Lightning The LDAR II Network Nicholas W. S. Demetriades, Ronald L. Holle and Martin J. Murphy Vaisala, Inc., Tucson, Arizona HEAT Project - First Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weather Maps & Fronts Refers to the state of the atmosphere at a specific time and place. Influenced by pressure systems (high and low) and fronts. Describes.
Advertisements

Cloud Flash Evaluation Issues and Progress Report Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL Al Nierow, FAA Dennis Boccippio, NASA/MSFC.
Thunderstorms. What Are Thunderstorms? Thunderstorms are the most common kind of severe storm. They form in clouds called thunderheads, or cumulonimbus.
Lightning Climatology Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array May - September, Paul Krehbiel New Mexico Tech September 28, 2005.
Vaisala TLS200, Technological Advancements for VHF total lightning mapping / Nikki Hembury and Ron Holle - Vaisala / Southern Thunder Conference 2011.
The Effects of El Niño-Southern Oscillation on Lightning Variability over the United States McArthur “Mack” Jones Jr. 1, Jeffrey M. Forbes 1, Ronald L.
Briefing to DC3 Participants by Stephanie Weiss 9 April 2012 Anvil Lightning and Aircraft.
DUAL-POLARIZATION OF WSR-88D NETWORK
NATS 101 Lecture 28 Lightning. Review: Thunderstorms A cumulonimbus with lightning and thunder! Deep layer of conditionally unstable air is necessary.
Transient Luminous Events and the 9 May 2007 Oklahoma Mesoscale Convective System Contact Info: Timothy J. Lang, CSU Atmospheric Science, Ft. Collins,
STEPS Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study May-July 2000 S. Rutledge, S. Tessendorf, K. Wiens, T. Lang, J. Miller # Department of.
S. Hunter Coleman*, Michael Cammarata, Anthony Petrolito NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Columbia, SC * A Significant Hail.
Radar signatures in complex terrain during the passage of mid-latitude cyclones Socorro Medina Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
CONVECTION IN TROPICAL CYCLONES John Molinari and David Vollaro University at Albany, SUNY Northeast Tropical Conference Rensselaerville, NY June 2009.
Part 4. Disturbances Chapter 11 Lightning, Thunder, and Tornadoes.
The Houston Environmental Aerosol Thunderstorm (HEAT) Project: 2005
ON THE RESPONSE OF HAILSTORMS TO ENHANCED CCN CONCENTRATIONS William R. Cotton Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University.
On the relationship of in-cloud convective turbulence and total lightning Wiebke Deierling, John Williams, Sarah Al-Momar, Bob Sharman, Matthias Steiner.
Two Similar CG Lightning Flashes with Vastly Different Associated IC Activity William H. Beasley 1, Douglas M. Jordan 2 and Stephanie A. Weiss 1 1 University.
Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D. Pete Wolf, SOO National Weather Service Jacksonville, Florida.
Thunderstorms. Review of last lecture 1.Two types of lightning (cloud-to-cloud 80%, cloud-to- ground 20%) 2.4 steps of lightning development. 3.How fast.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Southern Thunder Alliance and LMA Assessments Steve Goodman.
AN OVERVIEW OF TORNADOGENESIS AND VORTEX STRUCTURE by Ernest M. Agee Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana.
SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY LABORATORY The Dallas and Fort Worth Storms of May 5, 1995 Storms of May 5, 1995 BY: Brent Crisp, Phil Grigsby, Thomas Jones, Devon.
Forecasting Lightning Initiation and Cessation at Kennedy Space Center
TLE Corte June 2008 BALLOON BORNE DC AND AC ELECTRIC MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINTY OF TROPICAL CONVECTIVE CLOUDS. J.J. BERTHELIER 1, F. SIMOES 1, J.P. POMMEREAU.
Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Last Lecture: We looked at severe weather events in the lower latitudes Principal weather event is the formation and movement.
Mesoscale convective systems. Review of last lecture 1.3 stages of supercell tornado formation. 1.Tornado outbreak (number>6) 2.Tornado damage: Enhanced.
A statistical framework for the analysis of large lightning and radar datasets Timothy J. Lang and Steven A. Rutledge Department of Atmospheric Science.
Vaisala Total Lightning Network Update / Nikki Hembury / Southern Thunder Conference 2011.
Supercell Rotating thunderstorm with updrafts and downdrafts structured so it can maintain itself for several hours What makes a supercell different from.
