Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Advertisements

The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
The Solar Corona B. C. Low High Altitude Observatory National Center for Atmospheric Research The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated.
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
ICMEs and Magnetic Clouds Session Summary Charlie Farrugia and Lan Jian.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
Solar Erupting Filaments and Magnetic Field Configurations of IP Magnetic Clouds Yuming Wang 1, 2 & Jie Zhang 1 (Presenting) 1 George Mason University.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
The Halo CMEs’ Speeds and Energy of Their Related Active Regions Yang Liu¹, and CDAW Source Identification Team² ¹Stanford University ² Including: E. Cliver,
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive.
August 2006 IAU Assembly Halo CMEs and Configuration of Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University
3-D Pre-Eruption Magnetic Field Configuration Involved in 28 Oct 2003 Fast Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University 36 Th COSPAR Assembly Beijing, China,
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
September 2007LWS 2007 Halo CMEs and Configuration of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
1Yang Liu1997 May 12 Event The 1997 May 12 Event Yang Liu – Stanford University
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University
Working Group E: The Pre-CME Sun - Pre-eruption structure, evolution & energy release - Global issues: helicity, homologous CMEs - Inputs to CME initiation.
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..
1. Background2. Flux variation3. Polarity reversal4. Electron evolution5. Conclusions The role of coronal mass ejections in the solar cycle evolution of.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
The Occurrence and Speed of CMEs Related to Magnetic Helicity Injection in Their Source Regions Sung-Hong Park Solar and Space Weather Research Group Korea.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
A Plan for Publication of a Magnetic Cloud List As a Long-Term Database K. Marubashi 1, K.-S. Cho 1, K.-C. Coi 1,2, J.-H. Baek 1, and S.-H. Choi 1 1 Korea.
Evolution of Magnetic Fields from the Sun’s Surface to the Heliopause of one Solar Cycle Nathan Schwadron, Boston University.
1 Global magnetic connectivity in the Hollween events of 2003 (Zhang et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2006)
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
Dimming analysis 13/05/05 Gemma Attrill
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
MDI Level 1.8 Magnetograms
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Observations of December 2006 events
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
The Second International Space Weather Symposium
Presentation transcript:

Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University

Erupted filaments in quiet Sun and magnetic cloud A relationship between erupted filament in the quiet sun and the magnetic cloud has been established. A relationship between erupted filament in the quiet sun and the magnetic cloud has been established. Pioneer work done by Marubashi (1986), followed by Bothmer & Schwenn (1994), Rust (1994), Bothmer & Rust (1997), Marubashi (1997), Zhao & Hoeksema (1998), McAllister & Martin (2000), and Ruzmaikin et al (2003). Pioneer work done by Marubashi (1986), followed by Bothmer & Schwenn (1994), Rust (1994), Bothmer & Rust (1997), Marubashi (1997), Zhao & Hoeksema (1998), McAllister & Martin (2000), and Ruzmaikin et al (2003).

Active regions and magnetic clouds Active region as a whole body: no correlations have been found. Active region as a whole body: no correlations have been found. Pudovkin (1977): Pudovkin (1977): 22 cases; IMF orientation agrees with the orientation of the meridional component of the background field in the flaring regions (but used an average of the IMF for those events). 22 cases; IMF orientation agrees with the orientation of the meridional component of the background field in the flaring regions (but used an average of the IMF for those events). Tang et al (1985): Tang et al (1985): 12 cases; Shows no correlation between flare field orientation and IMF orientation. 12 cases; Shows no correlation between flare field orientation and IMF orientation. Montana State U. folks (Pevtsov & Canfield, 2001; Leamon et al 2002, 2004): Montana State U. folks (Pevtsov & Canfield, 2001; Leamon et al 2002, 2004): Pevtsov & Canfield (2001): magnetic structure of individual active region plays a role in geomagnetic events; Pevtsov & Canfield (2001): magnetic structure of individual active region plays a role in geomagnetic events; Leamon et al (2002): 46 events from sigmoidal active regions. Only 70% of them have the same handedness with magnetic clouds (For erupted filaments in quiet sun, 95% agreement was found); Leamon et al (2002): 46 events from sigmoidal active regions. Only 70% of them have the same handedness with magnetic clouds (For erupted filaments in quiet sun, 95% agreement was found); Leamon et al (2004): 12 events with vector magnetograms available. Fluxes of AR and MC are comparable; electric currents of them are different in orders; twists of them are different in one order (AR’s is one order smaller than MC’s); no correlations for handedness. Leamon et al (2004): 12 events with vector magnetograms available. Fluxes of AR and MC are comparable; electric currents of them are different in orders; twists of them are different in one order (AR’s is one order smaller than MC’s); no correlations for handedness.

Active regions and magnetic cloud The erupted filaments in AR and magnetic clouds: limited case study cannot establish a correlation. The erupted filaments in AR and magnetic clouds: limited case study cannot establish a correlation. Webb et al (2000): Webb et al (2000): May event; May event; Filament defines orientation and handedness; Filament defines orientation and handedness; Dimming areas define footpoints of the modeled rope Dimming areas define footpoints of the modeled rope Agreement was found between the filament and MC in terms of orientation, handedness and flux. Agreement was found between the filament and MC in terms of orientation, handedness and flux. Yurchyshyn et al (2001): Yurchyshyn et al (2001): Two cases; Two cases; Filament defines orientation, LFFF defines handedness; Filament defines orientation, LFFF defines handedness; Agreement was found between the filaments and MCs. Agreement was found between the filaments and MCs.

Active regions and magnetic cloud Post-flare arcades and magnetic clouds: a relationship has not yet been established. Post-flare arcades and magnetic clouds: a relationship has not yet been established. Yurchyshyn et al (2005): Yurchyshyn et al (2005): Two cases (Oct and Nov. 18, 2003); Two cases (Oct and Nov. 18, 2003); 50% agreement. 50% agreement.

Active regions, CMEs and magnetic clouds A correlation has not yet been established. A correlation has not yet been established. Krall et al (2006): Krall et al (2006): Only one case (Oct. 28, 2003); Only one case (Oct. 28, 2003); Chen J. flux rope model (1996); Chen J. flux rope model (1996); LASCO images to define flux rope parameters; LASCO images to define flux rope parameters; NL orientation to define twist; AR size to define distance of footpoints of flux rope. NL orientation to define twist; AR size to define distance of footpoints of flux rope. Yurchyshyn et al (2006; 2007): Yurchyshyn et al (2006; 2007): LASCO images to define orientation of flux rope. LASCO images to define orientation of flux rope. Agreement between modeled flux rope orientation and magnetic cloud is at a level of 67% in a sample of 25 events. Agreement between modeled flux rope orientation and magnetic cloud is at a level of 67% in a sample of 25 events.

Summary A good relationship has been established between the erupted filaments in the quiet sun and the magnetic clouds; A good relationship has been established between the erupted filaments in the quiet sun and the magnetic clouds; There is still a long way to go to recover a whole picture between the active regions, flares, CMEs and magnetic clouds. There is still a long way to go to recover a whole picture between the active regions, flares, CMEs and magnetic clouds.

Questions to be addressed to establish a link Identifying actual erupted flux rope (or field) in active regions; Identifying actual erupted flux rope (or field) in active regions; Filament in AR? Post-flare arcades? Something else? Filament in AR? Post-flare arcades? Something else? Distortion & change of magnetic field structure of flux rope during eruption; Distortion & change of magnetic field structure of flux rope during eruption; For example kink instability (Fan & Gibson 2007). For example kink instability (Fan & Gibson 2007).Fan & Gibson 2007Fan & Gibson 2007 Coupling the local field and global field; Coupling the local field and global field; For example, EIT dimming (global and local; Zhukov et al 2007). For example, EIT dimming (global and local; Zhukov et al 2007). Interaction between the erupted rope and the heliospheric current sheets; Interaction between the erupted rope and the heliospheric current sheets; Pioneer work done by Zhao & Hoeksema (1996), followed by Yurchyshyn et al (2006). Pioneer work done by Zhao & Hoeksema (1996), followed by Yurchyshyn et al (2006). Distortion of configuration of flux rope due propagation in the interplanetary space: interaction with ambient solar wind. Distortion of configuration of flux rope due propagation in the interplanetary space: interaction with ambient solar wind. Only MHD experiments have been done (Gosling & Riley, 1996; Riley 1997; Odstrcil & Pizzo 1999; Schmidt & Cargill 2001; Riley & Crooker 2004). Only MHD experiments have been done (Gosling & Riley, 1996; Riley 1997; Odstrcil & Pizzo 1999; Schmidt & Cargill 2001; Riley & Crooker 2004).

Dst Dependence on V and B Gonzalez et al., Yurchyshyn et al., Zhang et al……. CMEs measured days before MCs measured min before R2O From Gopalswamy 2007, LWS