DR2 Structures PDR Structures and Weight Preliminary Design Review October 5, 2000 Presented By: Jeff Rodrian & Chris Curtis Team DR2 Loren Garrison Chris.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MIT Rocket Team November 20, 2010 Design and Fabrication.
Advertisements

Fiber Reinforced Plastic beam manufacturing process
James Rasmussen.  Original dash was made from sheet metal, foam, and vinyl  Was too heavy for its purpose  Didn’t offer standard gauge sizes  Didn’t.
TOOLING. WHAT IS REQUIRED OF THE TOOL? support weight of the part support weight of the part maintain structural integrity and dimensional stability following.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Composite Manufacturing Group 15 Eglin AFB Brandon Bair - John Brewer - Darnell Brown - Rob Contes Sponsor: Jeff Wagener - Lt Joe Czabarnek, AFRL Faculty.
Insight into Reverie & autoclaved composites By Simon Farren Presented at US Distributor Sector th April 2009.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
Revolutionary Technologies Group C1 Nicholas Arch, Nicholas Fraser, Robert Huth, Patrick Noble, Michael Toomey Preliminary Design Review March 20, 2008.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Team USYD National Aircraft Design-Build-Fly Competition.
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
DR2 Presented by: Mark Blanton Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian September 26, 2000 Chris Curtis.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
DR2 Stability and Control Preliminary Design Review and Performance PDR October 24, 2000 Presented By: Christopher Peters …and that’s cool Team DR2 Chris.
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Team 7: Vincent Borsello, Michael Brill, Daniel Gempesaw, Travis Mease
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review II October 17, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
AAE 451 – Fall 2003 Ares Team Mir Rashiduzzaman Alethea Tan Kai-Hui Leong Darwin Lisan Jung Hyun Ahn John Ko.
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Introduction to AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES Ratan Jha (CAMP 364, ,
1 AE 440 Structures Discipline Lecture 6 Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture.
Balsa Glider Construction
3D Imaging Software Brad Boldizar, Aubrey McKelvey, and Mackenzie Thomas Advised by: Dr. Paul King Matt Moore.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 11 & 12 Processing Routes Molding Compound -Short fibers, preimpregnated.
Aer E 423 Project Katarzyna Szemplinska 12/13/2008.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
Dane Batema John Tapee Audrey Serra Patricia Roman Kyle RyanCarlos Vergara Benoit BlierDrew Capps Team 1: Lessons Learned and Vehicle Summary Team “Canard”
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 9 & 10 Processing Routes Hot-melt Impregnation system Step 1 Preparation.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
Sam Krueger.  Entertainment Center  Preliminary design  Initial  36 plies, glass epoxy  [0 11 /±45 1 /90 5 ] s  No core  Modified design  36 plies,
P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software.
December 1, 2003PDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights PDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Structures PDR 1 Team Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal VanMeter October 12, 2000.
Team 5 Design Concept Selection Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review September 28, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
DR1 PF, E, & FTP PDR Prototype Fabrication, Economic and Flight Test Plan Preliminary Design Review October 26, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton & Chris.
Characterization of Advanced Composite Materials MSE 597 Junior/Senior/Graduate Students Lecture-Laboratory Course.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Structures Preliminary Design Review #1 October 12, 2000.
6.01 Aircraft Design and Construction References: FTGU pages 9-14, 27
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
Aircraft Design Process
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
Team “Canard” September 28th, 2006
Aerospace System Prototyping and Validation- Lecture 2
AUTONOMOUS LONG-ENDURANCE UAV (SMART INTERN PROJECT)
SAE AERO 2017 Joseph Zongolowicz, Kathy Hansen, Nick Montana, Marquis Ward, Frank Dixon, Thomas Houck, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Kevin Schesventer,
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
Project Plan Review Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2
Team 5 Final Design Review
Cargo Airplane Challenge
Structures and Weights Preliminary Design Review
Structures Overview Material Properties Structures Construction
CAD Design Part 2 AE460 Greg Marien Lecturer.
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

DR2 Structures PDR Structures and Weight Preliminary Design Review October 5, 2000 Presented By: Jeff Rodrian & Chris Curtis Team DR2 Loren Garrison Chris Peters Mark Blanton

