Beam Crossing Angle for  Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University International Linear Collider January 2005 MDI Workshop SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Advertisements

Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IP Layout What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
International Linear Collider Gamma-Gamma Options Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University Mar LCWS2005  /e  e-e- Physics and Technology.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
Beam-beam studies for eRHIC Y. Hao, V.N.Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, V.Ptitsyn.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Brett Parker Brookhaven National Laboratory Superconducting Magnet Division 20 October 2010 ILC QD0 R&D Update IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Summary of the Working Groups - Polarization -  Technical Aspects Conveners: Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,Louis Rinolfi, Sabine Riemann, Valery Telnov International.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2012, Arlington, US, October 24, 2012 Photon colliders: summary.
Laser cooling of electron beams Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk Nanobeam-2008 BINP, May 26-29, 2008.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Study of alternative ILC final focus optical configurations Dou Wang (IHEP), Yiwei Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) International Workshop.
Photon Linear Collider and other options Jeff Gronberg / LLNL June 3, 2007 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy.
Manchester Christmas meeting 2006: The ILC interaction region and beyond Rob Appleby Happy New Year everyone!
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting Updated
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 1 Impact of Crossing Angle Value on Magnets near the IP Overview of several unusual quadrupole designs that.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program: SuperB Mike Sullivan OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
Systematic limitations to luminosity determination in the LumiCal acceptance from beam-beam effects C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay LCWS06, Bangalore, 9-13 March.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
Problems of charge compensation in a ring e+e- higgs factory Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk 5 rd TLEP3 workshop, FNAL, July 25, 2013.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Implication of gamma-gamma on 14mr tunnels discussion (questions for discussion with WG-C and WG-A) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.19, 2007, SLAC.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
Interaction Region of gamma gamma colliders
Electron Polarization effects in Compton X/γ-ray Sources
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
The Interaction Region
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Summary of Gamma-Gamma session
First look at final focus part of super-B factory
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Discussion of gamma-gamma parameters
Final Focus System: gg Interaction Region
X-band Linac (NLC) based g-g collider
Raimondi-Seryi Final Focus for e+e- Factories?
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Beam Crossing Angle for  Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University International Linear Collider January 2005 MDI Workshop SLAC

Introduction  prefer large x-angle > ~25mr Strawman design –2mr, 20mr See: if 20mr is possible impact of 20mr on  No conclusion yet: What has to be done

Crossing angle consideration for  Bottom line QD0 Telnov e- Laser

Simulation of Disruption angle E(Gev) Angle(rad) Simulation by CAIN w/ TESLA parameters *density is for visual effct only not proportional to # of particle

How to reduce crossing angle Disruption angle for physics of Compton scattering : controllable but reduce luminosity significantly not acceptable reduce R/L*

Compact SC Quad Mihara at L*=5m

Compensation Coils accommodating L*=3.8m, Brett Parker

What these effort means?  w/ ~20mr crossing angle may be possible w/e+e- the beam parameters (beta-x/y at the IP) Price to pay : Need to study how small beta-x can be w/ fixed L* and QD remember: photon collider wants/allows highest possible geometric luminosity as the beamstrahlung is not a problem.

What has to be done  x =20mr: minimum modification from e+e- same L*, smallest possible QD0, e+e- parameters –detail investigation for disruption angle –QD0 design (for fixed L*) make sure if it is really possible to accommodate gg w/ e+e- parameters try to find FF optics to minimize horizontal beta function 25mr <  x –most reasonable design of QD0 to date –detail investigation for disruption angle –FF design Two case studies

Summary need expertized work in 3 area –final focus optics given  x and L*, find optics to maximize geometric luminosity –do not mind beamstrahlung –final focusing magnet find smallest possible radius as a function of L* to find  Q –simulation of laser-beam and beam-beam interaction detail investigation of low energy electrons to fix  d with safe mergine –disruption angle, tracking in magnetic field, backgrounds Klaus