B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF Vyacheslav Krutelyov Texas A&M University For CDF Collaboration July 1, 2004 BEACH04 Chicago,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
Advertisements

0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
1 Rare Decays At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) BEAUTY 2006 OXFORD 28 September 2006.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Search for LFV  decays involving     ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University.
B s and Λ b Lifetimes and BRs at the Tevatron Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 25 th September 2006 Beauty 2006,
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
1 CDF Results on B Physics Masashi Tanaka (Argonne) The Tevatron Connection June 24th, 2005.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
Experimental Review on Lepton Flavor Violating Tau decays 2008/4 K.Inami Nagoya university International workshop e + e - collisions from phi to psi PHIPSI08.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
February 28, 2008Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d'Aoste, B States at the Tevatron Matthew Jones Purdue UniversityPurdue University/CDFCDF.
1 LBNL RPM 15 February 2007 Probing the Physics Frontier with Rare B Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab)
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
1 Search for FCNC Decays B s(d) → μ  μ - Motivation Analysis Method Results Conclusion Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin For Doug Glenzinski, Hauke.
ICHEP 2002 First Heavy Flavor Results Using the Silicon Vertex Trigger A. Cerri.
Search for B s →  +  - and B d →  +  - Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju Lin (Fermilab) Representing CDF Collaboration SUSY 2004 Tsukuba, Japan June 17, 2004.
Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron Ralf Bernhard University of Zurich XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD 19 th March 2006.
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Search for the decay B c  B s  Masato Aoki September 13, B s  J/  channel 1.Pion reconstruction efficiency 2.Cut variables and optimization.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
M. Herndon, Illinois HETEP Seminar March Search for FCNC Decays B s(d) → μ  μ - Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison University of Illinois.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University CIPANP, June 2012.
1 Heavy Flavor Physics At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) Aspen Winter Conference Aspen, Colorado 13 February 2006.
SUSY Searches at the Tevatron Rencontres de Moriond, QCD March 2006 Else Lytken, Purdue University for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty st June 2005 Rare Decays at the Tevatron.
1 Sinéad M. Farrington University of Oxford for the CDF Collaboration HQL 15 th October 2010 Rare B and D Decays at CDF.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Hadronic B→DX Decays at LHCb and CDF Laurence Carson, Imperial College on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CIPANP 2012, St. Petersburg,FL.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Rare decays of charm & bottom atTevatron  Introduction  Tevatron  CDF & DØ Detector  Rare charm decays  Rare bottom decays  Summary & Conclusions.
Michael Milnik (University of Karlsruhe) for the CDF Collaboration Search for Rare b-Hadron Decays at CDF II HEP 2007, Manchester.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF Collaboration ICHEP 28 th July 2006 Rare B Decays at CDF.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Recent D0 results on Quarkonium HAN, Liang Univ. of Science & Technology of China Univ. of Manchester presenting D0 Collaboration ( commented by Rick Van.
1/16 Arnold Pompoš, Lisbon, Portugal, July 22, 2005.
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Exotic Quarkonium Spectroscopy & Production Jane Nachtman on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Iowa, USA Charm 2013, 31 August – 4 Sept, 2013,
Observation of Exclusive Charmonium Production and    in pp Collisions at CDF II James Pinfold University of Alberta For the CDF Collaboration.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for New Physics through Rare B Decays S. Uozumi for the CDF-II collaboration Feb-21th Lake Louis Winter Institute 2012 NP?
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Search for Anomalous Production of Multi-lepton Events at CDF Alon Attal Outline  Motivation  R p V SUSY  CDF & lepton detection  Analysis  Results.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
On behalf of the BABAR Collaboration
B States at the Tevatron
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
University of Liverpool for the CDF Collaboration ICHEP 28th July 2006
Search for Bsμμ and Bdμμ with 2 fb-1 of data
Search for FCNC Decays Bs(d) → μ+μ-
Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb Diego Martínez Santos
B Physics at In relation to SUSY ? 4th Workshop on Mass Origins
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF Vyacheslav Krutelyov Texas A&M University For CDF Collaboration July 1, 2004 BEACH04 Chicago, IL

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 2 Outlines  CDF Run2  Detector  Triggers  Searches  B s(d)       D 0       Measurements (successful searches)  X(3872)  B +  J/    B s   and pentaquarks  See talks by S.D’Auria and D.Litvintsev

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 3 Tevatron performance  As you know the Tevatron is working very well this year  Record initial luminosity = 84  cm -2 s -1 (92  cm -2 s -1 to CDF)  Detector efficiency ~85-90%  ~450pb -1 on tape  pb -1 used for analysis so far

