Critique of Research Outlines: 1. Research Problem. 2. Literature Review. 3. Theoretical Framework. 4. Variables. 5. Hypotheses. 6. Design. 7. Sample.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
(Identifying research problem) (Chapter 11)
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
Critiquing Research Articles For important and highly relevant articles: 1. Introduce the study, say how it exemplifies the point you are discussing 2.
Chapter 4 Validity.
Chapter Four. Writing the Proposal  What does the intended reader/audience need to understand better about the topic?  What does the audience know little.
Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research
Problem Identification
1 Writing the Research Proposal Researchers communicate: Plans, Methods, Thoughts, and Objectives for others to read discuss, and act upon.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Statistical presentation in international scientific publications 5. A statistical review (group work) Malcolm Campbell Lecturer in Statistics, School.
Research problem, Purpose, question
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat Evaluating the Studies You Read Planning the Actual Research.
The phases of research Dimitra Hartas. The phases of research Identify a research topic Formulate the research questions (rationale) Review relevant studies.
I want to test a wound treatment or educational program but I have no funding or resources, How do I do it? Implementing & evaluating wound research conducted.
1 The Literature Review March 2007 (3). 2 The Literature Review The review of the literature is defined as a broad, comprehensive, in- depth, systematic,
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Chapter 21 Preparing a Research Report Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Nursing Research Prof. Nawal A. Fouad (5) March 2007.
Evaluating a Research Report
Highlights from Educational Research: Its Nature and Rules of Operation Charles and Mertler (2002)
Copyright ©2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Foundations of Nursing Research, 5e By Rose Marie Nieswiadomy.
Is research in education important?. What is the difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods?
Evaluating Research Articles Approach With Skepticism Rebecca L. Fiedler January 16, 2002.
URBDP 591 I Lecture 3: Research Process Objectives What are the major steps in the research process? What is an operational definition of variables? What.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 8 Clarifying Quantitative Research Designs.
1 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY CHAPTER 3 PREPARED BY: MUKUNDA KUMAR.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Writing a Research Proposal.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
The Research Process.  There are 8 stages to the research process.  Each stage is important, but some hold more significance than others.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
TITLE OF THE STUDY. General Instructions 12/7/  Presentation Time: 15 minutes  Questions & Answers: 05 minutes  Each slide should not contain.
Title Sub-Title Open Writing it up! The content of the report/essay/article.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 3 Experimental Research Paradigm and Processes.
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 7 Understanding Theory and Research Frameworks.
HOW TO DESIGN & EVALUATE RESEARCH IN EDUCATION. PART 1 – Introduction to Research Chapter 1 - “The Nature of Educational Research”
Writing A Review Sources Preliminary Primary Secondary.
Strengthening Research Capabilities Professor John B. Kaneene DVM, MPH, PhD, FAES, FAVES Center for Comparative Epidemiology Michigan State University.
Understanding the Research Process
Assistant Instructor Nian K. Ghafoor Feb Definition of Proposal Proposal is a plan for master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation which provides the.
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Chapter 13 Writing a Research Proposal.
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Guidelines to Critiquing Qualitative Research Reports.
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
HCS 465 OUTLET Experience Tradition /hcs465outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Understanding Populations & Samples
Understanding Populations & Samples
Writing a sound proposal
Research Problems, Purposes, & Hypotheses
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Research Problem, Questions and Hypotheses
Chapter Four: Writing Strategies and Ethical Considerations
Data Collection Methods for Problem Statement
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat
Unit 6 Research Project in HSC Unit 6 Research Project in Health and Social Care Aim This unit aims to develop learners’ skills of independent enquiry.
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Research Proposal and Report
Managerial Decision Making and Evaluating Research
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat
Critiquing Qualitative Research
Presentation transcript:

Critique of Research

Outlines: 1. Research Problem. 2. Literature Review. 3. Theoretical Framework. 4. Variables. 5. Hypotheses. 6. Design. 7. Sample. 8. Data Collection. 9. Ethical Considerations. 10. Data Analysis. 11. Discussion and Interpretation of Findings. 12. Application to Nursing Practice.

1. Research Problem * Is the problem identified clearly? * Is it significant--does the researcher provide a good argument for significance? * Is it relevant to nursing/health care?

2. Literature Review: * Is it believable that the author reviewed a sufficient amount of literature? * Is it balanced, presenting literature that supports and that differs from the researcher's position? * Is the review written critically (giving strengths and weaknesses of previous work * Is the review comprised only of primary sources? * Are references current, or a combination of current and classic?

3. Theoretical Framework: * Is a theoretical framework specified? *Does the framework "fit" the problem? Include all relevant variables? *Are concepts (variables) defined clearly from a theoretical point of view? *If no framework is provided, should there be one? *Is it difficult to understand? *Are results interpreted in reference to the theoretical framework? -Note: qualitative research, descriptive studies, and physiologic studies typically will not have a theoretical framework.

4. Variables: * Are the variables in the study appropriate to the problem? * Are the variables relevant to nursing practice? * Are the resources to measure the variables appropriate?

5. Hypotheses: *Are hypotheses stated? If not, does the researcher provide sufficient information to determine what the hypotheses were? *If stated, are the hypotheses clear? Specific? Testable? --Note: qualitative research and many types of descriptive studies do not involve hypotheses.

6. Design (overall): * Is the design specified correctly? *What design was used? * Is the design appropriate to answer the research question? * Did the researcher attempt to control for threats validity?

7. Sample: * Is the sample size adequate? *Is the sample likely to be similar to members of the appropriate population overall? *Are the criteria for including and/or excluding people or items from the sample clear and appropriate?

8. Data Collection: *Are the instruments or other means for data collection described sufficiently and clearly? *Are reliability and validity of instruments addressed? Are these adequate? *Are the data collection methods appropriate? *Could the researcher have affected the results of the study in some way related to the collection of data?

9. Ethical Considerations: *Does the researcher indicate that approval was obtained from appropriate review boards? *Were the rights of human subjects protected (confidentiality, freedom from force)? *Is there any possibility that the subjects might have felt pressured to participate or their responses influenced in some other way?

10. Data Analysis: * Is the process used to analyze data clear? * Were the processes for data analysis appropriate to answer the research question? * Do the results provide an answer to the research question? * If tables are provided, are these clear and understandable?

11. Discussion and Interpretation of Findings: *Does the discussion "fit" with the data? Is it logical based on the data and results presented? *Does the researcher discuss the findings in regard to previous research? *Does the researcher discuss the findings in regard to the theoretical framework? *Does the researcher identify limitations of the study? How do these affect the quality of the study? *Does the researcher discuss implications for practice? Are these appropriate?

12. Application to Nursing Practice: *How similar are the conditions of the study (setting, sample, interventions, etc.) to other practice settings? To your practice setting? *How feasible would it be to make a change in practice based on this research? *Are benefits likely to compensate costs and risks of a change in practice for the patient, family, nurse, and organization?