BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy spectrometer cavity BPM Royal Holloway, University of London S. Boogert, G. Boorman University of Cambridge M. Slater, M. Thomson & D. Ward University.
Advertisements

Beam Delivery Simulation Development & BDS / MDI Applications L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, J. Snuverink, L. Deacon Royal Holloway,
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Simulations with ‘Realistic’ Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005 Selected pages from: Full talk at
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Status of BDSIM Developments at RHUL L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Acknowledgments: R. Bruce, S. Redaelli.
Background ATF2 (KEK) What could be ATF2 that could be valid for ILC ? Hayg GULER Marc VERDERI LLR-Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Radiological Aspects of ILC Hee-Seock Lee Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2 nd Workshop of Korean ILC at PAL.
Relative Error on Parameter Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic Estimate β function at the LW 3% 1% LW readout error 2% 1% Laser spot waist 10% Laser Pointing.
Background ATF2 (KEK) What could be ATF2 that could be valid for ILC ? Hayg GULER Marc VERDERI LLR-Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau,
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
Ijaz Ahmed Ijaz Ahmed Helmut Burkhardt Andrea Latina Beam-Halo Generation Study in CLIC CLIC Beam Dynamics Meeting, CERN: 13/02/08.
Research in Particle Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology of the Collaboration IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich & JINR A.N. Parfenov for the Collaboration.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Rough Estimation of energy spread produced in Final Focus line and effects to chromatic correction in ILC and ATF minor change Kiyoshi.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
ILC collimation using Beam Delivery Simulation (BDSIM) S. T. Boogert, L. Nevay, J. Snuverink, H. Garcia Morales ALCWS KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 20 th April 2015.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Collimator design and short range wakefields Adriana Bungau University of Manchester CERN, Dec 2006.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Status of Beam Halo/Gas Simulation A.Stradling(Wisconsin) P. Steinberg(BNL) G. Usai (Chicago) Standard Model Group 6 December 2006 A.Stradling(Wisconsin)
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Collimation Baseline Configuration and Collimation Studies Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Global Design Effort CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work Materials for discussion Daniel Schulte, Rogelio Tomas and Emmanuel Tsesmelis for CLIC team Andrei Seryi for.
ILC-BDS Collimators - Simulation and Experiment Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Group Annual Meeting December, 2007, Manchester Adriana Bungau.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
Status of BDSIM Simulation L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Royal Holloway, University of London 17 th.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Update on the Status of BDSIM Steve Malton On behalf of: Grahame Blair (RHUL) Ilya Agapov (CERN) Andrea Latina (CERN) Olivier Dadoun (LAL) Anyone else.
GUINEA-PIG: Beam-beam interaction simulation status M. Alabau, P. Bambade, O. Dadoun, G. Le Meur, C. Rimbault, F. Touze LAL - Orsay D. Schulte CERN - Genève.
Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.
Freddy Poirier ILC project Meeting Integrated Luminosity Performance Study on the ILC – WP6 (A snapshot of the European LC workshop at Daresbury) Freddy.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Electromagnetic Background From Spent Beam Line Michael David Salt (Cockcroft Institute – Optics, Backgrounds) Robert Appleby (CERN.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Halo and Tail Generation Studies and Application to the CLIC Drive Beam Presented by: Miriam Fitterer Acknowledgements: Erik Adli, Ijaz Ahmed,
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Collimator design and short range wakefields
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Background study plans : from to ILC
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Background issues for the Super-B background simulation team
Background Simulations at Fermilab
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from EUROTeV Future plans/Summary Grahame Blair Royal Holloway, Univ of London MDI Workshop SLAC January 6 th 2005

BDS Simulation ~km Collimation Precision Diagnostics Design Muons Halo Neutrons SR Laser-wires … Full simulations

Motivation and History Work dates back several years. Grew out of initial plans to include Geant processes in Merlin. Then “fast” tracking incorporated into Geant4. Now a stand-alone approach and an alternative tracking code. All Geant4 processes included automatically Multiple scattering Bremsstrahlung … New processes modified (eg new SR, muons, laser-wire ). Team at RHUL: Ilya Agapov - Optics design, beam diagnostics John Carter - SR, beam diagnostics, IR layout GB - Collimation, muons, backgrounds Chafik Driouichi - Laser-wire design

Overview of Approach Beam-lines are built up out of modular accelerator components Full simulation of em showers All secondaries tracked

Synchrotron Radiation Generator of H. Burkhardt Implemented for all components Based on local curvature Individual photons from individual parents Primaries and secondaries tracked

SR within beampipe Axes scales are m J. Carter currently building IR model and simulation. Interface to Guinea-Pig format for SR of disrupted beam (track reflections back to IR) Implements low-energy G4 package

IR Add any detector IR as a BDSIM object Ideal for MDI studies For various detectors

SR Absorption along ILC BDS GeV/m Exit of Linac IP z (m)

ILC Beam Halo GeV/m z (m) Collimation efficiency studies are easy.

Muon Showers Increase statistics for Bethe-Heitler by forcing The muons are in addition to the electrons (doesn’t conserve energy) correct spectra via track weighting :

250 GeV electron on 1m iron 500 GeV electron on 1m iron e  ’s

TESLA: Muon Trajectories BDS Concrete tunnel 2m radius No offset from centre View from top

ILC: Muons at IP Assume: Halo bunch; ie halo e’s per bunch N μ per e ~ , for 500 GeV e - (Bethe-Heitler only) Adding a cut on initial energy >100 GeV (reduces number of tracked muons by a factor of ~30 without affecting greatly the final results - preliminary) Muon spoilers have now been implemented in BDSIM as iron cylinders. An optional toroidal magnetic field is also included Including no spoilers and muon creation at z=1532, Gives approximately 144 muons per bunch at IR. (Assuming Concrete tunnel of 2m radius.)

Muon Rates at IP Linac IP m18m Initial z (m)Sp1 (Field/T)Sp2 (Field/T)Rel Flux Muon spoilers Sp1Sp2

Halo and Tail Generation (HTGEN) Part of Workpackage WP6 on Integrated Luminosity Performance Studies study of potential sources of halo and tail generation development of analytic models of halo where appropriate estimation of halo population development of code modules for halo and tail generation simulation studies of halo and tail generation explore possibilities for benchmarking For H. Burkhardt (CERN)

There is some (limited) experience from other machines : halo / tails can be a serious performance limitation whenever seriously attempted : halo / tails can be quantitatively understood and their production or effects be minimized First steps : establish a list of all possible candidate processes collect all existing information and codes work plan : priorities, what is missing, which framework(s) up-do-date web based list of processes, literature and code references as a very first attempt see close collaboration with related activities and in particular COLSIM and the whole of WP6 (Integrated Luminosity Performance Studies)

Candidate Processes Particle processes Beam Gas elastic scattering inelastic scattering, bremsstrahlung Ion or electron-cloud effects Intrabeam scattering Touschek scattering Synchrotron radiation (coherent and incoherent) Scattering off thermal photons Optics related Mismatch Coupling Dispersion Non-linearities Various, equipment related, collective Noise and vibration Dark currents Space charge effects close to source Wake-fields

Summary/Future Plans Accurate accelerator tracking within Geant4 achieved. Some optimisation still possible. Code management and public release planned (I. Agapov). The code is already at the status of an alternative tracking code. New processes: SR, Laser-wire, Muon generation Serious studies of collimation efficiency are now underway Neutron studies will need some work to gain efficiency G4 studies will set the scale for detailed BDS/MDI design. Need to ensure accurate physics models – low energy gammas, neutrons, multiple reflections of SR etc. Will need to improve weighting models etc. for efficiency BDIR simulation is a significant part of EUROTeV.