1 Quality of Service: for Multimedia Internet Broadcasting Applications CP Lecture 1

2 Background Interactive Multimedia applications stretch resources What is Quality of service? What does a QoS-aware architecture look like? What building blocks does a QoS-aware architecture consist of? What is happening on the Internet?

3 Applications Four important properties of multimedia internet broadcasting applications –Continuity, IMM applications generally deliver streams of data –Capacity, Large amounts of data are transported –Timeliness real-time constraints –Integrity presentation constraints

4 Architectural consideration A critical design issue is to provide mechanisms to observe and to control –stream continuity, –buffer capacities, –transmission delays and –integrity of data.

5 Definition (1) QoS is a system or object property, and consists of a set of quality requirements on the collective behaviour of one or more objects ( ISO/IEC IS 10746) for example: –rate of information transfer, –the latency, –the probability of a communication being disrupted, –the probability of system failure, –the probability of storage failure, –etc

6 Definition(2) to evaluate the characteristics of a system or service as to its task performance...qualitatively and quantitatively(ETSI) this is an end-user view

7 Frameworks(1) OSI-RM Quality of Service framework ISO (1997) Covers speed and reliability of transmission - e.g. –throughput, –delay, –delay variation (jitter), –bit error rate (BER), –cell loss rate, and –connection establishment failure probability etc.

8 Frameworks(2) ODP QoS Framework (1999) – More complete than ISO 13236

9 ODP framework QoS management of a system is driven by –the QoS characteristics user requirements or system policies. A QoS characteristic represents –QoS aspects of the system, service or the resources, – the actual behaviour of the application.

10 QoS Parameters Application - mainly presentation characteristics, e.g. –image size –resolution, –frame rate, –start-up delay etc Transportation - mainly network characteristics e.g –bandwidth, –delay, –jitter and –transmission error rate

11 Management Functions(ODP) Application and Transportation –allowing control of QoS control at transportation level uses congestion detection (i.e after the event) Control at application level allows for congestion avoidance (before the event) –this split gives a two-level control architecture application and network level

12 Others Other frameworks exist and different groupings used –e.g Nahrstedt uses –performance-oriented parameters e.g. end-to-end delay and bit rate; –format-oriented parameters e.g video resolution, frame rate, storage format and compression scheme –a synchronisation-oriented QoS parameter e.g. the skew between the beginning of audio and video sequences; –cost-oriented parameters e.g. connection and data transmission charges and copyright fees; –user-oriented parameters these describe the subjective image and sound quality.

13 Management functions(ISO) Stages of evolution of quality- controlled services –Prediction –resource reservation –negotiation –monitoring –tuning –termination

14 User’s view How does this fit with the user’s perception? –User’s understand –resolution, image size, colour depth, etc. –Mapped onto communication parameters –cell-loss rate, jitter etc

15 QoS Management architecture (de Meer)

16 Principles Basic concepts –Feedback (tuning and flow control) –Feed-forward (admission control) Architectures need both to be QoS aware

17 CORBA

18 TINA

19 QoSA - Lancaster

20 Heidelberg Architecture

21 TENET Architecture

22 Omega Architecture

23 General features Resource-oriented transport mechanisms –e.g. point-to-point flow control or admission control Openness –providing visibility of internal behaviour to enable QoS control –e.g filtering, shaping, monitoring Decision procedures –to interpret signals for the adaptation of resources

24 Intserv (integrated services) Huston G (2000) QoS Fact or fiction, Internet Protocol Journal Vol 3 No 1 from

25 Diffserv (Differentiated services) Huston G (2000) QoS Fact or fiction, Internet Protocol Journal Vol 3 No 1 from

26 Design constraints To identify openness constraints for a known QoS policy in terms of observability and controllability. To identify continuous variables that are stringent to the QoS policy to be achieved. Define their relationships to input and output of the system. To separate, architecturally, control functions from service functions. Define a clear interface between the control plane and the service or network plane.

27 Conclusions Many models exist Those outlined are mainly QoS- aware IMM applications will suffer without QoS-awareness