CF3Br, Impurity background correction: agust,www,...cf3br/PPT ak.ppt PC,LHj,...CF3Br/PXP ak.pxp agust,heima,...

Data: 1) cf3br Data “ ”, wave130 /cf3br ( cm-1 = 2hv) 2) Impurity data: “Impurity background.txt” (J.Long , )..agust,heima,..CF3Br/Sept10/ Impurity backgound.txt; wave0/impc (???cm-1): original data 3) diff = cf3br-impc NB!: original data points were shifted(y-offset) pnts needed to be cut from wave0/impc in order to make peaks Match. agust, heima,...PC,LHj,...CF3Br/PXP ak.pxp; CF3Br/PXP ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 5 Mw I(M+) CF3+ iBr+

Main mass signals which stick out after subtraction of “impurity background” are those for iBr+ and CF3+ N2+ impurity signal fluctuates a lot. Therefore the negative result of the N2+ signal after subtraction should be ignored. The small C+ and C2+ signals sticking out after subtraction most probably is not real, i.e. These signal most probably are due to impurti bakcground. As seen on next slide the difference signal are tiny compared to the absolut signals strengths:

Data: 1) cf3br Data “ ”, wave130 /cf3br ( cm-1 = 2hv) 2) Impurity data: “Impurity background.txt” (J.Long , )..agust,heima,..CF3Br/Sept10/ Impurity backgound.txt; wave0/impc (???cm-1): original data 3) diff = cf3br-impc NB!: original data points were shifted(y-offset) pnts neede to be cut from wave0/impc in order to make peaks match agust, heima,...PC,LHj,...CF3Br/PXP ak.pxp; CF3Br/PXP ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 5 Mw I(M+)