14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session1 MICE Beamloss Data Adam Dobbs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)
Advertisements

Target Operations A summary of Target Operation to Date Paul Hodgson The University of Sheffield.
Summary of MICE 4/4/2008 shift during the ISIS machine-physics period Goals for 04 Apr08 MICE shift: 1. Radiation survey in MICE Hall with target operating,
The MICE Target Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
Measurement - Length. Digital vs. Analog There are many other types of measuring instruments that measure various other things. There are many other types.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
9 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 DAQ Terminology ISIS Terminology MICE Terminology Parameter Definitions.
MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.
MICE Electronics Upgrade P J Smith (University of Sheffield) J Leaver (Imperial College) 17 th June 2009.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
On MICE Coordinate System Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
Beam Position Monitors MICE CM Harbin January, 2009.
Y. Karadzhov MICE MICO First EMR Plots 1.EMR detector has been successfully incorporated in the MICE DAQ system. 2.First 3 days of data taking in MICE.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Target Monitoring and Control Current status DAQ card – NI 6254 Analog/Digital card Problems with Linux version drivers Currently reading up to 12 channels.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
Target Test Report Given permission for a maximum of 5000 actuations. Performed 3679 actuations, 3654 with the gate valve open. Ran target at 0.4 Hz to.
MICO 9th Aug 2010J.S. GraulichSlide 1 MOM report o Last Week o Run Plan for this Week o Machine Physics Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Target Real Time software Current status DAQ card – NI 6254 Analog/Digital card Problems with Linux version drivers Currently reading up to 12 channels.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC.
DAQ Considerations For Increased Rep. Rate J. Leaver 01/12/2009.
A Tale of Two Targets … 7 th September 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
ISIS Beam Protection System and MICE operation. Dean Adams 29 Nov 07 Presented by Chris Rogers.
MOM - M.ApollonioAccel. R&D/Physics and IADR - RAL - 19/3/ Summary of MICE operations – 14/15 March 2008 AIMS - establish MICE beamline in ISIS synchrotron.
Commissioning needs: K.Long. Routine: LN2 bottle: –Needs to be sited in MICE Hall or outside vault so that routine checks of contents can be made.
Commissioning needs MICO meeting 30 June 2008 MOM ( Roumen Tsenov)
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 7 September, 2009.
DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MICE TARGET Target Drive The linear electromagnetic drive that has been designed to meet these requirements consists.
Hydrogen Recombination Time (µs) RF Envelope (V) Here So We get Calculated from # of protons per bunch Calculated from energy loss (voltage drop) in the.
Simulating the MICE target M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC.
Aim: Review Basic Measurement Do Now: Take a ruler from the back of the room for you and your partner to share during this lesson/activity. ** you will.
MICE Target – Design Update and Test Plans Chris Booth Sheffield 22 nd October 2005.
MOM report – part I Roumen Tsenov as MOM ( )
1 MICE TARGET STATUS 23 rd February 2007 CM17 - CERN Paul J Smith University of Sheffield.
MICE MICE Target Mechanism Control Electronics Upgrade P J Smith – University of Sheffield James Leaver – Imperial College 2 nd March 2009.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
24/10/2015Sheffield University 1 Target Electronics Recap - Decision has been made to rebuild the target electronics control system so that it is upgraded.
Status of installed target Preparation of “demonstrator” target Chris Booth Sheffield 25 th January 2008.
Aim: Review Basic Measurement Do Now: Take a ruler from the back of the room for you and your partner to share during this lesson/activity. ** you will.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
MICE Target Development Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
PULSE LASER WIRE Laser pulse storage in an optical cavity as a beam monitor & an X-ray source Kaori Takezawa Kyoto Univ. 2nd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
Beam Studies December 2014 Runs: 7820 – 7860 December 27, 2014.
Alain Blondel MICE VC 12 March 2009 Brief MICE news 1. Decay solenoid: operations will restart in early July. Criteria for acceptance have been specified.
1 Measurement of particle production from the MICE target Kenny Walaron, Paul Soler University of Glasgow.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
Target Commissioning Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Initial commissioning plans Chris Booth Sheffield 11 th February 2008.
Running plan Step I.1 Basic radiation levels. I.1.1 ISIS running with beam elements on, target off, beam stop shut. Establish permanent MICE monitoring.
MICE Target Failure UKNFIC Meeting Adam Dobbs - when and why 4 th July 2008.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC.
ISIS Beam and MICE Target Simulation MICE Collaboration Meeting Adam Dobbs 19 th Oct 2008.
10-meter Interferometer Results M. Woods (special thanks to Steve Myers and Tim Slaton) Jan. 31, 2000 Commissioning Setup System Noise Monte Carlo simulation.
Doubling the Target Insertion Rate P J Smith for MICE VC 163.
Aim: Review Basic Measurement
Luminosity Monitor Status

SEM Calibration in H6 Beam Line, 20cm Cupper Target
Serge Kalmykov, UNL (WG 6, Tuesday, 10/26/2017) vg +15 fs
Dione’s O2 Exosphere C. J. Hansen January 2013.
Presentation transcript:

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session1 MICE Beamloss Data Adam Dobbs

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session2 MICE Beam Loss Studies Overview Purpose – understand beam loss in ISIS due to MICE target Analogue ISIS beam loss signals (total ring loss, total sector 7 and 8 loss) readout by a MICE DAQ ISIS beam intensity, position and MICE target position signals also recorded by the DAQ DAQ operates at 100 kHz 2

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session3 Raw Data 3

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session4 Averaged Data 4 MICE beamloss ISIS at normal rep rate, 5 spills shown, MICE target dip on first spill

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session5 Averaged Data – reduced rep rate 5 ISIS at reduced rep rate => No spills without target present so cannot subtract background!

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session6 Background-subtracted Data (not averaged) 6 -used to make lookup table of target depth and beamloss for every actuation

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session7 Averaged and BG-subtracted 7 Data set _07

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session8 Averaged and BG-subtracted Electronics artefact Possible losses from target scraping beam at injection 8

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session9 Target Depth Vs Time 9 Data set _ maximum target depth of each actuation over period of a run (of order hours). Below is for the evening of the target failure on

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session10 Data set _00-01 Target Position Vs Beamloss: actual -from a typical run 10 Depth(mm) = Grad*Depth(V)+Off Grad = Off= V -> 32.68mm, 1.25V -> 35.23mm

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session11 8 January 2009MICE Target Meeting11 Data set _00-03 Target Position Vs Beamloss: actual -from a night of target failure on Severely reduced beamloss

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session12 Zoomed 12 Data set _00-03 Quantisation of data for target position – note scale

14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session13 Further Zoomed 13 Data set _00-03 A 2 nd quantisation of data for target position at smaller scale. Possible causes are discrete ruler measures used by laser position system, and the digitisation process