

Implications of Web-based Learning for Student Evaluation of University Teaching Chuck DziubanSteve Sorg Research Initiative for Teaching Center for Distributed.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee & CoursEval Implementation Committee Status Update to University Senate October 4, 2011 October 4, 20111TEC/CIC University.

Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.

Academic Careers Adapted from presentations and slides by: T. Williams - Texas A & M University C. Ellis - Duke University S. Castaneda, Clarke College.

Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.

1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.

1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.

The Role of the Office Institutional Research and Program Assessment at Baruch College Presented by: John Choonoo, Director Jimmy Jung, Assistant Director.

School Uniforms: An Investigation Status Report Harford County Public Schools December 17, 2007.

Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.

Sex comparisons among science faculty at Hunter College Hunter College Gender Equity Project & Provost’s Office 2007 Science Faculty Survey Department.

Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.

AQIP Action Project “Enhancing the Campus Climate for Scholarship”

Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.

Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge EEET July 11, 2009.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Recommendations on Teaching Evaluation Forms.

End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,

The P&T Process Roles of the Candidate, Supervisor and P&T Committee.

EGS Research & Consulting BASELINE SURVEYS OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT CHAIR PERSONS, MATHEMATICS FACULTY AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY.

Awareness of Decisions in Evaluating Promotion and Tenure (ADEPT) Carol Colatrella, Professor, ADEPT Coordinator, Energeia Editor.

SETE ABOR POLICY ON STUDENT EVALUATIONS 6-221B. General Policy It is the policy of the Arizona Board of Regents that faculty shall be evaluated on their.

Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.

Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.

02 April 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.

KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.

Student Evaluation of Teaching Task Force 1 Final Report and Proposal Presented to OSU Faculty Senate February 9, 2012.

Administrative Assessment Spring 2007 Remarks to the University Senate 9 January 2007 Joseph J. Molnar, Committee Chair.

Supporting PER as a Physics Department Chair Laura McCullough, Chair, Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Stout What’s the issue? As PER grows,

Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.

CAS Congress Annual Faculty Survey Purpose: Elicit a Faculty- Centered Agenda for the Policy Committee Identify the areas that faculty members wanted.

A Journey through the Seas of Tenure, Permanent Status, and Promotion at the University of Florida 2012: Angel Kwolek-Folland, Associate Provost for Academic.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Status Report. Teaching Effectiveness Committee Members in Gisela Buschle-Diller (Polymer & Fiber.

PROMOTION & TENURE 2015 – P&T Timetable (during sixth year) School Director and faculty member discuss Fall 2015 possibility for promotion and evaluation.

Faculty Well-Being Survey: Some Select Findings for Vice Provosts to Pique Curiosity in What the Data Can Tell Us Presentation for Vice Provosts.

University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.

Role of Chairs and Deans During the Tenure-Track Process Theme = “Onboarding faculty” Webster: “un-bearding”? “in-breeding”? Opposite = “off-boarding ”

OSU Faculty Senate Diversity Committee Dwaine Plaza & Evviva Weinraub The purpose of the Faculty Senate sponsored survey is to explore the current attitudes,

P&T ADVANCE COMMITTEE (PTAC) Sponsored by ADVANCE Program Report to GT NSF ADVANCE Conference March 31, 2005.

Evaluation of Teaching Recommendations of the Teaching Effectiveness Committee University Senate Meeting May 1, 2007.

Administrator Evaluation Guidelines and Survey. Committee Charter The committee shall oversee and/or conduct a periodic evaluation of University administrators.

 This policy applies to all campuses, one elementary school and one high school.  All district employed library media specialists are to adhere to the.

Comprehensive Planning 9 February Welcome! Thank you for your interest in helping to shape the future direction of the Ridley School District. Please.

Current status of Blue  Implementation of Blue is effective since October  Presentations to Colleges/Schools and Departments are currently ongoing 

27 February 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.

IN SUPPORT OF CONSISTENT FACULTY PEER REVIEW Senate Resolution S.R

“Involving University Science Faculty in the Preparation of Teachers: The Call and the Challenge of Participation ” by Philip I. Kramer College of Saint.

Effectiveness and Perceptions of a Peer Teaching Evaluation Program Lorin Sheppard, PhD Mary Kiersma, PhD, PharmD Manchester University College of Pharmacy.

