ROI in HRM: Validity of Selection Procedures Nicole Blake Edgar Nolasco Deena Desai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Class Selection June 2008 North 51 - A team you can rely on The Psychology of Selection.
Advertisements

PERSONALITY & INDIVIDUAL
STAFFING. KEY ASSUMPTIONS ä People differ ä Jobs differ ä Goal? ä ä Requires ä.
LESSON 9 ASSESSMENT CENTRES. WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? Meta-analyses of assessment center research results have been reported by Schmitt, Gooding,
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 5-1 Managing Human Resources Managing Human Resources Bohlander.
Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis Ulrich Schimmack Shigehiro Oishi R. Michael Furr David C. Funder.
Strategic Staffing Chapter 9 – Assessing External Candidates
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
Refining the Relationship Between Personality and Subjective Well-Being Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008)
Supervision in Organizations
 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd. Perception, Personality, and Emotion Chapter Two.
Introduction Method  Evaluation of ability to provide social support yielded scores with good internal consistency reliability.  There was moderate agreement.
Organizational Attitudes & Behavior Organizational Attitudes –Job Satisfaction –Organizational Commitment –Job Involvement –Organizational Justice Organizational.
Concept of Reliability and Validity. Learning Objectives  Discuss the fundamentals of measurement  Understand the relationship between Reliability and.
MGTO 324 Recruitment and Selections Internal Selection: Performance Appraisal Kin Fai Ellick Wong Ph.D. Department of Management of Organizations Hong.
1 The Employment Interview. 2 One of the most widely used hiring tools in the public and private sector Used for selection and recruiting Involve an interaction.
MGTO 324 Workshop 6: Criterion Validity. Multiple Regression Analysis Background You are an HR manager of an insurance firm. The most salient culture.
1 Assessing Situational Judgment with a Structured Interview: Construct Validity and Adverse Impact Frederick P. Morgeson Talya N. Bauer Donald M. Truxillo.
1 Report Tile UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Principles of Assessment.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Selection II: Testing.
Using JobCLUES Assessments October Objectives PART I - EDUCATION:  Why use Assessments?  How do Assessments fit into the selection process? —3.
Employee Testing and Selection
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EI) Presented by Derrick Lottes.
General Mental Ability aka (GMA) aka (g factor) aka (g)
TAYLOR HOWARD The Employment Interview: A Review of Current Studies and Directions for Future Research.
Copyright © 2012 by Cengage Learning. All rights reserved Chapter 7 Recruiting and Selection Prepared by Joseph Mosca Monmouth University.
Chapter 5 Selection Objectives and goals Selection Procedures
Performance Management
Individual, Personality and Attitudes Dr. G.D.R.U.U. Abeyrathne, Department of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Leadership Theories.
© 2008 The A&DC Group Ltd James Foster Marketing Manager © The A&DC Group 2009 The Changing Face of Assessment Centres Mike Murray.
Training and Experience Dr. Mike Aamodt Radford University Updated 12/06/2004.
Assessing Job Candidates: Tools for Selection
Transformational leadership, goal difficulty, and job design: Independent and interactive effects on employee outcomes Article Presentation Course 614.
1 SELECTION 2BC3 Week 5 ________________________ Dr. Teal McAteer DeGroote School of Business McMaster University.
MGTO 324 Recruitment and Selections Validity II (Criterion Validity) Kin Fai Ellick Wong Ph.D. Department of Management of Organizations Hong Kong University.
PRIJ 3030 Planning- Session 8
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Testing and Selecting Employees.
L 1 Chapter 12 Correlational Designs EDUC 640 Dr. William M. Bauer.
Tonya Filz & Regan A.R. Gurung University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Abstract As class sizes increase due to stagnating budgets, and as colleges and universities.
Performance Management
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 5-1 Managing Human Resources Managing Human Resources Bohlander.
1 Chapter 8 Selection I: Models of Testing. © 2013 by Nelson Education2 1.When is the use of testing, psychological and/or physical, a distinct advantage.
Problem Burnout and job satisfaction have been shown to be related to each other as well as turnover (Lee & Ashforth, 1996). Burnout is primarily viewed.
Selecting Employees to Fit the Job and the Organization 03/04/2013.
(Elisabeth Prechtl, Ph.D. student at University of Bayreuth, Germany) Predictive Validation of an Intercultural Assessment Centre (Elisabeth Prechtl, Ph.D.
Lecture 02.
Basic Approaches to Leadership © PAPERHINT.COM. What Is Leadership? Leadership The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals Management.
Management development programs Providing recommendations based on scientific evidence Presented to Altria October 2, 2014.
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Uniform Framework for employment decisions -- apply only to selection procedures for employment decisions Discrimination.
Measurement MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Assessment Ice breaker. Ice breaker. My most favorite part of the course was …. My most favorite part of the course was …. Introduction Introduction How.
CHAPTER 6 Selecting Employees and Placing Them in Jobs
Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order to higher- order, and interactive effects (Silvia et al., 2009) November 24,
RESEARCH METHODS IN INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY & ORGANIZATION Pertemuan Matakuliah: D Sosiologi dan Psikologi Industri Tahun: Sep-2009.
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement and Assessment
Strategy for Human Resource Management Lecture 15
Performance Appraisal MANA 5341 Dr. George Benson.
Basic Approaches to Leadership ©
Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2014) Prepared by: Christopher J. L. Cunningham, PhD University.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Selection II: Testing.
The Most Effective Tool to Measure SOFT SKILLS
Chapter 8 Selection. chapter 8 Selection Selection – the process by which an organization chooses from a list of applicants the person or persons who.
Measuring Athlete Coachability
Reliability and Validity of Measurement
Civil Service Commission
Basic Approaches to Leadership.
Job Performance Concepts and Measures
Chapter 6 Selecting Employees
Presentation transcript:

