Acquisition and Use of NEXRAD and FAA Doppler Weather Radar Data Presented to the Monroney Aeronautical Center 9 November 2000 Kelvin K. Droegemeier Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radar Climatology of Tornadoes in High Shear, Low CAPE Environments in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast Jason Davis Matthew Parker North Carolina State University.
Advertisements

User Perspective: Using OSCER for a Real-Time Ensemble Forecasting Experiment…and other projects Currently: Jason J. Levit Research Meteorologist, Cooperative.
Colorado State University
NOAA’s National Weather Service 2009 President’s Budget Rollout Jack Hayes NOAA Assistant Administrator & Director, National Weather Service National Weather.
Update On The NEXRAD Agency Plans For Near Real-Time WSR-88D Base Data Collection And Distribution Tim Crum, Ph.D. Radar Operations Center (ROC) NWS Focal.
Travis Smith (OU/CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
FAA Stated Requirements “ The goal is to substantially improve the capabilities for delivery of aviation weather information and to transform the current.
The National Severe Storms Laboratory Jeff Kimpel, Director NSSL NOAA Science Advisory Board Norman, Oklahoma November 5, 2002.
Science Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies The SPoRT Center – Infusing.
Storm Tracker – a Web-Based Tool for Working with the Automated Tracking of Thunderstorm Clusters Bob Rabin NOAA / NSSL / CIMSS Tom Whittaker Space Science.
Sebastián Torres Weather Radar Research Innovative Techniques to Improve Weather Observations.
Transition of Radar Refractivity to Operational Radars OS&T Briefing, 6 April 2004 Interested parties: NCAR, McGill University, NEXRAD Office of Science.
Project CRAFT: A Test Bed for Demonstrating the Real Time Acquisition and Acrhival of WSR-88D Base (Level II) Data Presented to UCAR/Unidata Program 12.
The Collaborative Radar Acquisition Field Test (CRAFT): A Unique Public- Private Partnership in Mission-Critical Data Distribution Kelvin K. Droegemeier.
Update on the Collaborative Radar Acquisition Field Test (CRAFT): Planning for the Next Steps Kelvin K. Droegemeier University of Oklahoma Presented to.
The Collaborative Radar Acquisition Field Test (CRAFT): A Unique Public- Private Partnership in Mission-Critical Data Distribution Kelvin K. Droegemeier.
The Collaborative Radar Acquisition Field Test (CRAFT): Next Steps Kelvin K. Droegemeier University of Oklahoma 2 nd Level II Stakeholders Workshop
Toward a 4D Cube of the Atmosphere via Data Assimilation Kelvin Droegemeier University of Oklahoma 13 August 2009.
GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NWS Storm Prediction Center Dr. Russell S. Schneider Chief, Science Support Branch NWS Storm Prediction Center.
Site-Specific Scanning Strategies for WSR-88Ds: Planning for Field Tests Rodger A. Brown NOAA, National Severe Storms Laboratory Randy M. Steadham NOAA,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Weather Evaluation Capabilities (NWEC) Environment National Weather Service Tri Nguyen,
1 Global Systems Division (GSD) Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) NextGen Weather Data Cube Chris MacDermaid October, 2010.
Collaborating on the Development of Warn-On-Forecast Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010 Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb.
1 Weather Information -- Collaborative Forecasting Extended Range Forecasting (CCFP) Joint Aviation Weather Units (JAWS) Friends and Partners (FPAWs) NBAA,
HWT Spring Forecasting Experiment: History and Success Dr. Adam Clark February 25, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
NOAA: Promoting Safe and Efficient Commerce and Transportation January 2005 Charlie Challstrom.
Kelvin K. Droegemeier and Yunheng Wang Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms and School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma 19 th Conference on.
Operational Issues from NCDC Perspective Steve Del Greco, Brian Nelson, Dongsoo Kim NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC Dongjun Seo – NOAA/NWS/OHD 1 st Q2 Workshop Archive,
Update on Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR)
Real-time Doppler Wind Quality Control and Analysis Qin Xu National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA Pengfei Zhang, Shun Liu, and Liping Liu CIMMS/University.
WSN05 6 Sep 2005 Toulouse, France Efficient Assimilation of Radar Data at High Resolution for Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Keith Brewster,
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
Hazardous Weather Forecasts and Warnings Overview: Forecast Division Jack Kain (NSSL) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
LEAD – WRF How to package for the Community? Tom Baltzer.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver June 21, 2007 Radar Operations.
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Office of the Federal Coordinator July 2000 Bethesda, MD.
Near Real-Time Verification At The Forecast Systems Laboratory: An Operational Perspective Michael P. Kay (CIRES/FSL/NOAA) Jennifer L. Mahoney (FSL/NOAA)
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
Gary Jedlovec Roadmap to Success transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations.
Donald W. Burgess Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Hazardous Weather Warnings.
Northeast Winter C&V Program Roy Rasmussen NCAR Wes Wilson MIT/LL.
THE BARON TORNADO INDEX (BTI)
Travis Smith Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Nowcasting Applications.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AT AMERICAN AIRLINES
Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP) Highlights for FPAW November 19, 2015.
Shu-Hua Chen University of California, Davis eatheresearch & orecasting
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
1 Aviation Forecasting – Works in Progress NCVF – Ceiling & Visibility CoSPA – Storm Prediction A Joint Effort Among: MIT Lincoln Laboratory NCAR – National.
1 KURT HONDL, NSSL MPAR PROJECT MANAGER OFCM MPAR WORKING GROUP MEETING 19 JUNE 2012 NOAA/NSSL Activities.
1 Unidata Policy Committee 5 February Level II Data Access & Distribution Linda Miller Roots Roots Why Level II Data? Why Level II Data? CRAFT CRAFT Applications.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Update 1ICMSSR 12/16/11 ICMSSR Meeting December 2011 Doug Forsyth, Co-chair, WG/MPAR.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Project Future Directions.
FAA Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP) Aviation Weather Forum: Opportunities for Implementation Panel 1 – Product Development July 25, 2000 Gloria.
AVIATION WEATHER Presented by: John Staples, Director of Flight Service Program Operations October 13, 2004.
HWT Experimental Warning Program: History & Successes Darrel Kingfield (CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
High Resolution Assimilation of Radar Data for Thunderstorm Forecasting on OSCER Keith A. Brewster, Kevin W. Thomas, Jerry Brotzge, Yunheng Wang, Dan Weber.
Multi-scale Analysis and Prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm Assimilating Radar and Surface Network Data using EnKF Ting.
High Resolution Weather Radar Through Pulse Compression
NWS Alaska Region, GSD, with input from AWC
Tuning an Analysis and Incremental Analysis Updating (IAU) Assimilation for an Efficient High Resolution Forecast System Keith A. Brewster1
Tuning an Analysis and Incremental Analysis Updating (IAU) Assimilation for an Efficient High Resolution Forecast System Keith A. Brewster1
Lightning Flashes in Alabama Tornadic Supercells on 27 April 2011
CAPS is one of the first 11 NSF Science and Technology (S&T) Centers
Radar Observation of Severe Weather
Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS) Briefing by Ming Xue, Director CAPS is one of the 1st NSF Science and Technology Centers established.
Keith A. Brewster1 Jerry Brotzge1, Kevin W
An overview by: Thomas Jones December 2, 2002
CAPS Mission Statement
An overview of real-time radar data handling and compression
Presentation transcript:

Acquisition and Use of NEXRAD and FAA Doppler Weather Radar Data Presented to the Monroney Aeronautical Center 9 November 2000 Kelvin K. Droegemeier Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms and School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma

NEXRAD Doppler Radar Network

NEXRAD Facts and Figures n 158 radars (141 in the Continental US) –120 National Weather Service radars –26 Department of Defense radars –12 Federal Aviation Administration radars

NEXRAD Data Types n Archive Level I (raw receiver data) n Level II data (digital data in spherical coordinates at full resolution) n Archive Level III (digital products) n Archive Level IV (forecaster-generated products)

NEXRAD Data Types n Archive Level I (raw receiver data) n Level II data (digital data in spherical coordinates at full resolution) n Archive Level III (digital products) n Archive Level IV (forecaster-generated products)

NEXRAD Product Data (NIDS) n 24 products available from all CONUS radars in real time n Lowest 4 elevation angles only n Low-precision because values are quantized (e.g., 0-5, 5-10, 10-15)

NEXRAD Data Types n Archive Level I (raw receiver data) n Level II data (digital data in spherical coordinates at full resolution) n Archive Level III (digital products) n Archive Level IV (forecaster-generated products)

NEXRAD Base (Level II) Data n Full resolution digital data –Full data precision –All elevation angles n Not available in real time except for selected sites (more on that later) n This data set is the focus of our efforts

Base Data Usage: NSSL Warning Decision Support System on 3 May 1999 Courtesy National Severe Storms Laboratory

Trimmed Detections and Ground Truth Damage Paths Hits (142) Misses (25) FAs (21) Courtesy D. Zittel

The Value of NEXRAD Radar Data for Numerical Storm Prediction: The 3 May 1999 Oklahoma Tornado Outbreak Copyright 1999 The Daily Oklahoman

NEXRAD Radar Observations CAPS Numerical Forecasts of the May 3 Tornadic Storms 5:00 pm - Model Initialization Time ARPS Prediction Model (0 hour forecast) Storm Beyond Velocity Range of NEXRAD

NEXRAD Radar Observations 5:30 pm - 30 min Forecast ARPS Prediction Model (1/2 hour forecast) Model Generates the Storm Itself CAPS Numerical Forecasts of the May 3 Tornadic Storms

NEXRAD Radar Observations 6:00 pm - 1 hour Forecast ARPS Prediction Model (1 hour forecast) CAPS Numerical Forecasts of the May 3 Tornadic Storms

NEXRAD Radar Observations 6:30 pm hour Forecast ARPS Prediction Model (1 1/2 hour forecast) CAPS Numerical Forecasts of the May 3 Tornadic Storms Strong Mesocyclone Present Tornado on the Ground

