Andy Blake Cambridge University Thursday April 12 th 2007 Towards a Combined Atmospheric Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Data / MC Comparisons for Low Hadronic Energy CC-like Events Reminder of problem Fiducial studies with more MC statistics Effect of offset in.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
1 Search for the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay,   → p     HyangKyu Park University of Michigan, Ann Arbor for the HyperCP collaboration.
Reconstruction neutral decay modes (E391) Doroshenko M.(KEK) E391 collaboration Outlines: Data summary Analysis strategy Reconstruction K3p,K2p,Kgg decays.
Atmospheric Neutrino Software Update Andy Blake Cambridge University Thursday December 7 th 2006.
CDF Results Andrew Mehta Liverpool Christmas Meeting 2008.
Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Andy Blake Cambridge University Wednesday June 13 th 2007 Combined Atmospheric Analysis: Study of 6 Month’s Data.
Far Detector Data Quality Andy Blake Cambridge University.
(I) MINOS Data Quality Software. Andy Blake Cambridge University Thursday December 7 th 2006.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
Update on NC/CC separation At the previous phone meeting I presented a method to separate NC/CC using simple cuts on reconstructed quantities available.
1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
Partially Contained Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis Andy Blake Cambridge University March 2004.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University September 2003.
Multiple Muons at the Far Detector Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, December 2006.
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
FD Timing Calibration Status Guardians of the FD timing calibration: –John Chapman, graduation in ~3-6 months. –Andy Blake, renewal of contract (or redundancy!)
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
FD event selection and data/MC comparisons Motivation of this study –Look at FD events (with blinding scheme imposed) to determine Whether we observe neutrino.
Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University September 2003.
Partially Contained Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis Andy Blake + John Chapman Cambridge University January 2004.
Low Level Processing of MINOS Data. Andy Blake Cambridge University Tuesday June 6 th 2006.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Study Andy Blake Cambridge University Thursday December 7 th 2006.
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
P. Vahle, Fermilab Oct An Alternate Approach to the CC Measurement— Predicting the FD Spectrum Patricia Vahle University College London Fermilab.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Latest Results from The MINOS Experiment
1 Cosmic Muon Analysis: Current Status Stuart Mufson, Brian Rebel Argonne March 18, 2005.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
The Status of MINOS Mike Kordosky University College London for the collaboration.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
2012/7/231 Cosmic Ray at STAR Shuai Yang Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China STAR Regional Meeting.
Cross-checking Beam Monitoring Records. Andy Blake, Cambridge University. Data Validation, July minos-doc-7463.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
Recent Progress on Wire-Cell Xin Qian and Chao Zhang BNL 1.
Mark Dorman – UCL/RAL – Calibration Workshop Talk Update on ND Strip-to-Strip Calibration Work Mark Dorman Calibration Workshop Fermilab, September 7-9.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.
A PID based approach for antineutrino selection
P0D reconstruction/analysis update
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
OPERETTE TEST BEAM EXPERIMENT :
Presentation transcript:

Andy Blake Cambridge University Thursday April 12 th 2007 Towards a Combined Atmospheric Analysis

Towards a Combined Analysis Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 2 Developing a combined atmospheric neutrino analysis: – Contained vertex muon neutrinos (John Chapman). – Upward-going muons (Brian Rebel, John Chapman). – Contained vertex electron neutrinos (Ben Speakman). Currently collating all the event selection code: – All track and shower selection variables now calculated in AtNuOutput classes and stored in AtNuEvent classes. – Event selection implemented in AtNuAna package. – Analysis variables written to short AtNuAna Ntuples. Propagating improved algorithms through reconstruction. e.g. Determination of direction from timing.

