FBRT: A Feedback-Based Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Yangfan Zhou November, 2004 Supervisors: Dr. Michael Lyu and Dr. Jiangchuan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cross-layer Design in Wireless Mesh Networks Hu Wenjie Computer Network and Protocol Testing Laboratory, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, Tsinghua.
Advertisements

Directed Diffusion for Wireless Sensor Networking
A 2 -MAC: An Adaptive, Anycast MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Hwee-Xian TAN and Mun Choon CHAN Department of Computer Science, School of Computing.
Min Song 1, Yanxiao Zhao 1, Jun Wang 1, E. K. Park 2 1 Old Dominion University, USA 2 University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA IEEE ICC 2009 A High Throughput.
Dynamic Object Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Tzung-Shi Chen 1, Wen-Hwa Liao 2, Ming-De Huang 3, and Hua-Wen Tsai 4 1 National University of Tainan,
11/03/03RPI ECSE ESRT: Event-to-Sink Reliable Transport in Wireless Sensor Networks[Sankarasubramaniam et. al, ACM MobiHoc 2003] Prepared by A. ABOUZEID.
Improvement on LEACH Protocol of Wireless Sensor Network
Monday, June 01, 2015 ARRIVE: Algorithm for Robust Routing in Volatile Environments 1 NEST Retreat, Lake Tahoe, June
PORT: A Price-Oriented Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Yangfan Zhou, Michael. R. Lyu, Jiangchuan Liu † and Hui Wang The Chinese.
1-1 CMPE 259 Sensor Networks Katia Obraczka Winter 2005 Transport Protocols.
Impact of Radio Irregularity on Wireless Sensor Networks
DTNLite: Reliable Data Delivery in Sensornets Rabin Patra and Sergiu Nedevschi UCB Nest Retreat 2004.
Quality of service for wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks Nicolás E. Ortiz Hernández Dr. Rajan Shankaran.
IEEE INFOCOM 2005, Miami, FL RID: Radio Interference Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks Gang Zhou, Tian He, John A. Stankovic, Tarek F. Abdelzaher Computer.
1-1 CMPE 259 Sensor Networks Katia Obraczka Winter 2005 Transport Protocols II.
1 Design study for multimedia transport protocol in heterogeneous networks Haitao Wu; Qian Zhang; Wenwu Zhu; Communications, ICC '03. IEEE International.
Self Organization and Energy Efficient TDMA MAC Protocol by Wake Up For Wireless Sensor Networks Zhihui Chen; Ashfaq Khokhar ECE/CS Dept., University of.
Adaptive Self-Configuring Sensor Network Topologies ns-2 simulation & performance analysis Zhenghua Fu Ben Greenstein Petros Zerfos.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha Presented by Ray Lam Oct 23, 2004.
1 Minimizing End-to-End Delay: A Novel Routing Metric for Multi- Radio Wireless Mesh Networks Hongkun Li, Yu Cheng, Chi Zhou Department of Electrical and.
Yanyan Yang, Yunhuai Liu, and Lionel M. Ni Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology IEEE MASS 2009.
High Throughput Route Selection in Multi-Rate Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Dr. Baruch Awerbuch, David Holmer, and Herbert Rubens Johns Hopkins University Department.
Mehmet C. Vuran Vehbi C. Gungor Özgür B. Akan School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA {mcvuran,
By : Himali Saxena. Outline Introduction DE-MAC Protocol Simulation Environment & Results Conclusion.
Efficient Network-Coding-Based Opportunistic Routing Through Cumulative Coded Acknowledgments Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Chih-Chun Wang and Y. Charlie Hu.
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks The First ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2003) November.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha.
A Simple and Effective Cross Layer Networking System for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Wing Ho Yuen, Heung-no Lee and Timothy Andersen.
1 Adaptive QoS Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks Lucy He Honeywell Technology & Solutions Lab No. 430 Guo Li Bin Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai,
The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering POWER-SPEED A Power-Controlled Real-Time Data Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor-Actuator.
Improving QoS Support in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Agenda Motivations Proposed Framework Packet-level FEC Multipath Routing Simulation Results Conclusions.
IEEE Globecom 2010 Tan Le Yong Liu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Polytechnic Institute of NYU Opportunistic Overlay Multicast in Wireless.
ESRT: Event to Sink Reliable Transport in Sensor Networks Yogesh S., O. Akan, I. Akyildiz (GaTech) ECE 256 Spring 2009.
GARUDA: Achieving Effective Reliability for Downstream Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Seung-Jong Park et al IEEE Transactions on mobile computing.
 SNU INC Lab MOBICOM 2002 Directed Diffusion for Wireless Sensor Networking C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, John Heidemann, and Fabio Silva.
Cross-layer Packet Size Optimization for Wireless Terrestrial, Underwater, and Underground Sensor Networks IEEE INFOCOM 2008 Mehmet C. Vuran and Ian F.
Presentation of Wireless sensor network A New Energy Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Supporting QoS 王 文 毅
Minimizing Energy Consumption in Sensor Networks Using a Wakeup Radio Matthew J. Miller and Nitin H. Vaidya IEEE WCNC March 25, 2004.
SIMPLE: Stable Increased Throughput Multi-hop Link Efficient Protocol For WBANs Qaisar Nadeem Department of Electrical Engineering Comsats Institute of.
S Master’s thesis seminar 8th August 2006 QUALITY OF SERVICE AWARE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS Thesis Author: Shan Gong Supervisor:Sven-Gustav.
Network and Systems Laboratory nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw Branislav Kusy, Christian Richter, Wen Hu, Mikhail Afanasyev, Raja Jurdak, Michael Brunig, David Abbott,
SenProbe: Path Capacity Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks Tony Sun, Ling-Jyh Chen, Guang Yang M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla.
By Naeem Amjad 1.  Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2.
Self Organization and Energy Efficient TDMA MAC Protocol by Wake Up for Wireless Sensor Networks Zhihui Chen and Ashfaq Khokhar ECE Department, University.
Multi-channel Wireless Sensor Network MAC protocol based on dynamic route.
Speaker: Yi-Lei Chang Advisor: Dr. Kai-Wei Ke 2012/05/15 IPv6-based wireless sensor network 1.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Tijs van Dam, Koen Langendoen In ACM SenSys /1/2005 Hong-Shi Wang.
SEA-MAC: A Simple Energy Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications By: Miguel A. Erazo and Yi Qian International.
A Multi-Channel Cooperative MIMO MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks(MCCMIMO) MASS 2010.
A Reliability-oriented Transmission Service in Wireless Sensor Networks Yunhuai Liu, Yanmin Zhu and Lionel Ni Computer Science and Engineering Hong Kong.
Muhammad Niswar Graduate School of Information Science
RM-MAC: A Routing-Enhanced Multi-Channel MAC Protocol in Duty-Cycle Sensor Networks Ye Liu, Hao Liu, Qing Yang, and Shaoen Wu In Proceedings of the IEEE.
Energy Efficient Data Management for Wireless Sensor Networks with Data Sink Failure Hyunyoung Lee, Kyoungsook Lee, Lan Lin and Andreas Klappenecker †
Toward Reliable and Efficient Reporting in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Fatma Bouabdallah Nizar Bouabdallah Raouf Boutaba.
I-Hsin Liu1 Event-to-Sink Directed Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks Alper Bereketli and Ozgur B. Akan Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering.
Rate-Adaptive MAC Protocol in High-Rate Personal Area Networks Byung-Seo Kim, Yuguang Fang and Tan F. Wong Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges Ian. F. Akyildiz, Ismail H. Kasimoglu
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
Universal Opportunistic Routing Scheme using Network Coding
Transport layer.
Surviving Holes and Barriers in Geographic Data Reporting for
Ramakrishna Gummadi, Ramesh Govindan, Konstantinos Psounis
Presentation by Andrew Keating for CS577 Fall 2009
Tarun Banka Department of Computer Science Colorado State University
Yiannis Andreopoulos et al. IEEE JSAC’06 November 2006
Muhammad Niswar Graduate School of Information Science
Presentation transcript:

FBRT: A Feedback-Based Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Yangfan Zhou November, 2004 Supervisors: Dr. Michael Lyu and Dr. Jiangchuan Liu 1 st Year MPhil Presentation

Presentation Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Design Considerations 3. Protocol Implementation 4. Simulation Results 5. Conclusion

Presentation Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Design Considerations 3. Protocol Implementation 4. Simulation Results 5. Conclusion

Introduction Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) –Sensors nodes measure physical phenomena. Target tracking Environment data measurement Engineering measurement –Sensor nodes form an ad-hoc multi-hop wireless network to convey data to a sink.

Introduction WSN Challenges –WSN suffers from energy constraint –WSN condition Unreliable wireless link –High packet loss rate Network Dynamics –Node failures –Link failures –Dynamic traffic load

Introduction Reliable sensor-to-sink data transport for WSN –It is Important –Objective to assure that the sink can receive desired information is very important. –The work presented here is to address this problem.

Introduction Reliable sensor-to-sink data transport for WSN –100% reliable data transport is not necessary. –Reliability means desired information has been achieved –Source sensors might have different contributions

Introduction Reliable sensor-to-sink data transport for WSN Bias the transport scheme

Introduction Current Approaches on WSN data transport –RMST: Reliable Multi-Segment Transport by Heidemann et al, SNPA’03 –PSFQ: Pump Slowly, Fetch Quickly by C. Wan et al, WSNA’02 Not applicable for sensor-to-sink data transport

Introduction –ESRT: Event to Sink Reliable Transport by Sankarasubramaniam et al, MobiHoc’03 Congestion detection –Queue Length Reliability consideration –Receiving rate of the incoming packets Rate adjustment –Unbiased adjustment

Introduction –CODA: Congestion Detection and Avoidance by C. Wan, SenSys'03, Congestion detection –channel sampling Congestion avoidance –Slowing down the sending rate –It has not addressed the reliability issues.

