1 Dark Energy? The study of the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and their effects on the evolution and structure of the universe, are some of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Astronomical Detectors
Using DELPHI for Weak Lensing Measurements: Science Return and Mirror Size Jes Ford, JPL, UNR SURF /21/07 Mentor: Jason Rhodes Co-mentor: David Johnston.
Cluster Cosmology at LPPC Illuminating Dark Energy with BCS and PISCO F. William High 2 nd Year Grad Student Harvard Univ Dept of Physics Monday, 21 August.
1 PHYSICS Progress on characterization of a dualband IR imaging spectrometer Brian Beecken, Cory Lindh, and Randall Johnson Physics Department, Bethel.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
September 22, 2006 Natalia Kuznetsova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The Super/Nova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Natalia Kuznetsova Natalia Kuznetsova.
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
1 SNAP/JDEM Physics and Detector R&D at Caltech HEP Alan Weinstein and Justin Albert in collaboration with Caltech Astronomy (R.Ellis, J.Rhodes, others),
Photo courtesy NOAO, taken with LBNL fully depleted CCD Optical Characterization of 1.7  m NIR Detectors for SNAP M. Brown (Michigan), J. Balleza (IDTL),
SNAP ICU ProjectDOE HEP Program Review June 2-4, SLAC Participation in The Supernova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Presentation to the DOE High Energy.
Thoughts on Ground-based lensing measurements Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford/SLAC KIPAC.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
Chapter 6 Photodetectors.
1st Eddington Workshop. Córdoba, June 14th, 2001 J. Miguel Mas-Hesse 1 EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera Preliminary design.
Limits on Reciprocity Failure in 1.7  m cut-off NIR astronomical detectors Wolfgang Lorenzon T. Biesiadzinski, R. Newman, M. Schubnell, G. Tarle, C. Weaverdyck.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
1 K. Gilmore - SDW The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Status Summary Kirk Gilmore SLAC/KIPAC.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Gerardo E. Cornejo M. Bonner Denton Scott Tilden Roger Sperline Denton Research Lab Department of Chemistry University of Arizona
Introduction to Optical Detectors: Plates, PMTs and CCDs Matt A. Wood Florida Institute of Technology Dept of Physics and Space Sciences.
STSAT-3 UN BSSW, June 2008 KASI Compact Wide-Field Survey IR Space Telescope Design Wonyong Han Korea Astronomy & Space Science Institute (KASI)
Characterization of a Large Format HgCdTe on Silicon Focal Plane Array
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Infrared Sensor Chip Systems for ESA’s Euclid Mission
1 SNAP Calibration Hardware Contributors: Chuck Bower Nick Mostek Stuart Mufson Mike Sholl.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
LSST Studies Large Synoptic Survey Telescope DOE HEP Program Review April 18, 2006 Brookhaven National Laboratory Morgan May.
WFIRST 10  m Pixel Pitch Detector Considerations March 10, /10/
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
Opto-Mechanics for SNAP at UM
Observational Astrophysics I
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
OL 750 Measurement Systems OL 750 Measurement Systems Optronic Laboratories, Inc.
A Detector Upgrade for LDSS3 Mike Gladders Jacob Bean (on the phone) with Andreas Seifart, Josh Frieman, John Carlstrom.
The Instrument The focal plane is like an HEP detector, larger than any present astronomical camera, but smaller than a vertex detector. ½ Billion pixels.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Goals for HETDEX Determine equation of state of Universe and evolutionary history for dark energy from 0
ISWG - December 7, Destiny, The Dark Energy Space Telescope.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
GSFC/Spinhirne 03/13/2002 Multispectral and Stereo Infrared Cloud Observations by COVIR (Compact Visible and Infrared Imaging Radiometer) J. Spinhirne,
Scientific DetectorWorkshop, 2005 Taormina Characterization of 1.7um cutoff detectors for SNAP Roger Smith Caltech.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
Cosmic Background Explorer: COBE
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Noise Characterization of the SIDECAR ASIC Readout Chip for SNAP Martin Diaz Stanford Linear Accelerator Center August 14, 2008.
Focal Plane Arrays and Focal Plane Electronics for Large Scientific Telescopes The HAWAII-2RG (H2RG) is the leading IR focal plane array (FPA) in ground-
Electronics & Communication Engineering
4x8 Mosaic Camera Development
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
Detectors of JWST Near IR Instruments
Photodetectors.
Persistence Experiment Preliminary Design Review
LSST Camera Detector Status
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
OL 750 Measurement Systems
Persistence Experiment Preliminary Design Review
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