1 Howard University Name: Effective Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning (ETTL) Person responsible: Dr. Folahan Ayorinde, Professor and Chair of.

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.

Course Evaluation Committee

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.

Revamping the student opinion instrument for faculty

Presentation transcript:

Survey of Current Teaching Evaluation Forms Teaching Effectiveness Committee

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Gisela Buschle-Diller (Textile Eng., Chair) John Heilman (Provost) Howard Clayton (Management) Al Fromhold (Physics) Sareen Gropper (Human Sciences) Raymond Kessler (Horticulture) Marcus Kieltyka (Library) David LaBand (Forestry) Jill Salisbury-Glennon (Educational FLT) Saralyn Smith-Carr (Vet. Medicine) Carole Johnson (Communication Disorders) Kem Krueger (Pharmacy) Scott Kramer (Building Science) Hakan Balci (graduate student) Marianne Clancy (undergraduate student) James Groccia (Biggio Center) New members in Peter Livant (Chemistry) Juliet Rumble (Library) David Weaver (Agronomy & Soils) William Boulton (Management) Kristen Helms (Pharmacy) Mert Serkan (graduate student) Virginia Planz (undergrad. student)

Survey details As a result of committee concerns, a survey was developed in February 2005 and sent to all faculty to get general campus input (via Flashlight on-line) The survey consisted of 10 questions regarding the currently used teaching evaluation forms

Focus of survey Validity of teaching questionnaire Use by administration Use by instructors

Results Response frequencies varied from 343 to 366 per question 170 additional written comments (fewer than five positive responses)

Demographics 7. Your professorial rank is: 8. Your tenure status is: Untenured 31% Tenured69% NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 364 NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 365

Responses by college NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 343

1. How confident are you that the current 8-question teaching evaluation questionnaire accurately measures teaching effectiveness? NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 365

2. To what extent do you believe that evaluations and comments written by students on evaluation questionnaires are used by AU administrators to make decisions regarding the quality of faculty teaching performance for raises, promotion and/or tenure? NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 363

3. To what extent do you believe that evaluations and comments written by students on evaluation questionnaires are used appropriately by AU administrators when evaluating faculty teaching effectiveness? In other words, are the data provided by the student evaluations used in reliable and valid ways? NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 361

4. To what extent do you believe the current student evaluation questionnaire on faculty teaching is valuable/useful in terms of helping you to improve your teaching performance independent of raise and tenure/promotion considerations? In other words, do you believe that this instrument is helpful to you in becoming a more effective teacher? NUMBER OF RESPONSES, N = 366

Essence of written comments 18 addressed the lack of or conflicting goals for teaching. 52 addressed the misuse of teaching evaluations. 16 addressed the lack of timely feedback. 51 questioned the validity of the TE form or its use. 4 felt they received positive feedback.

Summary Widespread response across the university community (response rate approx. 32%; all colleges represented) Clear majority of respondents expressed concern about the validity of the instrument and how it is being used More than 80% of the respondents do not feel the teaching evaluation form is useful for teaching improvement purposes

Survey questions How confident are you that the current 8-question teaching evaluation questionnaire accurately measures teaching effectiveness? [1 = no confidence ---6 = complete confidence] To what extent do you believe that evaluations and comments written by students on evaluation questionnaires are used by AU administrators to make decisions regarding the quality of faculty teaching performance for raises, promotion and/or tenure? [1 = do not believe at all = believe completely] To what extent do you believe that evaluations and comments written by students on evaluation questionnaires are used appropriately by AU administrators when evaluating faculty teaching effectiveness? In other words, are the data provided by the student evaluations used in reliable and valid ways. [1 = do not believe at all = believe completely] To what extent do you believe the current student evaluation questionnaire on faculty teaching is valuable/useful in terms of helping you to improve your teaching performance independent of raise and tenure/promotion considerations? In other words, do you believe that this instrument is helpful to you in becoming a more effective teacher? [1 = do not believe at all = believe completely] In your opinion, how committed is the AU administration to teaching excellence? [1 = no commitment at all = very strong commitment] In your opinion, how committed is the administration in your school/college to teaching excellence? [1 = no commitment at all = very strong commitment] Your professorial rank is: Your tenure status is: Your allocation of time to teaching is approximately: Please identify your college/school