Water Quality Data Elements (WQE) Workgroup Workgroup Co- Chairs Chuck Job, USEPA LeAnne Astin, ICPRB Glenn Patterson, USGS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FGDC Veg Subcommittee Established to: Promote standards of accuracy and currentness in vegetative data financed in whole or in part by Fed funds; Exchange.
Advertisements

EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Methods Board Report National Water Quality Monitoring Council July 28, 2005.
Projects to Help Implement The Monitoring Council’s Framework March 26, 2003.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Council Summer Meeting Fort Collins, Colorado July 22, 2008.
Tributary Workgroup Case Study. Outline for presentation Why Coordinate? Approach of SW Tributary workgroup SW Tributary Workgroup progress and next steps.
5/10/2015 Stream Physical Habitat Data Elements: Request for ACWI Approval Methods and Data Comparability Board Herndon, VA, Feb. 10, 2009.
The Ecological Data Application System (EDAS) for biological data analysis and data upload to STORET
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Jennifer Gimbel, ACWI Chair Acting Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior.
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Methods and Data Comparability Board Report to Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory April 23, 2008 Mission Briefing.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Quality Modern STORET Implementation Why Move From a Working Database To STORET: Originally.
Benjamin Jessup. Tetra Tech, Inc.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
Data for Water Resource Management Module 14, part A – Data types and sources.
Gulfwatch Presentation at the GOMC WG Meeting, Halifax, March 5 th,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University.
STORET and the Water Quality Exchange Status Update Dwane Young OWOW/AWPD/MB April 26, 2007.
NSDI Future Directions Initiative Towards a National Geospatial Strategy and Implementation Plan Ivan B. DeLoatch FGDC Staff Director.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Wetlands Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee  The Wetlands Subcommittee was re-launched in July of  Chaired by U.S. Fish and Wildlife.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Activities of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Gail Mallard, USGS NWQMC Meeting Phoenix, AZ, December 10, 2002.
Methods Board Meeting – March 2005 Highlights Most 2-yr workplans for each Workgroup prepared Discussed Board involvement in NMN – reported earlier in.
BioData a new bioassessment database for the USGS Briefing for the CDI
Evaluating the Potential Human-Health Relevance of VOCs in Samples from Domestic & Public Wells in the U.S. Patty Toccalino, Julia Norman, Barbara Rowe.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
1 Proposed Adoption of Biological and Toxicological Water Quality Data Elements and WQDE Guide LeAnne Astin Interstate Commission on the Potomac River.
NWQMC Meeting Update November 2, 2006 West Palm Beach, Florida.
Colorado EDAS Enhancement and Index Development 2004 Tetra Tech, Inc. and Utah State University.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Methods and Data Comparability Board Advisory Committee on Water Information Herb Brass September 15, 2004.
1 Methods and Data Comparability Board Accreditation of Federal Laboratories for Water Quality Monitoring Advisory Committee on Water Information April.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update-June 2004 Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research.
1 Overview of the Cooperative Water Program Task Force Findings Presentation for the Advisory Committee on Water Information Annual Meeting September 14,
SWAMP Statewide Monitoring Programs Statewide Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Infrastructure & Tools Infrastructure.
A Framework for Monitoring March 26, Mission: Provide a national forum to coordinate consistent and scientifically defensible methods and strategies.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update-April 2004 Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research.
HIGHLIGHTS From the PHOENIX MEETING December 2002.
Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Pilot and its Potential Role in NWIS/STORET Coordination October 18, 2005.
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Summary Overview Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
Report to Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI) January 19, 2006 Herndon, VA.
Water Information Coordination Program
Update Methods and Data Comparability Board San Diego, CA, Dec. 6,2007.
USGS Water Quality Programs and the Water Quality Monitoring Framework CONTACTS: Herb Buxton (609) Tim Miller
HOMELAND SECURITY: WATER SECURITY MONITORING METHODS/NEMI Herb Brass NATIONAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING COUNCIL MEETING PHOENIX, ARIZONA DECEMBER ,
WQX Biological and Habitat Data Effort STORET/WQX Users Conference Austin, TX November 28, 2007.
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Workshop on DOI’s applied to rice germplasm and co-development and transfer of rice technologies Third meeting of the Platform for co-development and transfer.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Anne Castle, ACWI Chair Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior William H.
Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.
CBP CLIMATE RESILIENCY WORKGROUP Cross-Goal Climate Resiliency Analysis and Decision-Making Matrix and Implementation Methodology.
NPDES SUBCOMMITTEE BIOLOGICAL SUBCOMMITTEE MONITORING STRATEGY FY 14 Program Recommendations.
Task Force Activities We are working together on a new approach that identifies sources of PCBs and dioxins, directly applies a plan for reduction and.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Niagara River Area of Concern
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Data Elements (WQE) Workgroup Workgroup Co- Chairs Chuck Job, USEPA LeAnne Astin, ICPRB Glenn Patterson, USGS

WQDE’s Relationship to the Framework -Who -Who collected and analyzed the data -What -What data were collected -When -When the data were collected and analyzed -Where -Where the data were collected -Why -Why the data were collected -How -How the data were collected and analyzed Data Reporting WQDE is a list of “core metadata,” facilitating comparability assessments, which tell us:

WQDE Workgroup Accomplishments –A modular approach used to develop “Who”, “Where”, “When”, “Why” WQDE lists for all data types, and the “What” and “How” WQDE lists for Chemistry and Microbiology, adopted by ACWI –Draft Fact Sheet prepared. –Biology WQDE workgroup formed; lists for field biological assessments and toxicity “What” and “How” distributed for review –Fostered development of eight pilot projects to test implementation concerns –EPA has developed a draft implementation approach and published in Federal Register

Biological Data Under Consideration Aquatic biological assessment data (e.g., fish, algae, macroinvertebrates, plants) Organism tissue contaminant data (e.g., clam tissue, fish tissue, specific organ contaminant data) Organism toxicity data (e.g., acute and chronic toxicity, Microtox) Biomarkers (stress proteins, etc)

Biology WQDE: Organizations Represented FederalEPA, FWS, USGS, NOAA InterstateDRBC, ICPRB StateWDNR, OWRB, MACZ, FDEP, NYDH, ODEQ, CA SWRCB, SJWMD, Ohio Biological Survey Municipal Denver Metro, Chicago WRD Other Kenyon College, Michigan State University, Idexx, Tetra Tech Total of 37 participants thus far

Activities Thus Far Compiled Data Elements from 10 databases: e.g., STORET, NAWQA, EMAP, EDAS, WDNR, ICPRB Evaluated additional element lists from NOAA, NASA, FGDC, EPA Envir Data Registry Compared Data Element lists with current WQDE Who, where, when and why modules from Chem/Micro are transferable to biology data

Activities Thus Far Compared draft biological data elements with current STORET requirements Drafted Position Paper on Workgroup mission Developed first draft of data elements for habitat data

Who Where Habitat Elements When Why What Drives the “How” and the “What” Chem/Micro Tissue Contaminants Bioassessment Toxicity [Analytical methods may require similar elements as existing chemical data elements.] [Some bioassessment field collection methods may also be useful for organism contaminant data.] [collection of samples covered, in part, in bioassessment module

Where are we going? –Fully implement modular approach –Further develop and implement outreach strategies to gain general acceptance of WQDEs ACWI facilitate member use, conduct survey –Complete pilot tests and prepare report to demonstrate ease of use and advantages of WQDEs –Developing WQDEs for field and biological methods –Consider how to respond to EPA data standards proposal