NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 1 st April2010 1 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ATST Imager and Slit Viewer Optics Ming Liang. 2 Optical layout of the telescope, relay optics, beam reducer and imager. Optical Layouts.
Advertisements

Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
CHARA AO WFS Design JDM (+LS,MJI) 2012Sep06 v0.1 1.
Alt.Aperturer 0 (m)FWHM(")  0 (")  0 (sec) 4 kmCFHT 3.8m km2.4 m~ ~600~5 35km10 m~ ~600~5 h (km)P (mbars)T (K)  (gm m.
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
LBT AGW units Design Review Mar.2001 General Concept Performance specifications and goals The off-axis unit The mechanical support structure The control.
GMT Phasing GLAO – not needed LTAO – Phase stabilization done at ~1kHz with edge sensing at M1 and M2 – Phase reference set at ~.01Hz using off-axis star.
NGAO Instrumentation Overview September 2008 Updated Sean Adkins.
NGAO 1-tier Draft Optical Relay Design P. Wizinowich 12/7/07.
LGS WFS Design Status & Issues Dekany, Delacroix, & Velur Caltech Optical Observatories.
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
Object selection ideas for NGAO NGAO Meeting #6 Anna Moore April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 HOWFS Design Update 2/27/08 C. Baranec Pasadena, CA February 27 th 2008.
A Short Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presentation for NGAO Controls Team Erik Johansson August 28, 2008.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
NGAO Wavefront sensors: conceptual design report WBS V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #12) Dec. 13 th, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
LO WFS Summit 6/19/2015Richard Dekany A Joint Meeting of the NGAO, IRIS, and K1 LO WFS Teams 12/15/2009.
AO opto-mechanical design architectures Cost Impact Don Gavel NGAO Team Meeting #5 February 5, 2009.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
2-Tier Layout (RK 11/20/07). 1-Tier Layout (RK 11/26/07)
Wide-field, triple spectrograph with R=5000 for a fast 22 m telescope Roger Angel, Steward Observatory 1 st draft, December 4, 2002 Summary This wide-field,
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 31 st March 2010.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 1 st April NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories.
LGS wavefront sensor : Type and number of sub-apertures NGAO Team Meeting #4 V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories 01/22/2007.
PALM-3000 High-order Wavefront Sensor Update Christoph Baranec Team Meeting #9 10/22/2008.
NGAO 1-tier Draft Optical Relay Design P. Wizinowich 12/3/07.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 1 st April NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories.
Performance analysis of NGAO NGSWFS with and without the IF dichroic Caltech Optical Observatories 6 th April, 2010.
P3K WFS development meeting #3 V VelurCaltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA /09/2007.
PALM-3000 Systems Engineering R. Dekany, A. Bouchez 9/22/10 Integration & Testing Review.
AO Opto-mechanical System Design Status, Issues, and Plans Don Gavel UCO/Lick Observatory (for the opto-mechanical design team) Keck NGAO Team Meeting.
Telescope Errors for NGAO Christopher Neyman & Ralf Flicker W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO Team Meeting #4 January 22, 2007 Hualalai Conference Room,
NGAO Laser Guide Star wavefront sensor Optical Design 17/16/2015Caltech Optical Observatories PD Phase LGS WFS Mini-Review.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
Keck AO the inside story D. Le Mignant for the Keck AO team.
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
B.Delabre November 2003ANGRA DOS REIS - BRAZIL ESO 2 nd GENERATION INSTRUMENTATION – OPTICAL DESIGNS ESO VLT SECOND GENERATION INSTRUMENTATION Optical.
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
MCAO System Overview Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Primary subsystems and their characteristics.
High Resolution Echelle Spectrograph for Chinese Weihai 1m Telescope. Leiwang, Yongtian Zhu, Zhongwen Hu Nanjing institute of Astronomical Optics Technology.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
The AO system for the GTC -an update Nicholas Devaney, Dolores Bello, Bruno Femenía, Alejandro Villegas, Javier Castro Grantecan, Instituto de Astrofísica.
1 Palomar Tomograph V. Velur 1, B. Platt 2, M. Britton 1, R. Dekany 1 1 Caltech Optical Observatories, California Institute of Technology 2 Interferometry.
The Second International Workshop on Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and their sources INR, Moscow, April 14-16, 2005 from Extreme Universe Space Observatory.
Brazilian Tunable Filter Imager (BTFI) Preliminary Design Review (PDR)‏ USP-IAG Universidade de São Paulo 18-19th June 2008 BTFI Optics (Keith Taylor)
MARS Design Review PP-1 Requirements Definition Performance: –Tip/Tilt error < 0.06″ rms mirror coordinates 0.12″ rms image coodinates 0.28″ fwhm image.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
An IFU for IFOSC on IUCAA 2m Telescope
NORDFORSK Summer School, La Palma, June-July 2006 NOT: Telescope and Instrumentation Michal I. Andersen & Heidi Korhonen Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Zero field The 25 ‑ m f /0.7 primary mirror for the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT) is made of seven 8.4 ‑ m segments in a close packed array. Each of the.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Wide field telescope using spherical mirrors Jim Burge and Roger Angel University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Jim
Telescope Desiderata. Various Goals Imagery / surveys - discovery, census – Consider scales, POSS vs HST, etc Astrometry / motions / distances Photometry.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
LAI-FKSI Optical Sensitivity at 2µ wavelength
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Calibration Plan Chris Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory April 20, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 1 st April NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

