Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPS-HEP Aachen 2003R. Brinkmann, DESY Linear Colliders R. Brinkmann, DESY EPS-HEP Conference, Aachen, July 17, 2003.
Advertisements

CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Report from the GDE director Barry Barish Snowmass 14-Aug-05.
The Art and Science of Making a Major Technical Decision Choosing the Technology for the International Linear Collider Barry Barish.
International Linear Colllider Global Design Effort Barry Barish SLAC ILC Group 5-May-05.
Plan ahead for the GDE Barry Barish ILC Consultations URA, Washington DC 12-May-05.
News from the ILC Barry Barish Users’ Meeting Fermilab 9-June-05.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Personal Perspectives on the ITRP Recommendation and on the Next Steps Toward the International Linear Collider Barry Barish PAC Annual Meeting Knoxville,
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
Accelerator Research at SLAC for Future HEP Programs Tor Raubenheimer SLUO Annual Meeting September 18, 2008.
The Art and Science of Making a Major Technical Decision Choosing the Technology for the International Linear Collider Barry Barish.
Strategies for Future Acclerators Barry Barish Elba 23-May-06.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05.
Report from the GDE Barry Barish ACFA Workshop EXCO, Daegu, Korea 11-July-05.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish Caltech 5-Jan-06.
GDE expectations from the SRF community Barry Barish Cornell SRF Mtg 15-July-05.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish Caltech 5-Jan-06.
The International Linear Collider The Technology Decision and the Path to the Future Barry Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
The Birth of the GDE Barry Barish TESLA Collab Mtg 31-March-05.
ITRP Linear Collider Technology Recommendation Barry Barish ILCSC/ICFA Special Meeting IHEP, Beijing 19-Aug-04.
International Technology Recommendation Panel ITRP Barry Barish ILCWS 20-April-04.
Status of International Linear Collider Global Design Effort Barry Barish (by telecon) HEPAP Washington DC 18-May-05.
The Path Toward a Linear Collider Barry Barish HEP 2005 Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish iThemba Cape Town 21-Oct-05.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
ITRP Linear Collider Technology Recommendation Barry Barish HEPAP Meeting Washington DC 23-Sept-04.
Review of last year: Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Consultations URA, Washington DC 12-May-05.
20-Jan-09 Madrid, Spain Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Madrid, Spain 20-Jan-09 Designing the ILC ATF-2 Final Doublet System.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
International Technology Recommendation Panel ITRP Barry Barish Linear Collider Funding Agency Meeting London 27-July-04.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Bejing 2004: the Choice of Cold Technology Giorgio Bellettini International Workshop on Thin films Applied to Superconducting RF: Pushing the Limits of.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
The International Linear Collider and the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics Barry Barish Caltech Lomonosov Conference 20-Aug-2015 ILC.
1-Feb-08 P5 Global Design Effort 1 GDE - ILC Barry Barish P5 Meeting - Fermilab 1-Feb-08.
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE ACCELERATORS (ICFA) Roy Rubinstein2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - 4 September
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
International Technology Recommendation Panel ITRP Barry Barish ALCPG Workshop Victoria, Canada 30-July-04.
常伝導技術での LC の可能性 LC feasibility consideration with normal conducting technology 第5回「機構の研究推進について」の意見交 換会 (ILC の推進について ) 平成 24 年 2 月 13 日 加速器・肥後寿泰.
Report from the GDE Barry Barish ACFA Workshop EXCO, Daegu, Korea 11-July-05.
Cold versus Warm, parameters impacting LC reliability and efficiency contribution to the discussion on risk factors Giorgio Bellettini, Seul ITRP meeting,
ParameterL-bandS-bandX-band Length (m) Aperture 2a (mm) Gradient (Unloaded/Loaded) (MV/m)17/1328/2250/40 Power/structure (MW) Beam.
The Path to an International Linear Collider Barry Barish TRIUMPF Seminar 15-April-05.
International Linear Collider Technology: Status and Challenges Steve Holmes Fermilab Wine & Cheese Seminar September 24, 2004.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish ANL Colloquium 3-Jan-06.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
1 May 06 LCFOA - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
TESLA Linear Collider project overview and linac technology R. Brinkmann, DESY ITRP Meeting, RAL Jan. 28, 2004.
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
ITRP Linear Collider Technology Recommendation George Kalmus ECFA Study Meeting Durham, 1 st Sept 2004.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Nan Phinney SLAC ILC Worldwide Event, Fermilab, June 12, 2013 (Many slides courtesy of Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto, Barry Barish) ILC Accelerator A 25-year.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
17-Sept-04ITRP Technology Recommendation 1 ITRP Linear Collider Technology Recommendation Barry Barish FALC Meeting CERN 17-Sept-04.
The Engineering Test Facility for nLC
ILC Global Design Effort
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Linear Colliders Linear Colliders 4 lectures
The International Linear Collider
Electron Source Configuration
International Technology Recommendation Panel ITRP
ITRP Linear Collider Technology Recommendation
Linear Colliders Linear Colliders 4 lectures
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
ITRP Linear Collider Technology Recommendation
Presentation transcript:

Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish2 Why a TeV Scale e + e - Accelerator? Two parallel developments over the past few years ( the science & the technology) –The precision information e + e - and data at present energies have pointed to a low mass Higgs; Understanding electroweak symmetry breaking, whether supersymmetry or an alternative, will require precision measurements. –There are strong arguments for the complementarity between a ~ TeV ILC and the LHC science.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish3 Electroweak Precision Measurements e + e+ and neutrino scattering results at present energies strongly point to a low mass Higgs and an energy scale for new physics < 1TeV

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish4 Why a TeV Scale e + e - Accelerator? Two parallel developments over the past few years ( the science & the technology) –The precision information from LEP and other data have pointed to a low mass Higgs; Understanding electroweak symmetry breaking, whether supersymmetry or an alternative, will require precision measurements. –There are strong arguments for the complementarity between a ~ TeV LC and the LHC science.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish5 Linear Collider Spin Measurement LHC should discover the Higgs The linear collider should measure its spin LHC/ILC Complementarity The process e + e –  HZ can be used to measure the spin of a 120 GeV Higgs particle. The Higgs must be spin zero

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish6 Extra Dimensions Linear collider LHC/ILC Complementarity Map extra dimensions: study the emission of gravitons into the extra dimensions, together with a photon or jets emitted into the normal dimensions.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish7 Why a TeV Scale e + e - Accelerator? Two parallel developments over the past few years (the science & the technology ) –Designs and technology demonstrations have matured on two technical approaches for an e + e - collider that are well matched to our present understanding of the physics.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish8 Parameters for the ILC E cm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV Luminosity  ∫ Ldt = 500 fb -1 in 4 years Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV Energy stability and precision below 0.1% Electron polarization of at least 80% The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish9 Linear Collider Concept

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish10 rf bands: L-band (TESLA)1.3 GHz  = 3.7 cm S-band (SLAC linac) GHz1.7 cm C-band (JLC-C)5.7 GHz0.95 cm X-band (NLC/GLC)11.4 GHz0.42 cm (CLIC)25-30 GHz0.2 cm Accelerating structure size is dictated by wavelength of the rf accelerating wave. Wakefields related to structure size; thus so is the difficulty in controlling emittance growth and final luminosity.  Bunch spacing, train length related to rf frequency  Damping ring design depends on bunch length, hence frequency Specific Machine Realizations Frequency dictates many of the design issues for LC