1 Dark Energy? The study of the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and their effects on the evolution and structure of the universe, are some of the most compelling scientific goals of this century, as recognized by the DOE Office of Science / HEP. I am not trained in astronomy or cosmology, but the opportunity to contribute to this work is simply too exciting for me to pass up! This is a new direction for me, but I believe that my expertise in HEP, and in gravitational wave detection, puts me in a good position to make significant contributions to the study of dark energy with SNAP/JDEM.

2 Involvement in SNAP/JDEM After much consultation with principle scientists in SNAP, I have applied for associate membership in the SNAP Collaboration, with the intent of ramping up to full membership within a year. I am proposing to contribute to SNAP R&D in collaboration with the existing Caltech group led by Richard Ellis, which includes Caltech Millikan Fellow Justin Albert. Proposed research plan (pending advice from SNAP Collaboration): —Testing and characterization of Near Infrared Focal Plane Array detectors —Development of techniques for extraction of cosmological parameters through the measurement of cosmic shear due to weak gravitational lensing —Development of SNAP simulation package I plan to request funding for a postdoc and graduate student to pursue this and related work It is still many years before SNAP will fly. I plan to continue to pursue my work in CMS and in LIGO for the next few years, if possible.

3 Hubble diagram – low z

4 Type Ia Supernovae as Standard Candles Progenitor C/O White Dwarf accreting from companion Just before Chandrasekhar mass, thermonuclear runaway Standard explosion from nuclear physics ("standard candle"). From the luminosity, we can measure the distance from us From the spectrum, we measure how fast they are moving away from us. From this, we construct a Hubble diagram, and infer the expansion rate of the universe, and the history of the expansion rate since the Big Bang (acceleration of the universe).

5 Hubble diagram - SCP In flat universe:  M =0.28 [ .085 stat][ .05 syst] Prob. of fit to  =0 universe: 1% redshift z

6 Supernova Cosmology

7 SNAP: The Third Generation

8 Dark Energy Equation of State

9 Dark Energy Exploration with SNAP Current ground based compared with Binned simulated data and a sample of Dark energy models

10 SNAP/JDEM Mission Design Wide field imaging from space

11 Optical Bands NIR Bands Z = 0.8Z = 1.2Z = 1.6 Simulated SNAP observations of high redshift SNe NIR observations in core SNAP science NIR allows observation of SNe rest frame optical to high redshift Tracing the effect of dark energy through cosmic time requires probing to high-redshift Rest frame optical shifts into NIR after z=0.9 Large wavelength coverage provides important constraints on systematic errors Substantially enhances auxiliary science

12 NIR Science drivers Spatial and wavelength coverage: NIR data for all SNe to constrain systematic errors  focal plane to match CCDs which cover the visible Wavelength coverage to overlap CCDs and allow B and V restframe observations to z>1.5  sensitivity from 1.0 to  1.7  m Signal-to-noise ratio: Noise should be dominated by unavoidable zodiacal light — dark current < 0.02 e - / pixel / sec — read noise < 5 e - Signal levels should be sufficient to allow precise observation of SNe near peak with adequate S/N out to z=1.7 within time constraints —quantum efficiency > 60%