DR2 Structures PDR Areas of Discussion Wing Fabrication Technique & Materials –Wing Loads –Wing Design –Wing Test Fuselage Fabrication Technique & Materials –Fabrication –Design –Payload Layout Landing Gear Configuration & Analysis Weight Estimate

DR2 Structures PDR

DR2 Structures PDR Elliptical Load Distribution b/2 qoqo q(x) x

DR2 Structures PDR x q(x) Trapezoidal Method for Approximating Load Distribution To approximate, The trapezoidal rule was used such that, For wing test loads, h = distance between pads, the load coefficient k pad is found as,

DR2 Structures PDR Wing Spanwise Loading

DR2 Structures PDR Prototype Wing Construction and Test Purpose: Evaluate wing bending and torsional stiffness Practice construction technique Method: Whiffletree system attached on upper surface of inverted wing to simulate air loads Advantage: Easily scale air loads, more realistic than wingtip loading.

DR2 Structures PDR Wing Test Whiffletree Method outbd up looking aft Single Point Load (Outboard pad can be used for subsequent wingtip loading) wing

DR2 Structures PDR Prototype Wing Model Construction and Test Schedule 10/10 Tues.-Fabricate wing skins 10/12 Thurs.-Wing construction complete 10/13 Fri.-Test apparatus complete & test wing 10/15 Sun.-Summarize test results

DR2 Structures PDR Composite Wing Fabrication Methods All methods require female molds of wing skins 1.Dry graphite wet lay-up 2.Fiberglass wet lay-up with graphite tow as spar caps 3.Pre-impregnated graphite lay-up

DR2 Structures PDR Female Mold Fabrication I –Materials Quality hardwood ( i.e. Poplar or Mahogany) –Lower Cost –Ease of manufacturing –Requires sealant –Grain pattern REN board –Designed for mold fabrication for CNC machining –No sealent required –Many sizes available –Costly

DR2 Structures PDR Female Mold Fabrication II –Regardless of material CNC machine on 3-axis mill –Create tool pathes with Surfcam from Iges files generated by Ironcad –Professor Sullivan has given his support of the project Mold issues –Reduce number of molds required with a untapered wing –Machine limits cut length to 4 ft. –Cost of molds

DR2 Structures PDR Dry Graphite Wet Lay-up –Vacuum bag lay-up without any heat –Yields very stiff structure with minimum weight and manufacturing cost –Cost prohibitive without donation ( ~$30/sq.yd.) –Use 2 plies [0/90/±45], graphite spar –Graphite Skin is main load-bearing structure along with spar

DR2 Structures PDR Fiberglass Wet Lay-up with Graphite Tow –Not as light and stiff as graphite –Graphite tow give stiffness to skin –Fiberglass inexpensive (~$4.90/sq yd.) –Graphite Tow very high strength Donation secured from Professor C.T. Sun –3 plies [±45/0/90/±45], graphite tow reinforced fiberglass spar

DR2 Structures PDR Pre-impregnated Graphite –Highest strength-to-weight –Material donated by Professor C.T.Sun –Requires elevated curing temperature ( F) –Molds must withstand at least 250 F –Use 2 plies [0/90/±45], graphite spar

DR2 Structures PDR Wing Structure Sizing –Construct molds regardless of composite method chosen –Secure composite material by end of mold construction (10/10) –Fabricate wing skins with method chosen –Test wing and determine pass/fail criteria –Modify design as required

DR2 Structures PDR Fuselage Sizing –Composite construction employing material used for wing fabrication –Machine female molds of left and right lofts –Possible alternative use male mold from foam –Use knowledge from wing test to determine ply schedule –Add graphite tow at high stress areas to distribute stress Wing attachment Landing gear attachment Tail boom –Design to incorporate simple cantilevered wing attachment system

DR2 Structures PDR Payload Layout –Initial layout done to demonstrate major system integration –Building block for final C.G. estimation

DR2 Structures PDR

DR2 Structures PDR Vertical Tail –Incorporate into mold for fuselage Horizontal Tail –Traditional balsa construction –Base on historic designs

DR2 Structures PDR Landing Gear use lightweight foam tires from Raymer p 274