Buspirone and Pindolol Effects on the EEG Frequency Spectrum in Healthy Men R.H. McAllister-Williams* and A.E. Massey Department of Psychiatry, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Introduction l 5-HT 1A receptors may be of central importance in the pathophysiology and treatment of affective disorders 1 l Current methods of examining their functional integrity in man are limited: F The neuroendocrine response to l-tryptophan and 5-HT 1A agonists may reflect postsynaptic hypothalamic 5-HT 1A receptor activation 2 F The hypothermic effect of 5-HT 1A agonists is believed to reflect a combination of somatodendritic and postsynaptic 5- HT 1A receptor activation 3 l The 5-HT 1A agonist buspirone causes a leftward shift of the EEG frequency spectrum 4,5 which is hypothesised to reflect somatodendritic 5-HT 1A receptor activation Methods l 14 healthy male volunteers l 4-way random order cross over, double blind experiment l Resting EEG recorded, plus temperature, prolactin levels and VAS for ‘depressed’, ‘drowsy’, ‘restless’, ‘nausea’ and ‘lightheaded’ EEG Temp Blood VAS 01:302:002:303:00 EEG Temp Blood VAS EEG Temp Blood VAS EEG Temp Blood VAS Pindolol 20 mg or placebo Buspirone 30 mg or placebo l 10 min EEG recording : F 29 scalp electrodes F referenced to left mastoid, re- referenced off-line to linked mastoids F band width Hz F blink corrected using VEOG F 10 s epochs generated F rejected if voltage deflection > 75 V (including HEOG) F FFT generated with bin width of 0.1 Hz F Post-hoc analysis used 8 colored sites to examine ant/post and left/right differences Subjects 1 2 l Prolactin response to buspirone and pindolol l Main effect of drug (F(1.7,26.3) = 15.80, p < 0.001) l Main effect of buspirone (F(1.0,20.7) = 27.85, p < 0.001) l Trend for effect of pindolol (F(1.0,16.6) = 4.61, p = 0.053) l Pindolol + buspirone significantly less than buspirone (F(1.0,18.6) = 20.07, p < 0.001) 3 l Temperature response to buspirone and pindolol l Main effect of drug (F(2.0,60.0) = 6.30, p < 0.01) l Main effect of buspirone (F(1.3,30.8) = 7.65, p < 0.05) l Main effect of pindolol (F(1.3,31.6) = 6.67, p < 0.05) l Pindolol + buspirone not significantly different to buspirone alone l Subjective effects rated using VAS scales l Nomain effect of buspirone or pindolol on depressed, drowsy or restless VAS l Significant buspirone X time effect, but not pindolol, on ‘nausea’ (F(2.52,30.23) = 4.86, p < 0.01) and ‘lightheaded’(F(2.06,26.82) = 10.32, p < 0.001) l Pindolol + buspirone significantly less than buspirone (F(2.26,27.11) = 4.80, p < 0.05 and F(2.42,29.08) = 3.03, p = respectively) 4 l Buspirone and pindolol effects on the EEG frequency spectrum F Relative power between 0.5 and 30Hz calculated from FFT (plotted to 15Hz) 5 6 l Frequency spectrum analysis by bands F Using bands determined by factor analysis 6 l Analysis of theta band F Drug X AP effect for buspirone (F(1,13) = 4.64, p = 0.051) and pindolol (F(1,13) = 18.24, p < 0.001) F No significant difference between pindolol+ buspirone and buspirone alone l Centroid analysis of FFT between 6 and 10.5 Hz Analysis of centroids - 8 sites 7 l Significant effect of buspirone and pindolol l Effect greater at posterior sites l Pindolol + buspirone not significantly different from buspirone alone Correlation between effects 8 l Weak correlation between shift in centroid (P7) and restlessness and prolactin response l Strongest correlation between prolactin response and nausea and lightheadedness Conclusions l Buspirone (30 mg) causes a leftward shift of the EEG frequency spectrum between 6 and 10.5 Hz in healthy subjects l Pindolol (20 mg) causes a similar effect l The relative effects of buspirone and pindolol on the EEG are different to the prolactin response which is known to reflect postsynaptic 5-HT 1A activation l Pindolol has been shown to be a partial agonist at somatodendritic 5-HT 1A receptors in rodents 7 l The shift in EEG spectrum with buspirone and pindolol may reflect somatodendritic 5-HT 1A receptor activation Acknowledgements l This work was supported by an MRC (UK) Clinician Scientist Fellowship award toRHMcAW References 1. McAllister-Williams R.H. & Young A.H. (1998) The pathology of depression. A synthesis of the role of serotonin and corticosteroids. In New models for depression (ed. Ebert D. and Ebmeier K.), Vol. 19, pp Karger, Basel. 2. Smith C.E., Ware C.J., &Cowen P.J. (1991) Pindolol decreases prolactin and growth hormone responses to intravenous L-tryptophan. Psychopharm. 103, Blier P., Seletti B., Young S.N., Benkelfat C., & de Montigny C. (1994) Serotonin 1A receptor activation and hypothermia: Evidence for a postsynaptic mechanism in humans. Neuropsychopharm. 10, 92S (O ). 4. Bogdanov N.N. &Bogdanov M.B. (1994) The role of 5-HT 1A serotonin and D 2 dopamine receptors in buspirone effects on cortical electrical activity in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 177, Anderer P., Barbanoj M.J., Saletu B., &Semlitsch H.V. (1993) Restriction to a limited set of EEG-target variables may lead to misinterpretation of pharmaco-EEG results. Neuropsychobiol. 27, Herrman W.M.,FichteK., &KubickiS. (1980) Definition of EEG frequency bands based on the interpretation of factor analysis with EEG power spectrum parameters. In Factor analysis and EEG variables (ed KubickiS., et al.), pp Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart. 7. Clifford E.M., Gartside S.E., Umbers V., Cowen P.J., Hajos M., & Sharp T. (1998) Electrophysiological and neurochemical evidence that pindolol has agonist properties at the 5- HT(1A) autoreceptor in vivo. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 124,