Christopher J. Schultz 1, Walter A. Petersen 2, Lawrence D. Carey 3* 1 - Department of Atmospheric Science, UAHuntsville, Huntsville, AL 2 – NASA Marshall.
Total Lightning Detection Your Name & Affiliation.
Results from Vaisala’s long range lightning detection network (LLDN) tropical cyclone studies Nicholas W. S. Demetriades Applications Manager, Meteorology.
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
Transient Luminous Events above Two Mesoscale Convective Systems Timothy J. Lang, Steven A. Rutledge, Walt Lyons, Jingbo Li, Steven A. Cummer, and Don.
Vaisala TLS200 VHF total lightning mapping for safety and nowcasting applications Nick Demetriades 1, Ron Holle 2, and Nikki Hembury 2 Vaisala Inc. 1 Helsinki,
Relationships between Lightning and Radar Parameters in the Mid-Atlantic Region Scott D. Rudlosky Cooperative Institute of Climate and Satellites University.
Determining Relationships between Lightning and Radar in Severe and Non-Severe Storms Scott D. Rudlosky Florida State University Department of Earth, Ocean,
Meteorology This event emphasizes understanding of basic meteorological principles with emphasis on interpretation and analysis of meteorological data.
THUNDERSTORMS 5 Ingredients for a thunderstorm Lift from Lift from Cold/warm front Cold/warm front Gust front Gust front Daytime heating Daytime.
On the Role of Electric Field Changes when Calculating Thunderstorm Currents Yu.V. Shlugaev, V.V. Klimenko, E.A. Mareev Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
Don MacGorman 1,2, Ted Mansell 1, Kristin Kuhlman 2, Alex Fierro 2, Conrad Ziegler 1, Stephanie Weiss 2, Dave Rust 2 1 NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Field Mill. Charging by induction Initially neutral Introduce a charge, creating an electric field E.
Curious Precipitation Curtains within the Inflow Region of a Supercell Thunderstorm: A Status Report Rodger A. Brown NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory,
A NASA Model for Improving the Lightning NOx Emission Inventory for CMAQ William Koshak 1, Maudood Khan 2, Arastoo Biazar 3, Michael Newchurch 3, Richard.
Early Evaluation and Operational Applications of Total Lightning in AWIPS-2 Al Cope NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Mount Holly, NJ
HRV (70-100%)IR10.8 (Tb 35dBz HRV cloud (HRV,HRV,IR10.8) radar Zmax > 35dBz (CC+CG) 10-minute lightning data (CC+CG) Simultaneous.
Thunderstorms are classified into four major types, namely the supercell, squall line, multicell single cell. The strongest type is called the supercell,
Lightning Mapping Technology & NWS Warning Decision Making Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL.
National Convective Weather Forecast (NCWF) Collaborators: C. Mueller, J. Pinto, D. Ahijevych, D. Megenhardt, N. Rehak Stan Trier, NCAR
Total Lightning Characteristics in Mesoscale Convective Systems Don MacGorman NOAA/NSSL & Jeff Makowski OU School of Meteorology.
© 2000 Roger Edwards Investigating the Potential of Using Radar to Nowcast Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Initiation over Southern Ontario 18 th Annual GLOMW.
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06 Cloud Lightning from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) Ronald L. Holle, Nicholas Demetriades, and.
Relationships between total lightning activity, microphysics, and kinematics during the 24 September 2012 HyMeX MCS system J.-F. Ribaud, O. Bousquet and.
Types of Lightning Intracloud: most frequent (can also have cloud to cloud) Cloud to ground Air discharge: from charged region to air Intercloud.
Thunderstorm Charge Structures Producing Negative Gigantic Jets
Paper Review Jennie Bukowski ATS APR-2017
Lightning Flashes in Alabama Tornadic Supercells on 27 April 2011
MM5- and WRF-Simulated Cloud and Moisture Fields
Severe Weather in Egypt near Alexandria
Nic Wilson’s M.S.P.M. Research
Supercells and Tornadoes
Use of Lightning Data for Electricity Transmission Operations
NATS 101 Lecture 28 Lightning
NATS 101 Lecture 28 Lightning
NATS 101 Lecture 20 Lightning
Thunderstorms Features Cumulonimbus clouds Heavy rainfall Lightning
Supercells and Tornadoes.
Presentation transcript:

Lightning The LDAR II Network Nicholas W. S. Demetriades, Ronald L. Holle and Martin J. Murphy Vaisala, Inc., Tucson, Arizona HEAT Project - First Planning Workshop Boulder, CO March 2004

