Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
ABET Accreditation Workshop on Innovations in ICT Education Beijing, China Oct. 22, 2012 Michael Lightner, Prof. and Chair ECEE University of Colorado,
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Undergraduate Curriculum Revision Department of Computer Science February 10, 2010.
INCORPORATING INDUSTRY NEEDS IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Dr. Samir Al-Baiyat Dean College of Engineering Sciences and Acting Dean College of Applied Engineering.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Why You Should Care About ABET And how you can help with ABET accreditation of the Civil and Environmental Engineering undergraduate degrees A quick orientation.
1 Indirect Assessment Dr. Mohammed H. Sqalli April 6 th, 2008.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
California State University East Bay
Mechanical Engineering 1 Graduate Programs Degree Programs –Master of Engineering or M.E. (thesis option) –Master of Science or M.S. (non-thesis option)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Utah Valley State College CNS, PEng, and EART Planning Meeting.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Undergraduate Research Experiences in Microbiology and Developmental Entomology Patricia Baynham and Lisa Goering-Ortiz, Department of Biological Sciences.
Graduate Programs in Dept of Computer Science Univ. of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Weining Zhang.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Science (CS) CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality.
Woodrow Wilson Indiana Fellowship Program Vision Statement –Highly qualified STEM teachers –Problem-based STEM curricula –Rural schools network –New models.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 190 Careers in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Computer Information.
Accreditation Evaluation of the BS-CSE Program Neelam Soundarajan Chair, Undergrad Studies Comm. CSE Department 1.
Presented by Jerry L. VerDuft, MSQA To ASQ Section 1312 September 10,2008 Distance Learning.
KFUPM-COE Industrial Advisory Council Meeting 31/5/ Department of Computer Engineering (COE) College of Computer Sciences and Engineering (CCSE)
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
CS.UCSB.EDU U. C. S A N T A B A R B A R A C O M P U T E R S C I E N C E I want to be a Computer Scientist Why should I choose UCSB?
Mission Mission To prepare students to be successful and ethical leaders capable of making valued contributions within the global marketplace; to advance.
Telecommunications Engineering The University of Texas at Dallas The Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science Jonsson School Industrial.
FECS 2007 Assessment and its Role in Accreditation Deborah Whitfield Frances Bailie Adel Abunawass.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Mission Mission The Raj Soin College of Business provides leadership and innovation to: Develop successful and ethical leaders capable of making valued.
Program goals and constituents Training Subcommittee University Assessment Committee University of Toledo
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Office of Service Quality
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
Industry Advisory Board May 29 th, 2015
Industry Advisory Board May 30 th, 2014
Industry Advisory Board June 8 th, 2012
Industry Advisory Board
Industry Advisory Board
Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:
Enterprise Computing Topics in IT Programs
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Advisory Boards – The Good, The Bad, and The Reality
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Assessment and Accreditation
Computing and Mathematics
Computer Science Section
Presentation transcript:

Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science

Goals Department presentation Curriculum Assessment results IAB members Feedback/guidance/teaching Outreach Faculty/Student Projects Student Internships

Web sites Department Accreditation: Coordinator Chengyu (login id/password: abet/Status)login id/password: abet/Status Industry Advisory Board: Coordinator Elaine /IAB/IAB2005.htm /IAB/IAB2005.htm

BS Curriculum (core)

BS Curriculum (electives)

MS Curriculum

Accreditation Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Undergraduate curriculum Assessment based Process Input data Output data

Assessment Definitions: Vision statement identifies how we want to be viewed. Mission statement is a description of what we do. Objectives are broad goals/statements of what the department would like to achieve. These include student educational objectives, faculty objectives and other department objectives. Student Learning Outcomes are specific skills that the students will possess at the end of the degree program. These Learning Outcomes are described to meet the student educational objectives. Measures are detailed metrics that indicate whether a specific Learning Outcome has been achieved.

Assessment Measures Surveys Students, Alumni, Faculty, Employer CS490 Major Field Achievement Test (MFAT) GPA CS437, CS491AB

Objectives 1.Graduating students have the knowledge and skills to pursue a career in industry and/or continue their education in graduate programs. 2.Graduates have the knowledge and skills that enable them to participate in life-long learning and to adapt to an ever- changing technological environment. 3.Faculty have enough time in their work schedule to pursue their research interests. 4.Faculty remain current in their fields. 5.The curriculum is up-to-date and reflects the best current thinking about computer science.

Objectives 6.Enrolled students have opportunities to participate in professional student organizations and pre-professional employment. 7.Our teaching and research facilities consist of state of the art classrooms and equipment. 8.We are well known and respected in the regional community. 9.Our programs are considered attractive and desirable options by all qualified students in our service community. 10.We retain contact, offer support, and establish a networking community for our alumni.

Learning Outcomes 1.Students will have a broad understanding of computing at all levels of abstraction (Algorithms, Architecture, Operating Systems, Programming Languages, Automata Theory) 2.Students have had the opportunity to focus in depth on selected areas of Computer Science. 3.Students will have the training to design and implement a large software system and will have the ability to work both individually and collaboratively. 4.Students will have sufficient oral and written communication skills. 5.Students will have the skills to pursue careers in industry and/or continue their education in graduate programs. 6.Students will have the skills to adapt to the evolving technologies in Computer Science.

Broad understanding of computing at all levels

Opportunity to focus in depth on selected areas

Design and implement a large software system

Communication skills

Pursue careers in industry

Pursue advanced degrees

Adapt to evolving technologies

Summary Standard curriculum Maintain Quality Acceptable assessment results MFAT – GPA correlation (>80%) Satisfaction (3.5/5 = 2.8/4) Accreditable