Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Window Options and Opportunities for Inertial Fusion Applications Leslie Bromberg Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting.
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
Oct 17, Non-Equilibrium Ionization Orly Gnat (Caltech) with Amiel Sternberg (Tel-Aviv University) Gnat & Sternberg 2007, ApJS, 168, 213 in Post-Shock.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
Partially ionized gas -contains IONS, ELECTRONS and neutral particles.
Effects of External Magnetic Fields on the operation of an RF Cavity D. Stratakis, J. C. Gallardo, and R. B. Palmer Brookhaven National Laboratory 1 RF.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.
Update on Self-Pinched Transport Simulations D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp. General Atomics, 7/1/02.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field: 3-D Simulations D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, and S. S. Yu Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
An Update Point Design for Heavy Ion Fusion Wayne Meier LLNL ARIES Meeting Jan. 8-9, 2003 UC San Diego Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department.
Physics of fusion power
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Aerosol protection of laser optics by Electrostatic Fields (not manetic) L. Bromberg ARIES Meeting Madison WI April 23, 2002.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Comparison of final focus magnetic systems for the Assisted Pinched Transport and the RPD-2002 J. Barnard,
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Beam Interaction with Chamber Aerosols D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose, MRC C. L. Olson, SNL S. S. Yu, LBNL October 2-4, 2002 Presented at the ARIES Project.
Propagation of HI Beams in Chamber Metal Vapor Atmosphere C. Olson, Sandia National Laboratories D. Welch, D. Rose, B. Oliver, T. Genoni, and R. Clark,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,
Modeling of Assisted and Self- Pinch Transport D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories S. S. Yu.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Towards An Analytic Model for Beam Spot Size in Ballistic Neutralized Transport Simon Yu, J. Barnard,
Coupling of APT Transported Ion beam to Hybrid Target D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 S.J. Pemberton 1, R.P. Abbott 1, G.T. Fukuda 1 D.R. Welch 3, S.S.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
1 Comments on gas filled RF cavity tests A.V. Tollestrup Aug 14,2007.
Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.
Radiation L.O: Describe an isotope understand properties of alpha, beta and gamma radiation Explain background radiation.
Ion Beam Cocktail Development and ECR Ion Source Plasma Physics Experiments at JYFL Olli Tarvainen 11th International Conference on Heavy Ion Accelerator.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
NON-EQUILIBRIUM HEAVY GASES PLASMA MHD-STABILIZATION IN AXISYMMETRIC MIRROR MAGNETIC TRAP A.V. Sidorov 2, P.A. Bagryansky 1, A.D. Beklemishev 1, I.V. Izotov.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering University.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
1 Nature of Light Wave Properties Light is a self- propagating electro- magnetic wave –A time-varying electric field makes a magnetic field –A time-varying.
International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion June 2004 Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University “Stopping.
Recent Results on the Plasma Wakefield Acceleration at FACET E 200 Collaboration 1)Beam loading due to distributed injection of charge in the wake reduces.
Radioactivity and radioisotopes The nature of radiation Distinguishing Radiation Background Radiation.
ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE PLASMA TRANSFER OF JETS AND BULLETS ACROSS DIELECTRIC TUBES AND CHANNELS* Zhongmin Xiong (a), Eric Robert (b), Vanessa Sarron (b)
Robust Heavy Ion Fusion Target Shigeo KAWATA Utsunomiya Univ. Japan U.S.-J. Workshop on HIF December 18-19, 2008 at LBNL & LLNL.
Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.
Magnetic Deflection of Ionized Target Ions D. V. Rose, A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, D. R. Welch, and R. E. Clark March 3, 2005 HAPL Meeting, NRL.
Simulation of the interaction of macro- particles with the LHC proton beam Zhao Yang, EPFL
SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Code Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California in San Diego HAPL Meeting, June 20-21, 2005, Lawrence Livermore.
© JP 1  alpha e-e-  beta  gamma Marie Curie Antoine-Henri Becquerel (1852 – 1908) α,  and  RADIATION.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
1 Computational Modeling in Support of the Magnetic Intervention Concept D. V. Rose,* T. C. Genoni, R. E. Clark, D. R. Welch, and T. P. Hughes Voss Scientific,
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
Collective Focusing of a Neutralized Intense Ion Beam Propagating Along a Weak Solenodial Magnetic Field M. Dorf (LLNL) In collaboration with I. Kaganovich,
Fusion Technology Institute 4/5/2002HAPL1 Ion Driven Fireballs: Calculations and Experiments R.R. Peterson, G.A. Moses, and J.F. Santarius University of.
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
Simulation of Heavy Ion Beam Propagation D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation, Albuquerque NM C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa Thesis Defense 8 April 2005.
SPES Target Group Data…… INFN-CISAS-CNR collaboration The Ablation Ion Source for refractory metal ion beams A preliminary design.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
ArcPIC2D update: Arc spreading through flat emission Kyrre N
University of California, San Diego
D. V. Rose, T. C. Genoni, and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp.
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
Presentation transcript:

Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April 22-23, 2002 Research supported by the DOE through PPPL and the HIF VNL

A plasma can be blown off the chamber wall and expand into the beam port We expect the plasma to be of order cm -3 density and 10 eV Neutral fraction may be quite small for these conditions Plasma can be diverted to port wall with a vertical or dipole magnetic field B Plasma from chamber Beam Port

