Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Address Advocacy The building pressure on address data to benefit the community and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wisconsin Department of Revenue Integrated Property Assessment System (IPAS) March 3, 2006.
Advertisements

Update on Oregon’s Address Point Repository Project Bob DenOuden, GIS Framework Coordinator Dept. of Administrative Services Office of the State CIO Geospatial.
Geographic Support System (GSS) Discussion FY 2011 Update Tim Trainor February 16, 2011.
The Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I) Partnership Program Donna Bullock U.S. Census Bureau November 2,
On the Road to 2020 Census Geographic Programs Update Oregon State Data Center Annual Meeting 11/29/2012 Rick Campbell Geographer L.A. Regional Office.
Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I) Partnership Program Update for the State Data Center Leads September 19, 2012.
A-16 REAL PROPERTY THEME UPDATE June 26, Background Real Property Assets consist of buildings, land parcels, linear structures, and structures.
Synopsis of House Bill No Geographic Information Systems in Kansas Seeks to make changes to the current governance structure of geographic information.
Geographic Information Council Framework Subcommittee.
West Virginia Legislative Redistricting Office Building 1, Room MB Kanawha Blvd., East Charleston, West Virginia
The use of GIS in the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Namibia By Mrs Ottilie M Mwazi Chief Statistician, Survey, Cartography/GIS
IURC Digital Mapping Update Electric Utilities Task Force April 6, 2004.
WHO ARE WE? The Alabama Association of Regional Councils (AARC) is composed of twelve regions. Each regional planning council is a public organization.
IRS XML Standards & Tax Return Data Strategy For External Discussion June 30, 2010.
MAF Update Plans and The Proposed FY2011 Geographic Support System Initiative Tim Trainor Chief, Geography Division.
1 Overview of Fulton County GIS Address Model Carl Anderson Fulton County GIS.
Using Digital Flood Hazard Data in the National Flood Insurance Program FGDC Coordination Working Group Scott McAfee Paul Rooney April 5 th, 2005.
The United States Thoroughfare, Landmark and Postal Address Data Standard Presentation to: FGDC Coordination Group By URISA International March 16, 2010.
Building Quality Address Data: A Census Bureau Perspective Rocket City Geospatial Conference Huntsville, AL November 16, 2011.
U.S. Census Bureau Geography Division Programs Presentation to the Indiana Government Geospatial Coordinator Forum September 20, 2012.
1 Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS) Laura Waggoner Legal Areas Team Lead Boundary and Annexation Survey Project Manager Michael Clements Geographer.
Second High Level Forum on GGIM Seminar on Regional Cooperation in Geospatial Information Management Doha, Qatar, 7 February 2013 Overview on Geospatial.
FGDC Standards Process Review Survey Results Summary Julie Binder Maitra FGDC Standards Coordinator April 13, 2010 Coordination.
Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Technical Workshop 2013 Esri International User Conference July 8–12, 2013 | San Diego, California ArcGIS for Local Government.
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
US Census Bureau West Virginia GIS Conference June 2 – June 5, 2014 Anne Jeffers Geographer 1.
Ref: Geographic Information System and Science, By Hoeung Rathsokha, MSCIM GIS and Remote Sensing WHAT.
September 18-19, 2006 – Denver, Colorado Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as.
The City of Fargo Master Address File Project. Discovering what the heck is out there? The City of Fargo is currently developing a comprehensive, standardized,
Michael Byrne Geographic Information Officer National Broadband Map Update.
The State of Kansas Data Access and Support Center (DASC)
Feasibility Study of Integrating WVDOT LRS Centerline With Statewide Addressing And Mapping Data.
Building Blocks The process of creating decennial census tabulation blocks. GeoElections User’s Conference October 6 th, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
Geographic Support System Initiative
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands.