NEXRAD Radar Observations 7:00 pm - 2 hour Forecast ARPS Prediction Model (2 hour forecast) CAPS Numerical Forecasts of the May 3 Tornadic Storms

NEXRAD Radar Observations Forecasts With and Without NEXRAD Data Moore, OK Tornadic Storm 2-Hour CAPS Computer Forecast Down to the Scale of Counties WITH WITHOUT

Summary: WSR-88D Radar Data n The scientific and operational communities need base data (real time and archived) n Although NIDS data are available in real time from all WSR-88D radars, they are insufficient for many applications (NWP, hydrology) –Degradation of precision –Only the lowest 4 tilts are transmitted n Base data currently are not available in real time –Originally would have been expensive –Presumed large volume of data (10 mbytes/5 min/radar) –Need wasn’t there 10 years ago n The technology and need now exist to prototype the direct acquisition, use, and archival of base data in real time

The Collaborative Radar Acquisition Field Test (CRAFT) n Establish a prototype real time WSR-88D base data acquisition test bed to –Evaluate strategies for compressing and transmitting base data in real time –Develop efficient and cost-effective strategies for direct digital ingest, archive, and retrieval at NCDC –Assess the value of base data in numerical weather prediction –Test web-based data mining techniques for rapid perusal/access of base data by the scientific community

Technical Strategy Repeater Hub RIDDS Linux PC Unidata LDM ($1500) Server Dedicated 56K line ($ $6000/year) Cisco 1600 Series Router($2000) WSR-88D At the radar site Users Internet

Original CRAFT Network

CRAFT Phase I: Proof-of-Concept

Abilene Network January 1999 Cleveland New York Atlanta Indianapolis Kansas City Houston Denver Los Angeles Sacramento Seattle Abilene Router Node Abilene Access Node Operational January 1999 Planned 1999

New Concept: Abilene/Internet2 + NEXRAD

NCEP NCDC OU NCAR/FSL U-WA New Concept: Abilene/Internet2 + NEXRAD AWC TPC

Radars Now Delivering Data

Links to be Established by This Time Next Year

Using the Data for Aviation

Weather Hazard Detection: FAA Earmark Funding to CAPS

Some Examples GOES Visible, 2245 Z 4 June 1998 KFWS Composite Reflectivity 00 Z, 4 June 1998

Sample Aviation Products Cloud Type and LWC at FL 050 Cloud Type and LWC at FL 320 Cloud Type and LWC N/S X-Section

Downburst PotentialSurface Isotachs & Streamlines CAPE & Helicity Sample Aviation Products

Surface VisibilityClear-Air TurbulenceIcing Potential Sample Aviation Products

Weather Hazard Detection: FAA Earmark Funding to CAPS

Statistical Climatologies of Storm Characteristics (location, intensity, movement, initiation, decay) relative to NAS assets Pugh (2000)

Mitchell et al. (2000)

The Future: FAA Radars n The CRAFT concept can be extended to include FAA radars that process weather information –TDWR (terminal Doppler weather radar) –ASR (airport surveillance radar) –ARSR (air route surveillance radar)

TDWR Weber (2000)

Airport Surveillance Radars (ASR-9) Weber (2000)

Airport Surveillance Radars (ASR-9) Weber (2000)

Airport Surveillance Radars (ASR-11) Weber (2000)

Air Route Surveillance Radars (ARSR-4) Weber (2000)

n An integrated, national data set of highly detailed weather radar information for use in –Numerical weather prediction –Real time air traffic control and planning –Research of specific relevance to aviation n The radar data can be used to create “assimilated” data sets that provide all meteorological variables at high resolution n We’re positioning Norman to serve as a national data repository for real time access The Result

–NOAA ESDIM Grant funded (CAPS+NSSL+OSF+NCDC) n $540K/3 years n Research Thrusts –Test of direct ingest/archival at NCDC –Improve compression algorithms –Initial work on web-based data mining –NOAA earmark funding to OU n $474K for 1 year n Expand CRAFT to 30 radars (CRAFT-2) n Develop data assimilation capabilities for the WRF model n Kelvin doing a mini-sabbatical at the NSSL this fall –HPCC Proposal ($150K for 1 year, about to be funded) n Data mining n Network quality of service research n Hardware for additional radars Funding Status

–FAA earmark funding to OU n $250K for 1 year n Assimilate data from multiple radars n Provide real-time aviation hazard products n A collaboration with the SPC and AWC n Hope to involve NCAR (say via the National Convective Forecast Product) n Fits into the CCFP? Funding Status

n The Oklahoma meteorological community is ideally poised to take the lead in bringing the FAA radars into Project CRAFT n Will involve collaboration with others (MIT/LL, NCAR) n The need has been recognized (Weber, 2000) n A proof-of-concept test is needed (cost will be minimal) n Could begin with OKC TDWR and extend to other systems (one ASR-9, one ASR-11, one ARSR-4) n The FAA earmark grant could be used to add a TDWR to the CRAFT data in the real time assimilated data sets n Develop a white paper and establish collaborations The Next Steps