13 Focal Plane Layout with Fixed Filters FoV: ~0.3 square degrees to match CCD FoV, observe SN in every color Wavelength coverage 0.9 – 1.7  m to observe V band out to z = 1.7 Three optimized filters to obtain redshifted B bands out to z=1.7 4-fold rotational symmetry to optimize scan strategy with minimal spacecraft re-orientation

14 NIR detector R&D Establish large format detectors with good QE out to 1.7 µm cutoff, operating at SNAP FPA temperature of 140 o Explore broadened technology options and vendor pool; establish competitive vendor environment —Rockwell (RSC) – MBE HgCdTe —Raytheon (RVS) – LPE HgCdTe —Sensors Unlimited/Rockwell – InGaAs Establish facilities for testing and characterizing NIR FPA and detectors Over the last year the SNAP infrared program has crystallized with several important developments: —NIR team assembled (Caltech, IU, JPL, UCLA, UM, GSFC) —Laboratory facilities in place and tested —Detector procurement and development program in place —Active program of device characterization under way

15 Proposed involvement in NIR R&D Caltech astronomy has a strong, experienced team of IR instrumenters, led by Keith Taylor and Roger Smith They are involved in many projects; SNAP involvement requires more participation. Propose to work with this team, learning the techniques and technologies; and work in close collaboration with other groups pursuing parallel goals (Michigan, JPL, GSFC). SNAP effort requires multiple teams working together and independently to develop key technologies. Caltech/UCLA Propose to help develop a larger, more automated and flexible test facility, capable of testing and characterizing multiple detector technologies and large arrays. Propose to recruit postdoc and grad student devoted to project.

16 Test dewar at Caltech OA Mount & enclosure on electronics box (dewar absent for clarity) Molybdenum detector heater plate Flex circuit potted into cap of light tight enclosure with silver filled epoxy: —Thermal ground —Light seal Labyrinth for light seal

17 Next Generation Test dewar Stabilized Blackbody Calibrated filters (CVF?) after aperture, open, or blocked Apertures, pinhole, open, blocked Temperature regulated blackbody, or some other calibrated light source, for QE Slits, holes, lenses, open, dark position with calibrated IR diode facing beam for QE crosscheck. Baffles to block scattered light Fully light shielded detector Access hatches in top plate

18 Goals for automated test dewar Capable of rapid cooling/warming cycles, cycling to LN 2 temperature and back up in 24 hours or less. Detectors would be tested under high vacuum and at temperatures ranging from 77 o to the SNAP radiative-cooling temperature of 140 o and up. Chamber large enough to accommodate a mosaic of 3×3 detectors (each a bit under 4 cm square) Illuminated in an ultra-dark chamber by calibrated light sources capable of fast pulsed illumination, with precision intensity, waveband, and position control. Many relevant detector parameters would be measured under automated control, to maximize throughput and flexibility while minimizing variations in test procedures. Comparable testing of devices from different manufacturers, different substrates and readout chips, different cutoff wavelengths, different AR coatings, and different filters.

19 Detector testing Tests would include Dark current as a function of temperature, pixel position, settling time, exposure time, bias voltage, previous illumination history (signal persistence), and other parameters. Electronics noise properties (frequency spectrum, bandwidth) characterized and their origins (MUX, clock, amplifier, controller, crosstalk, etc.) studied. Quantum efficiency measured versus wavelength for various temperatures, bias voltages, and sampling schemes, ideally using a calibrated source in order to reliably measure the absolute quantum efficiency. Intrapixel response would be studied. Other issues, such as reflectivity, capacitive coupling between pixels within detector material, charge diffusion, fill factor, etc., could be addressed.

20Conclusions I am very excited about the opportunity to work with SNAP and Caltech colleagues on the science of SNAP/JDEM. I am confident that I will be able to make significant contributions to the development of the mission. I look forward to a deep exploration of the nature of dark energy and its effect on the evolution and structure of the universe.