1 The momentum measurement of 2ry particle emitted from neutrino interaction DONUT DEC 10 th -11 th B.D.Park, S.Takahashi and T.Furukawa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hadron production in hard scattering Event GeneratorGEANT.
Advertisements

  (tau neutrino magnetic moment) Reinhard Schwienhorst University of Minnesota Donut analysis Talk at Nagoya University, 6/9/99.
The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
1 Status report of the PEANUT analysis Giovanni De Lellis Collaboration Meeting, June 5th 2007, Maiori.
NAKAMURA M. (NAGOYA Univ.)
Automated analysis of nuclear emulsions using new tracking technique presented by Tsutomu Fukuda ( Toho University ) Workshop on Nuclear Track Emulsion.
Carbon ion fragmentation study for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck base, prostate)
Slides for the discussion Cosmic ray density. Cosmic ray density. Cosmic ray is  useful for the alignment between plates. Decay search Momentum measurement.
Emulsion scanning: present status and plans for the coming run Giovanni De Lellis.
Vertex location status of Japan Nagoya vertex hunting team Y.Nonoyama, K.Hamada, S.Takahashi, H.Kubota, R.Komatani 2009 Jan 22 OPERA Japan Meeting.
Status of Multiplicity Studies at Primary Vertex Umut Kose.
OPERA brick (16215) scanning results Luisa Arrabito on behalf of Lyon Scanning Group Emulsion Workshop Nagoya 22th-23th January 2008.
Scanning Status of Nagoya N.Nonaka. Predictions : DAQ finished : Good Map : DATA Quality check.
NetScan for BL118 PEANUT Fermilab 22-23/Jan/2007.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
OPERA 2008 run: a report from the Swiss scanning lab Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern university for the Swiss scanning team OPERA Collaboration meeting Ankara,
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT in general scanning (unbiased) mode Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Andrea Russo Naples University.
Chant tracks for Analysis O.Sato.
NS=1 event Satoru Takahashi DONuT collaboration Nagano 2006/10/11.
Electron identification and shower analysis in ECC T.Toshito (Nagoya Univ.) 8.Mar.2002
Kouji Narita Nagoya University, Japan CHORUS collaboration Study of charm production in neutrino interactions.
Summary of the event location in Europe Giovanni De Lellis.
Momentum O.Sato. Chant Dt momentum(GBTR) check(‘96+’97) 0muEventcheck#track#match#DtDt/trackDt/match kink Vee.
Study of the fragmentation of Carbon ions for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck.
Film Storage and book-keeping Scanning Quality Control Cosmic Ray Density Vertex Confirmation Vertex Location WG4 summary.
Vertex localization in Lyon Emulsion Workshop 7th-9th Dec. 2006, Nagoya Luisa Arrabito – IPN Lyon.
Evaluation of SySal efficiencies for 1  sample Chorus Collaboration Meeting Ishigaki,7-8 April 2003 Emiliano Barbuto, Chiara Sirignano, Salvatore Sorrentino.
Time stamping for Emulsion Tracks with Gyaku Data Base method Y.Nonoyama.
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
Status of “Full scanning” 2007/ 03/ 26 Y.Nonoyama.
Umut Kose Neutrino interaction location in the OPERA Experiment New Development of Flavor Physics, , Tennomaru, Gamagori Nagoya University.
Interaction point analysis Judgment  /  March 10, 2009 Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
MonteCarlo simulation of neutrino interactions in PEANUT Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Alberto Marotta and Andrea Russo Naples University.
1 Momentum measurements of 2ry particles emitted from neutrino interactions in DONuT experiment B. D. Park Nagoya univ. Emulsion Dec.
Study of compact emulsion spectrometer for identification of neutrino/anti-neutrino interaction OPERA emulsion Nagoya Univ. Chika Fukushima.
The first application of automatic scanning to vertex location T.Toshito (Nagoya Univ.) 7. Mar. 2002
Deformation measurement by compton alignment Satoru Takahashi, Nagoya Univ. OPERA emulsion workshop.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.
DONUT Reinhard Schwienhorst DOE review 7/28/1999.
Status and results from the OPERA experiment Tsutomu FUKUDA ( Nagoya University ) On behalf of the OPERA Collaboration NNN10, 14 Dec 2010, Toyama International.
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
Status of the OPERA experiment Akitaka Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of the OPERA collaboration  CC event with charm production Candidate (Data)
Tsutomu Fukuda Nagoya University, JAPAN
Status and results from OPERA Tomoko Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of OPERA Swiss groups of Bern and ETHZ.
N. Saoulidou & G. Tzanakos1 Event Location N. Saoulidou and G. Tzanakos University of Athens, Department of Physics, Div. Of Nuclear & Particle Physics.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
DE/dX measurement by OPERA film Tsutomu Fukuda (Nagoya Univ) Emulsion work shop (11/12,2005)
2007’ One classical method - Multiplicity in N-N collisions at SPS/CERN J.T.RheeKonkuk-University.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
Event Location Rehearsal in PEANUT Bricks OPERA collaboration meeting Gran Sasso, May 2006 Kodama, Sato, Fukuda, Komatsu, Narita, Nonoyama NAGOYA.
Results on Inclusive Diffraction From The ZEUS Experiment Data from the running period The last period with the ZEUS Forward Plug Calorimeter.
The DONuT Experiment Observations of the Tau Neutrino Presentation by Suzanne Nichols.
Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009.
Nuclear emulsions One of the eldest particle detectors, still used in particle physics experiment (CHORUS, DONUT, OPERA) for its unique peculiarities:
Current Status of The OPERA Experiment
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
Status of the OPERA experiment
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
The LHC collider in Geneva
Jaewon Park University of Rochester
Neutrino and Charm Physics with CHORUS
USCMS Hans Wenzel and Nick Leioatts
Study of charm hadroproduction Tau neutrino production at CERN SPS
Presentation transcript:

1 The momentum measurement of 2ry particle emitted from neutrino interaction DONUT DEC 10 th -11 th B.D.Park, S.Takahashi and T.Furukawa Nagoya JAPAN

2 Contents 1. Criterion of primary track & how many tracks picked up by the condition 2. The distribution of RMS for High-Energy tracks after Fine-Alignment 3. Scattering distribution 4. Momentum measured ratio as a function of the slope in each module 5. Measured momentum vs. Limit & Momentum measurement error 6. Measured momentum vs. Spectrometer data (μ) 7. Data summary

3 Criterion of primary track and picked up the track 1. should start from vertex point or downstream plate of vertex point 2. consist of segments more than 3 segments (as track definition) 3. Impact parameter less than 5μm => Number of tracks / Number of events 634 / 168

4 Number of tracks vs. IP IP < 5μm 192 tracks μm Number of track Large slope & a low PH

5 RMS for High-Energy tracks after Fine-Alignment Entries RMS(x) RMS(y) Entries 3367 RMS(x) RMS(y) μm For all module For Module 1

6 RMS for High-Energy tracks after Fine-Alignment Entries 1259 RMS(x) RMS(y) Entries 3134 RMS(x) RMS(y) μm For Module 2 For Module 3

7 RMS for High-Energy tracks after Fine-Alignment Entries 857 RMS(x) RMS(y) Entries 499 RMS(x) RMS(y) μm For Module 4 For Module 5

8 RMS for High-Energy tracks after Fine-Alignment Entries 2734 RMS(x) RMS(y) Entries 163 RMS(x) RMS(y) μm For Module 7 For Module 8

9 Scattering distribution Bulk Entries 1049 ECC 200 Entries 985 ECC 800 Entries 495

10 Momentum measured ratio as a function of the slope tan θ Number of track Probability Entries 491 measured track tried track tan θ

11 Momentum measured ratio as a function of the slope Entries 75Entries 88 Entries 91 Entries 59

12 Momentum measured ratio as a function of the slope Entries 30 Entries 130 Entries 18

13 In each module Entries 69 Entries 66 Entries 48 Entries 26

14 In each module Entries 19Entries 88 Entries 8

15 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 290 (P < Limit)

16 Momentum measurement error

17 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 66 (P < Limit)

18 Momentum measurement error

19 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 34 (P < Limit)

20 Momentum measurement error

21 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) Entries 62 (P < Limit)

22 Momentum measurement error

23 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 25 (P < Limit)

24 Momentum measurement error

25 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 16 (P < Limit)

26 Momentum measurement error

27 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 83 (P < Limit)

28 Momentum measurement error

29 Measured momentum vs. Limit (Limit : maximum detectable momentum ) entries 4 (P < Limit)

30 Momentum measurement error

31 Measured momentum vs. Spectrometer (μ) 14 track

32 Summary Ⅰ Number of Measured tracks 47 Too short tracks 90 Not enough plate ( below the plate#10) 3 No Track 2 No map file 124 Not good alignment (RMS for High-Energy tracks after Fine-Align less than 1μm)

33 Summary Ⅰ - 2

34 Summary Ⅱ