A collaborative partnership between the State of Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division (KDOR/PVD), the Kansas GIS Policy Board’s Data.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
FGDC Address Standard Update: What's Next? Address Standard Working Group Martha Wells, GISP Carl Anderson, GISP Sara Yurman, GISP Ed Wells, GISP Hilary.
“Everyone Counts” But Can Everyone Be Counted? Why the MAF/Tiger can make or break the 2010 Census for Indiana A presentation to the Indiana GIS Conference.
A collaborative partnership between the State of Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division (KDOR/PVD), the Kansas GIS Policy Board’s Data.
The Digital National Framework of Great Britain GSDI 6 Conference - From Global to local September 16-19th 2002 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY.
New River Valley Emergency Communications Regional Authority
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The National Map Digital Mapping Techniques Workshop Columbus, Ohio June 12, 2006 Charles Hickman.
Use of Administrative Data Seminar on Developing a Programme on Integrated Statistics in support of the Implementation of the SNA for CARICOM countries.
2004 Annual Report Summary. 2 Summary of Responses.
WLIA Emergency Management Task Force. Introduction ► Video Presentation ► Purpose ► History  How EMTF was started  11 meetings in 13 months ► Tasks.
LAND POLICY AND LAND ADMINISTRATION Mark Marquardt Best Practices for Land Tenure and Natural Resource Governance in Africa October 2012.
…..Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division – Kansas GIS Policy Board - DASC ….. Statewide Tax Units Database A collaborative partnership.
Oregon’s Address Point Data Repository Project Cy Smith, State Geospatial Information Officer Dept. of Administrative Services Office of the State CIO.
The FGDC and Metadata. To maintain an organization's internal investment in geospatial data To provide information about an organization's data holdings.
OIT/ESS/GISSC 5/2007 OHIO LOCATION BASED RESPONSE SYSTEM Program Sponsor Ohio Department of Transportation Program Administrator Ohio Office of Information.
VBMP RCL Workshop: Using VDOT Data November 4, 2015.
Case Study: Franklin County, Ohio Location Based Response System (LBRS) Project Presented by: Transmap ® Corporation Ohio GIS Conference 2009.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange Pilot Project Promoting Geospatial Data Exchange Between EPA and State Partners. April 25, 2007.
Jessica D. Perkins GIS Programmer Analyst 2 Geospatial Transportation Information Section Program Planning & Administration Division of Highways West Virginia.
Address Points in Oregon Milt Hill Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office.
U.S. Census Data & TIGER/Line Files
Road Information System / Road Data Bank 10 April 2013 Lars Bergman M. Sc. In Civil Engineering Long Term Planning Swedish Transport Administration.
Presentation to the UN Experts Group Meeting UNSD 29 May - 1 June 2007 Alister Nairn Director - Geography Section GIS BASED CENSUS MAPPING APPROACHES -
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTATÍSTICA Census 2011 Mapping Portuguese Process United Nations EGM on Contemporary Practices in Census Mapping and Use of GIS.
Report on the Need for a National Address Database National Geospatial Advisory Committee National Address Database Subcommittee NGAC Web Meeting December.
Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.
FGDC Address Data Standard Scope, Status, and Structure  United States Street, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard"  Scope: Street, landmark,
Overview of Draft U.S. Address Data Standard Martha McCart Wells, GISPSpatial Focus, Inc. Ed Wells, GISPWMATA Carl Anderson, GISPFulton County, GA Sara.
Overview of the FGDC U.S. Address Data Standard Martha McCart Wells, GISPSpatial Focus, Inc. Ed Wells, GISPWMATA Carl Anderson, GISPSpatial Focus, Inc.
Developing a Comprehensive Address Data Standard for the United States U.S. Address Standard Working Group: Martha McCart Wells, GISP, Spatial Focus Inc.
The Geographic Support System Initiative (GSSI)
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
2020 Census Local Update of Census Addresses Operation (LUCA)
Presentation transcript:

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Address Advocacy The building pressure on address data to benefit the community and economy.

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Confidence Map Many items in this presentation are flagged to indicate a measure of confidence, accessibility or success. High confidence Caution Low Confidence

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office The Address Data Universe

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Local Address Coordination

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Where Am I ? The consumer has many tools and ways to identify their location. – By reference of known locations – Online maps, apps and widgets – Device and hand held GPS – Navigation devices Both high confidence and high accessibility Addresses serve as the common search string Most map to an address range or assumed location Open Street Map

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Where are they? uploads/2011/06/confused-baby.bmp US Census USPS State Local US Code Title 13 US Code Title 39 Local Building, Planning, & Tax Offices AMS

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Standards United States Thoroughfare, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard Final Address Standard Endorsed by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) – July 2011 Approved by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) – April 2011 Publication 28 - Postal Addressing Standards NENA Standards & Recommendations URISA: FGDC:

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office FGDC Standard Objectives The United States Thoroughfare, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard has been created to: Provide one standard that meets the diverse address data management requirements for local address administration, postal and package delivery, emergency response (and navigation generally), administrative recordkeeping, and address data aggregation Support the use of best practices in address data management Provide a systematic, consistent basis for recording all addresses in the United States Define the elements needed to compose addresses and store them within relational databases and geographic information systems Introduce the idea of the address reference system… Support seamless exchange of address information, and foster consistent implementation of this standard, by defining XML models for every address element, attribute, and class, integrated into a single XML Schema Document Recognize, as a practical matter, that different business purposes and different data sources will require different levels of complexity in address data records, files and repositories Build on USPS Publication 28, the Census Bureau TIGER files… Document number FGDC-STD Maintenance authority U.S. Census Bureau

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Definition of an “Address” This standard proposes a new definition of “address:” An address specifies a location by reference to a thoroughfare or a landmark; or it specifies a point of postal delivery. This definition differentiates addressing from the two other types of spatial referencing systems, coordinate reference systems and linear reference systems. The difference rests, not on what the systems locate, but on what they refer to in order to specify a location. Document number FGDC-STD

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office FGDC: types of addresses The Address Data Classification part of the standard classifies all US addresses into a simple, complete taxonomy of ten US address classes. The ten address classes are organized into three groups, plus a catch-all general class. Thoroughfare Classes. Thoroughfare addresses specify a location by reference to a thoroughfare. Landmark Classes. Landmark addresses specify a location by reference to a named landmark. Postal Delivery Classes. Postal delivery addresses specify points of postal delivery that have no definite relation to the location of the recipient, such as a post office box, rural route box, overseas military address, or general delivery office. The USPS specifies each class in detail in USPS Publication 28. General Class. The General Address Class is for files that hold addresses from various classes, and for addresses (such as foreign addresses) that might not fit in any of the thoroughfare, landmark, or postal delivery classes. 1. Numbered Thoroughfare Address ("123 Main Street") 2. Intersection Address ("Fifth Avenue and Main Street") 3. Two Number Address Range (" West Green Street") 4. Four Number Address Range (" , Milton Street") 5. Unnumbered Thoroughfare Address ("Forest Service Road 698") 1. Landmark Address ("Statue of Liberty") 2. Community Address ("123 University of Alabama") USPSPostal Delivery Box ("PO Box 16953") USPSPostal Delivery Route ("RR 1, Box 100") USPSGeneral Delivery Office ("General Delivery") Document number FGDC-STD

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office PSU Online: GEOG 482 After MAF/TIGER Modernization If TIGER had included accurate coordinate locations for every household, and correspondingly accurate streets and administrative boundaries, geocoding census data would be simple and less error-prone. Many local governments digitize locations of individual housing units when they build GIS land bases for property tax assessment, E-911 dispatch and other purposes. The MAF/TIGER modernization project begun in 2002 aimed to accomplish this for the entire nationwide TIGER database in time for the 2010 census. The illustration below shows the intended result of the modernization project, including properly aligned streets, shorelines, and individual household locations, shown here in relation to an orthorectified aerial image. Intended accuracy and completeness of modernized TIGER data in relation to the real world. TIGER streets (yellow), shorelines (blue), and housing unit locations (red) are superimposed over an orthorectified aerial image. (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.). National coverage of housing unit locations and geometrically-accurate streets and other features were not available in 2000 or before.