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 4 CDF Run2.   s=1.96TeV σ(Inelastic)~60mb. ℒ ~7  cm -2 s -1 (~400pb -1 good recorded)  Plan: ~8  cm -2 s -1 (Run2a); ~2  cm -2 s -1 (4-8/fb Run 2)  1.7MHz collision  20kHz L1 trigger  350Hz L2  60Hz L3/logging rate.  ~80% L1 (~1/3 at L3) of the trigger (bandwidth) are B physics  Better silicon coverage (  2), muon detection, improved tracking.  Better triggers: lower track p T, higher efficiency. Run2 vs Run1  SVX II (5layer) silicon strip det  svx+IP ~40  m COT tracker drift chamber  p T /p T 2 ~0.1%  p T /p T 2 ~1.5%(L1/XFT) CMU muon det (drift cham) p T >1.5GeV |  CMP muon det (drift cham + scint) p T >2.5GeV |  2 ft steel CMX muon det (drift cham + scint) p T >2GeV 0.6<|  

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 5 Triggers used  Dimuon trigger  p T >1.5GeV,  p T >2GeV, 0.6<  1  p T, , muon ID used to cut on tracks  Used for    X)  Two Track Trigger  p T >2GeV,   p T, , d 0 info used to cut on 2 tracks  Used for: B,D  hadrons ; D   All are input to the various Level-3 triggers That use the offline quality information primary vertex secondary vertex impact parameter ~ 1 mm b, c decays  Semileptonic trigger  p T, , d 0, muon ID used to cut on tracks  Used for ,D,    X)  no results presented in this talk

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 6 Triggers used  Dimuon trigger  p T >1.5GeV,  p T >2GeV, 0.6<  1  p T, , muon ID used to cut on tracks  Used for    X)

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 7 Triggers used  Two Track Trigger  p T >2GeV,   p T, , d 0 info used to cut on 2  Used for: B,D  hadrons ; D   primary vertex secondary vertex impact parameter ~ 1 mm b, c decays

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 8 B(D)   : Theoretical motivations. Current limits.  Flavor Changing Neutral Current. Loop contribution only in SM.  Br SM (B s  μ + μ - )=(3.4±0.5)   Br SM (B d  μ + μ - )=(1.00±0.14)  (hep-ph/ )  Br SM (D 0  μ + μ - )~3* (GIM suppressed)  Only upper experimental limit exists:  Br exp (B s  μ + μ - )<2.0  % C.L. CDF  Br exp (B d  μ + μ - )<1.6  % C.L. Belle  Br exp (D 0  μ + μ - )<4.1(4.2)* % C.L. BEATRICE(E771)  Limits are far away from the SM value: can test for a possible new physics.  MSSM: Br( B  μ + μ - ) enhanced by tanβ>10 terms ~tan 6 β. Up to 100 over the SM prediction.  R-parity violating models give tree level contributions. Not heavily constrained by other observables.  Can be seen in Run2 (esp. B s   )  Other models enhance less. E.g., universal extra dimensions. Up to +70% for B s  μ + μ - ’ i23  i22    b s RPV mSUGRA,SO(10)

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 9 D 0   search   1.43·10 -3  Use D *±  D 0 π ± tagged events  Use D 0      as a normalization mode.  Blind from  ID in 1.840<m  <1.882 GeV  Cuts:  |d 0 (μ,π)|>120μm, |d xy (D 0 )|<150μm  Δφ(μμ)>0.085  Background:  combinatorial (from right sideband) – expect 1.5±0.7  misidentification (punch-through/decay) – expect N(D 0      )  P(misID) 2  0.3±0.1

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 10 D 0   search  B(D 0   )<2.4  10 90% C.L.  B(D 0   )<3.1  10 95% C.L.  This result improves on the previous limits by ~  2 (4.1  from BEATRICE, and 4.2  from E771 at 90% C.L.) 69pb -1

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 11 Br(B s(d)  μ+μ-) measurement.  Expect to detect at most few events that might only look like B s(d)  μ+μ–  SM predicts 0 events  really a “search”  Don’t look at the data signal region (blind search)  Signal inside 5.169<M   GeV/c 2 (  3  window   demonstrate understanding of background events  accurately estimate  (acceptance) and  (efficiency)  intelligently optimize cuts CL=90% upper limit on for n obs and n bg 171pb-1 or 10 trillion collisions only Run1  Bs =0.9  b for p T  s >6 GeV/c, |y|<1 (use this as a baseline selection) 3% (CMU&CMP Run1) 25% Run1 Dimuon trigger and p T >6GeV baseline sample: 2940 events

