1 A Study of Highly Successful Middle Level Schools and their Principals: Leaders and Leadership Vicki N. Petzko, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Leadership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
What is Title 1?.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Commitment to Community Presented By: Susan K. Hintz, Interim Superintendent Osseo Area Schools - District #279.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
The Assistant Principal Pool Process 2014
Using the A*CENSUS Data for Benchmarking: The Case of Corporate Archives Gregory S. Hunter, Ph.D., CA, CRM Long Island University Society of American Archivists.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Perspectives on the Hispanics of Milan, Missouri Silvia Christen, Undergraduate University of Missouri, Dept of Rural Sociology.
Illinois CEE Student Survey Results Dr. Julia Melkers, Associate Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia Summary.
Selected Results from the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz Christina Madsen University of Minnesota.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Cluster Analysis on Perceived Effects of Scholarships on STEM Majors’ Commitment to Becoming Teachers versus Teaching in High Needs Schools Pey-Yan Liou.
International Workshop on Graduate Programs for Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers at Tokyo University of Science Tad Watanabe Kennesaw State University.
Chapter 2: Becoming a Teacher
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
 Self-advocacy. How do students come to understand their own learning needs? How do they learn to explain them to others?
NASDTEC Conference Portland, Oregon June 8, 2015 Innovative Collaboration for New Teacher Success Dr. Virginia (Jennie) Pilato Professor and Vice Dean,
How does the identification of students with special needs, legislation, and instructional differentiation relate to my practice and higher education students.
Reorganization of Curriculum Department 2008 – 2009 School Year.
Staff Development EDAD 5399 By Dr. Harold Smith. Texas Education Code Who is responsible? What must be taught? Who must attend? Purposes What setting.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
HERI Faculty Survey Selected IVCC Results Office of Institutional Research.
What every freshman should know! Presenters: Danita Mumphard Roxie Renner Visit: School of Education Degree Programs at SIU e What.
WELCOME TO CHATSWORTH ELEMENTARY ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING! THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, :30 AM OR 1:00 PM.
Master 4-H Volunteer Program Concept by Matthew J. Miranda County Extension Agent: 4-H and Youth Development- Guadalupe County.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Hialeah Gardens Elementary September 8, 2015 Sharon Gonzalez, Principal.
 The Pennsylvania National Agenda (PANA) committee, with the help of the Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network (PaTTAN) and the support.
EGS Research & Consulting BASELINE SURVEYS OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT CHAIR PERSONS, MATHEMATICS FACULTY AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY.
Power Point Introduction The new Oregon Diploma raises the rigor of educational requirements in order to ensure that students graduate with the skills.
The ISLLC Standards for School Leaders: A Comparison of Traditionally Certified Administrators and Administrators Certified Via Examination in California.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.
EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS EARLY ADOPTERS’ SURVEY Interpretive Summary Highlights of EWS Early Adopters Learning and Sharing Summit Survey, George W. Bush Institute,
YOUTH TRANSITION PROGRAM (YTP) PUT INTO PRACTICE Reynolds School District.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
International Association of Emergency Management Region 12 Survey Report: “Present Status and Future Trends” By IAEM Region 12 President Micheal Kemp.
Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
Reading Endorsement Program Information. Seminole County Public Schools offers the Reading Endorsement Add-on program for all teachers, regardless of.
Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.
November 16, :00pm Interactive Video Network Masters Degree/Secondary Principal Travis Jordan Oral Presentation (Planting the Seeds for Educational.
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
Agenda Brief introductions Overview of the Secondary Dual Educator Program (SDEP) Q & A with SDEPPERS Admission process & requirements Financial aid &
A Duck, is a Duck, is a Duck?: Roles of Reading Specialists Today Gilda Martinez-Alba Towson University.
General Member Survey VI Presented to: NEA West Region Field Team October 24, 2007.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended.
Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.
Superintendent Search Staff Survey Results. Questions Number of surveys sent: 4,200 (approximate) Number or responses: 533 What do you feel is the most.
Jillian Gourwitz, Ph.D. Suzanne M. Martin, Ph. D. University of Central Florida.
4.2, 4.3 How Schools are Governed. Local Governance is the basic governing unit for education. A board consists of five people, each elected for a four-year.
THE METLIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER: CHALLENGES FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP Gwendolyn Thomas Kimberly Patterson Shannon Biggs.
The ISLLC Standards for School Leaders: A Comparison of Traditionally Certified Administrators and Administrators Certified Via Examination in California.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
How Do Principal Preparation Programs in Hong Kong and Ontario Address Equity? Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
Jamie McCarthy This powerpoint will provide personal and professional information about my qualifications in regard to the TRT job position opening for.
For more course tutorials visit EDU 390 Entire Course For more course tutorials visit EDU 390 Week 1 Individual Assignment.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Leaders of Teachers (external to classroom)
Thomas Korth, Robert Girvin, Jennifer Nikkel, Allan Terry, Ryan Murphy
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY
Presentation transcript:

1 A Study of Highly Successful Middle Level Schools and their Principals: Leaders and Leadership Vicki N. Petzko, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Leadership The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga National Middle School Association Convention November, 2003; Atlanta, Georgia

2 Leaders and Leadership: Major Conclusions Principals of highly successful schools (HSS) and principals of national sample schools (NSS) are more alike than different, but… Youth is not a disadvantage Longevity counts Middle level knowledge matters Work smarter (and longer?) AND Recruit

3 We are more alike than different Assistant Principal experience (also see slide 4, 7) Certification (also see slide 5) Highest Degree Earned (also see slide 5) Teacher leadership is extensively utilized Leadership teams Team leaders Faculty as a whole Biggest roadblocks are Time District and State Mandates Funding (also see slide 21) Over 60% do not intend to be in these positions in 5 years (also see slide 23)

4 Assistant Principal: All levels (2.26) No such experience 1-3 years 4-6 years 7 or more years HSS NSS Assistant Principal: Middle Level (2.27) No middle level AP experience 1-3 years 4-6 years 7 or more years Professional Backgrounds

5 Principal Certification (2.15) K-12 Secondary Middle HSS NSS Highest Degree Earned (2.14) Master’s Degree Master’s + Educational Specialist Master’s Degree + All Coursework toward Doctorate Doctor of Education Doctor of Philosophy Professional Backgrounds

6 Youth is NOT a Disadvantage Highly successful school principals (male and female) were appointed to their first assistant principal position at a younger age than were their national sample school counterparts. Males in both groups were consistently appointed to leadership positions at a younger age than females Correspondingly, females bring more teaching experience to the Principalship than do their male counterparts.

7 Age Appointed to First Assistant Principalship (2.9) Highly Successful Schools National Sample Schools TotalMaleFemale TotalMaleFemale 24 and younger120 < <13 Not Applicable

8 Age Appointed to First Principalship (2.10) Highly Successful SchoolsNational Sample Schools TotalMaleFemaleTotalMaleFemale 24 and younger 000<

9 A Few Interesting Gender Differences In both groups, males were consistently appointed to administrative positions at a younger age than females. Female principals had taken more classes in middle education and were more likely to identify the improvement of curriculum and instruction as a reason for entering administration than were their male counterparts. 52% of the HSS principals were female, compared to 27% of the national sample.

10 Longevity Counts Principals of highly successful schools have been middle level principals for longer than have their national sample counterparts. Principals of highly successful schools have generally served as principals in their current schools for a longer period of time than their national sample counterparts.

