Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We will tackle accelerator physics the way we tackle most problems in classical physics – ie, with 18 th and 19 th century mathematics!
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Review of basic mathematics: Vectors & Matrices Differential equations Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 16 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 16 January 2012.
Transverse dynamics Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory x : the horizontal plane y : the vertical plane Erik.
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Basic Mathematics Rende Steerenberg BE/OP CERN Accelerator School Basic Accelerator Science & Technology at CERN 3 – 7 February 2014 – Chavannes de Bogis.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
Basic Mathematics for Accelerators
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Synchrotron Radiation
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Electric Field.
HST 2009 Introduction to AcceleratorsD. Brandt 1 The LHC: Physics without mathematics ! D. Brandt, CERN.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Daniel Dobos Seminar: Chaos, Prof. Markus
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Accelerator Fundamentals Brief history of accelerator Accelerator building blocks Transverse beam dynamics coordinate system Mei Bai BND School, Sept.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Accelerator Physics & Diagnostics, H.Wiedemann, DITANET, March 6 – 11, 2011, Stockholm, Sweden Accelerator Physics for Diagnostics Helmut Wiedemann Stanford.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Contents:  Overview of the Lectures  A Brief History on Particle Accelerators  The Mathematics we Need  Overview of the CERN Accelerator Complex 
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Lecture 3 Transverse Optics II
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Lecture 2 Transverse Optics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Contents:  Lattices and TWISS Parameters  Tune Calculations and Corrections  Dispersion  Momentum Compaction  Chromaticity  Sextupole Magnets 
AXEL-2017 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
AXEL-2017 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Introduction to particle accelerators
Review of Accelerator Physics Concepts
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
Presentation transcript:

Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 AXEL-2012 Introduction to Particle Accelerators

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL A quick recap……. We solved Hill’s equation, which led us to the definition of transverse emittance and allowed us to describe particle motion in transverse phase space in terms of β, α, etc… We constructed the Transport Matrices corresponding to drift spaces and quadrupoles. Now we must combine these matrices with the solution of Hill’s equation to evaluate β, α, etc…

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Matrices & Hill’s equation We can multiply the matrices of our drift spaces and quadrupoles together to form a transport matrix that describes a larger section of our accelerator. These matrices will move our particle from one point (x(s 1 ),x’(s 1 )) on our phase space plot to another (x(s 2 ),x’(s 2 )), as shown in the matrix equation below. The elements of this matrix are fixed by the elements through which the particles pass from point s 1 to point s 2. However, we can also express (x, x’) as solutions of Hill’s equation. and

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Matrices & Hill’s equation (2) Assume that our transport matrix describes a complete turn around the machine. Therefore :  (s 2 ) =  (s 1 ) Let μ be the change in betatron phase over one complete turn. Then we get for x(s 2 ):

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Matrices & Hill’s equation (3) Equating the ‘sin’ terms gives: Which leads to: So, for the position x at s2 we have… Equating the ‘cos’ terms gives: Which leads to: We can repeat this for c and d.

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Matrices & Twiss parameters These are called TWISS parameters Remember previously we defined: Our transport matrix becomes now: Remember also that μ is the total betatron phase advance over one complete turn is. Number of betatron oscillations per turn

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Lattice parameters This matrix describes one complete turn around our machine and will vary depending on the starting point (s). If we start at any point and multiply all of the matrices representing each element all around the machine we can calculate α, β, γ and μ for that specific point, which then will give us β (s) and Q If we repeat this many times for many different initial positions (s) we can calculate our Lattice Parameters for all points around the machine.

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Lattice calculations and codes Obviously μ (or Q) is not dependent on the initial position ‘s’, but we can calculate the change in betatron phase, d μ, from one element to the next. Computer codes like “MAD” or “Transport” vary lengths, positions and strengths of the individual elements to obtain the desired beam dimensions or envelope ‘β(s)’ and the desired ‘Q’. Often a machine is made of many individual and identical sections (FODO cells). In that case we only calculate a single cell and not the whole machine, as the the functions β (s) and dμ will repeat themselves for each identical section. The insertion sections have to be calculated separately.

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL The β (s) and Q relation.,where μ = Δ  over a complete turn But we also found: This leads to: Over one complete turn Increasing the focusing strength decreases the size of the beam envelope (β) and increases Q and vice versa.

