1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Thin Liquid Film Protection Concepts S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda ARIES Town Meeting (May 5-6, 2003) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Advertisements

Sticky Water Taiwan Hsieh, Tsung-Lin. Question When a horizontal cylinder is placed in a vertical stream of water, the stream can follow the cylinder's.
Fluid Properties and Units CEE 331 April 26, 2015 CEE 331 April 26, 2015 
Lecture 2 Properties of Fluids Units and Dimensions.
CHAPTER 2 DIFFERENTIAL FORMULATION OF THE BASIC LAWS 2.1 Introduction  Solutions must satisfy 3 fundamental laws: conservation of mass conservation of.
Convection in Flat Plate Turbulent Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi An Extra Effect For.
G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA Experimental Results for Thin and Thick Liquid Walls M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik.
External Convection: Laminar Flat Plate
Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta,
Nozzle Study Yan Zhan, Foluso Ladeinde April, 2011.
Pharos University ME 352 Fluid Mechanics II
Flow over immersed bodies. Boundary layer. Analysis of inviscid flow.
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Geometric Parameters on Liquid Single-Phase Pressure Drop in Micro- Scale Pin-Fin Arrays Valerie Pezzullo,
Analysis of In-Cylinder Process in Diesel Engines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Sudden Creation of Young Flame & Gradual.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Fluid Properties and Units CEE 331 June 15, 2015 CEE 331 June 15, 2015 
An Overview of the Fluid Dynamics Aspects of Liquid Protection schemes for IFE Reactor Chambers S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda US-Japan Workshop on Fusion.
G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA USA CHAMBER CLEARING : THE HYDRODYNAMIC SOURCE TERM S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK, S.G. DURBIN,
Engineering H191 - Drafting / CAD The Ohio State University Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Lab 4P. 1Autumn Quarter Transport Phenomena Lab 4.
Thermal Analysis of Helium- Cooled T-tube Divertor S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, Madison (June 14-15, 2005) G. W. Woodruff School.
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 9: FLOWS IN PIPE
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
November 20, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation 1 Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation A.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Lecture 7 Exact solutions
An Overview of the Fluid Dynamics Aspects of Liquid Protection Schemes for Fusion Reactors S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda TOFE-16 Meeting - Madison (September.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Fluid Properties and Units CVEN 311 . Continuum ä All materials, solid or fluid, are composed of molecules discretely spread and in continuous motion.
Heat Flux Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, San Diego (Nov 4-5, 2004) G. W. Woodruff.
An Ultimate Combination of Physical Intuition with Experiments… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Boundary Layer.
Design of Port Injection Systems P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Collection of Models to Predict Multi-physics of Spray …...
Computation of FREE CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Quantification of Free …….
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Fluid Properties and Units CEE 331 July 12, 2015 
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
Design Considerations for Thin Liquid Film Wall Protection Systems S.I. Abdel-Khalik and M.Yoda Georgia Institute of Technology ARIES Project Meeting,
G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA USA THE HYDRODYNAMIC SOURCE TERM: S.G. DURBIN, S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK, and M. YODA BOUNDARY.
Recent Advances in Condensation on Tube Banks P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Reduce the Degree of Over Design!!!
Hydrodynamics of Liquid Protection schemes for IFE Reactor Chambers S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda IAEA Meeting - Vienna (November 2003) G. W. Woodruff.
Flow rate across a fluid element with top and bottom faces moving Fluid element h dx dy Consider the fluid element with dimensions dx, dy, and h (film.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Update on Thermal Performance of the Gas- Cooled.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills, and J. D. Rader G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Updated Thermal Performance of.
Falling Liquid Film Flow along Cascade- type First Wall of Laser-Fusion Reactor T. Kunugi, T. Nakai, Z. Kawara Department of Nuclear Engineering Kyoto.
CP502 Advanced Fluid Mechanics
Lesson 21 Laminar and Turbulent Flow
高等輸送二 — 質傳 Lecture 8 Forced convection
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills, and J. D. Rader G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Correlations for the Plate Divertor.
CP502 Advanced Fluid Mechanics Compressible Flow Lectures 1 & 2 Steady, quasi one-dimensional, isothermal, compressible flow of an ideal gas in a constant.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Dimensional Analysis A tool to help one to get maximum information from a minimum number of experiments facilitates a correlation of data with minimum.
IESVic 1 QUANTITATIVE IMAGING OF MULTI-COMPONENT TURBULENT JETS Arash Ash Supervisors: Dr. Djilali Dr. Oshkai Institute for Integrated Energy Systems University.
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.
Modelling Spray Impingement
Pharos University ME 259 Fluid Mechanics for Electrical Students Revision for Final Exam Dr. A. Shibl.
Post Injection Process in Port Injection Systems P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Models Based Predictions of Multi-physics.
DESIGN WINDOWS FOR THIN AND THICK LIQUID PROTECTION SCHEMES IN IFE REACTOR CHAMBERS M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical.
Convection Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mode of Heat Transfer due to.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 6 Introduction to convection.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 9 Free Convection.
Subject Name: FLUID MECHANICS Subject Code:10ME36B Prepared By: R Punith Department: Aeronautical Engineering Date:
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Droplet Detachment Mechanism in a High-Speed Gaseous Microflow J. Fluids Eng.
Analysis of Port Injection Systems for SI Engines
Design of Port Fuel Injection System
Design of Port Injection Systems for SI Engines
T. Kunugi, T. Nakai, Z. Kawara Department of Nuclear Engineering
Spray Impingement & Formation of Films In Ports
Chapter 8 : Natural Convection
Chapter 4. Analysis of Flows in Pipes
Post Injection Process in Port Injection Systems
Fundamentals of Convection
Subject Name: FLUID MECHANICS
Presentation transcript:

1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA USA

2 Numerical Simulation of Porous Downward Facing Wetted Walls  Seungwon Shin & Damir Juric Experimental Investigation of Liquid Film Stability on Porous Wetted Walls  Fahd Abdelall & Dennis Sadowski Experimental Study of Forced Thin Liquid Film Flow on Downward Facing Surfaces  J. Anderson, S. Durbin & D. Sadowski Primary Contributors

3 Minimum Film Thickness Prior to Droplet Detachment Effect of Evaporation/Condensation on  Detachment Time  Detached Droplet Diameter  Minimum Film Thickness Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls (Follow up on Madison ARIES Meeting)

4 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Problem Definition IFE Reactor Chamber (Prometheus-L) X-rays and Ions Liquid Injection

5 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Summary of Results Quantify effects of injection velocity w in initial film thickness z o Initial perturbation geometry & mode number inclination angle  Evaporation & Condensation at the interface on Droplet detachment time Equivalent droplet diameter Minimum film thickness prior to detachment

6 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Evolution of Minimum Film Thickness (High Injection/Thin Films) Nondimensional Initial Thickness, z o * =0.1 Nondimensional Injection velocity, w in * =0.05 Nondimensional Time Nondimensional Minimum Thickness Minimum Thickness Drop Detachment

7 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Initial Perturbation Initial Perturbation Geometries Sinusoidal Random Saddle zozo ss zozo zozo ss

8 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Initial Perturbation Sinusoidal z o,  s = 0.5 mm w in = 1 mm/s Pb at 700K Random w in = 1 mm/s Saddle w in = 1 mm/s Detachment time  (s)

9 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Liquid Injection Velocity w in w in = 0 mm/s z o,  s = 0.2 mm  (s) w in = 0.1 mm/s z o,  s = 0.2 mm w in = 1 mm/s z o,  s = 0.2 mm w in = 10 mm/s z o,  s = 0.2 mm

10 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Evolution of Minimum Film Thickness (High Injection/Thick Films) Nondimensional Initial Thickness, z o * =0.5 Nondimensional Injection velocity, w in * =0.05 Nondimensional Time Nondimensional Minimum Thickness Minimum Thickness Drop Detachment

