CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, 2005 1 - Christian POLICARD, Executive Vice President Business Development INSTITUT PASTEUR - Nicole RIEUNIER-BURLE, Avocat.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATION CENTER WIPO/INN/MCT/04/3 WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT Muscat, April 20, 2004.

Advertisements

Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.

1 Patents Systems and Knowledge Policies Dominique Guellec Chief economist - EPO National Academy – January 2005 Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge.

IP System and Economic Development: Empirical Evidence from China Qi Su IP Institute, Tong Ji University Dec 04, TongJi Global Intellectual Property.

The Production and Consumption of Knowledge in Business and Academia Roger Elliott ALLEA.

Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,

Leveraging 3rd Party IP Innotech Oregon April 1, 2004 Intellectual Assets, Inc. Develop an Unfair Strategic Advantage Evaluation Licensing Tech Scouting.

Unconventional Financing of Intellectual Property: Patent Donations Varda N. Main Associate Director, Intellectual Property Rochester Institute of Technology.

What is Marketing?.

Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.

Knowledge Commons: The Case of the Biopharmaceutical Industry Arti K. Rai Duke Law School.

Intellectual Property Management in Universities and Successful Technology Licensing Organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in.

PRESENTED BY ELIZABETH TAMALE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MINISTRY OF TRADE, INDUSTRY AND COOPERATIVES AID FOR TRADE, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT-

A Tool for Effective Capacity Building, Education and Training in Korea April 3, 2009 In International Conference on Intellectual Property for Women in.

WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology Collaboration, Geneva, Switzerland, April 2005 Structuring Science &

Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.

Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.

THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.

Mitigating the Social Impact of Oil Operations 18th World Energy Conference Eleodoro Mayorga Alba World Bank October 22, 2001.

Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.

Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.

WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.

Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.

T HE SCSTI SUPPORT IN AREA OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER national project National infrastructure for technology transfer support in.

6 November 2002 Areas of Potential Disputes: the Venture Capital Perspective Francesco De Rubertis, PhD General Partner, Index Ventures WIPO Conference.

1. International agreements ratified by Ukraine. 2. Law of Ukraine “On international activity”. 3. Law of Ukraine “On investment activity”. 4. Law of Ukraine.

T2S Conference 2006 Policy and Networking: an RIS in Korea Yu Jin Jung School of Public Policy George Mason University.

1 Iowa’s Charitable Nonprofit Organizations The Impact of Charitable Nonprofit Organization on Iowa’s Economy and Quality of Life.

WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Collaborations April 25/26, 2005 Lorelei de Larena, Esq. UCLA Intellectual.

Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus

NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, WIPO CONFERENCE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION WIPO CONFERENCE ON DISPUTE.

NIH Funding Recipient Responsibilities February, 2004 Office of Technology Transfer Office of the Director National Institutes of Health.

A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.

NSF Programs and Possibilities Research Linkages EU-US 23 September 2004 Sylvia Spengler US National Science Foundation.

Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.

A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.

How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.

“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.

1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.

FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems Intellectual Property Rights Review meeting Delft,

BUILDING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FOR COLLABORATIVE R&D AS A TECH TRANSFER TOOL Lorne Heslop Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada May 29, 2003.

Commons, Networks, and Technology Transfer Gerald Barnett Director, Intellectual Property Management University of California, Santa Cruz.

WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.

Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.

Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.

Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.

What is Marketing? Chapter 1 Section 1. Marketing The process of developing, promoting, and distributing goods and services to satisfy customers’ needs.

Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.

Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.

1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.

The Importance of IP in the Global Context Colloquium on IP Rights Bratislava 25 June 2012 John Tarpey Director of Communications.

Knowledge Transfer Accelerating Innovation. slide 1 The Knowledge Transfer Group at the HR Induction Program (session II) 6 th September 2011 Enrico Chesta.

WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.

Competition and Intellectual Property Protection in the Pharmaceutical Sector Alexey Ivanov Director, HSE-Skolkovo Institute for Law and Development Director,

OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.

Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0

Annex: Berlin Contract

Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D

ARP, New Faculty Orientation August 22, 2008 Simran Trana Director

Alain GALLOCHAT, French Research Ministry

Intellectual Property Law

IPR’s: new challenges and opportunities

Causes of disputes Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Collaboration - WIPO Ian Harvey Chairman, Intellectual Property Institute.

Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Maribor, November 5 to 7, 2012 Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain.

Areas of Potential Disputes

The Free Enterprise System

A. B. Authorship Dispute Mediation Process at OUHSC

Presentation transcript:

CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, Christian POLICARD, Executive Vice President Business Development INSTITUT PASTEUR - Nicole RIEUNIER-BURLE, Avocat à la Cour Head of the Life Science Department BRUNSWICK LAW FIRM WIPO CONFERENCE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION WIPO CONFERENCE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION April 25-26, 2005 PRESENTATIONS OF:

CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, WHOM WE REPRESENT: INSTITUT PASTEUR  STATUS: foundation or charity i.e. assets dedicated to research purposes  in the fields of microbiology  with a mission of public service, i.e. –help to the community –domestic relation with health authorities –international assistance  dramatically relying on patents resulting for the research to survive –35 to 40% revenues from intellectual property –the remainder from donations, bequests and public subsidies  EXAMPLE OF HIGHLY PUBLICIZED DISPUTE, AMONG OTHERS: AIDS virus discovery and test invention

CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, WHAT WE SHALL FOCUS ON POTENTIAL AREAS OF DISPUTES IN THE DOMAIN OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM THE BENCH COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH EFFORTS (I) TO THE MARKET EXPLOITATION (II)

CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, I.AREAS OF POTENTIAL DISPUTES RELATED TO COLLABORATIONS A.DRAFTING THE RESEARCH PROGRAM  Highly qualified persons  Market share and public recognition… in terra incognita B.NEED TO IDENTIFY THE ACTORS Disputes may occur  among individuals  among organizations  between academic institutions and industry

CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, I.AREAS OF POTENTIAL DISPUTES RELATED TO COLLABORATION (Continued) C.THE GROUNDS OF DISPUTES  Inventorship and authorship  Assessment of pre-existing knowledge patents know-how  Co-ownership of joint results management during the implementation of the collaboration follow-up in the years  Management of the Research Programmes

CP/NRB/MF OMPI April 25-26, II.AREAS OF POTENTIAL DISPUTES RELATED TO EXPLOITATION A.SHARE VALUE v/ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Problem: research leads to upstream intangible with unknown intrinsic value Large premium over book value paid in pharma companies evidences that patented blockbuster are true economic assets But true value is indistinguishable from the value of the earnings produced by assets Audit of royalties B.PITFALLS AND DURATION OF PATENT PROSECUTION Oppositions in Europe and interferences in America defer time of certainty Scope and enforceability