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish11 TESLA Concept The main linacs based on 1.3 GHz superconducting technology operating at 2 K. The cryoplant, is of a size comparable to that of the LHC, consisting of seven subsystems strung along the machines every 5 km.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish12 TESLA Cavity RF accelerator structures consist of close to 21,000 9-cell niobium cavities operating at gradients of 23.8 MV/m (unloaded as well as beam loaded) for 500 GeV c.m. operation. The rf pulse length is 1370 µs and the repetition rate is 5 Hz. At a later stage, the machine energy may be upgraded to 800 GeV c.m. by raising the gradient to 35 MV/m.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish13 TESLA Single Tunnel Layout The TESLA cavities are supplied with rf power in groups of 36 by MW klystrons and modulators.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish14 The JLC-X and NLC are essentially a unified single design with common parameters The main linacs are based on 11.4 GHz, room temperature copper technology. GLC GLC/NLC Concept

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish15 GLC GLC/NLC Concept The main linacs operate at an unloaded gradient of 65 MV/m, beam-loaded to 50 MV/m. The rf systems for 500 GeV c.m. consist of MW Periodic Permanent Magnet (PPM) klystrons arranged in groups of 8, followed by 2032 SLED-II rf pulse compression systems

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish16 GLC / NLC Concept NLC Two parallel tunnels for each linac. For 500 GeV c.m. energy, rf systems only installed in the first 7 km of each linac. Upgrade to 1 TeV by filling the rest of each linac, for a total two-linac length of 28 km.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish17 Which Technology to Chose? –Two alternate designs -- “warm” and “cold” had come to the stage where the show stoppers had been eliminated and the concepts were well understood. –A major step toward a new international machine requires uniting behind one technology, and then make a unified global design based on the recommended technology.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish18 International Technology Review Panel

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish19 ITRP Schedule of Events Six Meetings –RAL (Jan 27, ) –DESY (April 5,6 2004) –SLAC (April 26, ) –KEK (May 25, ) –Caltech (June 28,29, ) –Korea (August 11,12,13) –ILCSC / ICFA (Aug 19) –ILCSC (Sept 20) Tutorial & Planning Site Visits Deliberations Exec. Summary Final Report Recommendation

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish20 Evaluate a Criteria Matrix The panel analyzed the technology choice through studying a matrix having six general categories with specific items under each: –the scope and parameters specified by the ILCSC; –technical issues; –cost issues; –schedule issues; –physics operation issues; –and more general considerations that reflect the impact of the LC on science, technology and society

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish21 Experimental Test Facility - KEK Prototype Damping Ring for X-band Linear Collider Development of Beam Instrumentation and Control

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish22 Final Focus Test Faclity - SLAC

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish23 TESLA Test Facility Linac - DESY laser driven electron gun photon beam diagnostics undulator bunch compressor superconducting accelerator modules pre- accelerator e - beam diagnostics 240 MeV120 MeV16 MeV4 MeV

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish24 Technology Recommendation The Panel recommended that the linear collider be based on superconducting rf technology –The superconducting technology has several very nice features for application to a linear collider. They follow in part from the low rf frequency.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish25 Some Features of SC Technology The large cavity aperture and long bunch interval reduce the complexity of operations, reduce the sensitivity to ground motion, permit inter-bunch feedback and may enable increased beam current. The main linac rf systems, the single largest technical cost elements, are of comparatively lower risk. The construction of the superconducting XFEL free electron laser will provide prototypes and test many aspects of the linac. The industrialization of most major components of the linac is underway. The use of superconducting cavities significantly reduces power consumption.

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish26 Technology Recommendation The recommendation was presented to ILCSC & ICFA on August 19 in a joint meeting in Beijing. ICFA unanimously endorsed the ITRP’s recommendation on August 20

18-Feb-05AAAS - Barish27 What’s Next Organize the ILC effort globally (Wagner) –Coordinate worldwide R & D efforts, in order to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc. –Undertake making a “global design” over the next few years for a machine that can be jointly implemented internationally. –These goals are within reach and we fully expect to have an optimized design within a few years, so that we can undertake building the next great particle accelerator.