The Development of Fluidised Powder Target Technology for a Neutrino Factory or Muon Collider Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham, Peter Loveridge Rutherford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP2: Targets Proposed Outline Work Programme Chris Densham.
Advertisements

A Study of Mechanical and Magnetic Issues for a Prototype Positron Source Target The positron source for the International Linear Collider (ILC) comprises.
Fluidised Powder Rig Development Work by: Ottone Caretta, Peter Loveridge and Chris Denham (RAL) Tom Davies (Exeter University) Richard Woods (Gericke.
Proposal for a programme of Neutrino Factory research and development WP-3 The Target The Neutrino Factory Target Lead Author - J R J Bennett CCLRC, RAL.
UKHPT Proposal for continuation of generic high power target studies Rob Edgecock (Huddersfield & STFC) on behalf of the UK High Power Target Group (UKHPT)
Ottone Caretta & Chris Densham Technology Business Unit Rutherford Appleton Laboratory A new idea for NuFact targets and beam dumps BENE Nov 06 – Frascati,
Fluidised Powder Rig Developments Work by: Chris Densham, Peter Loveridge & Ottone Caretta (RAL) Tom Davies (Exeter University) Richard Woods (Gericke.
Mercury Beam Dump Simulations Tristan Davenne Ottone Caretta STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK November-2008.
Fluidised powder target research A potential target technology for both a Superbeam and a neutrino factory CJ Densham, O Caretta, P Loveridge STFC Rutherford.
Fluidised powder as a new target technology: COMMISSIONING OF A NEW RIG Work by Chris Densham, Peter Loveridge & Ottone Caretta (RAL), Tom Davies (Exeter.
A Neutrino Factory Target Station Design based on Solid Targets J. R. J. Bennett STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science.
Chris Densham RAL High Power Targets Group To be a ‘one-stop shop’ (P. Hurh) for target technology Enable optimum physics performance via sound engineering.
Solid Targets for the Neutrino Factory J R J Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
R.Valbuena NBI March 2002 CNGS Decay Pipe Entrance Window Structural and Thermal Analysis A.Benechet, P.Cupial, R.Valbuena CERN-EST-ME.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 11 Mar 2009 Neutrino Factory Cryostat 1 Concept V.B. Graves MERIT Videoconference.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
T2K Target & Secondary Beamline - progress towards a neutrino Superbeam? Chris Densham.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Solid Target Studies in the UK Solid Target Studies in the UK Rob Edgecock On behalf of: J.Back, E.Bayham, R.Bennett, S.Brooks R.Brownsword, O.Caretta,
Solid Target Studies for NF Solid Target Studies for NF Rob Edgecock 22 Sept On behalf of: J.Back, R.Bennett, S.Gray, A.McFarland, P.Loveridge &
K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.
Mercury Beam Dump Simulations Tristan Davenne Ottone Caretta Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 1 st joint meeting of EUROnu WP2 (Superbeam)
Mercury Beam Dump Simulations Tristan Davenne Ottone Caretta STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 2 nd Princeton-Oxford High Power Target Meeting 6-7.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.
Fluidised powder as a new target technology: The new rig is ready for take off! Work by Chris Denham, Peter Loveridge & Ottone Caretta (RAL), Tom Davies.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Target Options for a Neutrino Factory Chris Densham, Otto Caretta, Tristan Davenne, Mike Fitton, Peter Loveridge, Matt Rooney Sept. 20, 2011.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
UKHPT Proposal for continuation of generic high power target studies Rob Edgecock (Huddersfield & STFC) on behalf of the UK High Power Target Group (UKHPT)
-Fact 99 cdj Experiments with liquid jets C.Johnson CERN History CERN Mercury Jet Target - version 1985 Muon Collider Collaboration Targetry Workshops.
A powder jet target for a Neutrino Factory Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham (RAL), Tom Davies (Exeter University), Richard Woods (Gericke Ltd)
Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation Workshop at Fermilab
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
Initiatives in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon. OX11 0QX, UK.
1 Simulations of Tungsten Powder Experiment at HiRadMat CERN Tristan Davenne, Peter Loveridge, Joe O’Dell, Otto Caretta, Mike Fitton & Chris Densham (High.
T2K Secondary Beamline – Status of RAL Contributions Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Vishal Francis, Matt Rooney, Mike Woodward, Martin Baldwin, Dave Wark.
Summary Why consider a packed bed as a high power target?
Cavitation Models Roman Samulyak, Yarema Prykarpatskyy Center for Data Intensive Computing Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy
Initiative in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
High flux heat transfer in a target environment T.Davenne High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Science and Technology Facilities Council.
Contents Beam Dump Work Program submitted to UK funding agencies Motivation to study pressure waves Progress so Far -Energy Deposition -Pressure wave calculation.
Powder jet targets for Neutrino Facilities Ottone Caretta, Tristan Davenne, Chris Densham (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory), Richard Woods (Gericke Ltd),
Investigation of a “Pencil Shaped” Solid Target Peter Loveridge, Mike Fitton, Ottone Caretta High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.
Tungsten Powder Jet Update Ottone Caretta STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 2 nd Princeton-Oxford High Power Target Meeting 6-7 November-2008.
Superbeam target work at RAL Work by: Ottone Caretta, Tristan Davenne, Peter Loveridge, Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Matt Rooney (RAL) EURONu collaborators:
BENE/CARE Frascati November 2006 CJ Densham CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Solid target studies in UK for T2K and for a neutrino factory JRJ.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Shock Tests on Tantalum and Tungsten J. R. J. Bennett, S. Brooks, R. Brownsword, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, S. Gray, A. McFarland, G. Skoro and D. Wilkins.
HIGH POWER TARGETS AND MACHINE/DETECTOR INTERFACE WORKING GROUP SUMMARY REPORT PASI 2012 Workshop, 1/14/12 Co-conveners: C. Densham, P. Hurh, J. Thomas,
ESSnuSB Target Chris Densham, Tristan Davenne STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 26 th May 2014.
ENG/BENE, ENG Plenary, 16 March 2005 The New UK Programme for Shock Studies J R J Bennett RAL.
HPT & M/D I WG DISCUSSION SLIDES PASI 2012 Hurh et al.
The Development of Fluidised Powder Target Technology for a Neutrino Factory, Muon Collider or Superbeam Chris Densham Ottone Caretta, Peter Loveridge.
Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment Overview
Targets Neutrino Factory J. R. J. Bennett
Skeleton contributions to targets section
Tungsten Powder Test at HiRadMat Scientific Motivation
Peter Loveridge High Power Targets Group
WP2 (SuperBeam) Targets Status of Work Programme
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Work by Chris Densham, Peter Loveridge & Ottone Caretta (RAL),
Presentation transcript:

The Development of Fluidised Powder Target Technology for a Neutrino Factory or Muon Collider Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham, Peter Loveridge Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 22 September 2010

Open jets Moving Segmented Pebble bed Monolithic Contained liquids SOLIDS LIQUIDS Looking for the ‘Goldilocks’ target technology Too bendy?

Open jets Moving Segmented Pebble bed Monolithic Contained liquids SOLIDS LIQUIDS Looking for the ‘Goldilocks’ target technology Too bendy? Too complicated?

Open jets Moving Segmented Pebble bed Monolithic Contained liquids SOLIDS LIQUIDS Looking for the ‘Goldilocks’ target technology Too bendy? Too complicated? Too cavitated?

Open jets Moving Segmented Pebble bed Monolithic Contained liquids SOLIDS LIQUIDS Looking for the ‘Goldilocks’ target technology Too bendy? Too complicated? Too cavitated? Too messy?

Open jets Moving Segmented Pebble bed Monolithic Contained liquids SOLIDS LIQUIDS Fluidised powder Looking for the ‘Goldilocks’ target technology Not too solid and not too liquid: Just Right?

Fluidised powder target propaganda Shock waves –Material is already broken – intrinsically damage proof –No cavitation, splashing or jets as for liquids –high power densities can be absorbed without material damage –Shock waves constrained within material grains, c.f. sand bags used to absorb impact of bullets Heat transfer –High heat transfer both within bulk material and with pipe walls - so the bed can dissipate high energy densities, high total power, and multiple beam pulses Quasi-liquid –Target material continually reformed –Can be pumped away, cooled externally & re-circulated –Material easily replenished Other –Can exclude moving parts from beam interaction area –Low eddy currents i.e. low interaction with NF solenoid field –Fluidised beds/jets are a mature technology –Most issues of concern can be tested off-line -> experimental programme

Questions for the experimental programme Can a dense material such as tungsten powder be made to flow? Is tungsten powder fluidisable (it is much heavier than any material studied in the literature)? Is it possible to generate a useful fluidised powder geometry? Is it possible to convey it –in the dense phase? –in the lean phase? –In a stable mode? What solid fraction is it possible to achieve? (a typical loading fraction of 90% w/w solid to air ratio is not good enough!) How does a dense powder jet behave? Difficult to model bulk powder behaviour analytically Physical test programme underway: –First results March 2009

Test rig at RAL Powder –Rig contains 100 kg Tungsten –Particle size < 250 microns Total ~10,000 kg powder conveyed so far –> 100 ejection cycles –Equivalent to 20 mins continuous operation Batch mode –Tests individual handling processes before moving to a continuous flow loop

1 1. Suction / Lift Summary of Operation

Suction / Lift 2. Load Hopper Summary of Operation

Suction / Lift 2. Load Hopper 3. Pressurise Hopper Summary of Operation

Suction / Lift 2. Load Hopper 3. Pressurise Hopper 4. Powder Ejection and Observation

Control Interface (GUI) Fully automated control system –Process control –Data 20 Hz –Hard-wired safety interlocks Control System Interface (MATLAB) Experiment notes System indicator window Warning messages Emergency stop Suction settings Ejection settings

Le jet d’W

Contained stable flow Contained unstable flow

Particle Image Velocimetry velocity distribution required to determine bulk density Ottone Caretta, Oxford, Nov 09

Variations in the flow rate – typical 2bar ejection How much material would a proton beam interact with? Bulk density? Is the amount of material in the nozzle (or jet) constant?