Presentation Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Design Considerations 3. Protocol Implementation 4. Simulation Results 5. Conclusion

Motivations Issues to be addressed to provide reliable sensor-to-sink data transport –Source reporting rate adjustment scheme –Routing scheme

Design Considerations Reporting Rate Control –Relationship between receiving rates and distortion –Different contributions of source nodes. –Different energy costs for communication. –Rate control scheme should employ an optimization approach to minimize energy consumption of the WSN. Adjust the rates so that energy consumption is minimized subjected to that the distortion is in a given range.

Design Considerations Distortion and Sensor Contribution –Application Specific, should be determined by applications. Rate Control –Cooperation of the application and the transport protocol. Figure

Design Considerations Communication cost estimation –Hop number from the source to the sink Simple Inaccurate –Node Price Our metrics: Total number of packets sent by the in-network nodes for per packet received by the sink Accurate –Physical layer overhead But hard to implement

Design Considerations Node Price NP(x): Node price of X = node n’s downstream neighbors Perc(i): the percentage of traffic that is routed to node i The hop loss rate between node n and node i The loss rate of the path from node i to the sink

Perc(2) 2 3 Perc(3) 1 PathLossRate(2) PathLossRate(3) HopLossRate(2) HopLossRate(3) NP(3) NP(2) Sink NP(sink) = 0 PathLossRate(Sink) = 0

Design Considerations Node Price Estimation –Each node can calculate its NP and PathLossRate based on The feedback of NP and PathLossRate of its downstream neighbors The HopLossRate to each of its downstream neighbors The routing scheme: Perc(i) –Two unknowns The HopLossRate The routing scheme (Discussed Later)

Design Considerations Hop Loss Rate –mainly caused by three factors Congestion Signal Interference Fading. –packet loss rate will exhibit graceful increasing behavior as the communication load increases (IEEE MAC) –reasonable to estimate the packet loss rate based on an exponential weighted moving average (EWMA) estimation approach.

Design Considerations Accurate and Current Hop Loss Rate Estimation –Indicates the congestion condition well –Indicates the weak link well Node Price: based on loss rate estimation –Indicates the dynamic wireless communication condition from the node to the sink well –can help to determine the reporting rates –can help to determine the routing scheme

Design Considerations Routing Schemes –Minimizing local NP. Locally optimal energy consumption, minimizing the energy consumed for the sink to receive per packet from me) Perc(2) 2 3 Perc(3) 1 HopLossRate(2) HopLossRate(3) NP(3) NP(2)

Design Considerations Routing Schemes: Oscillation Avoidance

Analysis –Gradually shift traffic to best path –Adaptive to downstream dynamics Perc(2) 2 3 Perc(3) 1 HopLossRate(2) HopLossRate(3) NP(3) NP(2)

Presentation Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Motivations and Design Considerations 3. Protocol Implementation 4. Simulation Results 5. Conclusion

Protocol Implementation Task assignment: Broadcast interest packet –Get possible downstream neighbor information –Select path with the lowest hop number to the sink as tentative best path –Low reporting rate requirement tentatively

Protocol Implementation Link loss rate estimation –Measured according to packet serial numbers holes –Estimated with an EWMA approach.

Protocol Implementation Feedback of communication condition –Checking the following parameters in a given interval A node ’ NP A node ’ s path loss rate to the sink Link loss rate from upstream neighbors – If they are changed, feed back the new value to upstream nodes higher priority.

Protocol Implementation Feedback of newly desired reporting rates FBRT Application Sensor Data & Source NP Rate adjustment feedback The Sink FBRT Node FBRT Encapsulate my NP into data packets Rate adjustment Sensor Data Application Source

Presentation Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Motivations and Design Considerations 3. Protocol Implementation 4. Simulation Results 5. Conclusion

Simulation results Coding FBRT over NS-2 –Setting of the network –Scheme 1: Based on directed diffusion with ESRT scheme. (*) –Scheme 2: FBRT (o) Area of sensor field1500m*1500m Number of sensor nodes100 MAC IEEE without CTS/RTS and ACK Radio power Packet length36 bytes Transmit Power0.660 W Receive Power0.395 W Feedback interval1 second IFQ length50 packets Simulation Time1000 seconds

Simulation results Simulation Network

Simulation results Results Energy consumed of the WSN (J)

Simulation results Results

Presentation Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Motivations and Design Considerations 3. Protocol Implementation 4. Simulation Results 5. Conclusion

Conclusion we propose FBRP, a feedback-based protocol to address reliable sensor-to-sink data transport issue FBRP optimizes the energy consumptions with two schemes. –the sink's rate control scheme that feeds back the optimal reporting rate of each source. –the locally optimal routing scheme for in-network nodes according to the feedback of downstream communication conditions. Simulation results verify its effectiveness for reducing energy consumption.

Thank You