North American Power Group Western Mine-Mouth Coal-Fired Power Two Elk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TransWest Express and Gateway South WECC Planning Coordination Committee David Smith, National Grid October 25-26, 2007 Vancouver, B.C.
Advertisements

South Dakota Energy Infrastructure Authority (SDEIA) Inaugural Meeting of State Infrastructure Authorities Rapid City, SD June 13, 2007.
Coal to Liquids Plant Site Selection in WV Douglas G. Patchen October 25, 2007.
Jonathan Walters Sector Manager, Energy and Transport Middle East and North Africa World Bank.
A Lower-Cost Option for Substantial CO 2 Emission Reductions Ron Edelstein Gas Technology Institute NARUC Meeting Washington DC February 2008.
WESTERN ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT Energy Infrastructure Policy Group Office of Energy Projects Docket No. AD Item A-3 July 23, 2003.
1 Transformation Presentation to the Public Sector Management Workshop June 1,
Transmission Transporting Electricity by Wire Darcy Neigum Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
Renewable Power from Poultry Litter Presentation
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
Floridian Natural Gas Storage Company Martin County, Florida
Bearcreek coal field, Montana, USA. In this area there a numerous studies that indicate significant reserves of coal, this is our area of interest. US.
VT Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation Wood Energy in Vermont January 2005 VT Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation.
SMALL SCALE LNG PROSPECTS
American Public Power Association The Challenge of Building a Coal Plant in Today’s Environment Raj Rao President, Indiana Municipal Power Agency Chairman,
South Dakota Energy Infrastructure Authority (SDEIA) Legislative Energy Briefing Pierre, SD January 11, 2007.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
American Municipal Power – Ohio, Inc. AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER – OHIO, INC. (AMP-Ohio)
1 Cheyenne Tuscola Lebanon Clarington Meeker Wamsutter Opal “Rockies Express Pipeline”
Arizona Corporation Commission 2010 Biennial Transmission Assessment Workshop June 3 & 4, 2010 Brian K. Keel Manager, Transmission System Planning Salt.
What do all those numbers mean on my electric bill? Managing utility costs.
Nuclear Power Isar Plant - Germany Diablo Canyon - California.
Arguments Against Nuclear Power Development in Iran May, 2003.
Integrated Planning Model (IPM) What It Is, Who Uses It, How It Works, What It Can Show You Presentation for For the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Permits/New.
Why Wind?.
Cogeneration at UC July 18, Welcome 3 Transformation of the Power Plant POWER PLANT CENTER OF CAMPUS CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT 2007.
Challenges in Transmission. 2 Environmental and Public Affairs Consulting for the Energy Industry Energy Sectors  Oil & Gas  Pipeline  Storage  LNG.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Wyoming Infrastructure Authority Developing Electric Infrastructure for the Future of the West Energy Gateway Update Presented by Darrell T. Gerrard Vice.
Sithe Global Power, LLC Toquop Energy Project. A 750 MW Coal fired electric generating plant Located 12 miles northwest of Mesquite, NV in Lincoln County.
1 Status of and Outlook for Coal Supply and Demand in the U.S. Imagine West Virginia Spring 2010 Board of Governors Meeting April 13, 2010 Scott Sitzer.
Don’t Scrub When You Can Be Clean A Mobile CNG Pipeline Operational in 6-12 months Low capital expense Relatively short contract duration Phased-in approach.
GE Energy Financial Services Policy Options Shaping Private Investments in Clean Tech Kevin Walsh Managing Director, Power & Renewables May 1, 2009.
Successful Transmission Planning & Development in the West Kelly Barr Manager, Regulatory Affairs & Contracts Salt River Project Phoenix, Arizona June.
National Petroleum Council Study Balancing Natural Gas Policy: Fueling the Demands of a Growing Economy September 2003.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
ISAC Fall School November 30, 2012 Iowa’s Wind Energy Industry & Economic Impact.
Selecting Renewable Projects at Colorado Springs Utilities APPA Conference John Romero GM Acquisition, Engineering and Planning October, 2009.
Natural Resource Partners L.P. SMH Capital Investor Growth Conference New York, NY November 8-9, 2007.
 Each day we rely on electricity-gobbling gadgets that didn’t exist years ago.  Americans are devouring much more energy than ever.  We need.
Energy Policy Act of 2005 Frank Prager Xcel Energy Inc. February 22, 2006.
Coal as a Future Generation Fuel Chris M. Hobson S enior Vice President and Chief Environmental Officer December 3, 2009.
KEC MGA Committee, 2/21/2008 Midwestern Governor’s Association (MGA) Energy Security and Climate Stewardship Platform and Midwestern GHG Accord.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
CWAG ENERGY CONFERENCE BIG SKY, MT Collaborative Efforts to Find Solutions: A Case Study – The Mountain States Transmission Intertie (MSTI) Presented by.
Midwestern Governors’ Energy and Jobs Accords Rolf Nordstrom Executive Director GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE Mid-America Regulatory Conference June 7, 2010.
Wyoming Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute Joint Producers Meeting CO 2 in Wyoming June 26, 2007 Casper, WY Brian Jeffries Executive Director Wyoming Pipeline.
Bryan Hassler, Executive Director Society of Petroleum Engineers January 21, 2004 Rock Springs, WY.
Would you pay for trash?. Energy! Energy History in the United States What is our main source of energy today? 100 years ago, what was our main source.
Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference May 21, 2010 This report contains transmission planning data that may be conceptual in nature and is.
1 Is there LNG in California’s Future? “LNG: When East Meets West” Zeus Development Conference Long Beach, CA by David Maul Manager, Natural Gas Office.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS — Current Projects — The Center for the New West “ The Sun Valley Energy Roundtables 2006” November 30 – December.
PacifiCorp and CAISO Expanding Regional Energy Partnerships
Entrega Gas Pipeline Project Wyoming Natural Gas Pipeline Authority - August 24, 2004.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Biofuel Report Summary Biofuels Team - David Terry Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop Denver,
Regional Transmission Expansion Project Staff Council Briefing Tom Kaiserski (MT) Program Manager February 15, 2011 Governor’s Office of Economic Development.
The Case for IGCC Kay Pashos President, Duke Energy Indiana MARC 2006 Annual Meeting June 20, 2006.
Bearcreek coal field, Montana, USA. This undervalued asset comprises over 389MM tons of high btu coal US COAL RESERVES AVAILABLE FOR JOINT VENTURE.
1 Portfolio Analysis Update Power Committee Discussion August 30, 2004.
Bureau of Land Management Federal Coal Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting Supporting Text.
Introduction And Thermal Power Plant
The Energy Problem Henry Lee Director Environment and Natural Resources Program John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University National Energy.
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY ANALYSIS Abhishek Chaudhary, Tim C
Energy Task Force Presentation
SunZia Project Description
Dominion Investments in Virginia
Carbon Capture & Sequestration
SWAC – Agenda 10/23/18 Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology – Draft Findings 2. Chapter 7 – Draft Landfill Disposal Existing Disposal System Disposal Options.
Presentation transcript:

