4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH and LOFAR Scientific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of the Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope for Space Weather A New Solar-dedicated Radio Facility Dale E. Gary, NJIT; Stephen M. White, U Maryland.
Advertisements

Determining broad-band spectra of radio galaxies with the EVLA Jeremy Harwood YERAC 2011 Background Image courtesy of NASA/CXC/CfA/R.Kraft et al.; MPIfR/ESO/APEX/A.
Masuda Flare: Remaining Problems on the Looptop Impulsive Hard X-ray Source in Solar Flares Satoshi Masuda (STEL, Nagoya Univ.)
Plasmas in Space: From the Surface of the Sun to the Orbit of the Earth Steven R. Spangler, University of Iowa Division of Plasma Physics, American Physical.
The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Lecture 15. Guiding Questions 1.What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.
Solar radio observations in Belgium C. Marqué, F. Clette, J.-L. Dufond, A. Ergen, J. Magdalenic, B. Dabrowski Royal Observatory of Belgium 2 nd LOFAR Solar.
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
1 Statistical determination of chromospheric density structure using RHESSI flares Pascal Saint-Hilaire Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley RHESSI Workshop.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: (Fig.
RHESSI 4-8 April 06 Origin of > 100 GHz radio emission Gérard Trottet Laboratoire d’Etudes Spatiale et d’Instrumentation en Astrophysique (LESIA) Observatoire.
Solar corona observations at decameter wavelengths Artem Koval Institute of Radio Astronomy Kharkov, Ukraine.
OVSA Expansion Pipeline Imaging. Log-spiral array: “uv” distribution Left: sampling of Right: inner region of spatial Fourier plane sampled spatial Fourier.
Solar Origin of energetic particle events Near-relativistic impulsive electron events observed at 1 AU M. Pick, D. Maia, S.J. Wang, A. Lecacheux, D. Haggery,
990901EIS_RR_Science.1 Science Investigation Goals and Instrument Requirements Dr. George A. Doschek EIS US Principal Investigator Naval Research Laboratory.
Solar dynamic spectra C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrum of the quiet Sun: First results 2. How to obtain spectra: Beamformed data 3. Single station spectra.
Overview of White Light & Radio Signatures of CMEs Angelos Vourlidas Naval Research Laboratory.
Chapter 3 Light and Matter
2009 Jun 24The Solar Science Data Center F. Breitling 1 The Solar Science Data Center F. Breitling, G. Mann, C. Vocks, H. Enke 2 nd Workshop of the Solar.
Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 03/15/2012Preliminary Design Review.
2nd LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2009 July Experience of NRH observations: which benefit for LOFAR KSP ? A. Kerdraon Observatoire de Paris - LESIA -
Multiwavelength observations of a partially occulted solar flare Laura Bone, John C.Brown, Lyndsay Fletcher.
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
Observations of quiet solar features with the SSRT and NoRH V.V. Grechnev & SSRT team Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Irkutsk, Russia Relatively.
Array Configuration Divya Oberoi MIT Haystack Observatory.
RHESSI and Radio Imaging Observations of Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD G. Trottet, Observatoire.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated decimetric/metric radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
STAMMS Conference Meeting, Orleans, France May 2003 R. L. Mutel, D. A. Gurnett, I. Christopher, M. Schlax University of Iowa Spatial and Temporal Properties.
The Sun.
SH43A-16 The Green Bank Solar Radio Burst Spectrometer T. S. Bastian National Radio Astronomy Observatory 520 Edgemont.
Solar Radio Monitoring at Nançay Observatory - spectrography and imaging K.-L. Klein, A. Kerdraon, A. Lecacheux
TYPE IV BURSTS AT FREQUENCIES MHz V.N. Melnik (1), H.O. Rucker (2), A.A. Konovalenko (1), E.P. Abranin (1), V.V. Dorovskyy(1), A. A. Stanislavskyy.
Solar System Physics Group IPS Using EISCAT and MERLIN: Extremely-Long Baseline Observations at Multiple Frequencies R.A.Fallows, A.R.Breen, M.M.Bisi,
Type III radio bursts observed with LOFAR and Nançay radioheliograph Jasmina Magdalenić 1, C. Marqué 1, A. Kerdraon 2, G. Mann 3, F. Breitling 3, C. Vocks.
Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) : Design and Status Divya Oberoi, Lenoid Benkevitch MIT Haystack Observatory doberoi, On behalf.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
SH 51A-02 Evolution of the coronal magnetic structures traced by X-ray and radio emitting electrons during the large flare of 3 November 2003 N.Vilmer,
Hard X-ray and radio observations of the 3 June 2007 flare Nicole Vilmer Meriem Alaoui Abdallaoui Solar Activity during the Onset of Solar Cycle
Solar origin of SEP events and dynamical behaviour of the corona Monique Pick, Dalmiro Maia, and S. Edward Hawkins LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon,
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 2 Light and Matter.
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
SOLAR RADIO PHYSICS RESEARCH IN INDONESIA
-1- Solar wind turbulence from radio occultation data Chashei, I.V. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia Efimov, A.I., Institute of Radio Engineering.
Some EOVSA Science Issues Gregory Fleishman 26 April 2011.
Stephen White Gyroresonance emission in FORWARD & Developments in radio telescopes.
Solar observations with single LOFAR stations C. Vocks 1. Introduction: Solar Radio radiation 2. Observations with single LOFAR stations 3. Spectrometer.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA; Thessaloniki University) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
1 November, 2006 SHI Meeting IPS and Solar Imaging Divya Oberoi MIT Haystack Observatory.
Joe Khan Lyndsay Fletcher, Eduard Kontar, Alec MacKinnon, Graham Woan Solar Physics and Space Weather Science with LOFAR: The UK Perspective.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
4th Solar KSP Meeting Potsdam 2010 November 08
R. Miteva1, K.-Ludwig Klein1, Ines Kienriech2,
Solar and heliosheric WG
Dong Li Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS
Physics of Solar Flares
SWAVES-like radio instrument?
Diagnosing kappa distribution in the solar corona with the polarized microwave gyroresonance radiation Alexey A. Kuznetsov1, Gregory D. Fleishman2 1Institute.
Solar Radio Imaging Array SIRA
Combining SWAP and LYRA observations
Origin of > 100 GHz radio emission
Coronal and interplanetary radio emission as a tracer of solar energetic particle propagation Karl-Ludwig Klein (F Meudon)
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave
The Interstellar Medium
The Centre of the Solar System Earth Science 11
An MHD Model for the Formation of Episodic Jets
Presentation transcript:

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH and LOFAR Scientific and technical aspects A. Kerdraon Observatoire de Paris - LESIA - USN

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Comparisons / differences – UV coverage – Software and data formats Science requirements – Solar activity and bursts. – Quiet sun thermal emission. 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9

Nançay Radioheliograph vs LOFAR General characteristics (Lofar is red) – Frequency range: MHz ( MHz) – 648 baselines from 50 to 3200m (25 to 4,800  to >  – Spatial resolution: ~4 to 0.3 arcmin (depending on frequency, declination, snapshot/synthesis) ( better than 0.2 arcmin at 150 MHz) – Field of view: from 10 to 3 degrees (> 3 degrees at 150 MHz)) – Stokes I and V (4 Stokes) – Time resolution: 0.1 to 0.2 typ. ( could be < 0.1s ? Depending on the frequency range ?) Works in progress on NRH: – Realtime computer: will need a > 1 month stop in 2011 (when?) – Correlator: will be changes in We consider a move to a more standard data format after. Observations will stop a few month

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH -> LOFAR KSP: Interferometry U-V coverage – The solar corona is a broad complex source: u-v min < 30  Main problem: negative bowl due to poor uv sampling around the origin. Strong impact on quiet Sun T B. Different size scales ( from 1 degree to a fraction of arcmin) A dense coverage is needed at D < 1000m – Diffusion of radio waves in the corona broadens sources: baselines > km may not useful (probably, but…) Field of view: – Inverse of UV min -> largest structure observed, > 3 degrees – Primary beam: > 6 degrees -> field of view around the sun. CMEs, ejectas, may be observed at very high altitudes To a lesser extent, type III also

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 Centre of UV plan Lofar: orange NRH= brown Snapshot uv coverage: at common frequencies, cross-calibration should be easy. LOFAR alone has not so many visibilities !

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR NRH Light blue: snapshot coverage Blue: denser uv coverage Will LOFAR increase the spatial resolution on snapshots? Is it possible to have more baselines in the core ? Currently, the uv sampling is low at U,V > 1000m

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR NRH Light blue: rotationnal synthesis UV coverage Dark blue: snapshot UV coverage With rotationnal synthesis (not shown explicitly, let us imagine a 7h rotation), LOFAR has a much greater UV coverage then NRH -> images of the quiet sun Again: the snapshot uv coverage is very sparse.