NGS WFS Requirements Modes of operation (FR-3247 and FR-3445) – 60 x 60 subapertures…. – 5 x 5 subapertures – Pupil imaging mode Operating wavelengths (FR-203) – 500 to 900 nm Patrol Field of Regard (FR-127) – 40 x 60 arcsec rectangle (limited by narrow field relay) – NGS WFS Field Steering Mirror Ass’ly based pick-off design WFS FoV – 4 arcseconds in 60 x 60 mode (FR-131) NGS WFS operates with no ADC (B2C decision) 2 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Motion control requirements Field steering mirrors – need to be able to pick any star in a 60x40 arcsecond Field of Regard Whole WFS motion – The WFS must work with and without the IF dichoric Lenslet XY motion & Post-lenslet relay and camera focus – The WFS needs to operate in 63x63, 5x5 and pupil imaging modes. 3 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

NGAO optical relay – the packaging problem NGS WFS Sci. Int. 2 Sci. Int. 1 LGS WFS IF 4 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Context diagram of the NGS WFS NGS WFS AO control RTC AO relay and Optical bench StatusConfig Data Optical Mechanical 5 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories The AO (supervisory) control can configure (FSM motion, lenslets, read-out mode etc.) and access status signals from the NGSWFS sub-system. NGS WFS needs to interface mechanically and optically to the AO relay/ optical bench. NGSWFS needs to send pixel data to the RTC. Note that the RTC has no control path to the sensor (unlike the LGSWFS where there is a TT mirror control).

Input to the NGS sensor Design characteristics:  NGS light is picked off in collimated space and focused using a (BASF2-N15- BASF2) triplet  F/# =  Plate scale = mm/” 6 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Input to the NGS sensor – spot diagram at the NGS sensor pick- off focal plane 7 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Ray fans at the NGS sensor pick-off focal plane 8 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Grid distortion at the NGS WFS input 9 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Effect of atmospheric dispersion Zenith Angle (deg.) Residual dispersion (mas) Max. dispersion introduced by the atmosphere between nm = 29 mas at 45 degree zenith angle – results in negligible change in sub-aperture pot size 10 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

What’s the implication for the NGS WFS? Wavefront error on input beam is 1.15 waves RMS (6 waves 600 nm at the extreme (and worst case) field points. This is mostly astigmatism. As per KAON 685 we know that this corresponds to (y = ar^2 -> 0.69 *10^(-6) = 25 * a -> a =.276*10^(-7); dy/dr = 2*a*r ->dy/dr=0.2*10^(-6) ) [c.f. Figure 13 in the KAON] KAON 692 Figures 9 and 10 along with corresponding analysis also indicate that for a large # of sub-apertures (60 in our case) the sub-ap spot size due to input aberration is going to be of the order of 2 um (RMS). 11 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Analysis result Impact of input aberrations – Negligible impact on NGS WFS subaperture spot size – Acceptable centroid offsets (~0.1 pixel worst case) – Small amount of distortion (0.13%) will be calibrated using ACQ system – Chromatic aberrations acceptable (TBC?) Atmospheric dispersion introduces ~30 mas of spot blurring. 12 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

