Trickle Injection Overview Background Injection is necessary to refill beam “buckets” which have lost charge. A particular bucket is targeted for each.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operating the Harmonizer
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Chem. 133 – 2/19 Lecture. Announcements Lab Work –Turn in Electronics Lab –Starting Set 2 HW1.2 Due Today Quiz 2 Today Today’s Lecture –Noise –Electrochemistry.
ESS Timing System Plans and Requirements Timo Korhonen Chief Engineer, Integrated Control System Division May 19, 2014.
ICS Test Environment Alexander Söderqvist Dec 9, 2014.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.
Target Monitoring and Control Current status DAQ card – NI 6254 Analog/Digital card Problems with Linux version drivers Currently reading up to 12 channels.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Target Test Report Given permission for a maximum of 5000 actuations. Performed 3679 actuations, 3654 with the gate valve open. Ran target at 0.4 Hz to.
M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.
MDI meeting, Nov First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
ISIS Beam Protection System and MICE operation. Dean Adams 29 Nov 07 Presented by Chris Rogers.
30. Nov I.Will, G. Klemz, Max Born Institute: Optical sampling system Optical sampling system for detailed measurement of the longitudinal pulse.
Hydrogen Recombination Time (µs) RF Envelope (V) Here So We get Calculated from # of protons per bunch Calculated from energy loss (voltage drop) in the.
ORNL-SNS Diagnostic Group SNS Beam Loss Monitors and HARPs Machine Protection System FDR September 11,2001 Presented by Saeed Assadi.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
SNS Integrated Control System SNS Timing Master LA-UR Eric Bjorklund.
MDI meeting, March 19, 2004 Categorizing radiation aborts Livio Piemontese When something really bad happens to the beams, they are aborted. An optimized.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
Laboratory 9: Electronic Filters. Overview Objectives Background Materials Procedure Report / Presentation Closing.
‘Dude where's my muon?’ Trigger Efficiency of the Single Station. Edward Overton 1.
8114A Overview. 8114A Overview 10-Feb-04 Page A Overview 1) Specifications and Applications 2) Operational Overview 3) Block Diagram.
Timing Requirements for Spallation Neutron Sources Timing system clock synchronized to the storage ring’s revolution frequency. –LANSCE: MHz.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Fast Fault Finder A Machine Protection Component.
Laboratory 10: Electronic Filters. Overview  Objectives  Background  Materials  Procedure  Report / Presentation  Closing.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
SVTRAD Upgrades M. Bruinsma1Sept. 22nd 2003 SVTRAD Upgrades M. Bruinsma September 22, 2003 Background Workshop, SLAC Motivation.
BIC Issues Alan Fisher PEP-II Run-4 Post-Mortem Workshop 2004 August 4–5.
Wednesday ● 02h04: Stable beams # b x 121b. – Peak luminosity 1.2e25 cm-2 s-1 ● 08h32: Beams dumped on request. – Length=6h28. Rampdown.
PEP Run 4 Post-run Review Operations Issues M. Stanek 5-Aug-2004.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,
1 What I did last year Nick Barlow Manchester Christmas meeting January 2005.
Nuclear Phase Transition Diagram Mar RHIC Monday Meeting T. Satogata DOE NSAC Long Range Plan … a whole page! (one out of 14)
Fuji Test Beam Line commissioning Y.Sudo Univ. of Tsukuba.
M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.
Chem. 133 – 2/18 Lecture. Announcements Homework Set 1.2 (bold problems) – due today Quiz 2 Today Electronics Lab Reports – due Tuesday Seminar this Friday.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –
MD377 Schottky diagnostic M. Wendt, M. Betz, T. Lefevre.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
Results of the 2007 BLM hardware tests in LSS5
News from J-PARC: the system, the data and the simulation code
2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium (NSS)
Top-Up Injection Schemes
Spectral methods for measurement of longitudinal beam profile
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
SuperB LNF meeting March 21st 2012 Marcello Piccolo
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
Trickle Background Investigation
Friday :00 machine setup for luminosity run. Better b-to-b stability from injectors. 01:58 stable run with 228 bunches 11:00 luminosity leveling.
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
Radiation Abort Policy
DIRC Background Status
Long term projections summary
Background characterization: MD plan
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
Beam Tests data vs Matlab simulations
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Presentation transcript:

Trickle Injection Overview Background Injection is necessary to refill beam “buckets” which have lost charge. A particular bucket is targeted for each injection shot. MCC operators limit the maximum trickle rate – typically 20Hz total. The machine is capable of 30Hz injection. The amount of charge in an injected bunch, the “quanta”, is selectable per injection shot. The “BIC” is capable of requesting any of 4 quanta, but typically only 2 are setup for use (one 20% the charge of the other). Trickle is done with the smaller quanta. Different quanta require different tuning in the injection line. M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007

Monitoring BaBar is signalled before each injection shot to allow monitoring. Injection quality is monitored in two ways: SVT exposure per injection shot Triggers generated by each injection shot Triggers dropped (“deadtime”) M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007

PulseNoise+BGPulseNoise+BG SVTRAD Injection Monitoring Logic 1.Receive Injection Pulse Signal 2.Integrate Pulse 3.Integrate Noise + Stable Beam BackGround 4.Dose = Pulse – (Noise + BG) 5.EPICS Variables: Max Dose : Avg Dose : # Injection Pulses (Max Dose Over 2 Seconds, Average Dose Over 2 Seconds) HER/LER Injection Pulse Signal from PEP End Injection Pulse / Begin Noise + BG End Noise + BG Time  Rad Variable Width Pulse/Noise+BG Windows (Limited by Injection Rate) S. Curry 4

SVT:FE:BG:MID_AVGINJDOSEPEP SVT:FE:BG:MID_MAXINJDOSE (FE:FW / TOP:MID:BTM) EPICS Variables: Max Dose and Avg Dose every 2 seconds S. Curry 15

LER Injection Monitoring Summary Yellow – Max Inj Dose above 1 mRad Red – Max Inj Dose above 5 mRad Black – Max Inj Dose above 50 mRad (SVT Configuration Losses) S. Curry 13

Injection- & trickle- background history Monitor by integrating SVTRAD diode signals over 12 ms after each injection SVT electronics are sometimes “upset” by exposures greater than 50 mrad / injection. HER injection-quality monitor LER LER injection-quality monitor Average Dose/Injection (mrad) M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007

Most often see backgrounds extending out this side Triggers Generated Per Injection Shot

HER Trickle Quality “1M” Triggers / HER Injection typically large dose data quality (Hint of ~360 Hz structure) May 31, 2006 Stored beam background level Large long-time component Longitudinal Frequency (energy ↔ time) May 31, 2006 M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007

Monitor using triggers gated around the passing of the injected bunch (1  s x 15 ms) Injection contaminates the BaBar physics data sample if backgrounds endure too long HER injection-quality monitor LER LER injection-quality monitor Injection- & trickle- background history Triggers/Injection M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007

Deadtime associated with HER injection JAS Plots L1 inhibit windows chosen to maximize livetime. Optimal when deadtime ~ 12% at end of inhibit window (3.75ms) All recorded triggers Shows L1 inhibit window and “sampling” triggers. Verifies that L1 hardware is working. M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007

Some numbers: Hardware filter window (maintain DAQ livetime) 0.54 ms / inj = 0.054% * r (Hz) Physics filter window (maintain DQ) 2.79 ms / inj = 0.28% * r (Hz) HER ms / inj = 0.19% * r (Hz) LER Calibration filter window 30 ms / inj = 3.0% * r (Hz) Injection rates are typically 5-10 Hz. Occasional periods of 15 Hz PEP needed 20 Hz LER to explore 10**34 lumi Machine is capable of injecting at 30 Hz Administrative limit is 20 Hz M. WeaverMDI Meeting Feb 23, 2007