Gender Differences in Students' Perceived Experiences in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clicker Use in upper-level physics courses Michael Dubson Dept. of Physics U. Colorado at Boulder Please pick up a clicker.
Advertisements

Student Understanding of Potential Energy Diagrams in Quantum Mechanics Sam McKagan PER seminar Colorado School of Mines October 30, 2007.
Building for Success in Calculus David Bressoud St. Paul, MN The First Two Years of College Math: Building Student Success Reston, VA October 5–7, 2014.
Building for Success in Calculus David Bressoud St. Paul, MN The First Two Years of College Math: Building Student Success Reston, VA October 5–7, 2014.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No: HRD Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations.
Improving on the Recitation Section: Tutorials in Introductory Physics Wed Brown Bag SJP Fa '05.
When Top Down Meets Bottom Up: Supporting Educational Transformation in a Physics Department Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein, Katherine Perkins, Stephanie.
SELF CONFIDENCE (2 nd of the 4 C’s) “The most consistent difference between elite and less successful athletes is that elite athletes possess greater self-confidence”
Logistics of a secondary implementation of the Washington Tutorials University of Colorado at Boulder per.colorado.edu For the last four semesters, we.
Studying Student Beliefs About Science: their importance and what affects them their importance and what affects them We have developed and validated surveys.
NSF GK-12 Educational Activities and Future Directions This program is based upon collaborative work supported by a National Science Foundation Grant No.
Neag School of Education Using Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Online Courses Anthony R. Artino,
Examining the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder.
MATH IN THE MIDDLE MICHAEL A. COBELENS. Problem Solving Identify Learning Experiences Purpose: Methods of Teaching Problem Solving and Computational Skills.
Origins of the Gender Gap: Pre-College and College Influences on Differences Between Men and Women Linda J. Sax Casandra E. Harper University of California.
ICER 2005 Factors Affecting the Success of Non-Majors in Learning to Program Susan Wiedenbeck Drexel University.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Measuring Students’ Beliefs about Physics in Saudi Arabia H. Alhadlaq 1, F. Alshaya 1, S. Alabdulkareem.
1 Why we should teach the Bohr model and how to teach it effectively Sam McKagan, Kathy Perkins, Carl Wieman University of Colorado July 30, 2007.
Physics I MOOC – Educational Outcomes David Lieberman*, Michael Dubson ¶, Katherine Goodman ¶, Ed Johnsen ¶, Jack Olsen ¶ and Noah Finkelstein ¶ * Department.
PER-based Techniques in a Large Lecture Modern Physics Course for Engineers Sam McKagan, Katherine Perkins, and Carl Wieman University of Colorado at Boulder.
What are the Effects of Self- Assessment Preparation in a Middle School Science Classroom? Sara E. Severance Mapleton Expeditionary School of the Arts,
Kara Gray & Valerie Otero University of Colorado Boulder Analysis of Former Learning Assistants’ Views of Cooperative Learning C1. Role implicit in the.
Chris Evans, University of Winchester Dr Paul Redford, UWE Chris Evans, University of Winchester Dr Paul Redford, UWE Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance:
Matthew A. Ludwig, NSF Doctoral Fellow
Using Authentic Discovery Projects to Improve Student Outcomes in Statistics Joint Mathematics Meetings January 16, 2010 Dianna Spence Brad Bailey Robb.
Developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching Challenges in the implementation and sustainability of a new MSP Dr. Tara Stevens Department of.
Examining cognitive career theories: Current status, future trends, implications for the development and implementation of guidance services Janet G. Lenz,
Girls in Physics Victoria Millar Melbourne Girls’ College Dr Maurizio Toscano Faculty of Education, The University of Melbourne Australian School Innovation.
Understanding Belonging to Improve Persistence: A Gender Study Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University Denise Wilson (Project Lead) and Diane Jones, University.
GABY MARTIN Albert Bandura: A Study on Self-Efficacy.
Data Management for Large STEP Projects Michigan State University & Lansing Community College NSF STEP PI Meeting March 15, 2012 Workshop Session I-08.