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Tune corrections What happens if we change the focusing strength slightly? The Twiss matrix for our ‘FODO’ cell is given by: Add a small QF quadrupole, with strength dK and length ds. This will modify the ‘FODO’ lattice, and add a horizontal focusing term: The new Twiss matrix representing the modified lattice is:

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Tune corrections (2) If d  is small then we can ignore changes in β So the new Twiss matrix is just: This gives This extra quadrupole will modify the phase advance  for the FODO cell.  1 =  + d  New phase advance Change in phase advance

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Tune corrections (3) These two matrices represent the same FODO cell therefore: Which equals: Combining and compare the first and the fourth terms of these two matrices gives: Only valid for change in b <<

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Remember  1 =  + d  and dμ is small dQ = dμ/2π If we follow the same reasoning for both transverse planes for both QF and QD quadrupoles In the horizontal plane this is a QF QF QD Tune corrections (4),but:

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Let dk F = dk for QF and dk D = dk for QD  hF,  vF =  at QF and  hD,  vD =  at QD Then: This matrix relates the change in the tune to the change in strength of the quadrupoles. We can invert this matrix to calculate change in quadrupole field needed for a given change in tune Tune corrections (5)

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Dispersion (1) Different energy or momentum particles have different radii of curvature ( ρ ) in the main dipoles. These particles no longer pass through the quadrupoles at the same radial position. Quadrupoles act as dipoles for different momentum particles. Closed orbits for different momentum particles are different. This horizontal displacement is expressed as the dispersion function D(s) D(s) is a function of ‘s’ exactly as β(s) is a function of ‘s’ Until now we have assumed that our beam has no energy or momentum spread: and

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Dispersion (2) The displacement due to the change in momentum at any position (s) is given by: D(s) the dispersion function, is calculated from the lattice, and has the unit of meters. The beam will have a finite horizontal size due to it’s momentum spread. In the majority of the cases we have no vertical dipoles, and so D(s)=0 in the vertical plane. Local radial displacement due to momentum spread Dispersion function

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Momentum compaction factor The change in orbit with the changing momentum means that the average length of the orbit will also depend on the beam momentum. This is expressed as the momentum compaction factor, α p, where: α p tells us about the change in the length of radius of the closed orbit for a change in momentum.

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Chromaticity The focusing strength of our quadrupoles depends on the beam momentum, ‘p’ But Q depends on the ‘k’ of the quadrupoles Therefore a spread in momentum causes a spread in focusing strength The constant here is called : Chromaticity

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Chromaticity visualized The chromaticity relates the tune spread of the transverse motion with the momentum spread in the beam. p0p0 A particle with a higher momentum as the central momentum will be deviated less in the quadrupole and will have a lower betatron tune A particle with a lower momentum as the central momentum will be deviated more in the quadrupole and will have a higher betatron tune Focusing quadrupole in horizontal plane p > p 0 p < p 0 QF

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Chromaticity calculated Remember To correct this tune spread we need to increase the quadrupole focusing strength for higher momentum particles, and decrease it for lower momentum particles. This term is the Chromaticity ξ This we will obtain using a Sextupole magnet and Therefore The gradient seen by the particle depends on its momentum

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Sextupole Magnets Conventional Sextupole from LEP, but looks similar for other ‘warm’ machines. ~ 1 meter long and a few hundreds of kg. Correction Sextupole of the LHC 11cm, 10 kg, 500A at 2K for a field of 1630 T/m 2

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Chromaticity correction Vertical magnetic field versus horizontal displacement in a quadrupole and a sextupole. x By Final “corrected” By By = Kq.x (Quadrupole ) By = Ks.x 2 (Sextupole)

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Chromaticity correction (2) The effect of the sextupole field is to increase the magnetic field of the quadrupoles for the positive ‘x’ particles and decrease the field for the negative ‘x’ particles. However, the dispersion function, D(s), describes how the radial position of the particles change with momentum. Therefore the sextupoles will alter the focusing field seen by the particles as a function of their momentum. This we can use to compensate the natural chromaticity of the machine.

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Sextupole & Chromaticity In a sextupole for y = 0 we have a field By = C.x 2 Now calculate ‘k’ the focusing gradient as we did for a quadrupole: We conclude that ‘k’ is no longer constant, as it depends on ‘x’ Using which after differentiating gives For k we now write So for a Δx we get and we know that Therefore

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Sextupole & Chromaticity We know that the tune changes with : Where: and Remember with If we can make this term exactly balance the natural chromaticity then we will have solved our problem. The effect of a sextupole with length l on the particle tune Q as a function of Δp/p is given by:

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Sextupole & Chromaticity (2) There are two chromaticities: horizontal  ξ h vertical  ξ v However, the effect of a sextupole depends on β (s), which varies around the machine Two types of sextupoles are used to correct the chromaticity. One (SF) is placed near QF quadrupoles where β h is large and β v is small, this will have a large effect on ξ h Another (SD) placed near QD quadrupoles, where β v is large and β h is small, will correct ξ v Also sextupoles should be placed where D(s) is large, in order to increase their effect, since Δk is proportional to D(s)

R. Steerenberg, 17-Jan-2012AXEL Questions….,Remarks…? Hill’s equation Lattices and tune corrections Sextupoles Dispersion and chromaticity