Erosion Monitoring Expect rig lifetime to be limited by wear Wall thickness monitoring: –Dense-phase hopper / nozzle No damage –Lean-phase suction pipework Straight vertical lift to avoid erosion –Deflector plates So far so good Design to avoid erosion problems is critical –Lean phase optimisation ( ↓ u, ↑ ρ) –Avoid lean-phase bends –Operate without discharge valve –Replace deflector plate with powder/powder impact Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge Selected Material Hardness Values

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes D. Lean Phase Low fraction of solid material High velocity = erosion! Used in vacuum recirculation line Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes D. Lean Phase Low fraction of solid material High velocity = erosion! Used in vacuum recirculation line Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure C. Continuous Dense Phase Pipeline part full of material Stable continuous flow Intermediate velocity

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes C. Continuous Dense Phase D. Lean Phase 2.1 bar Run 57 Low fraction of solid material High velocity = erosion! Used in vacuum recirculation line Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes B. Discontinuous Dense Phase C. Continuous Dense Phase D. Lean Phase 2.1 bar Run 57 Low fraction of solid material High velocity = erosion! Used in vacuum recirculation line Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure Pipeline almost full of material Unstable “plug flow” Intermediate velocity

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes 1.9 bar Run 56 B. Discontinuous Dense Phase C. Continuous Dense Phase D. Lean Phase 2.1 bar Run 57 Low fraction of solid material High velocity = erosion! Used in vacuum recirculation line Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure

Pneumatic Conveying Regimes 1.9 bar Run 56 A. Solid Dense Phase B. Discontinuous Dense Phase C. Continuous Dense Phase D. Lean Phase Pipeline full of material, 50% v/v Low velocity Not yet achieved in our rig – further work 2.1 bar Run 57 Low fraction of solid material High velocity = erosion! Used in vacuum recirculation line Low Velocity High Velocity Increasing Driver Pressure

A Flowing Powder Target Layout Sketch c ompatible with either solenoid or magnetic horn Potential powder target materials –Tungsten (W), ρ solid 19.3 g/cc –Titanium? (Ti), ρ solid 4.5 g/cc –Nickel (Ni), ρ solid 8.9 g/cc –Titanium Oxide (TiO 2 ), ρ solid 4.2 g/cc Schematic layout of a flowing powder superbeam target

Flowability of tungsten powder –Excellent flow characteristics within pipes –Can form coherent, stable, dense open jet (c.10 kg/s for 2cm dia) –Density fraction of 42% ± 5% achieved ~ static bulk powder density Recirculation –Gas lift works for tungsten powder (so far c. 2.5 kg/s, 4 x slower than discharge rate. –NB this is equal to discharge rate for new baseline 1 cm diameter target at 10 m/s) Both contained and open powder jets are feasible A number of different flow regimes identified Design to mitigate wear issues is important for useful plant life – so far so good. No wear observed in any glass tubes used for discharge pipe tests Flowing powder target: interim conclusions

Optimise gas lift system for future CW operation Attempt to generate stable solid dense phase flow Investigate low-flow limit Carry out long term erosion tests and study mitigation Study heat transfer between pipe wall and powder Demonstrate magnetic fields/eddy currents are not a problem –Use of high field solenoid? Investigate active powder handling issues (cf mercury?) Demonstrate interaction with pulsed proton beam does not cause a problem –Application to use HiRadMat facility at CERN has been submitted Flowing powder target: future work

Input to the IDR 1.O. Caretta and C.J. Densham, RAL, OX11 0QX, UK; T.W. Davies, Engineering Department, University of Exeter, UK; R. Woods, Gericke Ltd, Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 7DJ, UK, PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTS ON A FLUIDISED POWDER TARGET, Proceedings of EPAC08, Genoa, Italy, WEPP161 2.C.J.Densham, O.Caretta, P.Loveridge, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, UK; T.W.Davies, University of Exeter, UK; R.Woods, Gericke Ltd, Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 7DJ, UK THE POTENTIAL OF FLUIDISED POWDER TARGET TECHNOLOGY IN HIGH POWER ACCELERATOR FACILITIES Proceedings of PAC09, Vancouver, BC, Canada WE1GRC04 3.TW Davies, O Caretta, CJ Densham, R Woods, THE PRODUCTION AND ANATOMY OF A TUNGSTEN POWDER JET, Powder Technology 201 (2010)

And Finally *Live* demonstration of tungsten power jet today in R12 at 3:30 today