Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting March 6, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sales Call Plans Set Objectives Design Sales Call Flow
Advertisements

Communities Coordinating for Healthy Development: Minnesota’s ABCD III Initiative National Academy for State Health Policy Annual Conference October 5,
Claytor Lake Project No. 739 Recreation Assessment & Angler Use Survey Study Kickoff Meeting January 24, 2007.
Applying Social Science to Outdoor Recreation Management Diane Kuehn SUNY ESF.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Approach for Developing New.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting July 21, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 6,
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
4th Annual Innovation Challenge Kick-Off and Overview Fall
MONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAYSUNDAY WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK CALENDAR PROJECT.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Welcome to the Learning Community 2015 Roll out webinar Hosted by the Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar will begin shortly.
Process Evaluation Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011 Billings, MT.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2008 ERCOT Market Participant Survey February 12, 2008.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Evaluation of the Indianapolis, Indiana September 2002 – August 2003 Stamp Out Syphilis Coalition.
Understanding and Administering the School- Wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
Day Weighted Resident Rosters New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services AND July-August 2010.
Credentials Committee Orientation. Responsibilities of the Committee Review the credentials of all applicants to the Medical Staff and privileges requests.
WELCOME! External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Wednesday, June 18, :00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. WELCOME!
“Keeping your money in your pocket, where it belongs.” Chart of Accounts Update Florida Court Clerks & Comptrollers - New Clerk Academy March 13, 2014.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable January 21, :00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. MyFloridaMarketPlace.
SENSE Fall 2007 Pilot Orientation Conference Calls.
STRATUM Data Collection and Analysis: Baltimore. Baltimore’s 2007 Sample Survey Background TreeBaltimore Why a survey? Why a sample? Why iTree?
Applying Social Science to Outdoor Recreation Management Diane Kuehn SUNY ESF.
1 A Study to Evaluate the New Dawn (ND) Project of Single Parents/Child Carers under CSSA Scheme Research team Dept. of Social Work & Social Administration,
Participant Accrual. Numbers that Matter 3476= total number of women enrolled at least 95% retention at each visit, at each study site 100% attention.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Time Management From Proposal to Dissertation Defense.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting February 19, 2008.
Incident Management PCCYFS June 27, 2007 Incident Management for the Office of Children, Youth and Families.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 8, 2010.
BAD Building Technical Assistance Grant Program Overview Luke Elser Northern WV Brownfields Assistance Center January 16 th, 2015.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
Using Evaluation for Continuous Program Improvement: A Conversation with the Accelerating Opportunity Evaluators Lauren Eyster and Maureen Conway National.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg 11 ICCS 2009 – Field Trial Survey Operations Overview.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section B 1.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
ERCOT Staff Demand Integration Update to DSWG 3/08/2013 DSWG Meeting.
Overview of the Program Prioritization Process Task Force Representatives K-State Research and Extension Annual Conference October 18, 2012.
M ODESTO I RRIGATION D ISTRICT | T URLOCK I RRIGATION D ISTRICT FERC PROJECT N O Don Pedro Project Relicensing.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting June 1, 2009 Handout #2.
April 21, 2010 Sunflower Project Monthly Conversion Meeting – April.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
Middle Fork Project Existing Resource Information Reports July 18, 2006.
Market Metrics Working Group 2005 Accomplishments and 2006 Goals.
 Pilot Survey: For non-radiation Risk Factors Faith Davis, Ludmilla Krestinina, Oleg Kalyov, Dale Preston, Alexander Akleyev, Timothy Johnson (JCCRER.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
Making Health and Safety Meetings Work If you had to identify, in one word, the reason why the human race has not achieved, and never will achieve, its.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Session # DATES Session # DATES 1January 4 th to January 15 th 11May 23 rd to June 3 rd 2January 18 th to January 29 th 12June 6 th to June 17 th 3February.
Middle Fork American River Project Recreation Resources Technical Working Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
SEAD-funded APEC-CAST Project Proposal Solicitation Update 39 th Meeting of the APEC Expert Group on Energy Efficiency & Conservation 28 February 2012.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Becoming a TEAMS Collegiate Host
CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation
Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
Becoming a TEAMS Collegiate Host
Public Education Department
Becoming a TEAMS Collegiate Host
Presentation transcript:

Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting March 6, 2008

General Visitor Survey Protocols 2

Proposed Sampling Effort Table 5 Table 5 3

General Protocols  Statistical sites will be sampled on weekdays, weekend days and holidays  Qualitative sites will be sampled on weekends and holidays  Sampling effort for statistical sites is stratified by month based on use distribution – June, July, August  For each month, the number of holiday, weekend-day, and weekday sample-day are assigned  Fridays will not be scheduled for sampling to provide an open day for QA/QC and data management activities and to allow for adjustments to the sampling schedule, if needed  Each sample-day represents two sample-blocks  Each sample-block represents a four hour sample effort 4

General Protocols  Sampling-blocks dates for each month are first randomly selected for each “day-type”  Second, sampling blocks were systematically adjusted to account for staff loading  Staff load balancing only occurs within “day-type” categories  Example: A weekday sampling block can be re-assigned to another weekday but not a weekend-day  Sampling block times are systematically selected based on survey location and facility type  Surveyors will remain on site 4 hours (AM, PM, or evening) for each designated survey block  Surveyors will survey all persons encountered during the sampling block, provided they are willing to participate 5

Site-Specific Protocols  Campgrounds  Surveys will be conducted during AM blocks (8-12) or evening blocks (4-8) only  Survey team will coordinate sampling dates for reserved group sites with Forest Service to ensure occupancy at site  All Other Individual Sites  Surveys will be conducted during AM blocks (8-12) or PM blocks (1-5)  Grouped Sites  Surveys will be conducted during AM blocks (8-12) or PM blocks (1-5)  Surveyors will rove through groups of sites over a 4-hour period  Starting points within each group of sites will be randomly selected  All persons encountered at any one site will be approached and asked to participate in the survey 6

Site-Specific Protocols  Survey Administration  Section A-1 will be administered at all survey locations  With the exception of campgrounds, each user will be asked to complete two additional relevant sections based upon the primary activities they identify  Users intercepted at campgrounds will be asked to complete all relevant sections  Survey administration may be adjusted pending the pre-test results and/or feedback from early sampling efforts 7

Site-Specific Protocols  Locations in ASRA  Surveys will be conducted during AM blocks (8-12) or evening blocks (1-5), and will target stream-based recreation users  Sections A-1 and A-5 will be administered at all locations  Section A-7 will also be administered, if applicable  Ruck-a-Chucky  Sections A-1 and A-5 will be administered to all users  One of the following sections will be administered - Section A-2, A-3, or A-7 8

Survey Log Survey logs will be completed for each sampling location Survey logs will be completed for each sampling location Surveyors will record the following information on the survey log: Surveyors will record the following information on the survey log:  Site Identification  Weather Conditions  Site Conditions  Surveyor Name  Date  Time Arrived at Site  Time Departed Site  Estimated Number of People at Site  Contact Number  Contact Time  Surveyed Previously (Y/N)  Willingness to Participate (Y/N)  Survey No.  Male/Female (M/F)  Part of Family? (Y/N)  Part of Larger Group (Y/N)  How may in family/group (#/#) 9

Proposed Sampling Schedule Sampling schedule tables Sampling schedule tables 10

Proposed Pretest Process and Schedule  Conduct surveys at Ruck-a-Chucky on Sunday, March 9 th  If no one is present at Ruck-a-Chucky, move to Confluence  Conduct interviews over a 4-hour period, from 1PM - 5 PM  Intercept all users present at site  Record survey participation notes on survey log  Report results and discuss proposed survey form/ protocol revisions to group at March 26 th TWG 11

Focus Groups 12

Draft Invitation Letter(s) Draft Invitation Letter(s) Proposed Discussion Topics Proposed Discussion Topics  Whitewater Boating Focus Group  Angler Focus Group  Trail Users/Stream Crossing Focus Group Timing Timing  February - March 2008: Identify Focus Group participants for each Focus Group  February - March 2008: Develop Focus Group topics  April - May 2008: Conduct Focus Group sessions 13

Whitewater Boating Flow Studies 14

Flow Study Implementation Timing Timing  March - April 2008: Develop flow study survey instruments  March - April 2008: Evaluate water-year data to refine windows for flow study Implementation  April - May 2008: Select flow study team members  June 2008: Orientation of study team members  July - October 2008: Implement studies in coordination with instream flow studies conducted as part of AQ 1 TSP 15

Flow Study Implementation Study Reaches and Potential Target Flows Oxbow PH to Ruck-a-Chucky ,025 cfs cfs cfs Ruck-a-Chucky to Mammoth Bar Mammoth Bar to Confluence Confluence to Oregon Bar ,025 cfs cfs cfs cfs16

Flow Study Implementation Whitewater survey form Whitewater survey form 17