May 6, 2006 Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 1 Intent and Interaction EGVE 2006, Lisboa, Portugal Gerwin de Haan MediaMatics, Computer Graphics & CAD/CAM.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Synergy Distributed Meeting Scheduler(SDMS) TEAM:4 Rutvij Mehta Shruti Mehta Shveta Mupparapu Meghna Swetha Raguraman Rakesh Sanapala Venkata Jaganadh.

Advertisements

Chapter 18 Building the user interface. This chapter discusses n Javas graphical user interface. n Swing: an enhancement of a library called the Abstract.

10 september 2002 A.Broersen Developing a Virtual Piano Playing Environment By combining distributed functionality among independent Agents.

Graphical input techniques

© 2005 Avaya Inc. All rights reserved. A Client-Side Architecture for Supporting Pervasive Enterprise Communications Amogh Kavimandan, Reinhard Klemm,

Eindhoven Technische Universiteit What offers VR to the Designer Bauke de Vries Henri Achten.

VRIXML: A User Interface Description for Virtual Environments Erwin Cuppens, Chris Raymaekers, Karin Coninx Expertise Centre for Digital Media (EDM) Limburgs.

User Interfaces for an In-store Sales Process Supporting System Rainer Blum Sascha Häberling Karim Khakzar Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Dep. of.

From Model-based to Model-driven Design of User Interfaces.

Towel: Towards an Intelligent ToDo List Ken Conley Jim Carpenter SRI International AAAI Spring Symposium 2007.

Shweta Jain 1. Motivation ProMOTE Introduction Architectural Choices Pro-MOTE system Architecture Experimentation Conclusion and Future Work Acknowledgement.

Revolutionary next generation human computer interaction.

Part 3: Design Days 15, 19, 21, 23 Chapter 8: Work Reengineering and Conceptual Design Chapter 9: Design Guidance and Design Rationale Chapter 10: Interaction.

John Hu Nov. 9, 2004 Multimodal Interfaces Oviatt, S. Multimodal interfaces Mankoff, J., Hudson, S.E., & Abowd, G.D. Interaction techniques for ambiguity.

November 2, A Reprocessing Tool for Quantitative Data Analysis in a Virtual Environment E. J. Griffith, F. H. Post, M. Koutek, T. Heus and H. J.

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 1 MKT project 1 & Mens-Machine-Interactie slides chapter 3 Dix et al. The interaction Charles van der Mast.

Using Tweek to Create Graphical User Interfaces in Virtual Reality Patrick Hartling IEEE VR 2003.

1 System: Mecano Presenters: Baolinh Le, [Bryce Carder] Course: Knowledge-based User Interfaces Date: April 29, 2003 Model-Based Automated Generation of.

Part 3: Design Chapter 8: Work Reengineering and Conceptual Design Chapter 9: Design Guidance and Design Rationale Chapter 10: Interaction Design Chapter.

0 HCI Today Talk about HCI Success Stories Talk about HCI Success Stories Talk about Norman’s Paper Talk about Norman’s Paper Start talking about The human.

© Lethbridge/Laganière 2001 Chapter 7: Focusing on Users and Their Tasks1 7.1 User Centred Design (UCD) Software development should focus on the needs.

Dynamic Reconfiguration of Component-based Real-time Software Words February 2005 Sedona, Arizona, USA Andreas Rasche, Andreas Polze and Martin.

Using a head joystick in a one axis manipulation.

March 9, 2008 Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 1 SEARIS'08 Workshop IEEEVR 2008, Reno NV, USA Gerwin de Haan G. de Haan, F.H. Post Data Visualization Group.

Animation IS 247: Information Visualization and Presentation Saifon Obromsook Linda Harjono.

Graphical User Interfaces in Virtual Reality Patrick Hartling Virtual Reality Applications Center IEEE VR 2002.

Automated Tests in NICOS Nightly Control System Alexander Undrus Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Software testing is a difficult, time-consuming.

Computational Thinking Related Efforts. CS Principles – Big Ideas  Computing is a creative human activity that engenders innovation and promotes exploration.

An Intelligent Broker Architecture for Context-Aware Systems A PhD. Dissertation Proposal in Computer Science at the University of Maryland Baltimore County.

1 Shengdong Zhao Department of Computer Science University of Toronto July 9, 2008 earPod: Efficient, Hierarchical, Eyes-free Menu Selection.

CompuCell Software Current capabilities and Research Plan Rajiv Chaturvedi Jesús A. Izaguirre With Patrick M. Virtue.

Marcelo de Paiva Guimarães Bruno Barberi Gnecco Marcelo Knorich Zuffo

Designing 3D Interfaces Examples of 3D interfaces Pros and cons of 3D interfaces Overview of 3D software and hardware Four key design issues: system performance,

© 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 0-1 Spring(2007) Instructor: Qiong Cheng © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

Parallels in Tangible Interface & Web 2.0 Sharad Singh Solanki.

Melissa Armstrong – Sponsor Dr. Eck Doerry – Mentor Greg Andolshek Alex Koch Michael McCormick Department of Computer Science SolutionProblemDesign User.

Virtual Cockpit: Terbu Alexander Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision Graz University of Technology An Alternative Augmented Reality User Interface.

Speaker: Shau-Shiang Hung( 洪紹祥 ) advisor :Shu-Chen Cheng( 鄭淑真 ) Date : 2010/4/8 Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Publication Date : March-April.

25 juin 2010 Interactive Genetic Algorithms for Creative Enhancement in UI design Dimitri Masson Alexandre Demeure Gaelle Calvary 1.

A Compiler-Based Tool for Array Analysis in HPC Applications Presenter: Ahmad Qawasmeh Advisor: Dr. Barbara Chapman 2013 PhD Showcase Event.

Snap2Diverse: Coordinating Information Visualizations and Virtual Environments Nicholas F. Polys, Chris North, Doug A. Bowman, Andrew Ray, Maxim Moldenhauer,

Reference WPx/Tx.y/YY-MM-DD/PP Distributed User Interfaces in Space and Time Jérémie Melchior Université catholique de Louvain Doctoral Consortium at EICS2011.

Cs413_chapt01.ppt Chapter 1 Web Sites Numerous

Subtask 1.8 WWW Networked Knowledge Bases August 19, 2003 AcademicsAir force Arvind BansalScott Pollock Cheng Chang Lu (away)Hyatt Rick ParentMark (SAIC)

Mantid Development introduction Nick Draper 11/04/2008.

Nick Draper 05/11/2008 Mantid Manipulation and Analysis Toolkit for ISIS data.

Supporting rapid design and evaluation of pervasive application: challenges and solutions Lei Tang 1,2, Zhiwen Yu 1, Xingshe Zhou 1, Hanbo Wang 1, Christian.

1 Cascading Dialog Modeling with UsiXML Marco Winckler 1,2,Jean Vanderdonckt 2, Adrian Stanciulescu 2, Francisco Trindade 3 1 IRIT, Université Toulouse.

© University of Strathclyde Martin Fitchie University of Strathclyde Research Presentation Day 2004 Integrating Tolerance Analysis and.

Architecture View Models A model is a complete, simplified description of a system from a particular perspective or viewpoint. There is no single view.

Mantid Stakeholder Review Nick Draper 01/11/2007.

1 What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments Alissa N. Antle, Greg Corness, Milena Droumeva.

March 7, D Topography in Virtual Environments TUDelft Computer Graphics & CAD/CAM group VRLab at TUDelft My PhD work, in progress: “Architectures.

1 Presentation Methodology Summary B. Golden. 2 Introduction Why use visualizations?  To facilitate user comprehension  To convey complexity and intricacy.

SEESCOASEESCOA SEESCOA Meeting Activities of LUC 9 May 2003.

From Use Cases to Implementation 1. Structural and Behavioral Aspects of Collaborations  Two aspects of Collaborations Structural – specifies the static.

 Real world › Bimanual  Mouse and keyboard? › Unintuitive › One point  Special device? › Expensive › Still not very intuitive.

A Speech Interface to Virtual Environment Authors Scott McGlashan and Tomas Axling Swedish Institute of Computer Science.

WELCOME Topic: Peoples and Machines. Definition People and machines is a concept that includes all of the issues that relate to how people interact with.

Tatyana Povalyaeva Important Aspects of the Annotation of Data in Virtual Environments Seminar

HUMAN MEDIA INTERACTION CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR PLAY AND

Unit 2 User Interface Design.

VR as a Next-Generation User Interface?

Introduction to R.

Jim Fawcett CSE776 – Design Patterns Summer 2003

Introduction to Computer Graphics

Document Visualization at UMBC

Sculpting 3D Models Dorsey & McMillan

Scanners – Robots – Measurement Plans Synergy in Motion

Chapter 27 Variations and more complex evaluations

Presentation transcript:

May 6, 2006 Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 1 Intent and Interaction EGVE 2006, Lisboa, Portugal Gerwin de Haan MediaMatics, Computer Graphics & CAD/CAM G. de Haan, E.J. Griffith, M. Koutek, F.H. Post Hybrid Interfaces in VEs:

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Focus: Interactive VR Applications Target applications (VR-Vis), Interactive Exploration

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Hybrid Interfaces Use 2D interface elements in a Virtual Environment + Well-known + Portability + Good for abstract 2D info and interaction - Bulky size - Clumsy interaction Goal: Facilitate (more) usable Hybrid Interfaces

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Parallel approach: Develop Hybrid interface elements Extend Supportive interaction (IntenSelect) > Combine Interface and Interaction

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Hybrid Interfaces Previous work Importing 2D bitmaps Importing existing toolkits Why new development? Standard? Availability? 2D + 3D integration Interaction integration Bi-directional communication

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Hybrid Interfaces Windows Widgets Dialogs “Graph Window”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Hybrid Interfaces Windows Widgets Dialogs “Graph Window”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Hybrid Interfaces Windows Widgets Dialogs “Graph Window”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Hybrid Interfaces Windows Widgets Dialogs “Graph Window”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Parallel approach: Develop Hybrid interface elements Extend Supportive interaction (IntenSelect) > Combine Interface and Interaction

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Supportive Interaction: IntenSelect (1) Selection Volume Test (2) Score contribution (3) Score accumulation (4) User Feedback [dHKP05]: “Intenselect: Using Dynamic Object Rating for Assisting 3D Object Selection” Problems: Accuracy Small or remote Ambiguity Occlusion or Cluttering Complexity Movement or Shape

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Supportive Interaction: IntenSelect (1) Selection Volume Test (2) Score contribution (3) Score accumulation (4) User Feedback [dHKP05]: “Intenselect: Using Dynamic Object Rating for Assisting 3D Object Selection”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Supportive Interaction: IntenSelect (1) Selection Volume Test (2) Score contribution (3) Score accumulation (4) User Feedback [dHKP05]: “Intenselect: Using Dynamic Object Rating for Assisting 3D Object Selection”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Supportive Interaction: IntenSelect (1) Selection Volume Test (2) Score contribution (3) Score accumulation (4) User Feedback [dHKP05]: “Intenselect: Using Dynamic Object Rating for Assisting 3D Object Selection” “temporal effect”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Supportive Interaction: IntenSelect (1) Selection Volume Test (2) Score contribution (3) Score accumulation (4) User Feedback [dHKP05]: “Intenselect: Using Dynamic Object Rating for Assisting 3D Object Selection”

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” IntenSelect: New Extensions Direct interaction Snapping behavior Object manipulation Scoring control Scoring redistribution P   cone O ray

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” IntenSelect: New Extensions Direct interaction Snapping behavior Object manipulation Scoring control Scoring redistribution

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” IntenSelect: New Extensions Direct interaction Snapping behavior Object manipulation Scoring control Scoring redistribution

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” IntenSelect: New Extensions Direct interaction Snapping behavior Object manipulation Scoring control Scoring redistribution

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” IntenSelect: New Extensions Direct interaction Snapping behavior Object manipulation Scoring control Scoring redistribution

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Parallel approach: Develop Hybrid interface elements Extend Supportive interaction (IntenSelect) > Combine Interface and Interaction

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Integrating Interaction and Interface Snapping Constraints Redistribution Bi-manual operation [video]

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Integrating Interaction and Interface Ray based snapping Redistribution Small (!) controls

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Application Integration [video]

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Ongoing and future work Verification and Validation: User Testing Broader range of widgets and dialogs Specific scoring enhancements Intelligent interface management

May 6, G. de Haan, “Hybrid Interfaces in VEs: Intent and Interaction” Questions ? Remarks ! - ? !