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 12 Signal & Background  Need to select discriminating variables that leave most of the signal and remove most of the background. P T  PTPT  x y B s    R < 1 (  < 57 o ) PTPT   P T vtx  Most Promising Discriminating Variables – Invariant mass – c  :  2D lifetime  c –  :  (p T B ) –  (vtx) – Isolation: Largest expected background: gluon splitting g  bb   

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 13 Optimization Results  Optimize on (M , c , , Iso) to get the best expected limit  (c , ,Iso) = (>200 mm, 0.65) and mass window  80 MeV around world avg Bs(d): GeV (5.279 GeV)  Bs(d):  total = (2.0  0.2)% (  6.6%,  total  30%)  Accepted bgd  = (6  2) fb  Expected bacground in 171pb -1 = 1.1  0.3 events Poisson prob

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 14 Observed limits BR(B s  μ + μ  ) < 5.8x10  7 90% C.L. (7.5x10  7 95% C.L.) 3 times better than Run I (previous world best) BR(B d  μ + μ  ) < 1.5x10  7 90% C.L. (1.9x10  7 95% C.L.) slightly better than (1.6x10  7 90% C.L., just published) B-factory/Belle result

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 15  for SUperSYmmetry C.L.) 7.5  R. Arnowitt et al., PLB 538 (2002) 121, new plot by B.Dutta R-parity violating R. Dermisek et al., hep-ph/ SO(10) significant New limit excludes significant amounts of the previously allowed SUSY models parameters (more to go) Dark matter allowed region new CL

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 16 Spectroscopy – Exotic States X(3872)  New narrow state observed first by Belle in decay modes J/      Charmonium state not expected near mass peak.  D* Dbar deuteron-like molecule ?  CDF confirms X in 220pb -1  Preference for M(   ) > 500MeV  670±90 candidates, sign.~ 12   Mass scale using  (2S) peak

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 17 X(3872): Long-lived fraction  Long-lived fraction:  F X(3872) =16.1  4.9  2.0 %  cf F  (2S) = 28.3  1.0  0.7 % CDF II

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 18 B  J/    Cabibbo-suppressed decay B +  J/    Br Expected to be 5% relative to Br(B +  J/  K + )  Br(B +  J/  + )/Br(B +  J/  K + )=4.2  0.7% PDG02  Signal selection  p T (B + )>6.5GeV, p T (K + )>2GeV, L xy >200  m

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 19 Summary  Great physics results are coming in from CDF  Br(B s   )<5.8 x at 90% C.L.  Br(B d   )<1.5 x at 90% C.L.  Br(D   )<2.4 x at 90% C.L.  X(3872) confirmation  Long-lived fraction F X(3872) =16.1  4.9  2.0 % . accepted/published by PRL

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 20

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 21 BACKUP SLIDES

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 22 Data Samples —OS+ : opposite-sign muon pairs, ctau > 0 our signal sample – not used for xchecks — OS- : opposite-sign muon pairs, ctau < 0 — SS+ : same-sign muon pairs, ctau > 0 — SS- : same-sign muon pairs, ctau < 0

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 23 R. Arnowitt et al., hep-ph/ , PLB 538 (2002) 121 mHmH  Overlap with measured δa μ (BNL) in mSUGRA parameter space.  Overlap with dark matter=LSP allowed region.  Eliminate large parameter space (~ all for tanβ>40), with Br(B s  μ + μ - )~10 -8 in Run2 (15/fb) Motivations: B s  μ + μ - (mSUGRA)

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 24 _ ’ i23  i22    b s c b l s  l  R. Arnowitt et al., hep-ph/ , PLB 538 (2002) fb  1 2 fb  1 e.g., W TRPV = ijk L i L j E k  ’ ijk L i Q j D k  ’’ ijk U i D j D k R P Violation: Br vs. m 1/2

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 25 B  hh PR plot now ~1K events with 180/pb

7/1/04 S. Krutelyov B physics: new and rare BEACH04 26 M  [GeV/c 2 ]   CDF, PRD 57, 3811 (1998)  Ldt = 98 pb  1 (~5 x collisions) B d : GeV/c 2 B s : GeV/c 2 N obs = 1 with GeV/c 2 (consistent with an expectation from the Standard Model backgrounds) Br(B d   ) < 8.6 x 10  7 (95% C.L.) Br(B s   ) < 2.6 x 10  6 (95% C.L.) B d(s)   : Run I Results