11 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Evolution of Minimum Film Thickness (Low Injection/Thin Films) Nondimensional Initial Thickness, z o * =0.1 Nondimensional Injection velocity, w in * =0.01 Nondimensional Time Nondimensional Minimum Thickness Minimum Thickness Drop Detachment

12 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Evolution of Minimum Film Thickness (Low Injection/Thick Films) Nondimensional Initial Thickness, z o * =0.5 Nondimensional Injection velocity, w in * =0.01 Nondimensional Time Nondimensional Minimum Thickness Minimum Thickness Drop Detachment

13 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Representation where,,,,, Nondimensional Momentum Equation

14 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Minimum Film Thickness

15 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Minimum Film Thickness

16 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Minimum Film Thickness

17 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Evaporation/Condensation at the Interface where Nondimensional Mass Conservation

18 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Evaporation/Condensation at the Interface Interface Advancement

19 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Parameters For Various Coolants WaterLeadLithiumFlibe T (K) l (mm) U 0 (mm/s) t 0 (ms) Re

20 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Evaporation/Condensation at Interface  * =31.35  * =27.69  * =25.90 m f * =-0.005m f * =0.0m f * =0.01 (Evaporation)(Condensation) z o * =0.1, w in * =0.01, Re=2000

21 (Condensation)(Evaporation) Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Evaporation/Condensation at Interface  * =25.69  * =25.13  * =25.74 m f * =-0.005m f * =0.0m f * =0.01 z o * =0.1, w in * =0.05, Re=2000

22 (Condensation)(Evaporation) Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Evaporation/Condensation at Interface  * =15.94  * =16.14  * =16.84 m f * =-0.005m f * =0.0m f * =0.01 z o * =0.5, w in * =0.01, Re=2000

23 (Condensation)(Evaporation) Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Effect of Evaporation/Condensation at Interface  * =17.11  * =16.94  * =17.83 m f * =-0.005m f * =0.0m f * =0.01 z o * =0.5, w in * =0.05, Re=2000

24 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results -- Detachment Time Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

25 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results -- Detachment Time Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

26 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results -- Detachment Time Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

27 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results -- Detachment “Diameter” Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

28 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results -- Detachment “Diameter” Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

29 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results -- Detachment “Diameter” Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

30 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results – Minimum Film Thickness Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

31 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results – Minimum Film Thickness Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

32 Numerical Simulation of Porous Wetted Walls Non-Dimensional Results – Minimum Film Thickness Different Evaporation/Condensation m f * Values

33 CONCLUSIONS Generalized charts have been developed to allow quantitative evaluation of effects of various operating and design variables on system performance  Identify “design windows” for successful operation of the wetted wall concept Experimental investigation to validate numerical results over desired parameter range underway (isothermal conditions)

34 IFE chamber (Prometheus) First Wall Injection Point Detachment Distance x d Liquid Film/Sheet X-rays and Ions Problem Definition

35 2 mm nozzle 17 GPM 10.7 m/s 10 o inclination Re = mm nozzle 17 GPM 10.7 m/s 10 o inclination Re = Objectives Determine “design windows” for high-speed liquid films proposed for thin liquid protection of IFE reactor chamber first wall Wall protection issues (in the absence of film dryout)  Detachment of film from first wall  Ejection of drops from film free surface  Downward-facing surfaces at top of chamber: greatest gravitational impact on detachment Implementation issues  How does film spread from injection point?  How does film flow around obstructions (e.g. beam ports)?