ROI in HRM: Validity of Selection Procedures Nicole Blake Edgar Nolasco Deena Desai

Employee Selection: Will Intelligence and Conscientiousness Do the Job? Orlando Behling

Key Terms General Intelligence “g” Big Five Meta-Analysis – combining research results from existing studies that meet a specific criteria for to generate a general conclusion.

Summary Measuring general intelligence “g” in addition to the Big Five provides a stronger predictor of job performance in past jobs. Group Hypothesis: What have we learned since Behling?

Article A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Conscientiousness in the Prediction of Job Performance: Examining the Intercorrelations and the Incremental Validity of Narrow Traits By: Nicole M. Dudley, Karin A. Orvis, Justin E. Lebiecki and Jose M. Cotina George Mason University Nicole Blake

Key Terms Global Conscientiousness: A broad characteristic of being conscientious (careful, thorough). Four Narrow traits of conscientiousness: ▫Achievement ▫Order ▫Dependability ▫Cautiousness Nicole Blake

Introduction: The Big Five Conscientiousness: the most important & the most valid personality predictor of job performance. Multiple meta-analyses from previous research examined and used in the current meta analyses. Goal of this study Nicole Blake

Hypothesis 1) The narrow traits of conscientiousness are a better predictor than global conscientiousness alone. 2) Narrow traits can be a useful predictor for specific occupations but not all occupations. Nicole Blake

Method Validity coefficients and intercorrelations among the 5 predictors were obtained from previous studies. Criteria for inclusion 2 moderators: type of performance criterion & occupational type. Hierarchical regression analysis Nicole Blake

Results 1: Incremental Validity for Job Performance Criteria Nicole Blake

Results 2: Overall Job Performance by Occupational Type Nicole Blake

Resume Screening & Personality Testing Recruiters Inferences of Applicant Personality Based on Resume Screening: Do Paper People have a Personality? By: Michael S. Cole, Hubert S. Feild, William F. Giles, Stanley G. Harris. Excludes potential candidates. Considerable error present in recruiters inferences. Nicole Blake

Take Home Message Focusing on narrow traits is a better predictor of job performance than focusing on broad traits. Managers should consider narrow traits when the goal is to predict contextual performance or to predict overall performance for specific occupations ▫Saves money in the long run by hiring the best fit applicants. Nicole Blake