LSP Plasma Diversion Simulation A moving plasma blob is initialized in the x-y Cartesian simulation with a cm -3 density. The simulation box was 30-cm long and 10-cm wide. The plasma had H + ions with a eV temperature and a 3-9 cm/microsecond forward velocity. A no-field case and a case with electromagnetic fields and a 1-kG B y field (for x > 15 cm) were simulated with Lsp. The B y case shows the plasma is stopped and decays to the outer wall. Moving plasma blob confined by B B

1-kG field was chosen to confine low-beta plasma For 10-eV, cm -3 plasma, the ratio of plasma energy to magnetic field energy  = 8  nkT/B 2 =.04 –plasma cannot exclude magnetic field and should be confined Mean ion cyclotron radius  c = m i v i c/eB is roughly 3 mm for protons

2D Electromagnetic calculation run 80 ns Plasma ions can move a few mm JxB force leads to charge separation (electron motion is completely stopped) Plasma diamagnetic current negates 10% of applied field 80 Gauss self B1 kV/cm self E

Self-Fields remain small after 500 ns Magnetic field penetration stagnates at 10% of applied field Small depth to penetration 70 Gauss self B 1.6 kV/cm self E

Ions are turned in space charge field Ion velocity stagnates at 15.4 cm, decays to wall 500 ns100 ns

Snapshots of B y run - plasma stagnates at roughly x = 18 cm

0.4 Beta Plasma Calculation Plasma temperature is increased to 100 eV with a 9 cm/  s forward-directed velocity Simulation is much faster than increasing density by 10 but keeping T fixed Same external magnetic field topology

100-eV plasma with v = 9 cm/  s

Close up of ion density shows stagnation at 15.5 cm

Mean ion velocity turns towards outer wall by 250 ns

Plasma pushes fields back 5 mm before stagnating and decaying B y at y = 0 for t=25, 50, 100 and 250 ns

Conclusion 2D calculations predict expected plasmas diverted by a moderate strength magnetic field (1 kG) B field need extend no further than a few cm - beam deflection is small of order radian 3D effects generally weaken confinement - may necessitate somewhat larger required magnetic fields than 2D calculations - but expect same qualitative behavior.

Effect of Pre-Neutralization and Protoionization on Transport W. Sharp and S. S. Yu D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April 22-23, 2002 Research supported by the DOE through PPPL and the HIF VNL

Progress on an integrated calculation for both foot and main pulse with NBT Target Plasma just inside port Plasma just outside final focus magnet fringe fields Target Radiation 3 m e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- Xe + Do the benefits of a local plasma extend to the both foot and main pulses? What are the effects of photo ionization and stripping?

Beam/Chamber Parameters Foot Pulse: Pb 3 GeV, 870 A, (K=5x10 -5 ) 30ns Main Pulse Xe 2.4 GeV, 2.8 kA (K=1.8x10 -4 ) 8 ns 1.1 pi-mm-mrad normalized emittance 0.6 mTorr BeF 2 in chamber (ionization and stripping) With and without pre-neutralization by 10-cm long 2.5x cm -3 density plasma

Plasma electrons are effective neutralizers even with ion stripping Log n e

Plasma pre-neutralization improves transport dramatically Snapshots near focus of 870-A Pb foot pulse in 7 x cm -3 BeF 2 conducting beam pipe near plasma significantly improves neutralization emission from beam pipe makes small additional improvement effects of pre-neutralization decrease with increasing gas density

Lsp simulation with plasma pre-neutralization, photoionization 6-m long, 2-plasma foot (in progress) and main pulses impact only and including photo ionization and stripping for main pulse Target Plasma just inside port Plasma just outside final focus magnet fringe fields Target Radiation 3 m e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- Xe +

Pre-neutralization also works at higher perveance results for “realistic” 2.8-kA Xe main pulse in 7 x cm -3 BeF 2 tapering 3 m emitting beam pipe with 10-cm plasma layer at each end 3-m chamber after beam pipe with plausible gas-vacuum interface pre-neutralization makes dramatic improvement in transport final 2.5 mm radius is close to value required by distributed-radiator target

What does photoionization do? results for “realistic” 2.8 kA Xe main pulse in 7 x cm -3 BeF 2 target heating by 30-ns foot pulses in other entry ports LSP currently allows only single ionization of background gas photoionization reduces focal spot by about 15% neutralization by photoionization plasma is offset by increased beam charge inclusion of multiple gas ionization would improve situation

How does photoionization affect beam charge? results for “realistic” 2.8 kA Xe main pulse in 7 x cm -3 BeF 2 time histories of beam charge states stripping artificially stopped 20 cm before target for numerical reasons photoionization significantly increases average charge state near target effect of higher charge state is limited by small distance to target

How does photoionization affect beam emittance? results for “realistic” 2.8 kA Xe main pulse in 7 x cm -3 BeF 2 time histories of beam rms emittance at select axial locations higher charge-state near target leads to 20% emittance increase effect of higher emittance is offset by better neutralization

Conclusions Pre-neutralization from plasma improves chamber transport efficiency –Both foot and main pulses benefit Given pre-neutralizing plasma, lower chamber pressure helps beam transport for both foot and main pulses Photo ionization assists main pulse transport –photo stripping increases beam charge state and emittance near target, tempers the effect to a 15% spot improvement –inclusion of multiple gas ionization should improve spot further