1 MICE Beamline Design: General principles & expected capabilities Kevin Tilley, 16 th November Charge to beamline & desirable beam General principles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Paul drumm, mutac jan MICE Beamline Optics Design Kevin Tilley, RAL, 12th June MICE Needs Generic Solution Pion Injection & Decay Section (a) Inputs.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Slide 1 MICE Beamline Design and Commissioning Review 16 th Nov 2007 Simulation comparison / tools / issues Henry Nebrensky Brunel University There are.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Beam line summary paul drumm for beam line group.
124/3/2010CM26 - Riverside1 m. apollonio ( ,P) matrix.
M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/ M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.
MICE Beam Line Design Oct 24 th 2005 Dean Adams, Kevin Tilley Based on TURTLE element definitions by K Walaron, T Roberts and K Tilley.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.
Critical Issues for MICE Chris Rogers MICE CM 15.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.
(+) session, PAC09 Vancouver – TH6PFP056 Introduction The Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE, fig. 1c) at RAL[1]
1 Beamline DayTimePresenterTopic Thurs9:00C.BoothMICE Target Wed16:00K.TilleyRecent Beamline Design Work Wed16:30T.RobertsMICE Beamline Performance + Emittance.
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
M. apollonio MICE Beamline summary. - Beamline parallel session (June 1 st ): - envisaged goals (Alain) - assess readiness of the line magnet status (Ken)
1 Beamline 1. Beamline Target/Misalignment problem 2. Magnet measurements 3. Everything that’ critical and outstanding – eg d/str beamline monitors final.
Beam line commissioning Preparations for Phase1 Kevin Tilley For Paul Drumm & the beam line group.
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Precursor: - Resources since cm16. Beamline Review Response. Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
14/01/2008MICE CM23 - Beam Line Parallel Session1 Simulations: tools and status Marco Apollonio, Imperial College - London.
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations Ao Liu on behalf of the MICE collaboration Fermilab Ao Liu on behalf of the MICE collaboration.
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
(one of the) Request from MPB
Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
1 1 Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status - G4BL/TTL Simulation comparisons - Beam steering/correction -Collimation d/stream &
M.apollonioNuFact??1 ABSTRACT In the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) at RAL, muons are pro­duced and transported in a dedicated beam line connecting.
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations
Beam-Line Analysis m. apollonio 7/7/2010 CM27 - RAL 1.
MICE Beamline Status m. apollonio 17 December 2009 MICE VC
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
Design of the MANX experiment
Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

1 MICE Beamline Design: General principles & expected capabilities Kevin Tilley, 16 th November Charge to beamline & desirable beam General principles & design (with reference to basic 7pi design) Pion Injection & Decay Section - Solution Muon Transport & ε n Generation/Matching - Solution Status of current optics designs Expected capabilities

2 2 MICE Muon Beam - Generic Needs Other important features:- –High flux muon beam at MICE (good transmission) –Single muons of either sign Charge:-

3 3 MICE Beamline Design – General Principles & Solution General Solution:- –We adopted to design a pion-muon decay beamline. –since many requirements similar to Condensed Matter pion-muon decay beamlines:- PSI uE4 TRIUMF muon beamlines RAL-RIKEN muon beamline –For our particular case, beamline spilts into 4 parts: - pion capture decay muon transport ε n generation / matching

4 4 MICE Beamline Design - General Solution

5 5 Pion Injection & Decay Channel - principles For high energy muons -> high energy pions:- Angle of beamline to ISIS as acute as possible (~25°) for high energy pions. B1 large such that B2 small & low dispersion. For fluxes:- Optics set to capture maximum acceptance & maximise transmission into decay solenoid. Target tp Q1 fixed by angle choice (3m) Pion capture capture length fixed at ~8m given entry to MICE hall & RF junction box. Maximise accumulation of muons in decay section –highest decay solenoid field, consistent with controllable pion beam profile. For high purities Chose always ~ highest pion momenta possible - to allow selection of 'backward' going muons for higher purity & higher fluxes.

6 6 Almost all emittance, momenta cases use same pion optic above. (only 1 envisaged exception – 10pi, 240MeV/c case) C2H4 'Proton absorber' Pion Injection & Decay Channel - Solution C2H4 'Proton absorber' Acceptance ~ 0.4 milli-ster A n,x ~0.25pi mm rad, A n,y ~0.03pi mm rad

7 7 For large Momentum spreads:- B2 angle small for small dispersion. Triplets. For high flux:-- B2 - Q4 distance small as possible. Beamline short. PIDs near focal points. For high purity:- Choose backward decay muons, C 2 H 4 on B2. To produce high emittances & match into MICE – focus/scatter beam at end. Cartoon:- Described in more detail later, but:- Perform emittance generation immediately before MICE. Focus beamsize at diffuser. Muon Transport, ε n generation & Matching: - principles

8 8 Muon Transport – TTL 7π,200MeV/c Solution example for 7.1π mm rad case given above

9 9 -> (p/m o c)R.R' ~ ε n, rms ~7.1π mm rad R/R'=2p/q ~ β match α ~ 0= α match ε n generation & matching into MICE – TTL 7π,200MeV/c Soln. Xrms ~ 3.55 cm, x’rms = 107 mrad, rxx'=0.04 yrms ~ 3.61 cm, y’rms = 102 mrad ryy'=0.13 …for +/-10% momentum cut ~ p ref =208.6MeV/c

10 Matched Turtle beam showing cooling in MICE. ε ┴ (m rad) Pz (MeV/c) Z distance from centre of StepVI configuration

11 Status of this particular optics design The TTL 7π,200MeV/c case has received closer study in Turtle & also evaluation in the G4Beamline code -> with air, improved scattering model, spatially extended dipole fringes etc, optics design evaluates to ~8.4pi in TTL. -> there is some disagreement with G4Beamline (HN talk)

12 Other designs There are other optics design in place, with “nominal” boxes:- pp LowMidHigh TT-8.4 . mm rad (evaluates to 8.8  in G4BL) TT-nom 10  mm rad: Qmatch G4BL ‘May’07 ~11  mm rad. Q: match 140 Plan: Use single design “TTL-8.4  ” as starting point for commissioning in January – best understood. Continue to aim towards theoretical optics for other 200MeV/c cases.

13 Expected capabilities Filling out the “matrix” of (  p) case’s is ongoing. Q: what theoretically is the matched emittance range? Q: what momentum range is furnishable ? Q: what are the beam purities likely to be? Q: what is the dp/p spread and match at different momenta? Q: what are likely misalignments at MICE? Q: what are likely Rates?

14 Expected capabilities - Emittances Minimum emittance From Turtle, natural unmatched emittance exiting TOF1 is~ 2.8 pi mm rad. (smaller than G4BL) ie. -> ~ 1.4 pi mm rad unnormalised. Estimate of minimum emittance beam that can be matched:- given 2.8 mm rad, to produce 6pi requires:- lead thickness = 7.5mm alpha ~ 0.23, beta ~ 0.78m before lead. (MA talk) We can propagate optics functions back to Q9 & Q8 & est. beamsize At Q8 centre -> y 3σ = 26.4cm y_max aperture = 23.6cm hence beamsize for 6pi ≥ aperture. Smaller emittances require larger y rms So 6pi is ~ a lower limit.

15 Expected capabilities - Emittances To produce matched emittances < ~6pi:- If from beamline:- - use a collimator either upstream of Q7 or downstream of Q9 - move Q9,Q8,Q7 ~ 0.8m closer to MICE. If in software:- - offline select particles with smaller emittances Maximum emittance Larger matched emittances require smaller y_rms in Q8/Q9, hence not limited by apertures. Limited only by thickness’ of lead available – no known limits in beamline.