Event Selection Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 3 DATA / MC DATA QUALITY CHECKS GOOD TRACKSGOOD SHOWERS GOOD EVENTS UPWARD-GOING MUONS CONTAINED VERTEX ELECTRON NEUTRINOS Outline of event selection: John and Brian’s track selection Ben’s shower selection Data: HV, coil, GPS, LI, bad chips etc. MC: large scatters. LI rejection, clean planes, “fiducial” event

Event Types Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 4 typedef enum EEventType { kNothing = 0x00, kGoodSlice = 0x01, kGoodEvent = 0x02, kGoodTrack = 0x04, kGoodShower = 0x08, kCV = 0x10, kCE = 0x20, kUP = 0x40, kFC = 0x80, kPC = 0x100, kPCDN = 0x200, kPCUP = 0x400, kUPMU = 0x800, kCosmic = 0x1000, kStoppingMuon = 0x2000, kThroughGoingMuon = 0x4000, kMultipleMuon = 0x8000, kVeto = 0x10000, kSpill = 0x20000, kBeamSpill = 0x40000, kFakeSpill = 0x80000, kGoodDirection = 0x100000, kGoodCharge = 0x200000, kPositiveCharge = 0x400000, kNegativeCharge = 0x800000, kAtmosNumu = 0x , kAtmosNumuCV = 0x , kAtmosNumuUP = 0x , kAtmosNue = 0x , kLIevent = 0x , kMCscatter = 0x } EventType_t; typedef enum EAtmosEventType { kNothing = 0x00, kGoodEvent = 0x01, kSpill = 0x02, kBeamSpill = 0x04, kVeto = 0x08, kCV = 0x10, kUP = 0x20, kGoodTrack = 0x40, kGoodShower = 0x80, kAtmosNumu = 0x100, kAtmosNumuCV = 0x200, kAtmosNumuUP = 0x400, kAtmosNue = 0x800, kAtmosNumuCVcut1 = 0x1000, kAtmosNumuCVcut2 = 0x2000, kAtmosNumuCVcut3 = 0x4000, kAtmosNumuCVcut4 = 0x8000, kAtmosNumuUPcut1 = 0x10000, kAtmosNumuUPcut2 = 0x20000, kAtmosNumuUPcut3 = 0x40000, kAtmosNumuUPcut4 = 0x80000, kAtmosNueCVcut1 = 0x100000, kAtmosNueCVcut2 = 0x200000, kAtmosNueCVcut3 = 0x400000, kAtmosNueCVcut4 = 0x } AtmosEventType_t; Event Types containment cosmics veto shield, beam spills good direction, good charge light injection MC scatter Atmos Neu Event Types containment cuts upward going cuts electron neutrino cuts Above event types defined by methods in AtNuAna class.

Current Progress Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 5 STEP 1 : implement selection and test using ~1 day sample. (lots of cutting and pasting of selection code…) STEP 2 : optimize selection using ~6 months data and MC. (hopefully shouldn’t need much optimizing…) (DONE) (PROCESSING)

Event Selection: (I) Contained Events Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 6 Trace Cut: atmos cosmic data

Event Selection: (I) Contained Events Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 7 Topology Cuts: atmos cosmic data

Event Selection: (II) Upward Muons Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 8 RMS Timing cut: atmos cosmic data

Event Selection: (II) Upward Muons Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 9 Time Slope cut: atmos cosmic data

Event Selection: (III) Electron Neutrinos Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 10 Shower Trace cut: atmos cosmic data

Event Selection: (III) Electron Neutrinos Combined Analysis, slide 11 Moment of Inertia cut: atmos cosmic data Andy Blake, Cambridge University

Event Selection: (IV) Event Rates Andy Blake, Cambridge UniversityCombined Analysis, slide 12 Events / kT-Yr (atmos run 179) CurrentCombined Contained  CC Contained e CC Pretty good agreement – so no obvious mistakes! Event rates slightly lower at the moment though. Haven’t processed any upward muons yet.

Summary Combined Analysis, slide 13 Making lots of progress, given fraction of time spent on analysis. – Much selection code now in place. – Selection seems broadly okay so far. – But need to look at a much larger sample. Unlikely to have full combined analysis ready for summer though. – Selection and some analysis (e.g. charge ratio) should be ready. – Will try to be done by September! Andy Blake, Cambridge University