Article Situational Judgment Tests, Response Instructions, and Validity: A Meta-Analysis By: Michael A. McDaniel, Nathan S. Hartman, Deborah L. Whetzel and W. Lee Grubb III Edgar Nolasco

Key Terms SJT- Situational Judgment Test ▫Behavioral tendency ▫Knowledge Cognitive ability or g – It is a set of abilities, skills or processes that are part of nearly every human action. Big Five– Extraversion, Emotional Stability, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Openness. Edgar Nolasco

Introduction/Study Two things being tested through this study Using a Meta-Analysis ▫The psychometric artifact method was used in the study Data set from the McDaniel (2001) study Previous research shows that SJTs predict performance because they measure job knowledge Edgar Nolasco

Example of an SJT You have just attended a training course delivered by your manager. While talking to the others privately after the course, several of them were critical of how your manager delivered the course. Your manager is unaware of this feedback and you felt the course delivery was adequate. Rate the effectiveness of each of the actions below on the following scale: 1 = Very Ineffective, 2 = Ineffective, 3 = Effective, 4 = Very Effective. a. Tell your manager that you personally think the course went well and don’t mention the feedback from the other delegates. b. Tell the other delegates that they should communicate their feedback to your manager if they feel strongly about it. c. Tell your manager about the feedback from the other delegates, without mentioning them by name. d. Don’t mention any feedback about the course to your manager. Edgar Nolasco

Method Study uses: ▫Data from McDaniel (2001) ▫The psychometric artifact distribution meta-analysis method (Hunter and Schmidt, 1990, 2004) Criteria: ▫Employees or applicants only ▫Paper-Pencil format ▫Priority to supervisor ratings over job performance ▫Hierarchical level, # of employees supervised, years of management experience, and salary omitted Edgar Nolasco

Results : Criterion-Related and Incremental validity Edgar Nolasco

Take Home Message When looking for the candidate both behavior and knowledge based SJTs should be asked. ▫SJTs that use behavioral instruction are easier to manipulate because respondents know what to say. SJTs are unique: either serve assessment of typical or maximal performance SJTs offer job relevance, ease of use, flexible, are validated and are fair Edgar Nolasco

Further Evidence for the Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions: A Meta-Analysis of the incremental Criterion- Related Validity of Dimension Ratings John P. Meriac, Brian J. Hoffman David J. Woehr and Matthew S. Fleisher Deena Desai

Key Terms Assessment Centers (AC) – objective method of measurement of skills, competencies and characteristics for a specific job Dimensions – Characteristics beyond the Big Five and cognitive ability Hierarchical Regression – adds factors at each stage Forward selection – testing individual variables Deena Desai

Introduction Job Performance PersonalityAC’s Cognitive ability Assessment Centers (AC’s) Weak construct validity Independent influence on job performance Deena Desai

Hypothesis How much if any, incremental variance in job performance do AC dimension ratings account for over and above that accounted for by cognitive ability and personality? Deena Desai

Method Perform a Meta-Analysis ▫Retrieve studies that meet criteria ▫Extract AC dimensions ▫Input in one of the seven dimension categories identified by Arthur et. al. ▫Forward selection Deena Desai

Sample Breakdown 48 Samples 23 Published 17 Unpublished dissertations/ manuscripts 4 Conference presentations 4 Unpublished tech reports Deena Desai

Sample Breakdown 135 AC Dimension Labels Organizing & Planning Problem Solving Drive Influencing Others Consideration/ Awareness of others Stress Tolerance Communication Deena Desai

Results Deena Desai

Results AC dimensions have an incremental variance in job performance above that of personality and cognitive ability ▫The individual characteristics in addition to personality and cognitive ability have a significant relationship with job performance Cognitive ability + the big five + organization and planning = most significant impact on job performance Deena Desai

Take Home Message AC’s are costly therefore should not be used for all positions AC’s must utilize up to date measures to be effective Further research is required to obtain alternative methods that effectively measure specific characteristics Deena Desai

Group Take Home The research demonstrates that to date: ▫Specific measurements of narrow traits beyond personality and cognitive ability are the strongest predictors of job performance. ▫Assessing general characteristics for a variety of jobs increases the risk of litigation.