1 Ghost Trackers If there’s something strange (or charm or bottom) in your neighbourhood… Dave Jackson Oxford University / RAL LCFI Collaboration 28 th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards a C++ based ZVTOP Ben Jeffery (Oxford) LCFI Collaboration ZVTOP Introduction Motivation Progress Plans & Release Schedule.
Advertisements

LCUK Meeting, 26 th September 2006Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 LCFI Simulation and Physics Studies LCUK Meeting, Durham, 26 th September 2006 Sonja Hillert.
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
1 The Topologies For a B decay to a single cascade charm D B IP lB lB lD lD ZVTOP vertex found furthest from IP contains the cleanest set of true B,D tracks.
1 ZVTOP algorithm (based on part of March ’04 Vienna talk) Overview Vertex finding with ZVTOP More details on the algorithm OO development plans Dave Jackson.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
22 July 2005Mauro Donega HEP20051 B s lifetimes in hadronic decays at CDF Mauro Donegà Université de Genève on behalf of the CDF collaboration.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
1 LCWS talks I Sat 19 March Tracking and Vertexing session: 09:00-09:15 Sonja Hillert (University of Oxford) Heavy Flavour ID and Quark Charge Measurement.
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2005 International Linear Collider Workshop, Stanford, 19 th March 2005 p. 0 Heavy flavour ID and quark charge measurement.
Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
12/14/021 Measurements of the Branching Fractions and Helicity Amplitudes in B  D*  Decays Authors: Guangpei Chen, Roy A. Briere Intended for: PRD (RC)
1 Physics Impact of Detector Performance Tim Barklow SLAC March 18, 2005.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Search for CP violation in  decays R. Stroynowski SMU Representing CLEO Collaboration.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2005 International Linear Collider Workshop, Stanford, 20 th March 2005 p. 0 Heavy flavour ID and quark charge measurement.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Lepton/Photon 2003, Batavia, IL, USA August 11 th – 16 th Measurement of  b Branching Ratios in Modes Containing a  c Why are the  b branching fractions.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
The LCFI Vertex Package Details and Testing Ben Jeffery Oxford University on behalf of the LCFI collaboration.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
B-tagging Performance based on Boosted Decision Trees Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li and B. Zhou) ATLAS B-tagging Meeting February 9,
E. Devetak – CERN CLIC1 LCFI: vertexing and flavour-tagging Erik Devetak Oxford University CERN-CLIC Meeting 14/05/09 Vertexing Flavour Tagging Charge.
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
ECFA ILC workshop, Valencia, 9 th November 2006Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 Overview of the LCFI Vertex Package ILC workshop, Valencia, 6 – 10 November 2006.
LCFI Package and Flavour 3TeV Tomáš Laštovička Institute of Physics AS CR CLIC WG3 Meeting 9/6/2010.
Measurement of b-tagging Fake rates in Atlas Data M. Saleem * In collaboration with Alexandre Khanov** F. Raztidinova**, P.Skubic * *University of Oklahoma,
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
1 Vertex Finding in AliVertexerTracks E. Bruna (TO), E. Crescio (TO), A. Dainese (LNL), M. Masera (TO), F. Prino (TO)
Secondary Vertex reconstruction for the D + Elena Bruna University of Torino ALICE Physics Week Erice, Dec. 6 th 2005.
ILC Software and Tools workshop LAL-Orsay, 3 rd May 2007Sonja Hillert (Oxford) p. 0 The LCFIVertex package Sonja Hillert (Oxford) on behalf of the LCFI.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
TILC08 workshop, Sendai 4 th March 2008Sonja Hillert (Oxford) p. 0 LCFI Vertex Package: Parameter Optimisation Sonja Hillert (Oxford) on behalf of the.
1 Studies of Heavy Flavour Jet Tagging with ZVTOP in JAS3 Overview Jet flavour tagging in JAS3 Cosθ dependence Primary vertex momentum Use of neutral energy.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
14/06/11 Jet physics meetingV.Kostyukhin 1 Flavour fractions in di-jet system V.Kostyukhin C.Lapoire M.Lehmacher Bonn.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
E. Devetak - SiD Meeting RAL 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL SiD 04/2008 Abingdon‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 0 Recent results on vertex charge reconstruction Sonja Hillert.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
CHEP2003, La Jolla, San Diego, March P.Vanlaer, IIHE-ULB Brussels 1 Vertex reconstruction framework and its implementation for CMS Outline Introduction.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