16 Expected capabilities – Momenta & purity Looking at the extreme cases pp 11 66 10  pi, 140MeV/c requires 0mm lead –> requires-> ~210MeV/c muons in decay solenoid.. -> Requires from initial pion momenta of at least 210MeV/c. 10pi, 240MeV/c requires ~15mm lead -> requires ~ 310MeV/c muons in decay solenoid. -> Requires from initial pion momenta of at least 310MeV/c. Pion momentas 60 – 550MeV/c available from the target. Upstream beamline can transport up to 486MeV/c pions. Can supply all required momenta to MICE. For all (  p) cases except (10pi, 240MeV/c), can choose pion momenta such that muon momenta from backward decay. Purities of ~97% expected for all settings except (10pi,240MeV/c)

17 Expected capabilities – dp/p In all cases, can deliver +/-10% dp/p about the reference momentum (red lines) Quality of match over +/-10% dp/p:- The scattering through thick lead diffuser helps to mitigate chromatic aberrations. Makes phase space-ellipses more upright α->0, & provides momentum dependent scattering for β=2p/qB. For high emittance cases (≥7π) we should expect match over reasonable momentum bite. Indications shown: for +/-10% beam:-> Full distribution is what MICE will see, with rms ~13.4% % dp/p

18 Expected capabilities – control of alignment Some misalignment of the beam at MICE is expected, due to:- - intrinsic nature of particle source – need to change the target position to change beam rate. Δy target (max) ~ +/-5mm seems plausible. - plan to estimate & measure typical misalignments offsets at MICE.

19 Expected capabilities – misalignment tolerances We have a reasonable estimate of acceptable misalignments:- - on the basis of minimal reweighting, & cooling reduction. ( 1mm – 2mm x & y offset & ~3mrad offset in x’ & y’ in spectrometer solenoid1) - these translate into alignment criteria at TOF1 – near end of beamline – coordinates within red ellipse:- ~ dx ~ 5mm, dx’ ~ 1mrad)

20 Beam line Steering – baseline scheme If required, correctors could be placed at ~ 310°/98° (H/V position) and ~ 221/160° (H/V angle) phase advance upstream of tracker input plane. B2 VSM1 / HSM1 CKV1 VSM2 HSM1 Q4-6 Q7-9 TOF0 TOF1 Beam correction for -1mm displacement, 0mrad angle in H & V Beam correction for 0 mm displacement, 1 mrad angle in H and V

21 ~ 0.57m Expected capabilities – Rates & TOF0 collimator The beam rates at MICE can be limited for a number of reasons:- - Few proton intersections on target (ISIS beam loss activation etc) - If target rates are reasonable, a limiting factor can be the beam intensity at TOF0 detector, which cannot operate above 1.5MHz. - Instead of restricting target dip, can collimate ‘outlier particles’ not reaching MICE but contributing to TOF0 rate. Hence incr intensities. - Will not install on day1, but if required, have baseline solution:- B2 CKV1 Q4-6 Q7-9 TOF0 TOF1 ~ 0.15m

22 The full future lattice at the moment If all of these systems are required, there are many devices between B2 – Q4 D2 VSM1 / HSM1 CKV1 VSM2 HSM1 Q4-6 Q7-9 TOF0 TOF1 A second solution for steering magnets is to steer using trim coils on the quadrupoles. This needs to be simulated. A number of other options are possible for collimator (shorter length/distributed) ~ 0.57m ~ 0.15m Beamline monitor

23 Summary. Outlined general principles & solution. Status of designs:- have starting optic for January. Study further for commissioning. Produce further (  p) Expected capabilities: - lattice can furnish down to ε n ~6pi - 1pi requires collimation All required momenta can be supplied. Large dp/p can be matched. Muon purity >97% for all cases except (10pi, 240MeV/c) Steering correction scheme if beam alignments are outside tolerances. Collimation solution if TOF0 intensity limits rates at MICE.

24 Backup Slides.

25 TOF0 nominal rates & collimation example : - Shows benefit to MICE of collimator: 50% increase in rate :- Is inserted quite far (as per example here). :- this does effect rates & optical properties of beam at the end. :- Would need use case plan: may need to retune optics if adopt this approach. : - Using standard targeting assumptions: 1.7x10 12 pot / second