What is Teacher Effectiveness and How May it Be Assessed? David E. Meltzer Department of Physics, University of Washington and Seattle Country Day School.
From traditional lectures to active learning: Persistent gender differences in large introductory biology classrooms Sara E. Brownell Assistant Professor.
Drew Hickman and Justin McGee University of Dallas.
Is your clicker working? A)Yes B)No (!?) Press and hold power button – it should flash green Enter “AA” Please return your clicker at the end!! If the.
PER in Polynesia: How much does culture matter? Brian A. Pyper Ph.D. Director of Physics Education BYU-Idaho Department of Physics.
1 Self-Regulation and Ability Predictors of Academic Success during College Anastasia Kitsantas, Faye Huie, and Adam Winsler George Mason University.
Educational Psychology, 11 th Edition ISBN © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Social Cognitive Views of Learning and Motivation.
Assessing multiple research-based transformations in second semester physics. Steven J. Pollock University of Colorado at Boulder ( per.colorado.edu) We.
Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh Attitudes and Beliefs about Physics from a UK Academics’ Perspectives Robyn Donnelly 1, Cait MacPhee.
The Persistence of the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics, University of Colorado at.
V v COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SCIENCES Improvement of Self-Efficacy, Attitude and Belief Systems of Undergraduates Working with Children with.
V v Examining the Effect of “Hands-on” Experiences of Volunteers in a Physical Activity Program for Children with Disabilities Ryan Willoughby, Jill Pawlowski,
Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and impacts on LA’s in Phys 1110 (Sp ‘03) S. Pollock With NSF/STEM-TP support.
Update on the MAA’s Studies of Calculus David Bressoud St. Paul, MN AMS Committee on Education Washington, DC October 31, 2015 A pdf file of this PowerPoint.
Terje Manger Beate Buanes Roth In co-operation with Arve Asbjørnsen, Ole Johan Eikeland, and Lise Jones Bergen Cognition and Learning Group University.
Learning Assessment Loop Closing Activity in the Biology Department Vivian Navas Biology Department Assessment Coordinator May 2006.
Assessing Gender Differences in Students' Understanding of Magnetism using Magnetism Conceptual Survey Jing Li Department of Physics and Astronomy University.
Using Lecture Tutorials and ConcepTests to Engage Students Karen M. Kortz, Ph.D. Early Career Geoscience Faculty Workshop Monday, June 13, 2011 Teaching.
There is a small but significant difference in course grades and final exam scores for males & females Consistent with Tai & Sadler (2001): males perform.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Girls and Physics Chris Meyer York Mills C. I.
Learning Progressions in Climate Change Education Research J. Randy McGinnis Wayne Breslyn 2 Chris McDonald Emily Hestness.
Project SPROUT Simple Protocol for Observing Undergraduate Teaching Lynn C. Reimer School of Education University of California, Irvine This material is.
Creating Effective Cooperative Groups in 3 rd Grade Math Classes Rebecca R. Kish Dr. Sharon O’Connor-Petruso Brooklyn College CBSE 7202T.
PER-BASED INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS REFORM AT OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY AAPT, JULY 2010 Dedra Demaree, Sissi Li.
Adapting geoscience materials for introductory biology courses using a Faculty Mentoring Network J. Hanselman, H. Scherer, S. Donovan, A. Hale.
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
Developing a Survey Instrument to Improve Students’ Learning
Discussion and Conclusion
Written by: Jennifer Doherty, Cornelia Harris, Laurel Hartley
Critical - thinking Assessment Test (CAT)
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Title of Poster Site Visit 2017 Introduction Results
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Confidence & Self-efficacy in Sports Performance
Higher Standards and fewer failures?
Title of Poster Site Visit 2018 Introduction Results
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Presentation transcript:

Gender Differences in Students' Perceived Experiences in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics University of Colorado at Boulder July 28, 2009