1 Ghost Trackers If there’s something strange (or charm or bottom) in your neighbourhood… Dave Jackson Oxford University / RAL LCFI Collaboration 28 th March 2006

2 ZVRESZVKIN In the conventional ZVTOP algorithm secondary vertices are found first. The linearity of the B->D decay chain is then used for ‘L/D’ track attachment In the Ghost Track algorithm the ‘straight’ IP->B->D topology is exploited first, to estimate the B/D flight direction before vertex finding

3 The straight ghost track is anchored at the IP, initially given a 25 μ m width then moved in θ and φ to minimise ∑ χ 2 (sum over jet tracks). Final ‘fitted’ width of ghost track (minimum 25μm ) calculated for ‘compatibility’ with jet tracks: each has χ 2 ≤ 1.0 with fitted ghost track SLD

4 The SLD Ghost Track used straight Gaussian tubes for fast analytic track fits – this required reparametrising the track near a vertex location. This should not be so much of an issue for the LCFI C++ code in which the approximation is not made

5 Care with errors and χ 2 s important since vertex finding relies on probability of vertex fit calculation PROB(∑ χ 2,2N-3) For N tracks in jet from same MC B vertex (spike at zero due to non-Gaussian tails) PROB(∑ χ 2,2N-4) Where N now includes the Ghost Track in the fit – so less ‘free’ than the jet tracks alone. Probability is now a measure of a good secondary vertex fit AND compatibility with the B direction (ghost track). SLD

6 The algorithm proceeds to build vertices according to the highest Probability; while Prob>1%. So this distribution needs to be fairly flat for genuine vertices; and to be flat for a range of track multiplicity (shown here), decay length, etc. The pre-requisite for this is a fitter that has the right properties for jet tracks alone. Probability of ghost + B tracks fit SLD

7 At SLD the B’s came in back-to-back pairs. The EVENT would be tagged with ZVRES before running ZVKIN for analysis of each jet For LCFI generally would like to consider each jet independently; design flavour/charge tagger for each jet with ZVTOP3 in C++ SLD

8 BACKUP SLIDES…

9 L/D for non-Seed tracks passing T < 1mm Monte Carlo Track Origin D Decay IP B Decay VXD2 b-jets Cut at L/D > 0.3 to attach tracks from B decay chain to Seed

10 Highly boosted B kinematics: IP→B→D straight to ~1% (for Z 0 ) B,D vertex locations are not independent in 3D space ‘Ghost Track Algorithm’ builds in this information from the beginning

11 Stage 1: Pivot straight ghost track at IP, initially along jet axis direction Give ghost track a 25 μ m width and calculate χ 2 of ghost to each track in jet Swivel ghost track in θ and φ to minimise ∑ χ 2 (sum over jet tracks) Angle between true B flight and jet axis Angle between true B flight and ghost track Radians

12 Stage 2: PROB(χ 2,ndof) for jet track(s) to be consistent with each other and with the ghost track or IP ellipsoid is constructed For jet with N tracks, initially N+1 candidate vertices: IP N N Ghost Calculate fit probability for all pairs of objects (if IP is not included, then ghost track is added) If maximim PROB > PCUT (typically 1%) then: combine the two objects and iterate Else: vertex reconstruction is complete: Allows reconstruction of ‘1-prong’ vertices PRISECTER

13 The Topologies For a B decay to a single cascade charm D B IP True MC l B True MC l D Measured l B Measured l D cm lB lB lD lD

14 Compare ‘ZVTOP’ with ‘Ghost Track Algorithm’ Number of Found Vertices ‘B Decay’ Invariant Mass GeV/c 2 ZVTOP GHOST

15 Options The ‘Tidy’ cuts : For SLD ~20% of jets contained ≥ 1 high impact parameter track from Ks, Λ, detector interaction etc. Tidy cuts are applied first to prevent the Ghost Track direction being distorted (~half background tracks removed at SLD) For each algorithm ~4 tunable parameters that effect efficiency vrs purity of vertex reconstruction also: ZVTOP – can guide vertex finding with V(r) weighting Ghost Track – can force the topology to find fixed number of vertices – Momentum factor

16 July 2003 World B S mixing sensitivity B 0 : b→c : D + or D 0