11 Total Years as Principal TotalMaleFemaleTotalMaleFemale or more years (2.31) Highly Successful Schools National Sample Schools

12 Total Years as Middle Level Principal TotalMaleFemaleTotalMaleFemale or more years (2.32) Highly Successful Schools National Sample Schools

13 Years as Principal of Current School (2.33) Highly Successful Schools National Sample Schools TotalMaleFemaleTotalMaleFemale

14 Knowledge about Middle Level Issues Matters Although only 18% of the highly successful school principals held graduate degrees with a major in middle level education, this was 60% more than the national sample respondents (11%) (2.13) More than half (54%) of the principals in highly successful schools had taken three or more courses specific to middle level education, compared to only 29% of their national sample counterparts. (2.16) 30% of HSS principals considered “lack of knowledge among staff regarding programs for middle level students” a moderate or serious roadblock, compared to 60% of the NSS principals. (2.57)

15 Graduate Study in Middle Level Education (2.16) National Sample Schools Number of Middle Level Courses Taken TotalMaleFemale TotalMaleFemale None or to or more Highly Successful Schools

16 Principal Recommendations for the Preparation of Middle Level Principals 1 = Not Useful, 2 = Somewhat Useful, 3 = Very Useful, 4 = Essential NSS #4: Oral and Written Communication Skills (HSS #7) _________________ NSS #6: Legal Issues (HSS #13)

17 Teacher Quality Matters 90% of the HSS principals rated their classroom teachers as “EXCELLENT” (67% NSS) 83% of the HSS principals rated their special education teachers as “EXCELLENT” (62% NSS) 70% of the NSS principals rated their department chairs/team leaders as “EXCELLENT” (54% NSS) 56% of the NSS principals rated their superintendents as “EXCELLENT” (47% NSS) (2.37)

18 Principals of Highly Successful Schools Work Differently Both groups work L-O-N-G hours The principals of HSS spend their time more aligned with their priorities Principals of HSS use parents “differently”

19 Principals Self-Reported Hours for an Average Work Week Hours (2.62) Highly Successful SchoolsNational Sample Schools

20 Principals Rank Order of Time Allocation for a Typical Work Week Highly Successful SchoolsNational Sample Schools (2.63) Do Spend Should Spend Do Spend Should Spend School Management 1514 Personnel 2222 Student Activities 5636 Student Behavior 7848 Program Development 3151 Planning 4363 District Office 6979 Community 9787 Professional Development 8495

21 Largest discrepancies in perceptions of principals about roadblocks that prevent them from doing the kind of job they would like to do (see also slide #3) 3=Serious Factor 2=Moderate Factor 1=Not a Factor Highly Successful Schools National Sample Schools Inability to provide teacher time for planning and professional development Parents apathetic or irresponsible about their children Problem Students (apathetic, hostile, etc.) Resistance to change Variations in the ability and dedication of staff Lack of knowledge among staff regarding programs for middle level students (slide 14)

22 Parent/Citizen Involvement in a Specific Capacity (2.42, 2.43) Highly Successful Schools National Sample Objectives and priorities for the school 8173 Program changes and new programs being considered 7970 Student activities 7577 Finance and fund raising 7665 Volunteer tutor 7570 Volunteer aide 7180 Resource persons to programs and activities, including instruction 6961 Student behavior, rights, and responsibilities 6251 Evaluation of programs 5845 Operates concessions, etc., for benefit of the school 5770

23

24 Middle Level Principals’ Career Plans for the Next Three to Five Years (2.61) HSSNSS Remain in Current Position3938 Retirement Retire - Continue in Educational Leadership in another Retirement System Retire - Seek Position in Higher Education Retire (total) Seek a Principalship at the High School Level35 Seek a Position as a Superintendent910 Seek a Central Office Position other than Superintendent WE WILL HAVE TO REPLACE…………… 1415

25 Would You Choose Educational Administration Again? Highly Successful Schools National Sample Schools MaleFemale MaleFemale Definitely Yes Probably Yes Uncertain Probably Not Definitely Not

26 Questions or Comments? Please feel free to contact Vicki Petzko at Jerry Valentine at