North American Power Group Western Mine-Mouth Coal-Fired Power Two Elk

North American Power Group, Ltd. NAPG  15 Year-Old Privately held Denver, CO based IPP  Full member of WECC  Owns and operates 7 power plants in California 4 Biomass (84 MW total) 2 Coal/Pet Coke (69 MW total) 1 Gas (48 MW total)  Conceived and developed the Two Elk project in the Power River Basin of Wyoming

Two Elk Project  Central station plant anchoring transmission  MW  Unit #1 at 325 MW under construction  Ample water supply  Ample coal supply by mine truck or overland conveyor belt  No additional infrastructure needed for subsequent units  Potential for Clean Coal for reduced or “zero”emissions

Two Elk Project  The plant is mine mouth, being a single mine truck haul from 20% of the nation’s coal supply.  The three mines abutting the project shipped approximately 196 million tons of coal in 2004 and can supply 250 million tons per year.  Unit #1 has been designed and is being constructed by Bechtel to allow it to burn non- commercial waste coal but run equally well on commercial coal.  Unit #1 officially commenced construction in late May Wyoming ruled all permits valid and in full force and effect in July  The Two Elk project has permits and water rights for an 11 well field, providing more than 3500 GPM. Two Elk Unit #1 has been designed with dry cooling to minimize water requirements.  An advantageous capital structure for Unit #1 based upon Tax Free Bonds provides most of Unit #1’s capital. Three hundred, twenty six million dollars ($326,000,000) in tax-exempt bonds have been sold to date.

