Update on the District of Columbia’s Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) November 18, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.
Stormwater Management/ MS4 Permitting International Municipal Lawyers Association 2014 Annual Conference Baltimore, Maryland Gene Tanaka
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
THE DISTRICT’S ANACOSTIA RIVER TRASH TMDL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of the Hempfield Township’s New Storm Water Management Program.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
The Virginia Bar Association October 22, 2009 Richmond, Virginia Reginald Parrish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Update on.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
GREEN STREETS | GREEN JOBS | GREEN TOWNS INITIATIVE
Update on PI Modeling and Nitrogen Removal at Blue Plains
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
MACo Winter Conference
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Local Planning Process…
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Update on the District of Columbia’s Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) November 18, 2010

2

DC Allocations In our WIP, DC met its allocation goals for: – Nitrogen – 2.37 mil lbs/yr – Phosphorous -.13 mil lbs/yr – Sediment – now 12 mill lbs/yr, since our Regs and MS4 permit will require 1.2” retention, this will allow us to meet our allocations.

Timeline of Events D.C. held a Stakeholder Meeting on August 25 th, 2010 at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments The District submitted our Draft Phase 1 WIP to the EPA on September 1, 2010 The EPA issued the Draft TMDL on September 24, 2010 D.C. held a Public Meeting at the National Zoo Visitor Center on September 29 th, 2010 Final Phase 1 WIP due to EPA on November 29 th,2010 The EPA will establish the Bay TMDL on December 31, 2010

D.C. Water Quality Issues The sections of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers that lie within the District’s boundaries carry pollution from other jurisdictions D.C. is a totally permitted urban area; therefore our focus is primarily on sources such as: municipal waste water treatment plants (WWTP), CSOs and stormwater runoff

DC Water Quality Issues The Potomac River is the main water body in D.C. – The Potomac receives runoff from five jurisdictions: Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia and D.C. – 0.5% of the Potomac watershed lies within D.C. 7

DC Water Quality Issues The Anacostia River is one of the most polluted tributaries in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed – 82% of the Anacostia watershed lies within Maryland, 18% in D.C. 8

Nutrient Sources in D.C. Values from July 2010 Phase 5.3 Model Run

D.C.’s Progress in Reducing Loads since Values from July 2010 Phase 5.3 Model Run

Current and Draft Target Loads (in million pounds per year) NitrogenPhosphorousSediment CurrentTargetCurrentTargetCurrentTarget Bay-Wide ,236.66,066- 6,673 D.C Values from July 2010 Phase 5.3 Model Run

Allocations Phase 1 DC lies entirely within the Potomac Basin and therefore was issued one state-basin allocation for Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Sediment that will be allocated among different source sectors: – Blue Plains – CSOs – MS4 – Non significant facilities – Other (traditional nonpoint sources and forest) – Growth

D.C.’s Path to Progress DC Water (DC WASA) has developed and is implementing – Enhanced Nitrogen Removal for the Blue Plains WWTP (cost: approximately 1 billion dollars) – Long Term Control Plan for CSOs (cost: approximately 2.2 billion dollars) Stormwater Management Regulations and MS4 Permit – One of the most aggressive in the country – Permit is expected to be revised in the near future

D.C.’s Path to Progress Partnership with Federal Facilities – D.C. is working towards developing a Federal partnership framework that will facilitate implementation and tracking of restoration efforts in the District Stormwater (and Erosion Control) Regulations – D.C. is developing new regulations which will put in place the framework to assist in implementing WIP requirements – Regulation is due out any day now…have held public meetings w/NGO’s and wide-ranging public

D.C.’s Path to Progress DC Water (formerly DC WASA) has developed and is implementing: – Enhanced Nitrogen Removal for the Blue Plains WWTP (cost: approx $1 billion) Removes additional Nitrogen from wastewater before being discharged Improves quality of discharge to Anacostia and Potomac rivers during wet weather events Expected to be completed in 2015 – Long Term Control Plan for CSOs (cost estimated approx $2.2 billion) Will reduce CSO overflows by 96% Expected to be completed in

D.C.’s Path to Progress Washington Aqueduct – Constructing a residuals processing facility that will cut current sediment loading by 99% – Solids processing facility will contribute to reductions in Nitrogen and Phosphorous as well where N & P are bound to sediment particles – Construction expected to be completed in September

D.C.’s Path to Progress Erosion Control & Stormwater Management Regulations and MS4 Permit – One of the most aggressive in the country – A new Permit is expected to be issued by EPA in the Fall of 2010 – The draft permit contained an aggressive retention and green infrastructure approach heavily relying on infiltration, water harvesting/reuse and retention over treatment All of which will help DC work towards the sediment allocation load and is included in the Final Phase 1 WIP 17

D.C.’s Path to Progress Erosion Control & Stormwater Regulations – D.C. is developing new regulations which will put in place the framework to implement WIP requirements Accounting for Growth – Redevelopment is common in the District and is subject to stormwater regulations Redevelopment normally increases stormwater retention thereby decreasing Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Sediment loading – Growth in D.C. is expected to be mainly in the wastewater sector from increased population This is reflected in the loading numbers for Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility 18

Draft D.C. WIP Evaluation For D.C.: minor backstop Needs to be more aggressive in addressing stormwater – D.C. worked with the EPA and has met the sediment allocation through a 1.2 inch retention standard that will likely be included in the upcoming MS4 permit, and the DC Stormwater Regs. This retention standard will be reflected in the Final Phase 1 WIP and input deck. D.C. is revising the WIP to reflect the intention of the upcoming MS4 permit. Does not list all non-significant wastewater facilities – D.C. has worked with EPA to obtain information for estimating loads on some additional non-significant facilities within the District. These facilities will be accounted for in the final Phase 1 WIP and input deck. Appears to under-identify federal facilities – D.C. has received GIS help from the EPA to identify GSA facilities within the District. DDOE is working closely with federal facilities to ensure that they are all accounted for properly in the Final Phase 1 WIP.

2 Year Milestone Accomplishments DDOT planted 4,150 trees in 2009, which helps to increase urban tree canopy coverage by 5 percent (from 35 percent to 40 percent) in 25 years. The “RiverSmart Rooftops” program offers a rebate of $5/sq ft. Since the start of the program 1 year ago 15 green roofs covering 113,000 sq ft have been installed. DDOE has installed 400 rain barrels on residential properties In 2009 DDOE initiated and held a full day workshop with 5 federal agencies to explore creative ways to implement the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) DDOE held two training workshops on source controls (pollution prevention) to all its sister agencies in 2009 and 2010

2 Year Milestone Accomplishments DDOE has conducted 266 facility inspections including: 179 Auto shops, 74 Dry cleaners/Laundromats & 13 car washes DDOE developed an aggressive Pet Waste Strategy in 2009 and will begin marketing it this calendar year with schools, parks and riparian communities Watts Branch designs are pending final approval. Construction will begin on the stream restoration in late 2010; sewer line work will be concurrent with construction work. Pope branch designs for stream restoration and sewer replacement is scheduled to be complete in October of Construction will begin shortly thereafter. DDOE and DC Water began charging an impervious stormwater fee in May 2009

Important Links/Contacts Draft DC WIP: ,ddoeNav,%7C31007%7C.asp ,ddoeNav,%7C31007%7C.asp Draft Bay TMDL: DC Contacts: Diane Davis: Sarah Sand: 22