Acknowledgments Physics faculty: Michael Dubson Noah Finkelstein Kathy Perkins Steven Pollock Carl Wieman Ph. D. students: Charles Baily Lauren Kost Benjamin Spike Chandra Turpen Postdocs: Stephanie Chasteen Steven Goldhaber Laurel Mayhew Archie Paulson Noah Podolefsky School of Ed members: Valerie Otero Kara Gray Heidi Iverson May Lee Bud Talbott III This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. REC , CAREER: Physics Education and Contexts of Student Learning. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF

Background Gender Gap on FMCE Partial Interactive Engagement Full Interactive Engagement A persistent gender gap exists at our institution.

Background End-of-Term Survey Three prior semesters of data Questions about components of course –Clicker Questions- Exams –Tutorials- Homework NO consistent gender differences –Usefulness for learning –Enjoyable –Comfort discussing with peers, TAs

How comfortable do you feel discussing the physics content with your peers during clicker questions? p = 0.3

New Survey Questions about student experiences Areas identified from literature –Physics Identity –Epistemology –Sources of Self-Efficacy

Courses Studied Calc-based Intro Mechanics (N=887) Curriculum was identical Different professors Student populations similar FallSpring FMCE Pre32% FMCE Post72%69% FMCE Post M-F18%11%

Sense of Physics Identity “The way a person understands and views himself, and is viewed by others” 1 “who they think they are … and who they want to be.” 2 1 J. Lave & E. Wenger, Situated Learning, N.W. Brickhouse, et. al. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 37, 441 (2000).

Physics Identity I feel like I could be a good physicist. p < 0.001

Physics Identity Other students in this class were easy to relate to. p = 0.6

Physics Identity (7 questions) Identity FMCE Posttest 0.24* Course Grade 0.32*

Physics Self-Efficacy The beliefs that people have about their ability to complete a specific task. 3 SE beliefs influence choices and effort. 3 Four sources of self-efficacy 4 : Mastery experience Vicarious experience Verbal and social persuasions Emotional and physiological responses 4 E.L. Usher & F. Pajares, Rev. Ed. Res. 78, 751 (2008). 3 A. Bandura, Psych. Rev. 84, 191 (1977). 5 H. Fencl & K. Scheel, J. Col. Sci. Teach. 35, 20 (2005). Questions from Sources of Self-Efficacy in Science Courses – Physics. 5

Physics Self-Efficacy I worried about my ability to solve physics problems on exams. p < 0.001

Physics Self-Efficacy Physics makes me feel uneasy. p < 0.001

Physics Self-Efficacy (4 questions) Self-Efficacy FMCE Posttest 0.38* Course Grade 0.50*

Controlling for Exam Score Even when controlling for exam score, females have significantly lower self-efficacy than males.

Conclusions We find significant gender differences in student experiences related to identity and self-efficacy Identity and self-efficacy are correlated with student grades and conceptual performance Both are possible targets of future interventions to alleviate gender disparity

Thank You Find more info at: Come see my poster tonight: –PST2N-07 – Unpacking the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics

Impact of Pretest on Post Test r pre,post = % 19% 8% 22% 21% 16% 14% 22% 20% 21%

Regression Analysis Control for prior physics and math knowledge and incoming attitudes and beliefs Multiple Regression –The average posttest gender difference is 3% (reduced from the observed difference of 10%). –70% of the gender gap is accounted for by background differences.

Conclusions (II) Gender differences exist in several components of introductory course Males and females are differently prepared Differences in male and female backgrounds account for about 70% of the gender gap How do males and females experience the introductory physics course?

Different Experiences

Physics Self-Efficacy The beliefs that people have about their ability to complete a specific task. 3 SE beliefs influence choices and effort. 3 Four sources of self-efficacy 4 : Mastery experience Vicarious experience Verbal and social persuasions Emotional and physiological responses 3 A. Bandura, Psych. Rev. 84, 191 (1977). 4 E.L. Usher & F. Pajares, Rev. Ed. Res. 78, 751 (2008).