Transmission Access

Why Two Elk ?  Fuel Supply 3 mines adjacent to Two Elk –2004 production 196 MM Tons –Mines Permitted for 250 MM Tons/year The adjacent mines have coal reserves of more than 21.7 billion tons No risk of supply or additional permits required 4 th mine scheduled to open by 2010

Why Two Elk ?  Fuel Transportation Mine-Mouth location immediately adjacent to mines No over the road trucking or railroad Delivery by 400 Ton Mine Truck or overland conveyor belt Mine Plan and transportation rates agreed upon for 30 years Audit and adjustment rights to reflect actual costs to deliver

Why Two Elk ?  Air Permits Construction underway on Unit #1 Air Modeling completed for additional units Air Permit application can be filed in Q Developer experienced with WY DEQ

Why Two Elk ?  Water 11 well field permitted by State Engineer Each well permitted at 325 GPM Unit # 1 with dry cooling design consumes 275 GPM Adequate water to support additional generation

Why Two Elk ?  State Support NAPG awarded $326 million in tax exempt bonds for Unit #1 (AA-/A-1+) Local and regional groups formed to support transmission –Wyoming Infrastructure Authority –Governor Freudenthal –Wyoming Counties For Responsible Energy Development (WyCFRED) Wyoming Carbon Sequestration Committee formed to explore for CO2 capture and sequestration Wyoming Pipeline Authority exploring Enhanced Oil Recovery using CO2 flood

NAPG Coal Development Characteristic Two Elk Unit I Two Elk Unit II Two Elk Unit III Two Elk Unit IV Two Elk Unit V Water 275 gpm 3575 gpm available 3000 gpm availableTo be permitted Fuel Supply PRB Waste– Mine truck/Conveyor belt Electric Transmission PacifiCorp PacifiCorp, WAPA, Xcel, APS, TransElect, National Grid 500 kv DC Line Addition PacifiCorp, WAPA, Xcel, APS, TransElect, National Grid 500 kv DC Line Addition PacifiCorp, WAPA, Xcel, APS, TransElect, National Grid 500 kv DC Line Addition PacifiCorp, WAPA, Xcel, APS, TransElect, National Grid 500 kv DC Line Addition Land Owned Rail Transport N/A Competitive Advantage No fuel cost-transport only. Tax Exempt Debt Coal in gas market. Identical need in Utility Resources (4 Utilities) Supply curve location Coal in gas market. Identical need in Utility Resources (4 Utilities) Supply curve location Coal in gas mkt. Identical need in Utility Resources (4 Utilities) Supply curve location Coal in gas mkt. Identical need in Utility Resources (4 Utilities) Supply curve location Coal in gas mkt. In-Service Date /2011

Why Two Elk ?  Transmission Substantial studies completed for Two Elk to the desert Southwest Right of Way from Two Elk to PacifiCorp secured Information and previous work can accelerate process –Environmental & site evaluation including GIS –Federal Agency contacts for lead and scoping –Corridor and route study information available

Why Two Elk ?  760 acre site with expansion option allows for additional units without added infrastructure expense. (600 MW IGCC => 80 Acre footprint)  Ash Ash storage and disposal site permitted and in place This is the only such permit in Wyoming  Two Elk can anchor transmission that will provide access to Wyoming’s Superb wind resources  Two Elk is 60 miles from prime CO2 flood enhance oil recovery fields and export pipelines

Why Now?  Unit 1 Currently Under Construction, COD 2009  NAPG is poised to permit subsequent coal units (COD dates )  Favorable State and Local support  Unit #1 to anchor transmission build out as well as subsequent expansion  New Transmission with Two Elk as an Anchor will enable Wyoming Wind Development

Conclusion  The Two Elk Project will provide long-term, stable, lowest bus bar cost of electric power.  Unit #1 is under construction and has the support of local and regional stakeholders.  Two Elk will act as an anchor for your transmission additions.  Future resource additions at Two Elk involve only an air permit.  Project enhancements are possible via carbon capture and sequestration and regional Enhanced Oil Recovery.  With low fuel cost, no transportation, carbon capture and EOR, Two Elk has the potential be the Palo Verde of Wyoming.  NAPG already has completed significant work, reducing risk and time to market.

Plan  The West has the Load  The will exists to expand the transmission  Funding is available  All that is missing is the generation complex  We have a head start with a project under construction and room to grow  We need partners that want to expand the site, jointly own power projects or provide PPAs

Options  PPA from Load Serving Entity to NAPG Permitting for Unit 2-5 EIS for larger Transmission Build Out  Joint Development of Subsequent Units Palo Verde Model  “Big Box” Model We have site, water, infrastructure Build your Unit on our Property Reduces risk, time to market, and cost