EDGE™ Project Review P09711- Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2007 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Interactive Solutions & Design Group.
Advertisements

SEP1 - 1 Introduction to Software Engineering Processes SWENET SEP1 Module Developed with support from the National Science Foundation.
Andreana Crance, Industrial & Systems Engineering Matt Syska, Industrial & Systems Engineering.
P11462: Thermoelectric and Fan System for Cook Stove Jared RuggProject Manager (ME) Brad SawyerLead Engineer (ME) Jeff BirdMechanical Engineer Tom GorevskiElectrical.
Christian Seemayer Rob Proetti Tim DeBellis Tim Giguere Will Kelly.
Eric Albanese Helen Jervey Barret Zeinfeld Josh Monsees Faculty Guide: Professor Kaemmerlen.
Automation/Improvement of Packaging on Cookie Line Project Manager: Stephanie Rager (IE) Chief Engineer: Bruno Coelho (ME), Members: Brian Duffy (EE),
LFTB Proprietary Information 1 Fuser test bed ™ R I T MSD1 Project Review February 22, 2007 Fuser Test Bed P07501 IE TEAM Justin McMillan – Project Lead.
Overview of Phase 4 Performance Validation Methods and Techniques.
RIT Senior Design I, Project Review P07310: Electronic Shifted Manual Transmission George Slack Team Guide Jason BotterillTeam Leader, Mechanical Engineer.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P Management Review (MSD I) Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Requirements Analysis Lecture #3 David Andrews
Automation/Improvement of Packaging on Cookie Line Project Manager: Stephanie Rager (IE) Chief Engineer: Bruno Coelho (ME), Members: Brian Duffy (EE),
P09713 – FRESH BREAD AND ROLL SCALING ROOM Senior Design Winter
EDGE™ Systems Level Design Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME),
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
P07007: Adapted Home Entry Sponsor: National Science Foundation Wenbo Chen Project Manager, EE Tanvir Rasel EE Meklet Kidane EE Faculty Mentors: Dr. Elizabeth.
Team 10 Air Conditioning Experiment Members –Sean Gallagher –Pamela McDowell –Brian Davison –Prathana Vanarath Sponsors –Dr. Wexler –Dr. Advani Advisor.
EDGE™ Detailed Design Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark.
EDGE™ Project Overview Presentation P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME),
The objective of this project was to design a dynamic similarity test rig to replicate the operating conditions of the main crank bearing in the Dresser-Rand.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView.
Sponsored by Wegmans P Automation/Improvement of Packaging on the Cookie Line Stephanie Rager Bruno Coelho.
Wegmans Frozen Cookie Capacity Increase Final Project Presentation Richard Latham, Bridget Eggers, Tyler Brent, Valeria Gonzalez.
Acquisitions, a Publisher’s Perspective Craig Duncan Development Manager External Development Studio Building the partnership between.
Project Launcher Project #3 Introduction to Transportation.
Sponsored by Wegmans R Modern Food Processing and Bakery Technology for Lean Production Systems Levi Stuck Evan DeCotis Kate Gleason Stephanie Rager.
CHEESECAKE DEPANNING Zach Alsheimer Garth Sinclair Matt Gundrum Casey Bauman.
Economics 101 – Section 5 Lecture #14 – March 2, 2004 Production – long run production.
Wegmans: Flip-Label Project Team Members: Brandon Sbordone (ME), George Kilger (EE), Ben Bouffard (EE), Ian Baker (ME), Charlie Nicolosi (ME), Helen Jervey.
Design Report Expectations Sophomore Engineering Clinic I November 24, 2014.
Managing Processes and Capabilities CHAPTER THREE.
Sponsored by Wegmans R Modern Food Processing and Bakery Technology for Lean Production Systems Levi Stuck Evan DeCotis Kate Gleason Stephanie Rager.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet and Girder Integration Lewis Doom, NSLS-II Project National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) will.
P10712 CHEESECAKE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Andreana Crance, Kevin Rodas, Rob Santora, Jeremy Smith, Matt Syska.
Project Charters Module 3
Preliminary Detailed Design Review P15080 Flow Culture System November 13, 2014.
Project Active Vibration Cancellation. The Team NameDisciplineRole Kaitlin PeranskiIndustrial and SystemsProject Leader/ Edge Updating Jeremy BerkeElectricalScribe.
P09712 Commercial Roll Line Shrink Reduction Evan DeCotis Levi Stuck Ryan Dennison Joseph FitzeryCinthia Sanchez.
Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME), Chukwuma.
Chapter 8 Process Implementation Reference: Tan, A. (2007). Business Process Reengineering in Asia: A Practical Approach, Pearson Education, Singapore.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System Subsystem Design Review 10/20/15.
MH...CH LECT-021 SYSTEMS CONCEPT Adopting a materials handling systems from overall optimization point of view. Adopting a materials handling systems.
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
I N T HE N AME OF G OD. T IME T O M ARKET (TTM) W HAT IS TTM ? time to market ( TTM ) is the length of time it takes from a product being conceived until.
5 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 5 5 Slide 5-1 Target Costing,Theory of Constraints, and Life-Cycle Cost.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
Marble Cake Process Improvement – Final Review Aaron Delahanty Arwen Sharp Benson Yu Kenyon Zitzka Ryan Norris.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Joseph Ferrara Team Lead (ME) Joseph ChurchDesign Engineer (ME) Joshua Van Hook LabView Engineer (EE) Jamie Jackson Electronics (EE) Joelle Kirsch Project.
Lecture 3 Prescriptive Process Models
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
Project Reports: Written and Oral
CSC 421: Algorithm Design & Analysis
CSC 421: Algorithm Design & Analysis
CSC 421: Algorithm Design & Analysis
P08351: Automated Oiling System
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
HEMODYNAMIC SIMULATOR II P09026
Project Review P07442: Thermoelectric Demonstration Test Bed
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter
CSC 421: Algorithm Design & Analysis
Somerset Berkley Regional High School
P11017 Tactile Navigation Interface
Team P16228: Magnetically Levitated Propeller
Preliminary Detailed Design Review
Detailed Design Review (Phase 4)
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Presentation transcript:

EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME), Chukwuma Morah (IE), Brian Duffy (EE), Benjamin Powell (EE)

EDGE™ Project Overview Project Description: Wegmans bakes and packages all of their mini cookies at their bakeshop located here in Rochester on Brookes Avenue. Currently the packaging is done by six or seven people who stand around a conveyor and pull the cookies into the clam-shell packages. This leads to the problem of packing more cookies than needed into a package. The mini-cookie package calls for 397 grams worth of cookies but employees sometimes package up to 450 grams. This is a loss for Wegmans because customers are receiving more cookies than they are paying for. This project will look into building an automated prototype that will separate the cookies into the correct amount by weight, which the employees can then package.

EDGE™ High Level Customer Needs  Must separate mini-chocolate chip cookies by weight  Must reduce the amount of excess mini- cookies in package  Must not substantially slow down process  Should be adjustable for other products  Must be simplistic for employees to use  Must not create a substantial amount of extra labor for employees  Must not be considered a capital investment  Percentage of packages with excess (2 or more) cookies (currently at 95%)  Weight of cookie package  Requires training that takes X minutes  Changeover time  Creates clear separation of product for packaging  Throughput  Cost Key Target Metrics

EDGE™ Overall Prototype System Sifting Bar: Need 4.2 Metric 7 Push-Rod: Metric 6 Weigh Station: Need 1.1 & 2 Metric 1 & 2 Incline Gate: (not shown) Need 3, 4.1 & 5 Metric 4 & 5

EDGE™ Design Review Summary Key Issues: Systems Level Design Review –Definition of excess cookies Clearly defined excess cookies in metrics, defined appropriate marginal and ideal target specifications –Breakage/Pinch Points Re-assessed design for other possible solutions instead of chute, other options just created other problems –Clogging Assessed the flow rate, re-designed system to have 4 tunnels and 8 weigh stations, prototype will be one fourth of entire system Key Issues: Detailed Design Review –Pick-Up of Cookies Will prioritize cookie pick-up during MSDII, at the very least pick-up concepts will be developed and designed by the end of MSDII –Enclosures, Attachments & Adjustability of Design Drawings Re-designed some components to include adjustability, completed drawings with enclosures and attachments –Interfacing of Scales Assessed the best interface for production level implementation of eight scales

EDGE™ High Level Risk Assessment RiskSeverityProbabilityOverallContingency Plan Mechanical and Electrical systems don’t interface well with each other 5315 Be aware of the interface between the two, constant communication between electrical and mechanical engineers Cookies get stuck in tunnel section5525 Use sifting bar to put cookies into lines which can be more easily handled by the tunnels Weigh station doesn’t push out cookies quickly enough 339 Use alternative pushing method instead of push rods, use air at a high pressure Chutes don’t switch quickly enough5315 Use one weigh station and close chute while cookies back up Difficulty controlling push rod using motors 428Use air compression to control push rod Force of cookies falling on scale from chute gives a false reading on scale 3515 Take an average of the weight samples when deciding when to push cookies out of weigh station Cookies get damaged by push-rod when being pushed off scale 5315 Reduce the speed of the push-rod when pushing cookies off in order to gently slide them off scale Temperature of Cookies at top of Conveyor 428 Move pick-up of cookies lower on the conveyor Importance Scale: 1 through 5 1 = Consequences from risk have little effect on the cookie line’s flow 5 = Consequences from risk halt the entire cookie line or project

EDGE™ Current State of Design Selected design meets primary customer needs All needs with high importance (ranked at a 9) Some needs that are ranked at a 5 Design is projected to meet primary target metrics All metrics with ranking of 9 Some metrics that are ranked at a 5 Project cost projected at < $4,000 Ideal cost metric = < $5,000 On schedule to be complete by end of MSDII End of Detailed Design Phase

EDGE™ MSD II Project Schedule Milestones Week 1 (March 13 th ) All parts order and ideally received for initial construction Familiarization with ordered board and coding Week 2 (March 20 th ) Parts cut and prepped Run code and test connections Week 3 (March 27 th ) Construct sub-assemblies Initial testing on weigh scale and run motors Week 4 (April 3 rd ) Construction complete, full assembly Integration and code adjustments Week 5-8 (April 10 th - May 1 st ) Testing and minor adjustments Week 9 (May 8 th ) Testing documented Project poster complete Week 10 (May 15 th ) Final project review