11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earthquake Dynamic Triggering and Ground Motion Scaling J. Gomberg, K. Felzer, E. Brodsky.
Advertisements

Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network IVO OPRSAL.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
SPATIAL CORRELATION OF SPECTRAL ACCELERATIONS Paolo Bazzurro, Jaesung Park and Nimal Jayaram 1.
Numerical methods in the Earth Sciences: seismic wave propagation Heiner Igel, LMU Munich III The latest developments, outlook Grenoble Valley Benchmark.
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Session: Computational Wave Propagation: Basic Theory Igel H., Fichtner A., Käser M., Virieux J., Seriani G., Capdeville Y., Moczo P.  The finite-difference.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Theoretical aspects of seismic waves and sources Massimo Cocco INGV Earthquakes produce effects to the environment & the society Damages are produced by.
Northridge 1D rock/soil Simulation (36 sites) Loma Prieta 1D east/west SAF Simulation (56 sites)
103/25/04 NGA Workshop Parameterization of Basin Response Based on 3D Simulations by PEER/SCEC 3D Ground Motion Project Team PI: Steven M. Day San Diego.
March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:
SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/021 Numerical Modeling Using Finite Difference Techniques.
03/24/2004NGA Workshop: Validation1 BROADBAND SIMULATION METHODOLOGY: A HYBRID DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACH  Use Deterministic Methodology at.
Simulated Deformations of Seattle High-Rise Buildings from a Hypothetical Giant Cascadian Earthquake Tom Heaton Jing Yang (Ph.D. thesis) Caltech Earthquake.
PEER-SCEC WORKSHOP ON GROUND MOTION SIMULATION AND BUILDING RESPONSE SIMULATION with focus on long period ground motions and tall buildings PEER Nov 2,
Recipe of strong motion prediction for future earthquakes Seminar at Charles University, Prague, Czech September 5, 2003 Kojiro Irikura Disaster Prevention.
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
Description of selected broadband ground motion simulation methods Paul Somerville, URS Yuehua Zeng, USGS Golden.
MARsite kickoff meeting December 19-20, 2012, Istanbul WP5 - TASK 2 Near real-time determination of the earthquake finite-fault source parameters and models,
Large-scale 3-D Simulations of Spontaneous Rupture and Wave Propagation in Complex, Nonlinear Media Roten, D. 1, Olsen, K.B. 2, Day, S.M. 2, Dalguer, L.A.
Exploring Planet Earth Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Rupture Animation (Northridge, 1994) Brad Aagaard, USGS
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
An Extension of Stochastic Green ’ s Function Method to Long-Period Strong Ground-motion Simulation Y. Hisada and J. Bielak.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Jhungli-Taiwan 2009 Testing earthquake triggered landslides against earthquake aftershocks for space distributions (implications for triggering processes)
Complex earthquake directivity during the 2009 L’ Aquila mainshock Tinti E., Scognamiglio L., Cirella A., Cocco M., and A. Piatanesi Istituto Nazionale.
Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.
Ergodicity in Natural Fault Systems K.F. Tiampo, University of Colorado J.B. Rundle, University of Colorado W. Klein, Boston University J. Sá Martins,
Zadonina E.O. (1), Caldeira B. (1,2), Bezzeghoud M. (1,2), Borges J.F. (1,2) (1) Centro de Geofísica de Évora (2) Departamento de Física, Universidade.
Disputable non-DC components of several strong earthquakes Petra Adamová Jan Šílený.
Fig. 1. A wiring diagram for the SCEC computational pathways of earthquake system science (left) and large-scale calculations exemplifying each of the.
SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation and Validation Development of an Integrated Ground Motion Simulation Validation Program.
Shiann-Jong Lee 1, Dimitri Komatitsch 2,3, Yu-Chang Chan 1, Bor-Shouh Huang 1 and Jeroen Tromp 4 1 Institute of Earth Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei,
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Validation of physics-based ground motion earthquake simulations using a velocity model improved by tomographic inversion results 1 Ricardo Taborda, 1.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop ALLCAL Steven N. Ward University of California Santa Cruz.
A1 A2 Standard scenario Ground motions are calculated for a standard scenario earthquake. Afterwards, source parameters are varied one by one, and the.
Present / introduce / motivate After Introduction to the topic
Ground motion simulations in the Pollino region (Southern Italy) for Mw 6.4 scenario events.
Southern California Earthquake Center SCEC Technical Activity Groups (TAGs) Self-organized to develop and test critical methodologies for solving specific.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
The seismogram U = Source * Propagation * Site.
Phase 1: Comparison of Results at 4Hz Phase 1 Goal: Compare 4Hz ground motion results from different codes to establish whether the codes produce equivalent.
GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS AT RAPID RESPONSE SITES IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Anibal Ojeda 3, Kuvvet Atakan 1, Mustafa.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Unified Structural Representation (USR) The primary mission of the USR Focus Area has been the development of a unified, object-oriented 3-D representation.
UCERF3 Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) 14 Full-3D tomographic model CVM-S4.26 of S. California 2 CyberShake 14.2 seismic hazard.
The Snowball Effect: Statistical Evidence that Big Earthquakes are Rapid Cascades of Small Aftershocks Karen Felzer U.S. Geological Survey.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Computational Fluid Dynamics - Fall 2007 The syllabus CFD references (Text books and papers) Course Tools Course Web Site:
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
Thursday May 9 8:30 am-noon Working Group 4 Convenors: Olsen, Igel, Furumura Macro-scale Simulation Dynamic Rupture and Wave Propagation Innovations in.
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
High-F Project Southern California Earthquake Center
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Southern California Earthquake Center
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
THESIS, Munich, Using Numerical Green’s Function Method to Investigate Ground Motion Variation Haijiang Wang LMU What affects the.
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
High-Performance Computing (HPC) IS Transforming Seismology
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Mw 7
by J. Galetzka, D. Melgar, J. F. Genrich, J. Geng, S. Owen, E. O
Presentation transcript:

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure Wave Propagation

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop2

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop3  Rupture time derived from simple scaling formula  Coarse slip distribution and hypocenter after Hartzell et al. (1996)  Extend to fine-scale sampling using K -2 filter (e.g. Somerville et al., 1999) Creating a Rupture Model: Northridge Earthquake

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop4 TpTp TrTr A h Slip Velocity Function

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop5

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop6 Rupture Description Issues Currently kinematic with dynamic guidance/constraints Fully dynamic descriptions are expensive and underlying physics is not completely understood

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop7 Complex 3D Basin Geology SCEC CVM

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop8 Solution (approximate): Average media parameters over grid cell volume (effective media parameters) Harmonic averaging of Lame parameters (λ and µ) Arithmetic averaging of density (ρ) Spatial Aliasing for Grid Based Models

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop9 Velocity Structure Issues Different grid-based methods (FEM, SEM, FDM) will “see” slightly different velocity structures. Our knowledge of the true velocity structure is not complete: the models will evolve.

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop10 Verification / Validation of Simulation Methodologies Verification =Do the codes / methods perform as expected? (theoretical models) Validation =How well does the method / model predict natural phenomena? (reproduce past observations)

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop11 Verification Example

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop12

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop13 Validation Example: 1994 Northridge EQ buried thrust, strong up- dip directivity near-fault strong motion recordings at 69 sites deep sediment-filled basins

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop14 Recorded / Simulated Ground Velocity pulse-like near fault motions extended duration basin motions General waveform character is matched well-

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop15 Recorded / Simulated PGA and PGV at 69 Sites

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop16

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop17

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop18

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop19