Anthony Whiley Environmental Engineer WA Department of Ecology (360-407-7241) Spokane River Phosphorus Ratios Preliminary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 – Seattle Region 10 – Seattle
Advertisements

Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources Chapter 15 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Spokane River Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load WRIA 54 Planning Unit Drea Traeumer, Spokane River TMDL Lead February 28, 2007.
“Universe” of potential phosphorus for trading Tributaries (Hangman, Little Spokane, Coulee) Mainstem groundwater Lake Spokane groundwater/surface water.
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
THE DISTRICT’S ANACOSTIA RIVER TRASH TMDL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
Exploring Trading to Reduce Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage: Cheat River, West Virginia Evan Hansen: Downstream Strategies, LLC Paul Ziemkiewicz, Jerry Fletcher,
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
WISCONSIN RIVER TMDL Presentation for North Central Wisconsin Stormwater Coalition July 25, 2013.
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
City of El Monte Draft Watershed Management Program (WMP) Ed Suher, P.G. CASC Engineering and Consulting October 9, 2014.
Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer Study Preliminary Project Scope March 2002 Idaho Department of Water Resources Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Idaho.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Obtaining the goals.  Identify realistic future use of all water bodies – drinking water, irrigation water, livestock watering, bathing, fishing, recipient.
Overview of the draft Pend Oreille River Total Dissolved Gas Total Maximum Daily Load Paul J. Pickett, P.E. Transboundary Gas Group Castlegar, BC October.
LEED NC Sustainable Sites Terms, Concepts Referenced Stds Sustainable Sites Credits.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Update: Spokane River DO TMDL Implementation ________________________ David Moore Washington State Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August xx, 2012.
Water Quality Trading in Washington Helen Bresler (360)
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Toxics Management Plans Ecology Review Principles.
Tool Box Implementation Schedule DO TMDL Subcommittee Meeting June 19, 2012.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Environmental Economics1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 6, Chapter 9 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Rough Draft Biennial Report Spokane River and Lake Spokane Dissolved Oxygen TMDL.
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board - March 16, 2006 Total Maximum Daily Loads for Trash.
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
Spokane River Basin Monitoring. Spokane Basin Monitoring.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
1 Richard Looker 2008 RMP Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 The Water Board’s Regulatory Approach and the RMP Mercury Strategy Hg.
DO TMDL Subcommittee Meeting June 19, A Bit of History ( ) Summer-Fall 2008 BAP discussion begins Study Proposal formulated Summer-Fall.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Climate change in the Colorado River Basin: Water management implications Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
Chapter 92 – NPDES Permits Watershed Permits Issue: Some pollutants persist and accumulate in the watershed, resulting in a threat to water quality standards.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
MS4 and Trading Considerations
Department of Water Management Water Supply Update
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation transcript:

Anthony Whiley Environmental Engineer WA Department of Ecology ( ) Spokane River Phosphorus Ratios Preliminary Analysis Approach

Concept of Ratios Simplified method of accounting for the fate and transport of pollutants. Because of the varied physical, chemical, and biological factors present – there is recognition that where phosphorus is introduced to the river weighs on the ultimate effect it has at the compliance location.

Proposal for Determining River-Based Ratios Step 1: Establish Spokane River reaches. The reach size would be based on physical and environmental factors as well as model considerations.

Proposal for Determining River-Based Ratios Step 2: Set up initial load condition that serves as the reference. Apply TMDL CE-QUAL W2 model to establish base phosphorus load at TMDL assessment location. Model run based on the same year and conditions present for the study year though based on the following assumptions………….. The model would be run to establish the base load condition as observed at the TMDL assessment point above Lake Spokane.

Proposal for Determining River-Based Ratios Initial Condition Model Assumptions: Waste load allocations have been achieved. Point source discharges have met anticipated phosphorus reduction levels. Load allocations have been achieved. TMDL-based nonpoint phosphorus loads associated with tributary inflow and storm-water have been achieved. The assessment period, used to generate the ratios, will conform to the critical period defined in the TMDL. The analysis period will remain the same as that used in the TMDL. The TMDL total phosphorus compliance locations will be the ratio assessment points as opposed to specific NPDES permit discharge locations.

Proposal for Determining River-Based Ratios Step 3. Conduct reach assessment. Selectively reduce phosphorus loading within each of the assessment reaches and determine the resulting change in load at the TMDL assessment point.

Proposal for Determining River-Based Ratios Step 4. Calculate ratios. River Reach Ratio = Base Load – Scenario Load (kg/d) Reach Load Reduction (kg/d) ……change in load at the compliance location….in relation to the change in load at the assessment reach.

Questions / Comments

Other phosphorus source Additional ratios apply to sources that do not directly drain to the river – undergo other varying transport and fate Processes.