NGS WFS parameters Following Keck Drawing Drawing #1410-CM0010 Rev. 1, we have 59 (+1/2+1/2) WFS sub-apertures across the a circle that inscribes the Keck primary mirror. We also support another calibration mode with 5x5 pupil samples across the Keck primary mirror.Drawing #1410-CM0010 Rev. 1 The WFS FoV is 4” because the sensor needs to track extended objects that are 4” in diameter. One could also work out the spot size. 13 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Modes of operation 63x63 sub-ap. mode of operation – We use 4 physical pixels per sub-ap. Which can be binned on chip and read as 2x2 pixels/sub-aperture with almost zero read noise penalty. This gives us the flexibility of 2 modes, one with high linearity and another with lower read noise. – Only 59x59 sub-apertures are lit by NGS star light at any time. The pupil imaged by the WFS nutates around the 63x63 sub-apertures. 5x5 mode of operation – to simply the size of moving parts while facilitating the two pupil sampling modes, we use the same collimator and post-lenslet relay for both the 63 and 5 sub-ap mode of operation. – We choose 48 pixels/sub-aperture (instead of 50 pixels/sub-ap) to enable 4x4 binned pixel/sub-aperture operation with standard centroiding algorithms. – A small fraction of light will be lost from the outer-most sub-apertures due to pupil nutation. Pupil imaging mode – The NGS WFS can image the pupil using the WFS camera. 14 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Keck primary projected on the 64x64 actuator BMM HODM 15 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories Envelope over which the pupil wobbles (nutates)

Motion control Whole WFS translation Lenslet X & Y motion Post-lenslet relay and camera focus Lenslet 1Lenslet 2 16 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Modes of operation cont’d Modes(Clockwise from top): 5x5, 63x63 and pupil imaging modes 17 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Modes of operation cont’d Modes(Clockwise from top): 5x5, 63x63 and pupil imaging modes 18 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Pupil mapping between NGSWFS-DM and primary mirror As per Drawing #1410-CM0010 Rev. 1, :Drawing #1410-CM0010 Rev. 1 The whole DM would be mapped by using a pupil that is 25.2 mm/24 mm * = m and has the same focal length ( m). This corresponds to an F/# = Plate scale = * /(180/pi*3600) = um/” at the telescope focal plane The apparent plate scale at the NGS pick off focal plane is (instead of ). The plate scale is mm/”. 19 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

WFS design parameters Parameter60x60 mode5x5 modeunits f_collimator60 mm Input plate scale mm/" Binned pixel size (# of pixels)112pixels Detector plate scale (mm/") mm/" Plate scale ratio (IPS/DPS) input f/#19.06 pupil sampling635sub-aps across pupil d_lenslet mm de-magnification (m)1.68 f_lenslet mm f# lenslet14.12 wavelength (for worst case FN calc.)0.90 um fresnel # radius of curvature of lenslet mm 20 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

63x63 NGS WFS layout Total relay length = 262 mm Components from (left to right) –collimating doublet, lenslet array, field singlet, focusing doublet followed by the window and the detector. Wavelength of operation – nm 21 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

63x63 sub-aperture NGS WFS spots 21 um pixel detector with 63 spots with 4x4 pixels/sub-aperture. 22 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

63x63 NGS WFS layout 23 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

63x63 NGS WFS layout 24 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

63x63 NGS WFS post lenslet relay Mag. = Total relay length = 139 mm 25 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Post lenslet relay – spots delivered by the relay (Huygen’s) PSF Strehl = 97% at worst field point. 26 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Post lenslet relay – grid distortion 27 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

5x5 NGS (calibration) WFS layout Total relay length = 269 mm Components from (left to right) –collimating doublet, lenslet array, field singlet, focusing doublet followed by the window and the detector. Wavelength of operation – nm 28 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

5x5 NGS WFS layout 5040 um detector with 5 spots across the pupil with 4x4 (binned) pixels/sub-aperture [48x48 physical pixels/sub-aperture] 29 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

5x5 NGS WFS layout Reminder: The 5x5 and the 63x63 modes use the same post-lenslet relay 30 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

NGS WFS behind the NGAO optical relay 31 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

NGS WFS spots showing 59 ‘lit’ sub-apertures 32 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Post lenslet relay – magnified view Magnified view of the WFS focal plane. 168 um correspond to 8 pixels. 33 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Other issues For B2C we ruled out an ADC in the NGS WFS – What is the implication of this? What about pupil imaging mode? What are the mechanical stage, etc. requirements? Alignment issues – Anything unusual? Fixtures, etc. Is this really the same as any other NGS WFS ever built? – Manufacturing / alignment tolerances Thermal issues – -15C operation (does this matter?) Stray light – Baffles / filters (unnecessary?) – Ghosts (usually not an issue of NGS WFS, but for PDR mention for completeness) 34 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Detector choice and performance NGAO envisages the use of 256x256 pixel CCID74 detector with 21 um pixels that is under development at Lincoln Labs for wavefront sensing. 35 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Predicted Quantum efficiency (based on 75 micron substrate, Bodacious Black AR coating on Pan-STARRS CCID-58) 36 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories

Read noise [predicted and measured] 37 NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories