Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEAMS (FLEXURE) BEAM- COLUMNS SHEAR / CONC. LOADS
Advertisements

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
Limit States Flexure Shear Deflection Fatigue Supports Elastic Plastic
Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo.
Tension Members Last Time
DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR COMBINED FORCES
DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR COMBINED FORCES
REVIEW OF STEEL DESIGN KNOWLEDGE BASE REQUIRED: STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
Beam-Columns.
Axial Force Member Design CE A433 – Spring 2008 T. Bart Quimby, P.E., Ph.D. University of Alaska Anchorage Civil Engineering.
Beams and Frames.
LRFD-Steel Design Dr. Ali Tayeh Second Semester
Chapter 13 Buckling of Columns
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Design of Tension Members
Design of Tension Members
Compression Member Design
Chap. (6) Compression Members Columns: Beam-Columns: Columns Theory:
Buckling Critical Load Considerations
Compression Members.
Column Theory - Column Strength Curve
Biaxial Bending AISC Chapter H
Compression Members.
BC-11 The horizontal beam column shown below is subjected to service live loads as shown. The member is laterally braced at its ends. Check its capacity.
Slender Columns.
CE 579: STRUCTRAL STABILITY AND DESIGN
Beam-Columns. Members Under Combined Forces Most beams and columns are subjected to some degree of both bending and axial load e.g. Statically Indeterminate.
Chap. (7) BEAMS Beams are an essential element of any structure, they carry loadings transversely applied to their axis. Various types of beams are encountered.
Combined Load Member Design
Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS)
Ø = resistance factor for shear = 0.90 Vn = nominal shear strength
LRFD- Steel Design Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester.
LRFD-Steel Design 1.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
Chap. (6) Compression Members Columns: Beam-Columns: Columns Theory:
LRFD- Steel Design Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials
Reinforced Concrete Design
Compression Component Design
Design of Combined Bending and Compression Members in Steel.
Jurg Conzett – Traversina Bridge
1.
1Combined Forces Theory Developed by Scott Civjan University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
LRFD – Floor beam Unbraced top flange. Lateral Torsion Buckling  We have to check if there is plastic failure (yielding) or lateral-torsion buckling.
LRFD- Steel Design Dr. Ali I. Tayeh second Semester Dr. Ali I. Tayeh second Semester.
Department of Building Engineering An-Najah National University
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
By Prof. Dr. Wail Nourildean Al-Rifaie
Design of Thin-Walled Members
PROBLEM # 2 SQUARE HSS Page # 4-52.
STEEL DESIGN KNOWLEDGE BASE REQUIRED: STRENGTH OF MATERIALS STEEL DESIGN REVIEW OF TIMBER DESIGN BEARING PROBLEM TIMBER DESIGN SOIL MECHANICS REVIEW OF.
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
N.W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar 1 By: Prof Dr. Akhtar Naeem Khan Lecture 09: Compression Members.
DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR COMBINED FORCES
62323: Architectural Structures II
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
Columns and Other Compression Members
REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN
Compression Members.
Chapter 13 – Buckling of Columns
Beams.
Beam-Columns.
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
REVIEW OF STEEL DESIGN KNOWLEDGE BASE REQUIRED: STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
Reinforced concrete column
KNOWLEDGE BASE REQUIRED:
Deflection of Beams In addition to being safe, the structure must be serviceable ; Serviceable structure is one that performs satisfactorily, not causing.
Presentation transcript:

Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS) Chap. (8) Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS) Members subjected to combined axial loads and bending moments are called “Beam-Columns”. Examples of this, are floor or roof beams resisting later wind loads. Top chord truss elements supporting roof loading causing bending, etc. w w w w w w w Top chord with bending Interaction Formula: where: Pu = factored axial compression. Mu = factored bending moment. Pn = nominal axial strength. Mn = nominal bending strength. BC-1

LRFD Criteria for Beam – Column Equation (BC-1) is the basic of AISC design criteria as stated in (chapter H) of AISC – LRFD specs:- BC-2

LRFD Criteria for Beam – Column Example BC-1 The beam-column shown in Figure below is pinned at both ends and is subjected to the factored loads shown. Bending is about the strong axis. Determine weather this member satisfy the appropriate AISC Specification interaction equation. Solution From the column load tables (Table 4.1) the axial compressive design strength of W8x58 with Fy=50 ksi and KyLy=17 ft cPn = 286 kips BC-3

LRFD Criteria for Beam – Column (Contd.) From the beam design charts (Table 3-10 page 3 – 125) for un braced length of Lb=17, and Cb=1.0 bMn = 202 k.ft. For this condition and this loading : Cb=1.32 (table 3.1)  bMn = 1.32 x 202 = 267 k.ft. bMp = 224 k.ft. (Table 3.2 page 3-18).  bMn = 224 k.ft.  bMp This member satisfies the AISC specifications. BC-4

Moment Amplification Moments caused by eccentricity of axial load cannot be ignored for beam-columns. The value of (P·) is called “Moment magnification” due to initial beam column initial crookedness or from bending due to transverse load (). It can be proven that a beam column with initial crookedness (e) and initial moment (Mo = Pu ·e), that the total moment becomes: M = Pu ( e + ymax) BC-5

Moment Magnification Contd. where:- M = Magnified moment. Mo = Initial moment (due to initial crookedness or more often due to transverse loads). Example BC-2 Compute the amplification factor for example (BC-1) So M = 1.15 Mo = 1.15  93.5 = 107.5 k·ft. BC-6

Braced Frames & Unbraced Frames Moment amplification is covered in chapter C of the AISC code. Two amplification factors are used in LRFD:- * One to account for amplification due to deflection. * One to account for amplification due to frame sideway to lateral forces in unbraced frames. LRFD account for both effects: Mu = Mr = B1 Mnt + B2 Mlt AISC C2-1a Where: Mr = Mu = factored load combination as affected by amplification. Mnt = Maximum moment assuming no sidesway (no translation) Mlt = Maximum moment caused by sidesway (lateral translation). (Mlt = 0 for braced frames) B1 = amplification factor for braced frames. B2 = amplification factor for unbraced frames. BC-7

Members in Braced Frames The maximum moment in a beam-column depend on the end bending moments in a braced frame, the various cases are accounted for by a factor (Cm) as follows: (AISC C2-2) BC-8

Evaluation of Cm Factor Where: Cm = Coefficient whose value taken as follows: 1: If there are no transverse loads acting on the member, (AISC Equation C2 – 4) M1/M2 is a ratio of the bending moments at the ends of the member. M1 is the end moment that is smaller in absolute value, M2 is the larger, and the ratio is positive for moment bent in reverse curvature and negative for single-curvature bending. Reverse curvature (a positive ratio) occurs when M1 and M2 are both clockwise or both counterclockwise. BC-9

Evaluation of Cm Factor 2. For transversely loaded members, Cm can be taken as 0.85 if the ends are restrained against rotation and 1.0 if the ends are unrestrained against rotation (pinned). End restraint will usually result from the stiffness of members connected to the beam-column. The pinned end condition is the one used in the derivation of the amplification factor; hence there is no reduction for this case, which corresponds to Cm = 1.0. Although the actual end condition may lie between full fixity and a frictionless pin, use of one of the two values given here will give satisfactory results. (AISC C2 – 5) BC-10