Presentation Outline - 1 Brief description of the NLDN Description of LDAR II Mapping lightning flashes in 3 dimensions Spatial extent of LDAR II, NLDN and radar reflectivity data Total lightning uses for thunderstorm growth, decay and organization

Presentation Outline - 2 LDAR II source density images (an alternative way of representing the data) 3-dimensional lightning structure in MCSs LDAR II flash initiation points for cell tracking Conclusions

NALDN - CG Flash Detection Efficiency

24-hour NALDN Map

LDAR II - What Does it Detect? LDAR II detects pulses of radiation produced by the electrical breakdown processes of lightning in a 5 MHz band within a subset of the VHF ( MHz) band VHF pulses of radiation can then be used to reconstruct the path (map) of CG and Cloud lightning discharges in 2D or 3D

3D/2D Lightning Mapping - LDAR II 3-Dimensional Mapping within Network Perimeter meter location accuracy Greater than 95% expected flash detection efficiency Reduces to 2-Dimensional Mapping well outside of the Network (~150 km) 2 km or better location accuracy Greater than 90% expected flash detection efficiency out to 120 km

LDAR II sensor: DFW Airport

Dallas-Fort Worth LDAR II Network

3D Cloud Discharge Mapping A Bi-level Cloud Flash detected by the DFW LDAR II Network on 11 April 2001 Initial upward breakdown, followed by charge re- organization on both the upper positive and lower negative charge regions Upper positive charge region is shown by higher density sources between 7 and 10 km and lower negative charge layer is shown by lower density sources between 4 and 6 km Initial Upward Breakdown

Spider Lightning Flash Detected by the DFW LDAR II Network 13 October 2001 Produced 2 Isolated CG Discharges (White Lightning Symbols) along its Total Path Length of ~190 km

DFW LDAR II Sources (red) and NLDN CG Flashes (black) detected between UTC 13 October 2001 Fort Worth WSR-88D Radar Base Reflectivity Image 13 October 2001 at 0105 UTC Area covered by WSR-88D Reflectivity, LDAR II Total Lightning and CG Lightning

MCS Lightning as shown by LDAR II and the NLDN LDAR II Sources (Red) and NLDN Flashes (Black) detected between 0312:30 and 0317:30 UTC 15 June 2001 Fort Worth WSR-88D Base Reflectivity Image from 0315 UTC 15 June 2001

Thunderstorm Growth and Decay: Cloud Lightning Flash Rates

Total lightning sources detected by the DFW LDAR II Network within an isolated thunderstorm between 0345 and 0615 UTC 25 May 2002 White arrow identifies height rise during thunderstorm growth phase and the purple arrows identify height descent during thunderstorm decay phase Thunderstorm Growth and Decay: LDAR II Altitude Information

Thunderstorm Organization: Total and Horizontally Extensive Lightning Flash Rates

LDAR II Source Density Images: Lightning Holes - Lightning Holes (white arrows) detected in two supercell storms between 0304 and 0307 UTC 6 April These storms were producing baseball to grapefruit sized hail at this time - Lightning Holes are caused by very strong updrafts - Very strong updrafts are not easily identified with radar reflectivity

LDAR II Source Density Images: Lightning Notches - Lightning Notch (white arrow) detected in a supercell storm between 0030 and 0032 UTC 11 October Lightning Notches are probably caused by either strong rear inflow or a highly sheared lightning hole - These signatures have only appeared in severe storms

UTC UTC UTC LDAR II Source Density Images: Bow Echo Evolution 13 October 2001

3-dimensional MCS Lightning Structure LDAR II Sources detected between 0205 and 0207 UTC 13 October 2001 Fort Worth WSR-88D Base Reflectivity Image from 0204 UTC 13 October 2001

3-dimensional MCS Lightning Structure: Radar reflectivity and lightning source density

DFW LDAR II sources (red) and flash initiation points (black) detected between 0110 and 0112 UTC 13 October 2001 DFW LDAR II sources detected between 0110 and 0112 UTC 13 October 2001 Flash Initiation Points for Cell Identification

Conclusions The Houston, TX LDAR II network will give a complete representation of total (cloud plus CG) lightning activity in and around the Houston area Lightning flash initiation points will help identify important cloud microphysical and kinematic relationships for lightning generation The structure of lightning flashes in 3 dimensions will help identify important cloud microphysical and kinematic relationships for lightning propagation in thunderstorms