Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Real-World Stepwise Spectral Unmixing Daniel Newland Dr. John Schott Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Error Characterization of the Alpha Residuals Emissivity Extraction Technique Michael C. Baglivio, Dr. John Schott, Scott Brown Center for Imaging Science.
Advertisements

September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Hyperspectral Image Acquisition and Analysis PECORA 15 Workshop 7 Airborne Remote Sensing: A Fast-track Approach to NEPA Streamlining for Transportation.
A Graphical Operator Framework for Signature Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery David Messinger, Ph.D. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Chester.
1 Cartography and GIS Research Group-Department of Geography 2 Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering 3 Department of Electronics and Informatics.
Image classification in natural scenes: Are a few selective spectral channels sufficient?
URBAN AREA PRODUCT SIMULATION FOR THE ENMAP HYPERSPECTRAL SENSOR P.Gamba, A. Villa, A. Plaza, J. Chanussot, J. A. Benediktsson.
A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use and Cover from LiDAR, Multi-spectral Imagery, and Ancillary Data Jason Parent Qian Lei University.
Hyperspectral image processing and analysis
Vegetation indices and the red-edge index
Soil Moisture Estimation Using Hyperspectral SWIR Imagery Poster Number IN43B-1184 D. Lewis, Institute for Technology Development, Building 1103, Suite.
Hyperspectral Imagery
Lecture 13: Spectral Mixture Analysis Wednesday 16 February 2011 Reading Ch 7.7 – 7.12 Smith et al. Vegetation in deserts (class website)
Lecture 13: Spectral Mixture Analysis Tuesday 16 February 2010 Last lecture: framework for viewing image processing and details about some standard algorithms.
Detecting Emerald Ash Borer Infestation with Hyperspectral data using Spectral Mixture Analysis Silvia Petrova Objective The objective of this project.
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Hyperspectral Environmental Monitoring of Waste Disposal Areas Jason Hamel Advisor: Rolando Raqueño Digital.
Rolando Raqueno, Advisor Credits for Winter Quarter, 2002: 2
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
Mapping Roads and other Urban Materials using Hyperspectral Data Dar Roberts, Meg Gardner, Becky Powell, Phil Dennison, Val Noronha.
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Mixed Pixels and Spectral Unmixing 1 Spectral Mixtures areal aggregate intimate Linear mixing models (areal.
Chapter 12 Spatial Sharpening of Spectral Image Data.
S CIENCE TECHNOLOGY LESSON 5. REVIEW Electromagnetic Spectrum (definition): The range of energy which contains parts or bands: visible light, infrared,
Remote Sensing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. 1. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing ► Collects image data in many narrow contiguous spectral bands through the.
TAILING MODELLED AND MEASURED SPECTRUM FOR MINE TAILING MAPPING IN TUNISIAN SEMI-ARID CONTEXT N. Mezned 1,2, S. Abdeljaouad 1, M. R. Boussema
Noise-Robust Spatial Preprocessing Prior to Endmember Extraction from Hyperspectral Data Gabriel Martín, Maciel Zortea and Antonio Plaza Hyperspectral.
Chenghai Yang 1 John Goolsby 1 James Everitt 1 Qian Du 2 1 USDA-ARS, Weslaco, Texas 2 Mississippi State University Applying Spectral Unmixing and Support.
The use of MOD09 product and in situ data in a reservoir Valério, A.M.; Kampel, M.; Stech, J.L. alineval, milton, stech COSPAR Training.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Classification & Vegetation Indices
A New Subspace Approach for Supervised Hyperspectral Image Classification Jun Li 1,2, José M. Bioucas-Dias 2 and Antonio Plaza 1 1 Hyperspectral Computing.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Fuzzy Entropy based feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data Mahesh Pal Department of Civil Engineering National Institute of Technology.
Accomplishments Conclusions Dyctiota (macroalgae), Diploria clivosa and the gorgonians show similar reflectance curves due to the zooxanthellae (unicellular.
University of Wisconsin GIFTS MURI University of Hawaii Contributions Paul G. Lucey Co-Investigator.
刘瑶.  Introduction  Method  Experiment results  Summary & future work.
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
Jonatan Gefen 28/11/2012. Outline Introduction to classification Whole Pixel Subpixel Classification Linear Unmixing Matched Filtering (partial unmixing)
Compression and Analysis of Very Large Imagery Data Sets Using Spatial Statistics James A. Shine George Mason University and US Army Topographic Engineering.
What is an image? What is an image and which image bands are “best” for visual interpretation?
Károly Róbert College The GREEN College. Remote sensing applications in disaster management Tibor Bíró dean Károly Róbert College Faculty of Natural Resources.
A Study on the Effect of Spectral Signature Enhancement in Hyperspectral Image Unmixing UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH Student: Ms. Enid Marie Alvira-Concepción.
Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions: comparing multispectral and hyperspectral observations G.P.Asner and K.B.Heidebrecht.
IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada HYPERSPECTRAL UNMIXING USING A NOVEL CONVERSION MODEL Fereidoun A. Mianji, Member, IEEE, Shuang Zhou, Member, IEEE, Ye Zhang,
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Validation of MODIS Snow Mapping Algorithm Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
Hyperspectral remote sensing
earthobs.nr.no Retraining maximum likelihood classifiers using a low-rank model Arnt-Børre Salberg Norwegian Computing Center Oslo, Norway IGARSS.
Remote Sensing Unsupervised Image Classification.
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Ruiliang Pu Center for Assessment and Monitoring of Forest and Environmental Resources Department of Environmental Science,
Review of Spectral Unmixing for Hyperspectral Imagery Lidan Miao Sept. 29, 2005.
Demosaicking for Multispectral Filter Array (MSFA)
Sub pixelclassification
Comparative Analysis of Spectral Unmixing Algorithms Lidan Miao Nov. 10, 2005.
By: Reid Swanson Sam Soper. Goal: To describe land cover/use changes that have occurred in the Twin Cities Metro-Area from the 1991 to 2005 Quantifying.
Surface Characterization 4th Annual Workshop on Hyperspectral Meteorological Science of UW MURI And Beyond Donovan Steutel Paul G. Lucey University of.
Pathik Thakkar University of Texas at Dallas
Hyperspectral Sensing – Imaging Spectroscopy
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
-Shikha Gaur (Towards course project CS539 Fall 2017)
Hyperspectral Image preprocessing
Lecture 13: Spectral Mixture Analysis
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Statistical Classification on a Multispectral Image
Igor Appel TAG LLC, Washington, USA
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Real-World Stepwise Spectral Unmixing Daniel Newland Dr. John Schott Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Center for Imaging Science May 7, 1999

