The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.

Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.

Chapter 8 The Sun – Our Star.

Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.

General Properties Absolute visual magnitude M V = 4.83 Central temperature = 15 million 0 K X = 0.73, Y = 0.25, Z = 0.02 Initial abundances: Age: ~ 4.52.

Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.

Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:

Multiwavelength Study of Magnetic Reconnection Associated with Sigmoid Eruption Chang Liu BBSO/NJIT

SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.

MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.

Interaction between emerging flux and large scale loop systems observed with Hinode XRT Abstract Hinode XRT reveals ubiquitous large-scale connections.

Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.

Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.

Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,

Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.

Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.

Incorporating Vector Magnetic Field Measurements into MHD models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley and B.T. Welsch,

Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.

Predicting Coronal Emissions with Multiple Heating Rates Loraine Lundquist George Fisher Tom Metcalf K.D. Leka Jim McTiernan AGU 2005.

Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.

1Yang Liu1997 May 12 Event The 1997 May 12 Event Yang Liu – Stanford University

Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.

Summary of workshop on AR May One of the MURI candidate active regions selected for detailed study and modeling.

Reconstructing Active Region Thermodynamics Loraine Lundquist Joint MURI Meeting Dec. 5, 2002.

Homologous large-scale activity in the solar eruptive events of November 24–26, 2000 I. M. Chertok a, V. V. Grechnev b, H. S. Hudson c, and N.V. Nitta.

THE FORMATION OF FILAMENT CHANNELS K. Muglach, Y.-M. Wang Naval Research Laboratory.

The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.

Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University

Working Group E: The Pre-CME Sun - Pre-eruption structure, evolution & energy release - Global issues: helicity, homologous CMEs - Inputs to CME initiation.

Data-Driven Simulations of AR8210 W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley SHINE Workshop 2004.

Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.

Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.

Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.

The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.

Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher

Homology tutorial Hugh Hudson Solar MURI 21-Nov-03.

Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:

Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.

Coronal holes as seen in soft X-rays H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) SOHO-11, Davos, March 13, 2002.

UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..

2002 May 1MURI VMG mini-workshop1` Solar MURI Vector Magnetogram Mini-Workshop Using Vector Magnetograms in Theoretical Models: Plan of Action.

Session C8 Coronal Data Products AIA/HMI Science Team Meeting 16 February 2006 Marc DeRosa.

Page 1Hinode4 October 11-15, 2010 Studying Emerging Flux Regions With The SDO Data Yang Liu and HMI Team Stanford University and Other Places

Review of Conditions for the Formation and Maintenance of Filaments Paper by Sara F. Martin, 1998 Review presented by Samuel Tun October 13, 2005

Kinematics and coronal field strength of an untwisting jet in a polar coronal hole observed by SDO/AIA H. Chen, J. Zhang, & S. Ma ILWS , Beijing.

Flares in and their associations with CMEs N.V. Nitta, J.P.Wuelser, M. J. Aschwanden, J. R. Lemen (LMSAL), D. M. Zarro (Adnet, Inc.)

Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.

Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.

SLIDE SHOW 3 B changes due to transport + diffusion III -- * * magnetic Reynold number INDUCTION EQUATION B moves with plasma / diffuses through it.

SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,

Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,

Using the evolution of dimming regions to probe the global magnetic field topology A new interpretation of the 12 th May 1997 event G. Attrill 1, M. Nakwaki.

SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.

KASI Low atmospheric reconnections associated with an eruptive flare Yong-Jae Moon(1), Jongchul Chae(2), Young-Deuk Park(1) 1: Korea Astronomy and.

Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,

Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,

Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.

Three-Dimensional Power Spectra of GONG++ High- Cadence Magnetograms F. Hill, J. Bolding, R. Clark, K. Donaldson-Hanna, J. Harvey, G. Petrie, C. Toner.

Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.

Joint Planning of SOT/XRT/EIS Observations Outline of 90 Day Initial Observing Plans T. Shimizu, L Culhane.

Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.

Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs

Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events

Observations of December 2006 events

Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs

Vector polarimetry with HMI

Solar and Heliospheric Physics

Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.

Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang

Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling

Presentation transcript:

The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley

May Classic 2-ribbon flare occurring in NOAA AR 8038 at ~ 04:45 UT Halo CME seen ~ 1-2 hours later (partial) filament eruption Global solar magnetic configuration is quite simple Magnetic data: poor temporal coverage, coarse spatial resolution In MURI teams: Yang Liu (Stanford) is doing most of the work on this event

Global magnetic configuration around May 12, 1997 (pfss model) Overall global magnetic configuration is simple; just one active region on the disk at the time of the flare/CME.

Magnetic Evolution of AR 8038 over 3 days: Active region appears to be mature and starting to decay, with apparent flux cancellation …

May 12, 1997: Evolution seen in H  2-ribbon flare Partial filament disappearance X-ray importance: C-class

May : X-ray evolution: Before flare: sigmoid shaped arcade Flare decay: classic candle- flame shaped arcade

May 12, 1997: Double dimming, EIT wave Double- dimming occurs after flare, roughly at ends of 2- ribbon flare arcades.

May : LASCO C2 images Wimpy halo event seen ~ 2 hours after the 2-ribbon flare

Interplanetary Data for the May event Some hidden text

May 1, 1998 Active region 8210 produced a long series of flares and CMEs as it rotated across the disk. Our focus is several small flares / CMEs occurring on May 1, 1998 because of very high quality vector magnetic field observations taken that day. Overall solar configuration was not so simple: 8210 appears connected to an active region across the equator via trans-equatorial loops

Global magnetic configuration around May 1, 1998 (pfss model) AR 8210 appears to be magnetically connected to a northern hemisphere AR and is also adjacent to a low-latitude coronal hole…

24 hours of high cadence MDI evolution of AR 8210 on May : Flux emergence above and to right of sunspot Clockwise rotation of sunspot Flow of positive polarity on left of spot toward lower right

Non-constant  force-free field fit to AR 8210 (Regnier) Uses vector magnetogram data from IVM instrument on Haleakala – data averaged for a 15 minute cadence

Models of the emission from AR 8210 (Loraine Lundquist) Start from Regnier’s FFF solution Assume a heating function Q ~ B/L on each field line Solve energy balance equation Compute emissivity and make false image

H  evolution of AR8210 on May 1, 1998 There are several filaments associated with this active region, which appear to be constantly evolving There appears to be a 2-ribbon flare around 23:40 UT

X-ray evolution of AR 8210 on May 1, 1998 Note simultaneous flickering of the two active regions, plus hint of transequatorial loops Note the repeated activation of the arcade of loops on the LHS of the active region

EIT evolution of AR 8210 on May 1, 1998 Note repeated brightenings along LHS of active region adjacent to “coronal hole” This evolution described by Sterling & Moore in their paper on EIT “crinkles” as repeated reconnection of closed field lines with open field lines in the hole

Interplanetary Data for May 1, 1998