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Software aspects: – LOFAR: Casa or any Aips-like software. MS or uvfits formats: Lot of work to get 1 image. Solutions may be: – Write python scripts – Export to Uvfits In any case, we have to make utilities to handle large numbers of images. – NRH: proprietary visiblities files format. May export FITS images files. Has a lot of utilities to merge with other solar observations Cannot export MS or uvfits format (to do ?) Some capabilities to merge with other radiotelescopes (namely: GMRT) with an uvfits import.

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH – LOFAR Solar activity Expected science (from previous NRH observations): – T III bursts (electrons beams) In relation ship with flares and CMEs: they seem to be reasonnably connected to Interplanetary medium at 150 MHz – Low frequency spectras – Direction finding in space – Comparisons with space coronagraphs, B extrapolations etc. But positions at higher altitudes may help ( 100 – 30 MHz range). Also an increase in spatial resolution and sensitivity. For type IIIs storms,( typ. < 80 MHz), and any particles acceleration high in the corona, everything has to be done 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH – LOFAR Solar activity Shocks Type II radio bursts: – Sometimes at meter, often at decameter  At meter wavelength – Often emission at 2 nd or 3 rd harmonic at a time. – Seams to be located on the CMEs sides. – May be difficult to compare with decameter, or interplanetary shocks. With LOFAR: – Much more bursts. – More frequencies for a better understanding. – Connection with interplanetary shocks (?) 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Quiet sun emission: what benefits ? – We are speaking of the slowly varying thermal emission, on which we can apply rotationnal synthesis We think now that increased spatial resolution make sense at 150 MHz: features are not spatially resolved, like bright lanes or small holes. Features (magnetic ?) are symplifying when the wavelength (i.e. the altitude) increases, probably this evolution with the altitude will continue in the 150 – 50 MHz range -> solar wind. All examples are from Mercier, C. and Chambe, G. (to be published in Solar Phys. end of 2010) 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November Aug 15 : MHz. Typical with central coronal hole

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November Jun 6: very quiet sun MHz.

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November Jul 14 hole and large bright/dark features MHz.

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November may 15 holes and NS large features MHz.

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Models of quiet corona – 2 components: Corona ( N e, T) isothermal, vertically stratified. Transition region: fitted to EUV emission measure. T B < T c at 400 MHz, T B = T c at 100 (?) MHz – Parameters may differ in different structures (holes, bright structures, “mean” quiet sun…) – T B = T C (optically thick) may be reached in the meter range, but not everywhere on the sun. – Optically thin regime is expected at f < 66 MHz 4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November jun 27: no saturation at T c in the hole, the hole is not visible at 150 MHz

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November may 23: No saturation at T c in the hole, still cold at 150 MHz

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November jun 10: bright feature spectrum needs a different model (structuration by B)

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November jun 8: mean quiet sun is too hot at 450 MHz, the small « pore » can be fitted.

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Quiet sun programm – Increase the frequency coverage at low frequencies: Better models: effect of the magnetic field on the stratification, non isothermal models, solar wind acceleration… – Increase the spatial resolution: Better measurement of T B (there are a lot of samll scale structures)

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Some conclusions – Quiet sun: daily observations > 1 week in spring/summer, with at least a common frequency (150.9 MHz) with NRH and > 2 lower frequencies – Active sun: on a good candidate region, a good set of frequencies and high time resolution (better than 1 sec). – Small scale spectral features: high time resolution, what set of frequencies ? (zebra, pulsations and more at LF)

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH -> LOFAR KSP : time/frequency sampling for solar radio bursts 0.1 sec, 200 kHz bandwidth, 5 to 20 frequencies – With 20 frequencies, it is possible to have a raw spectrum of different sources. With the 200 kHz bandwidth, only I and V are required – In a spectrograph mode (one or a few stations), 4 Stokes make sense if the bandwidth is <10 kHz. Ability to obtain a large observing time: – This is mandatory to « get something ». If its possible only in the LF band of Lofar, it is still OK, assuming that NRH is observing at the same time (calibration ?)

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 NRH - LOFAR Thank you

4th LOFAR solar KSP meeting Potsdam4th LOFAR KSP meeting Potsdam 2010 November 8-9 Bastian et al. (2001)