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory OutlineOutline Objective Unmixing Background Data and Preparation Results Conclusions

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory ObjectiveObjective Use real data to verify a stepwise spectral unmixing routine tested only on synthetic data –Compare to traditional spectral unmixing –Compare to hierarchical spectral unmixing Hyperspectral DataMaterial Fraction Maps

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory OutlineOutline Objective Unmixing Background Data and Preparation Results Conclusions

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Operating Scenario Remote sensing by airborne or spaceborne imagers Finite flux reaching sensor causes spatial-spectral resolution trade-off Hyperspectral data has hundreds of bands of spectral information Spectrum characterization allows subpixel analysis and material identification

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Spectral Mixture Analysis Assumes reflectance from each pixel is caused by a linear mixture of subpixel materials Mixed Spectrum Example

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Mixed Pixels and Material Maps Input Image Red Fraction Map Green Fraction Map UNMIXED PURE MIXED

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory i = 1 … k Constraint Conditions Unconstrained: Partially Constrained: Fully Constrained: Traditional Linear Unmixing

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Unmixes broad material classes first Proceeds to a group’s constituents only if the unmixed fraction is greater than a given threshold Hierarchical Linear Unmixing Example Materials Hierarchy Full Library Concrete Metal Water Deciduous Trees Coniferous Trees Grass

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Stepwise Unmixing Employs linear unmixing to find fractions Uses iterative regressions to accept only the endmembers that improve a statistics-based model Shown to be superior to classic linear method –Has better accuracy –Can handle more endmembers Quantitatively tested only on synthetic data

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Performance Evaluation Compare squared error from traditional, stepwise and hierarchical methods Visually assess fraction maps for accuracy Error Metric:

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory OutlineOutline Objective Unmixing Background Data and Preparation Results Conclusions

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Data and Preparation Used HYDICE collection over the ARM site –210 bands around 10nm in width –Covers wavelengths of microns –Spatial resolution of 1.75 meters per pixel Processed original scene to generate unmixing input –Spatial averaging to form mixed pixels –Spectral subset to remove noise Constructed material library and truth map

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory HYDICE Scene Original 320 x 320 Convolved 80 x 80

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Atmospheric Attenuation

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Atmospheric Effects Band microns Road Pixel Vegetation Pixel

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Endmember Selection Endmembers are simply material types –Broad classification: road, grass, trees… –Fine classification: dry soil, moist soil... Used image-derived endmembers to produce spectral library –Average reference spectra from “pure” sample pixels –Chose 18 distinct endmembers

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Endmember Listing Strong Road Weak Road Panel 2k Panel 3k Panel 5k Panel 8k Panel 14k Panel 17k Panel 25k Spectral Panel Parking Lot Trees Strong Vegetation Medium Vegetation Weak Vegetation Strong Cut Vegetation Medium Cut Vegetation Weak Cut Vegetation False-Color IR

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Materials Hierarchy Grouped similar materials into 3-level hierarchy – Level 1 – Level 2 – Level 3

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Truth Map Creation Realistic classification required automated procedure Tested classification routines available in ENVI Chose Minimum Distance to the Mean classifier

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Truth Map False-Color IR Classified Scene

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Truth Detail Test Site Trees Parking Lot

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Tools for Analysis Data processed with ENVI and IDL Three unmixing routines written in IDL IDL support programs

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory OutlineOutline Objective Unmixing Background Data and Preparation Results Conclusions

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Truth Fraction Maps Labels Fractions

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Linear Unmixing Linear Truth

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Hierarchical Unmixing Hierarchical Truth

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Stepwise Unmixing Stepwise Truth

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Fraction Maps Material Truth Linear Hierarch. Stepwise Panel 3k Uncut Mid Vegetation Cut Weak Vegetation

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Linear Color Maps

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Hierarchical Color Maps

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Stepwise Color Maps

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Histogram Comparison Linear Hierarchical Stepwise

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Squared Error Results

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Hierarchical Results

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory OutlineOutline Objective Unmixing Background Data and Preparation Results Conclusions

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory ConclusionsConclusions Linear unmixing does poorly, forcing fractions for all materials Hierarchical approach performs better but requires extensive user involvement Stepwise routine succeeds using adaptive endmember selection without extra preparation

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Special Thanks Dr. John Schott Daisei Konno Lee Sanders Francois Alain

Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Questions?Questions? False-Color IR Stepwise Unmixed Fraction Maps