Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PORTFOLIO.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Professional Teaching Portfolio First Name, Last Name Contact Information, .
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Exit Portfolio of Your name Area of Licensure Completion date 2011.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
Donald Kauchak and Paul Eggen
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Introduction to the Teacher Work Sample Portfolio Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Contemporary Issues September 8, Adjunct Professor Kristin P. O’Neil Office Hours: Scheduled on an individual.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Table 1. Alignment of Assessment Domains with CEC and ACEI Standards Sheilah M. Paul et al. From Conceptualization to Reflection: Ensuring Robust Clinical.
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Professional Teaching Portfolio
NJCU College of Education
A Tutorial on Program Supplement Assessments
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
INTASC Standards By: Michelle Dea.
A Tutorial on Program Supplement Assessments
Elishah Benavides & Angie salvucci
Professional Teaching Portfolio
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program

Assessment Plan: Five Collection Points Provisional Program Admission Professional Core Levels Formal Program Admission Program Completion Post-Graduation Follow-up

Provisional Program Admission GPA:  3.0 or higher in general ed/3.25 last 30 hours CAAP test:  reading, writing, essay, mathematics Faculty Interview:  40 points from 3 faculty members University Competencies: English, communication, computer literacy, quantitative literacy.

Professional Core Levels Minimum GPA requirements:  3.0 in college work  B- or above in professional core courses Critical Performance Indicators (CPIs) based on INTASC Standards:  Program Disposition evaluation  Level defined performances  Portfolio evaluation

Program Dispositions NCATE defines dispositions as the “values, commitments, and professional ethics that influence behaviors toward students, families, colleagues, and communities and affect student learning, motivation, and development as well as the educator’s own professional growth.” There are nine dispositions adopted by the WSU Teacher Education Program. Candidates are evaluated at the end of each level by the level faculty and in clinical practice by the university supervisor, content supervisor, and collaborating teacher.

Program Dispositions Positive Attitude Caring/Responsive Ethical/Responsible Inclusive Flexible Collegial Reflective/Resourceful Poised Teachable

Critical Performance Indicators (CPIs) Each of the program levels have defined critical performances based upon INTASC Standards that candidates should meet upon completion of the level. These indicators look at candidates’ knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the level as a whole. While the artifacts used for identifying student performance come from individual requirements for level course work, they do not replace grades in the level courses.

Level 1 CPIs: Integrate and apply knowledge of students, learning theory, curriculum development, and K-12 content, in designing instruction Demonstrate competence in using both informal and formal assessment strategies to inform instruction and promote student learning. Recognize a variety of classroom management techniques. Use knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques.

Level 1 CPIs (con’t) Reflect on professional practice Initiate a portfolio system that provides evidence of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Demonstrate behavioral evidence of the nine program dispositions

Level 2 Elementary CPIs Demonstrate competence in content knowledge (reading and social studies) with preparation of lessons designed in Teacher Work Sample format and taught in the fieldwork classroom. Plan and implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, subject matter, objectives, and community contextual factors Understand how elementary students differ in their development and approaches to learning, and create instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse students. Use knowledge of effective communication techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration and interaction in the classroom.

Level 2 Elementary CPIs (con’t) Demonstrate competence in using both informal and formal assessment strategies to inform instruction and promote student learning. Establish and maintain positive, collaborative relationships with all in the learning community. Reflect on practice and continually evaluate the effects of decisions and actions on students and others in the learning community. Continue portfolio system that provides evidence of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Demonstrate behavioral evidence of the nine program dispositions.

Level 2 Secondary CPIs Demonstrate competence in content knowledge in major/minor areas of study for 6-12 grade students, with preparation of a Teacher Work Sample used in a field experience classroom. Use a variety of differentiated instructional strategies to integrate and apply knowledge of students’ diverse needs and culture as they integrate core curriculum and content area standards. Demonstrate ability to cultivate a positive learning environment for all students. Demonstrate competence in using both informal and formal assessment strategies to inform instruction and promote student learning.

Level 2 Secondary CPIs (con’t) Demonstrate ability to use a variety of sources of feedback to reflect on individual performance and that of students in grades Continue portfolio system that provides evidence of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Demonstrate evidence of the nine program dispositions.

Level 3 Elementary CPIs Apply content knowledge through preparing and teaching lessons in the elementary classroom. Apply knowledge of developmentally appropriate practice to create a positive and engaging learning environment. Use a variety of appropriate instructional strategies to encourage critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills in all students. Plan and implement instruction based on knowledge of subject matter, learning theory, objectives, community contextual factors, and the needs of all students.

Level 3 Elementary CPIs (con’t) Demonstrate competence in using both informal and formal assessment strategies and analysis to inform instruction and promote student learning. Reflect on practice to guide professional growth. Continue portfolio development that provides evidence of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Demonstrate behavioral evidence of the nine program dispositions.

Teacher Work Sample (TWS) Enables teacher candidates to demonstrate teaching performances directly related to planning, implementing, assessing student learning and evaluating teaching and learning for a standards- based instructional unit. Provides opportunity for candidates to develop, organize, implement, assess, and reflect upon instruction in their assigned subject and grade level. Focuses on student achievement and competence in knowledge and skills and provides credible evidence of a candidate’s ability to facilitate learning of all students.

Components of the Teacher Work Sample Contextual Factors Objectives/Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan Design for Instruction Instructional Decision-Making Analysis of Student Learning Reflection and Self-Evaluation

Use of the Teacher Work Sample In all levels the TWS, or its individual components, are used to evaluate candidates’ performance of level CPI’s. Required components in each level are tied to course content and design of field experiences. The teaching of at least one complete TWS is required during clinical practice.

Use of TWS (con’t) Level 1 provides an introduction of TWS emphasizing the instructional design, assessment, and multi media components. Level 2 elementary candidates complete and teach four (4) lessons using the TWS methodology. They also create a thematic unit based on hypothetical contextual factors using the first four (4) components Level 2 secondary candidates design and teach a complete TWS guided by the state core and the field experience classroom.

Level 3 elementary candidates create and teach four (4) TWS based lesson plans in field experience. They also use the TWS methodology to complete an integrated unit focusing on the 4 content areas of level 3 (art/music, math, science, language arts). Use of TWS (con’t)

Formal Program Admission State defined content area Praxis tests (Required for USOE licensure). Candidates in all disciplines must take Praxis II content test in both academic majors and minors prior to admission to clinical practice.

Program Completion Clinical Practice Final Evaluations based on INTASC Standards Development and teaching of at least one TWS in clinical practice classroom INTASC Portfolio designed around the INTASC Standards Program Exit Surveys

Post-Graduation Follow-up Graduate survey  Based on the INTASC Standards assessed during clinical practice.  Mailed to graduates first three years after graduation from program.

Assessment Data Collection COE has created an in-house database to collect and report all assessment data Collect data from teacher education core and content areas (as develop) Converting to Banner/Crystal Reports system and generating project reports for data needs Eventually will utilize banner data to populate candidate information into COE database