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Addressing Coordination Issues The Vision There will be a continuously updated, nationwide, publicly available address dataset, complete with geographic coordinates, that meets the needs of all stakeholders. The Need Addresses are used for essential government services, as well as by businesses and individuals in order to connect with others. The Ideal System A national system of addresses should be created with government and the private sector each playing their part. This system should provide data seamlessly to those who need it for issues that cross political boundaries. This would result in many life- and cost-saving benefits.

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Addressing Coordination Issues Current System is Fractured Addresses are created by local Address Authorities, usually a city or town, but sometimes the county. The new address information is provided to the owner and distributed to other organizations who need it, including various city and county offices, the US Postal Service, the phone company, other utilities, the school district, and the authority. From that point, each of these offices is responsible for maintaining its own address file. Weaknesses of such a system include: No recognized standard for address data No central, authoritative database Agency databases diverge over time No feedback loop to address authority or other stakeholders Inconsistent delivery of new addresses to stakeholders Spotty capture of geographic coordinates

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Addressing Coordination Issues The Ideal System The ideal role played by each is outlined below: 1. Local Government Address Authorities – Cities and Counties Use best practices, including standards, for assigning and disseminating data about new addresses Each maintains an authoritative database of their own addresses All departments draw from that database and provide feedback on changes Submit updated address information to the regional custodian Benefit: Saves resources; Local entities gain value from standard database that minimizes redundancy and error 2. Counties or authorities serve as the regional custodians of the data. Maintain an address database that includes information from all address authorities within their region Receive updates from address authorities and verify the quality of that information Distribute address and coordinate data free of charge to the public and all participants Benefit: Gains access to current, reliable data for internal use and trust from local governments by providing data service

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Addressing Coordination Issues The Ideal System The ideal role played by each is outlined below: 3. States provide statewide coordination and support to counties and authorities Provide a central website for accessing address data from regional custodians: counties and authorities Provide training, technical guidance and standards to counties and authorities Serve as a backup system for the regional systems Fill gaps by helping small and less affluent places fulfill their role Provide matching grants to local government to develop their systems Benefit: States gain ability to access data for internal purposes; e.g., sales tax management and medical benefits 4. Federal government U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Homeland Security, and others are able to access and use data nationwide in a standard format (e.g. Lat/Long and U.S. National Grid coordinates) U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Postal Service send notice of address data inconsistency to state and local governments whenever they are found. Note: U.S. Census Bureau is currently unable to participate because of Title 13 U.S. Census Bureau is able to release geographic coordinate data, saving local government the expense of collecting that information. Access to coordinate data is also restricted by Title 13 Benefit: Federal government saves money and has access to current and accurate local data

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Addressing Coordination Issues The Ideal System The ideal role played by each is outlined below: 5. Private sector Assists with local implementation and maintenance on a fee for service basis Provides technical resources for each level of government to fulfill its role Provides business services for the aggregation, maintenance, and use of address data in government and the private sector Uses nation-wide address data to develop new products and services to meet the needs of citizens, government, and the private sector Benefit: Cheaper, better, and quicker for local government

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Sharing Addresses Online Open to anyone Simple interface One feature at a time Edit attributes Peer reviewed

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Sharing Addresses Online OSM OpenStreetMap Open to anyone Rich interface One feature at a time Edit attributes Peer reviewed Edits instantly available Export features

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Sharing Addresses Online Open to anyone Enhanced OSM interface One feature at a time Edit attributes Peer reviewed Edits instantly available

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Partnerships Partnerships can be simple. Always appreciate what is shared. Never add requirements. What’s Returned Processed files will contain the following: Matched, standardized addresses No Match list Congressional variances County variances Missing and Invalid Secondary files

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office Barometer The next generation of consumer devices will include a barometer. Used with additional sensors to sense your location in 3 dimensions. This will usher in a new set of attributes and business needs. BMP180 target applications Indoor navigation GPS-enhancement for dead-reckoning, slope detection, etc. Sport devices, e.g. altitude profile Weather forecast Vertical velocity indication (rise/sink speed) High relative accuracy of +/-0.12 hPa (+/-1m)

Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office THANK YOU Michael A Vanhook Senior GIS Coordinator Alabama Dept. Finance Information Services Division Geospatial Office