36 Experimental Apparatus AGlass plate (1.52  0.40 m) BLiquid film CSplash guard DTrough (1250 L) EPump inlet w/ filter FPump GFlowmeter HFlow metering valve ILong-radius elbow JFlexible connector KFlow straightener LFilm nozzle MSupport frame A B C D E F G H I J K L M Adjustable angle  x z gcos  g

37 Experimental Parameters Independent Variables  Film nozzle exit dimension  = 0.1–0.2 cm  Film nozzle exit average speed U 0 = 1.9 – 11.4 m/s  Jet injection angle  = 0°, 10° and 30°  Surface inclination angle  (  =  ) Dependent Variables  Film width and thickness W(x), t(x)  Detachment distance x d  Location for drop formation on free surface

mm nozzle 13 GPM 10.9 m/s 10° inclination Re = GPM 10.9 m/s Re = ° inclination 1.5 mm nozzle Dimensionless Groups Reynolds number Re = U 0  / = 3700–21,000 Froude number Fr = U 0 /  (g cos  )  = 15–115  Only group involving  Weber number We =  U 0 2  /  = 100–3200 Film nozzle aspect ratio AR = (5 cm)/  = 25–50 Fluid properties (water at 17–19°C into air at p atm )  Kinematic viscosity = 1.06  10 –6 m 2 /s  Density  = 999 kg/m 3  Surface tension  = N/m

39 2 mm nozzle 17 GPM 10.7 m/s 10 o inclination Re = Detachment Distance x d xdxd  x d = distance along plate from nozzle exit where film detaches at plate surface Instantaneous detachment distance x d varies by up to  2 cm  reported x d values average of 20 independent realizations Typical images (8 ms exp.) of liquid film over a few seconds:  = 10°, Re = 8600,  = 0.1 cm (A) [ruler in inches] x d = cm cm cm cm

40 x d : Fr Effects Fr x d /   = 0.15 cm  = 0.2 cm  = 0   = 10   = 30  x d /   as Fr  x d /   as   Growth rate similar for all cases (except at low Fr) Account for different initial conditions with “virtual origin”?  = 0.1 cm

41 Average Film Width W(x) W(x) measured from above (viewed through plate)  = 0.1 cm;  = 30  ; Re = 7200; Fr = 81 2 mm nozzle 13 GPM 8.2 m/s 10° inclination Re = GPM 8.2 m/s Re = ° inclination 2 mm nozzle 5 cm x y W(x)W(x) Initially, film spreads after leaving nozzle (transition from no-slip to free surface at lower surface): “near-field” region Farther downstream, film thickens (due to gravitational and surface tension effects) and detaches: “far-field” region  Since mass/vol. flux constant at every x location, W must decrease  Does W decrease before detachment?

42 W(x):  Effects x / x /   = 0   = 10   = 30   = 0.2 cm (C) Re = 18,000 W independent of  for x/  < 400 (near-field) W  as   for x/  > 400 (far- field) x c /  < x d /  for all cases xd/xd/ W/W0W/W0 x c /   400 W c /W 0  3.6

43 W(x): Re Effects x / x /  W/W0W/W0  = 0.2 cm (C)  = 30  W independent of Re for x/  < 400 (near-field) W independent of Re at high Re? x c /  < x d /  in all cases x c /   400 W c /W 0  3.6 xd/xd/ Re = 7,500 Re = 12,400 Re = 18,600

44 Initial Observations Detachment distance x d  Fr most important parameter for detachment distance x d  For high-speed films, consistent growth rate in x d /   Virtual origin to compensate for initial conditions Film width (y-dimension) W  Maximum W  4–5 times initial value  Near-field (x < x c < x d ) : W dominated by initial conditions  Far-field (x > x c ):  most important parameter for W Characteristic film width W c = W(x c )   most important parameter for W c  For high-speed films, W c independent of Fr, Re and  Summary

45 Future Work Determine “design windows” for high-speed liquid films proposed for thin liquid protection of IFE reactor chamber first wall Wall protection issues (in the absence of film dryout)  Detachment of film from first wall  Ejection of drops from film free surface Implementation issues  How does film spread from injection point?  How does film flow around obstructions (e.g. beam ports)?

mm nozzle 10 GPM 8.4 m/s 10° inclination Re = GPM 8.4 m/s Re = ° inclination 1.5 mm nozzle Drop Ejection from Free Surface Drops ejected from film free surface upstream of detachment Major issue for first wall protection: minimize drops in chamber